Twenty killed in suicide bombing at Damascus church
(Reuters) -At least 20 people were killed and dozens injured when a suicide bomber blew himself up at the Mar Elias Church in the Dweila neighborhood of Syria's capital Damascus on Sunday, health authorities and security sources said.
It was the first suicide bombing in Damascus since Bashar al-Assad was toppled by an Islamist-led rebel insurgency in December.
Syria's interior ministry said the suicide bomber was a member of Islamic State. He entered the church, opened fire and then detonated his explosive vest, a ministry statement added.
A security source, speaking on condition of anonymity, said two men were involved in the attack, including the one who blew himself up.
Islamic State has been behind several attempted attacks on churches in Syria since Assad's fall, but this was the first to succeed, another security source told Reuters.
Syria's state news agency cited the health ministry as saying that 52 people were also injured in the blast.
A livestream from the site by Syria's civil defence, the White Helmets, showed scenes of destruction from inside the church, including a bloodied floor and shattered pews and masonry.
Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa, who led the offensive against Assad before taking over in January for a transitional phase, has repeatedly said he will protect minorities.
"We unequivocally condemn the abhorrent terrorist suicide bombing at the Mar Elias Greek Orthodox Church in Damascus, Syria," the Greek foreign ministry said in a statement.
"We demand that the Syrian transitional authorities take immediate action to hold those involved accountable and implement measures to guarantee the safety of Christian communities and all religious groups, allowing them to live without fear."
Islamic State had previously targeted religious minorities, including a major attack on Shiite pilgrims in Sayeda Zainab in 2016 — one of the most notorious bombings during Assad's rule.
The latest assault underscores the group's continued ability to exploit security gaps despite the collapse of its territorial control and years of counterterrorism efforts.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's MAGA Army Is Absolutely Ripping Him Apart Over The Iran Bombing, And Their Comments Are Pure Unfiltered Rage
Last night, President Donald Trump announced that the US military had bombed three nuclear sites in Iran in a planned attack. If you didn't catch Trump's address to the nation, here's one moment that's going viral: C-SPAN Twitter: @Mollyploofkins Trump also took to Truth Social to congratulate the US military on the strike and announced that "now is the time for peace." Well, MAGA supporters are not holding back their frustrations and voting regrets about Trump's decision to involve the US in another war in the Middle East. Here's what they're saying over on the r/LeopardsAteMyFace subreddit. lawmaker Marjorie Taylor Greene posted on X, stating, "This is not our fight." 2."I trusted you. I'm done with MAGA and all your bullshit." Related: Gavin Newsom Just Absolutely Dragged Trump's Military Parade, And Trump's Really, Really Not Gonna Like It 3."I fully regret voting for this shit." 4."You betrayed us, your MAGA base. I voted for you THREE TIMES." 5."Trump needs to be impeached." 6."Donald Trump has completely failed us." Related: Kamala Harris Trolled Donald Trump's Crowd Sizes Again, And This Little Jab Is Definitely Going To Set Him Off 7."NO MORE WARS!!!" 8."I regret my vote and I couldn't apologize more for voting for this." 9."More than disappointed with this action." 10."He's betrayed the vast majority of his voter base." for Trump voter: "You promised us NO War, and you just started one!!!" 12."If the United States enters war with Iran, as appears to be the case, I will regret my vote." 13."Very disappointed in President Trump." 14."I wish I never voted for @realDonaldTrump." finally, "I trusted Trump to put America first... We have been betrayed." What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below. Also in In the News: Trump Had A Middle-Of-The-Night Meltdown About... Well... So Many Things Also in In the News: Donald Trump Supporters Are Waking Up To The Reality Of Their Ballot Choices, And The Stories Are A Loooooot Also in In the News: MAGA Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really Doesn't Like This Army Vet's Now-Viral Speech
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's gamble on Iran: Nuclear threat ended? Or the start of 'endless war'?
The highest hope of President Donald Trump's bombing of Iran: A rogue nuclear program that had defied a half-dozen of his predecessors has finally been destroyed. The deepest fear: Just four years after the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan ended America's longest war, the United States is now enmeshed in another war in a volatile region, with perilous and uncertain consequences. "Our objective was the destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's No. 1 state sponsor of terror," Trump said in a late-night announcement in the East Room on June 21, interrupting Americans' Saturday night plans with news that B-2 bombers had dropped the world's most powerful conventional bombs on three sites considered crucial to Tehran's nuclear program. "Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace." That's the calculation behind "Operation Midnight Hammer," anyway − that despite its initial bluster, Tehran will be forced to abandon its nuclear program. But Trump acknowledged there were other possibilities. "Remember, there are many targets left," he said, surrounded by a solemn-looking trio of advisers − Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. "If peace does not come quickly, we will go after those other targets with precision, speed and skill." The White House debate over whether to launch the bombers put at odds some of Trump's most fundamental impulses. One is his fervent opposition in all three of his presidential campaigns against "forever wars," including the costly and controversial conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. His "America First" agenda reflects a determination to focus less on places like Ukraine and more on challenges close to home. Though most Republican congressional leaders praised the president for the decision, some people prominent in the MAGA movement did not. "This is not our fight," Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene complained on social media. "Every time America is on the verge of greatness, we get involved in another foreign war." On the other hand, Trump is also famously impatient with problems that have frustrated standard solutions. Witness, for instance, his willingness to press the limits of the law in identifying and deporting millions of undocumented immigrants. The lengthy efforts at negotiation with Iran, like much of diplomacy, seemed unlikely to reach the sort of dramatic and decisive conclusion he favors. The bombing of Iran also reflects his alliance with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who argues that Iran's nuclear program poses an existential threat to his country. For the prime minister, achieving his decades-old dream of destroying that program is the stuff of legacy. It's the stuff of Trump's legacy, too − a powerful message for a president who cannot run for the Oval Office again. Netanyahu struck that chord. "Congratulations, President Trump," he said in Tel Aviv. "His leadership today has created a pivot in history that can help lead the Middle East and beyond to a future of prosperity and peace." For better or worse, this will be Trump's war. For one thing, he didn't seek the approval of Congress, which under the Constitution has the right to declare war, though the president has broad authority to order the use of military force. The War Powers Act, passed after President Richard Nixon's secret bombing of Cambodia during the Vietnam War, requires presidents to notify Congress and limits the length of deployments. After the U.S. bombers had left Iranian airspace, the administration immediately notified congressional leaders, Hegseth told reporters at a Pentagon briefing early June 22. Virginia Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, said Trump had risked dragging the United States into a long war "without consulting Congress, without a clear strategy, without regard to the consistent conclusions of the intelligence community, and without explaining to the American people what's at stake." Those will be the elements of the debate ahead, in echoes of the Iraq War. How serious was the Iranian nuclear threat? And how will voters weigh the stakes and the cost? In Istanbul, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi accused Trump of having "deceived his own voters" by launching a strike despite his campaign promises. The U.S. administration holds "sole and full responsibility for the consequences of its actions," he said. But he didn't specify whether Iran would retaliate against U.S. forces in the region. Hours after the bunker-buster bombs were dropped, Iran launched a new round of missiles toward Israel. On June 23, the foreign minister plans to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin, an ally but one who has his own war to fight. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump's gamble on Iran: Threat ended? Or the start of 'endless war'?
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Not what 'MAGA wanted to hear': Trump's Iran strike stoking GOP tensions
After President Donald Trump finished his address to the nation about bombing Iran, close ally and MAGA leader Steve Bannon declared on his podcast that it may not have been what 'a lot of MAGA wanted to hear.' Trump indicated he doesn't want to escalate further, but said 'if peace does not come quickly, we will go after those other targets with precision, speed and skill.' Bannon called Trump's comments about potential additional strikes 'open ended' and said the situation has the potential to escalate. 'This is incrementalism,' Bannon said. 'If they hit back at American troops, do we go back in and hit again? Next thing you know, brother, you're in a forever war.' Another MAGA stalwart, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, wrote a long post on social media the day after the bombing that starts by saying "I don't know anyone in America who has been the victim of a crime or killed by Iran." "I can support President Trump and his great administration on many of the great things they are doing while disagreeing on bombing Iran and getting involved in a hot war that Israel started," Greene wrote. A vociferous debate about whether Trump should bomb Iran's nuclear facilities played out among conservatives in the lead up to the June 21 attack. Some prominent MAGA figures said a strike would go against Trump's anti-interventionist approach, which has tapped into deep discontent with prolonged wars in the Middle East and reshaped the party's foreign policy. Opposition to 'forever wars' has become one of the central tenets of the Trump GOP, something the president has repeatedly highlighted in casting himself as a 'peacemaker' who would get the country out of war − not start new ones. That makes this a delicate and legacy-defining moment for Trump. It's also a sensitive one for him within his own party. More: 'It's blowing up': The Iran conflict is sparking a MAGA civil war Many Republicans are rallying around the president after the Iran strike. Everyone from Trump's former Vice President Mike Pence to a slew of congressional leaders and MAGA figures such as Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk praised the move. Kirk said Iran gave Trump 'no choice' and that he acted with 'prudence and decisiveness.' Even Bannon, while raising concerns about how the conflict could play out, said: 'Not that it's wrong to take these actions, sometimes you must take these actions." 'Great unity in the Republican Party,' Trump wrote on social media the day after the attack. 'Perhaps unity like we have never seen before.' But tensions remain among conservatives. Bannon pointed to posts on his show's live chat in arguing Trump has 'some work to do' to sell his Iran strike to his base, particularly younger conservatives. What comes next will be key. Figures such as Bannon are concerned about seeking regime change in Iran, and don't want to see the situation escalate. "American troops have been killed and forever torn apart physically and mentally for regime change, foreign wars, and for military industrial base profits," Greene wrote June 22. "I'm sick of it. I can easily say I support nuclear armed Israel's right to defend themselves and also say at the same time I don't want to fight or fund nuclear armed Israel's wars." More: Trump vowed to keep US out of wars. What changed when he decided to bomb Iran? The Trump administration is attuned to such concerns. Vice President JD Vance appeared on two prominent television programs June 22 to make the case that Trump isn't pursuing regime change. 'I certainly empathize with Americans who are exhausted after 25 years of foreign entanglements in the Middle East, I understand the concern,' Vance said on NBC, adding: 'This is not going to be some long, drawn-out thing.' Vance also addressed the contradiction between the president casting himself as a peacemaker while dropping bombs on Iran. 'There's a question about how do you achieve peace, and we believe the way you achieve peace is through strength,' Vance said on ABC. Some conservatives are dismissing concerns that Trump's bombing campaign could fracture the GOP. Longtime Trump adviser Roger Stone told USA TODAY Trump is "far too wise" to get drawn into a "prolonged never-ending war," which he said is the only thing that could divide the MAGA coalition. Lanhee Chen, a fellow with the conservative Hoover Institution and former adviser to leading GOP figures, said on NBC June 22 that the debate between the the GOP leading up to Trump's strike on Iran has been muted since the bombs fell. Chen argued that keeping Iran from having nuclear weapons has long been a unifying point for Republicans. If the attack ends up being similar to what Trump did in 2020 when he ordered a drone strike that killed an Iranian general and didn't escalate into broader conflict, then Chen believes Trump is "going to be able to hold the coalition together." Republican consultant Matt Gorman said on Fox News Sunday that Trump "threaded the needle beautifully." Gorman, who served as an adviser to GOP U.S. Sen. Tim Scott's 2024 presidential campaign, said the Trump administration has been clear that the Iran attack is "a very limited, targeted, focused operation. They don't want anything long term." Iran's response could change the Trump administration's calculus, though. The president is gambling he can deliver a targeted strike without getting drawn into a prolonged conflict, something he has pledged to avoid. "We will measure our success not only by the battles we win but also by the wars that we end — and perhaps most importantly, the wars we never get into," Trump said on Inauguration Day. That commitment could be tested if Iran hits back and Trump weighs whether to retaliate with more U.S. strikes, which he is promising to do. 'I think the concerning part, at least the part that's open ended, is these additional strikes," Bannon said. This story has been updated to add new information. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Steve Bannon concerned Trump's 'open ended' position on striking Iran
