Opinion: Protecting our water resources is essential for Utah's future
Imagine this: after years of scraping by, you manage to build up a small cushion and get a little financial breathing room. Your job is steady, but not necessarily guaranteed. Would you spend that cushion now? Or protect it, knowing how hard it was to build?
Most of us would protect it. So why aren't we doing the same with our water?
Less than three years ago, northern Utah was in the grips of one of the most severe droughts in living memory. Reservoirs dropped to alarming lows. Cities and utilities scrambled to prepare for possible restrictions. In response, Utahns stepped up. We cut back. We conserved. And it worked.
Today, thanks to those efforts, good management and a few solid snow years, our reservoirs look healthy again, hovering around 80 to 90% full. But that's not a license to use water like it's going out of style.
Think of our reservoirs as a savings account. When we withdraw more water than we deposit, our balance drops. Unlike money, water doesn't come with overdraft protection. When supplies run low, the trade-offs are real: lawns or drinking water? Car washes or fire protection? Backyard pools or a healthy Great Salt Lake? We shouldn't wait for those choices to be forced on us.
As the pressure has eased, our habits have slipped.
In 2022, Utahns rose to the challenge of historic drought conditions and achieved record-breaking conservation. Even with reservoirs dipping to critically low levels (42% statewide), our collective effort helped avoid serious service cuts or restrictions. Since then, water use has steadily climbed, not from growth, but from individual behavior. Early 2025 data show a 20% increase per person over last year, which was already up 12.5% from the year before.
To return to our savings analogy: our emergency fund is shrinking, our future income — snowpack — is uncertain, and our spending is accelerating. We don't need Warren Buffett to tell us that's a bad plan.
The good news? We're not too late. There's still time to change course, and the solutions are well within reach.
Before anyone points fingers at agriculture, let's clarify: agricultural water is a different system than the one that serves our homes, schools and businesses. The water we use day to day is part of the municipal system — that's the one we can directly protect.
The biggest opportunity for savings? Our yards. Outdoor watering, especially turf grass, is far and away the largest driver of summertime water use. Replacing traditional lawns with waterwise landscaping can reduce water use by up to 60%, and rebate programs can help cover the cost. But if a full yard renovation isn't practical, start small: update a park strip, convert a side yard or reduce lawn to the areas you actually use.
Another option: install a smart irrigation controller, which adjusts watering based on weather and soil conditions. There are rebates for that, too.
The simplest step of all? Water efficiently. The average lawn watering session uses about 2,000 gallons, and the average Utah homeowner waters much more than necessary. Following the Utah Division of Water Resources weekly watering guide can help you determine just how much your lawn needs.
Slowtheflow.org provides even more water-saving tips. For example, raising your mower blades and leaving your grass at a longer length helps protect the root system from drying up, resulting in less water needs for your lawn.
It's human nature to move on and forget hard times. But when it comes to water, we can't afford complacency. The future of our families, communities and the Great Salt Lake depends on what we do today.
We're asking every household to do just a little better than last year. Even small reductions add up. If we hit our conservation targets, we'll be able to send an equivalent volume of water to the Great Salt Lake this fall, a direct investment in Utah's environment, economy and health. At the very least, we'll be shoring up our savings account for the next dry year.
Let's not waste what we worked so hard to protect. Let's show that conservation isn't just a crisis response; it's a shared commitment to a secure future.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
28 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Buffett Inspires Retail Investors to Bet on Japan Trading Houses
Japan's retail investors have started to place their bets on trading house stocks, heavily backed by Berkshire Hathaway Inc.'s legendary investor Warren Buffett, eyeing strong business models and stellar shareholder returns. Investment demand from Nippon Individual Savings Accounts, or NISA for short, has spread to trading companies alongside traditional favorites like Nippon Telegraph & Telephone Corp., Japan Tobacco Inc. and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Public lands sale may return to ‘big, beautiful' bill with Mike Lee amendment
St. George, Utah. (Photo by) After a controversial provision allowing the sale of public lands in Utah and Nevada was stripped from a massive spending package, Utah Republican Sen. Mike Lee hinted he may try to revive it in the Senate. Utah Republican Rep. Celeste Maloy initially proposed selling nearly 11,500 acres of Bureau of Land Management land in southwestern Utah to Washington and Beaver counties, the Washington County Water Conservancy District and St. George, in addition to 450,000 acres in Nevada. However, amid bipartisan opposition led by Montana Republican Rep. Ryan Zinke — who had said that selling public lands is a line he wouldn't cross — the U.S. House ended up striking the language from the proposed spending package, widely referred to as the 'big, beautiful' bill. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX Proposed sale of Utah public land pulled from Congress' budget bill Lee, who chairs the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, told Politico's E&E News on his way to cast a vote on Monday he intended to bring back the public lands provisions. Lee's office didn't confirm or deny the plans Tuesday. 'Senator Lee remains committed to advancing Western priorities and ensuring that those who live closest to the land have a voice in how it's managed,' his office wrote in a statement. 'As the process moves forward, he'll continue to advocate for solutions that reflect the needs of Utahns and other Western communities.' However, Lee's comment is already worrying environmental advocates, like Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, who have defended the recreational role of public lands among Americans. 'Senator Lee's avowed and oft-stated hatred of public lands makes him a true outlier in the Senate,' Travis Hammill, D.C. director for the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, said in a statement. 'His apparent intention to include a public lands sell-off provision in the Budget Bill, which was fiercely opposed in the House, is wildly out of step with what Americans have made clear that they want to see: federal public lands remaining in public hands.' While the provision introduced by Maloy and Nevada Republican Rep. Mark Amodei was met with intense pushback, the 'big, beautiful' bill is poised to undergo changes in the Senate with officials like Lee saying it needs to improve to pass the chamber. In a previous statement, Maloy had defended the proposal, arguing that it would help expand water, transportation and housing infrastructure in southwestern Utah as the region deals with rapid population growth. Officials eye airport expansion, reservoirs and new roads under Maloy's proposed public land sale If allowed to purchase the public lands, St. George officials were considering an airport expansion; Washing County Water Conservancy District planned to build a new reservoir and Washington County contemplated widening some roads. After the proposal was cut from the House's version of the budget bill, St. George City leaders said they planned on working with other lawmakers on the issue. 'We were disappointed that some groups falsely presented this amendment as if it were a land grab,' city leaders said. 'In actuality, the amendment was intended to protect existing critical infrastructure or future critical infrastructure that would be built on already disturbed public lands. Only approximately nine acres would have been used for attainable housing, at a spot adjacent to a future cemetery and an existing residential subdivision.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sen. Mike Lee considers reinstating language to sell Utah's public lands in massive tax package
WASHINGTON — A proposal to sell off public lands in Utah and Nevada could be revived in the massive tax reconciliation bill making its way through Congress. When asked if he would push to reinstate language selling roughly 11,000 acres of public lands in southern Utah, Sen. Mike Lee told Politico this week: 'Yes.' Although details are not clear on how Lee would move forward with such a proposal, his office told the Deseret News the Utah senator would advocate for handing control of the land to Utahns. 'Sen. Lee remains committed to advancing Western priorities and ensuring that those who live closest to the land have a voice in how it's managed,' a spokesperson for Lee told the Deseret News. 'As the process moves forward, he'll continue to advocate for solutions that reflect the needs of Utahns and other Western communities.' The move comes after the House stripped language to sell more than 211,000 acres across Utah and Nevada amid pushback from some Republicans who threatened to vote against the full reconciliation package if it was included. The original amendment was led by Utah Rep. Celeste Maloy, R-Utah, who drafted the provision upon request from officials in Washington and Beaver counties, who would have facilitated the sale. Maloy told the Deseret News she was unaware of any efforts to revive that language as the Senate begins deliberations on the reconciliation package. About 63% of Utah's land is owned by the federal government, the most of any state in the country aside from Nevada. The lands that would have been sold make up 'only a third of one percent of federal lands in the state,' according to Maloy. The proposal was met with pushback from some Republicans who have historically opposed public land sales, such as Rep. Ryan Zinke, R-Mont., the co-chairman of the newly created Public Lands Caucus. 'There's a lot of frustration down in the West. I understand that,' Zinke said in response to the amendment last month. 'But I prefer the management scheme. And I give an example as a hotel — if you don't like the management of a hotel, don't sell the hotel. Change the management. That's where I sit on that position.'