Solar farm approved beside Bronze Age rock art near Kirkcudbright
Planning permission has been granted for construction of a large solar farm located near "nationally significant" Bronze Age rock art.Dumfries and Galloway Council's planning committee approved the 43-hectare (106 acre) project at Little Drum Solar Farm.The proposed development will be constructed just over one mile (1.8km) south east of Kirkcudbright - but will not be visible from the town due to rolling hills.The nearest solar panel will be located 250m (820 ft) from the rock art, according to a report by planning officers.
There are multiple "non-designated archaeological areas" and features present on or near the site.This includes an inaccessible monument indicating the location of the rocks.The solar array will provide approximtely 36MW of electricity and include a 12MW battery storage facility.
A planning report by council officers said the monument was not currently publicised or the subject of any formal access arrangements.However, as part of the solar farm's approval, subject to conditions, a path will be constructed to the monument for the first time.The developer is required to complete the path within three months of the farm becoming operational.
'National significance'
The report by planning officers recognised the monument as "one of the finest of its type in Scotland and very important in terms of the period in history it represents".It said the area was "the second densest concentration of (bronze age) rock art in Scotland (after Kilmartin Glen in Argyll) and therefore of national significance".Despite this Historic Environment Scotland gave no objection to the project - after an initial holding objection.The preservation body said given the 250m distance from the monument and the solar panel height and position, the project did not raise "historic environment issues of national significance."However, the construction of the farm will not be able to start until an investigation has taken place and been signed off by the council.Although there was no reason to object on "heritage grounds" the council archaeologist said ground examinations should take place to explore potentially undiscovered archaeological features of the area.
Construction of the solar farm and battery plant is expected to last nine months; the developer is required to begin construction within three years.As part of the application, the solar farm will be operational and provide power for a 40-year lifespan once complete.The developers also plan to include "landscaping and biodiversity enhancement measures" around the solar farm - it will clear the area of invasive species in favour of native trees, grassland, flower meadow and hedgerows.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
SIR DAVID MURRAY EXCLUSIVE: Why I'm still worried about Rangers ... and whether American owners will be able to give Russell Martin the money he needs
Sir David Murray has raised doubts about 49ers Enterprises giving Rangers the rapid investment they need - and says he 'worries' about the club failing to reach next season's Champions League. The former Rangers owner told Mail Sport that he doubts the entire £20million outlay being touted by the club's new owners will be available for players and said he was yet to see evidence of bold work to give new manager Russell Martin the 'tools' he needs. He said: 'In the short term, I would judge them on the first three sales and the first three financial signings they make, because that will give you an indication of direction of travel. So, who have they signed so far? A loan player from Bournemouth (Max Aarons), who's not played a lot of football, but who Russell Martin knew from Norwich. 'I hope they give Martin the tools. I'm not sure they've paid off all the players they've got. Because you don't buy a player for £6m and pay it right away - it's over three years or something. So do they still have debts to pay? Instead of £20m, is that going for new players or is that just going in the books?' Rangers are yet to cash in on any players in this window and have limited their business so far to 25-year-old right-back Aarons, who started just two games on loan at Valencia after his move there last January. He has had only 14 Premier League starts for Bournemouth since August 2023. Rangers are also looking at Leicester City 's 32-year-old Conor Coady. Murray said he welcomed the arrival of new US owners. 'I don't think it's going to be an overnight change,' he said. 'They're true business people who will take a view and take time. They'll have a proper business plan. This'll not be a three-month plan. It'll be a five-year-plan. The way I ran a football club, you couldn't run it like that today.' The club's business model has always been built around Champions League revenues and Murray expressed concern about the tricky tie Martin has been handed against Panathinaikos in the second qualifying round, including having to play the second leg in Greece. 'I'm worried they haven't got the best draw in the Champions League against Panathinaikos with the first game at home,' he said. 'You always want the second game at home, when you know what you've got to do. I think it's a very tough task.' Murray, 73, said that Rangers were missing out on some of the Scottish talent that he always wanted to make the core to the team, citing Motherwell's 18-year-old midfielder Lennon Miller, who is now on Sunderland's radar. 'I'm not trying to be arrogant but, in my day, we would have bought him by now. But Rangers haven't bought him,' said Murray. He also cited Lewis Ferguson, who was a youth player at Rangers. 'They let him go to Hamilton and then to Aberdeen,' said Murray. 'Why didn't they buy him when he went to Italy? A young, energetic player with a release value and they didn't buy him. I don't understand that.'
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Israel-Iran war highlights Asia's dependence on Middle East oil, and slow progress on clean energy
Asia's dependence on Middle East oil and gas — and its relatively slow shift to clean energy — make it vulnerable to disruptions in shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic weakness highlighted by the war between Israel and Iran. Iran sits on the strait, which handles about 20% of shipments of the world's oil and liquefied natural gas, or LNG. Four countries — China, India, Japan and South Korea — account for 75% of those imports. Japan and South Korea face the highest risk, according to analysis by the research group Zero Carbon Analytics, followed by India and China. All have been slow to scale up use of renewable energy. In 2023, renewables made up just 9% of South Korea's power mix — well below the 33% average among other members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, or OECD. In the same year, Japan relied more heavily on fossil fuels than any other country in the Group of Seven, or G7. A truce in the 12-day Israel-Iran war appeared to be holding, reducing the potential for trouble for now. But experts say the only way to counter lingering uncertainty is to scale back reliance on imported fossil fuels and accelerate Asia's shift to clean, domestic energy sources. 'These are very real risks that countries should be alive to — and should be thinking about in terms of their energy and economic security,' said Murray Worthy, a research analyst at Zero Carbon Analytics. Japan and South Korea are vulnerable China and India are the biggest buyers of oil and LNG passing through the potential chokepoint at the Strait of Hormuz, but Japan and South Korea are more vulnerable. Japan depends on imported fossil fuels for 87% of its total energy use and South Korea imports 81%. China relies on only 20% and India 35%, according to Ember, an independent global energy think tank that promotes clean energy. 'When you bring that together — the share of energy coming through the strait and how much oil and gas they rely on — that's where you see Japan really rise to the top in terms of vulnerability,' said Worthy. Three-quarters of Japan's oil imports and more than 70% of South Korea's oil imports — along with a fifth of its LNG — pass through the strait, said Sam Reynolds of the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis. Both countries have focused more on diversifying fossil fuel sources than on shifting to clean energy. Japan still plans to get 30-40% of its energy from fossil fuels by 2040. It's building new LNG plants and replacing old ones. South Korea plans to get 25.1% of its electricity from LNG by 2030, down from 28% today, and reduce it further to 10.6% by 2038. To meet their 2050 targets for net-zero carbon emissions, both countries must dramatically ramp up use of solar and wind power. That means adding about 9 gigawatts of solar power each year through 2030, according to the thinktank Agora Energiewende. Japan also needs an extra 5 gigawatts of wind annually, and South Korea about 6 gigawatts. Japan's energy policies are inconsistent. It still subsidizes gasoline and diesel, aims to increase its LNG imports and supports oil and gas projects overseas. Offshore wind is hampered by regulatory barriers. Japan has climate goals, but hasn't set firm deadlines for cutting power industry emissions. 'Has Japan done enough? No, they haven't. And what they do is not really the best,' said Tim Daiss, at the APAC Energy Consultancy, citing Japan's program to increase use of hydrogen fuel made from natural gas. South Korea's low electricity rates hinder the profitability of solar and wind projects, discouraging investment, a 'key factor' limiting renewables, said Kwanghee Yeom of Agora Energiewende. He said fair pricing, stronger policy support and other reforms would help speed up adoption of clean energy. China and India have done more — but gaps remain China and India have moved to shield themselves from shocks from changing global energy prices or trade disruptions. China led global growth in wind and solar in 2024, with generating capacity rising 45% and 18%, respectively. It has also boosted domestic gas output even as its reserves have dwindled. By making more electricity at home from clean sources and producing more gas domestically, China has managed to reduce imports of LNG, though it still is the world's largest oil importer, with about half of the more than 11 million barrels per day that it brings in coming from the Middle East. Russia and Malaysia are other major suppliers. India relies heavily on coal and aims to boost coal production by around 42% from now to 2030. But its use of renewables is growing faster, with 30 additional gigawatts of clean power coming online last year, enough to power nearly 18 million Indian homes. By diversifying its suppliers with more imports from the U.S., Russia and other countries in the Middle East, it has somewhat reduced its risk, said Vibhuti Garg of the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis. 'But India still needs a huge push on renewables if it wants to be truly energy secure,' she said. Risks for the rest of Asia A blockade of the Strait of Hormuz could affect other Asian countries, and building up their renewable power generating capacity will be a 'crucial hedge' against the volatility intrinsic to importing oil and gas, said Reynolds of the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis Southeast Asia has become a net oil importer as demand in Malaysia and Indonesia has outstripped supplies, according to the ASEAN Centre for Energy in Jakarta, Indonesia. The 10-nation Association of Southeast Asian Nations still exports more LNG than it imports due to production by Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Myanmar. But rising demand means the region will become a net LNG importer by 2032, according to consulting firm Wood Mackenzie. Use of renewable energy is not keeping up with rising demand and production of oil and gas is faltering as older fields run dry. The International Energy Agency has warned that ASEAN's oil import costs could rise from $130 billion in 2024 to over $200 billion by 2050 if stronger clean energy policies are not enacted. "Clean energy is not just an imperative for the climate — it's an imperative for national energy security,' said Reynolds. ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
Times
6 hours ago
- Times
Stop building near the Clyde estuary, flood researchers warn
Plans for new buildings on the low-lying banks of the River Clyde must be halted because they cannot be defended from worsening flooding, scientists have warned. Some prime real estate in the west of Scotland — such as land around Glasgow airport — will be put at risk from rising sea levels, experts have previously said. Now a major study has found that the measures proposed to mitigate this threat, including re-creating 'soft' natural environments such as wetlands and salt marshes to slow down and absorb flood waters, will not be enough to save swathes of the area. Academics from Glasgow University said that avoiding future development 'in the tidal floodplains of large estuaries is the best means of minimising future flood risk in a rapidly warming world'. They said this applied to the UK as well around the world.
