Portsmouth Police searching for missing 12-year-old
PORTSMOUTH, Va. (WAVY) — The Portsmouth Police Department is asking for the public's assistance in locating a missing 12-year-old boy.
According to officials, Makai Jones, 12, was last seen on Tuesday, April 1 around 3:30 p.m. in the 100 block of Dale Drive.
Jones is described as a Black male standing at five-foot-one and weighing around 90 pounds. He was last seen wearing a black jacket and ripped gray jeans. Photos of Jones can be seen below:
Anyone with any information on Jones' whereabouts is urged to contact the Portsmouth Police Special Victims Unit at 757-393-8536.
Continue to check WAVY.com for updates.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
State bar wants new crack at disbarring Clark County Commissioner Justin Jones
LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — The state bar wants another shot at stripping Clark County Commissioner Justin Jones of his law license, according to documents obtained by the 8 News Now Investigators. In March, a hearing panel charged with deciding whether to discipline Jones voted to reprimand him instead of revoking or suspending his law license. The state bar urged the panel to disbar Jones for deleting text messages related to a controversial real estate development project near Red Rock Canyon. Moreover, it rejected outright the state bar's claim that Jones bribed then-county-commissioner and eventual Democratic Governor Steve Sisolak. The panel — comprised entirely of volunteers — rejected outright the notion of bribery and explained to Jones, his lawyers and the state bar counsel that they opted to reprimand him because of so-called character evidence portraying Jones in a good light. However, in recent filings with regard to Jones' disciplinary matter, the state bar counsel, Dan Hooge, requested a new hearing based on what they refer to as 'misconduct' by Jones' attorney, who Hooge wrote made 'improper closing arguments' which prejudiced the jury. Hooge also argues, in his April 28 motion, that the panel ignored instructions 'against using character evidence to determine guilt or innocence.' 'The cumulative effect of these improper arguments prejudiced the State Bar's case, denying it a fair hearing,' Hooge wrote. 'Each tactic—golden rule arguments, emotional appeals, vouching, and mocking—individually and collectively undermined the panel's ability to impartially evaluate the evidence.' Hooge also said that Jones' attorney, former Clark County District Court Judge Rob Bare spoke for too long to the panel, indicating that Bare's four-hour closing argument 'was improper.' Included in the 22 pages of memorandum and exhibits is a signed declaration by one of the three volunteer panelists, which was comprised of two volunteer attorneys and one member of the public. Attorney Rachel Wise, under the pains and penalties of perjury, wrote that the panel's deliberations were 'influenced by Respondent's counsel's improper tactics, including name-calling, crying, and golden rule violations.' Wise wrote that the one member of the public empaneled to decide Jones' disciplinary matter 'voted emotionally.' 'I believe that the improper conduct from Respondent's counsel prejudiced the panel's ability to render a fair and impartial decision,' Wise wrote. Jones did not respond to a request for comment. His attorney, Bare, did respond to the 8 News Now Investigators' request for comment, writing, 'Please review our opposition to the motion you reference. It speaks for itself.' To that end, in his own motion, Bare did not mince words. 'The State Bar's motion seems to operate in an alternate universe where the Hearing Panel somehow gave Mr. Joens a free pass for the misconduct it ultimately found him guilty of, arguing that the decision to 'impose only a reprimand' suggests the panel was 'swayed' for improper reasons,' Bare wrote, calling the motion 'litigator's remorse.' Bare also signed a written declaration under the pains and penalties of perjury, in which he took issue with some of the allegations in a separate writing from Wise's, an anonymous survey which ultimately was made public, in which she wrote Bare 'screamed' at the state bar's expert witness, UNLV Law Professor Benjamin Edwards. The hearing, Wise wrote in the survey, gave her a 'two-day migraine.' Edwards testified about whether and why, in his opinion, Jones committed bribery. 'My closing argument was reflective of the fact that I was defending two different bar complaints combined into one, which alleged various serious charges against Mr. Jones, including that he had committed a felony criminal act,' Bare wrote in his declaration. 'As the State Bar was seeking to permanently disbar Mr. Jones, I felt it was entirely necessary and appropriate to give the closing arguments that I did. It is unfortunate that Ms. Wise felt the need to resort calling me a '2 -year-old.'' This case is currently under automatic review by the Supreme Court of Nevada, with briefs due on June 19. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Aurora City Council will not hold in-person meetings until Kilyn Lewis lawsuit concludes
DENVER (KDVR) — Aurora Mayor Mike Coffman announced Tuesday that the city's council meetings will be held virtually to prevent disruptions while a lawsuit filed on behalf of a man shot and killed by police works its way through the court system. The message was echoed on the council's webpage. The webpage includes instructions for how members of the public can view the meetings or provide public comment on agenda items. However, all public comment listening sessions have been canceled until further notice. Family of man killed by Aurora police last May files suit against city, officer who fired deadly shot The measure was voted on during the June 9 council meeting, with seven in favor, three against, and two members in debate. In May, the council addressed a resolution that would change how it accepts public comment. 'As of right now, criminally, Michael Dieck did not murder Kilyn Lewis,' said councilwoman Danielle Jurinsky. 'It's in the court's hands now, and I would like to suspend this to be virtual until we have an official ruling from the court as to whether or not the city is liable in any way, shape or form for the death of Kilyn Lewis. Because if we are not in fact liable in any way, shape or form for the death of Kilyn Lewis, there is nothing left to discuss, and there's no reason for you to come back.' Jurinsky added that if the ruling takes years to reach, then she's on board with having virtual meetings until the ruling. Family and friends of Kilyn Lewis have held protests during several Aurora City Council meetings. The group has been seeking justice after the 37-year-old was shot and killed by an Aurora police officer in May 2024. In October, the district attorney ruled that an officer who shot Lewis would not face charges. In late May, Lewis' family filed a lawsuit seeking accountability from the Aurora Police Department in their loved one's death. It discusses excessive force, wrongful death and violations of the family's constitutional rights. 'This lawsuit is not just about a dollar amount. It's about truth. It's about making sure that the life of a Black man like Kilyn Lewis is not so easily discarded,' said MiDian Shofner, CEO of the Epitome of Black Excellence and Partnership and lead advocate for the family, in the May 28 announcement of the case filing. 'No amount of money can bring him back, but since America has made money the metric for justice, the family is rightfully pursuing every legal remedy available.' Coffman wrote on Facebook that he believes the group is simply looking for a check, and then they will 'go away.' Deadly shooting of Kilyn Lewis leads to new Aurora police SWAT policies: Report 'Until then, they will continue to disrupt our meetings. They have no choice but to continue disrupting our meetings because their lawsuit is meritless. This is why we have no choice but to stop all in-person council meetings, and go virtual, until their lawsuit has been concluded,' Coffman wrote. He noted that an Arapahoe County Grand Jury was also asked to review the case and declined to pursue charges against the officer. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ditched by Trump's EEOC, job applicant advances bias lawsuit against Sheetz
This story was originally published on HR Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily HR Dive newsletter. A Black job applicant who alleged that gas station chain Sheetz disproportionately screened out Black, Native American, Alaskan Native and multiracial applicants moved to continue his case June 5 after the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission abandoned it. EEOC filed a class-action lawsuit in April 2024 alleging that Sheetz maintained a longstanding practice of screening all job applicants for past criminal convictions and rejected those with such records. This practice violated Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, EEOC said in a press release, because it had a disparate impact on applicants of certain racial backgrounds. However, the agency moved to have the case dismissed last week because it determined that the disparate-impact claims would conflict with President Donald Trump's April 23 executive order directing agencies to cease enforcement of such claims. EEOC asked the court to defer dismissal of its claims by 60 days to allow the commission to notify class members so that they could obtain private representation. The legality of Trump's executive order on disparate-impact claims proved contentious, with one of EEOC's own administrative judges calling the order 'highly illegal.' But the June 5 filing in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania is one of the first examples in which the order has been put into practice. Trump said the end of disparate-impact liability enforcement was necessary because it inhibited businesses from hiring applicants on the basis of merit and skill. He also said that disparate-impact liability is unconstitutional and 'threatens the commitment to merit and equality of opportunity that forms the foundation of the American Dream.' The push to end disparate-impact liability is one of the goals stated by the conservative Heritage Foundation in its 'Project 2025' presidential transition document. The organization wrote that the concept should be thrown out because under disparate-impact theory, 'discriminatory motive or intent is irrelevant; the outcome is what matters. But all workplaces have disparities.' That logic has been met with resistance by former Democratic officials of the U.S. Department of Labor and EEOC, who said in May that disparate-impact liability is explicitly outlawed under Title VII and has been upheld by U.S. Supreme Court precedent. The former officials cautioned employers that they should avoid following Trump's executive order so they do not violate federal laws. 'Disparate impact liability is a necessary element of advancing equal opportunity for all, consistent with America's national commitment to equal justice,' the officials wrote. In a press release, plaintiff-side firm Outten & Golden, which is partly representing the job applicant in the Sheetz case, said EEOC had spent nearly a decade investigating the claims at issue and had found a basis to allege evidence of systemic discrimination. 'Our client has a right to be judged on his qualifications, and not to be denied a livelihood by policies that exclude people with stale convictions that are unrelated to the job,' said Ben Geffen, senior attorney at the Public Interest Law Center and a co-representative for the plaintiff, said in the press release. 'When the government steps back, we step in. We will not allow political interference to wipe out hard-won legal protections.' A similar dynamic played out following EEOC's abandonment of several lawsuits it filed on behalf of transgender workers alleging discrimination following an executive order from Trump. Advocacy groups have since filed to intervene on behalf of plaintiffs in those cases. Recommended Reading Shell Oil did not discriminate in hiring decision, 5th Cir. says
