
UN chief ready tells Caribbean leaders he's ready to present Haiti security plan
Months after Haiti filed a formal request for the return of blue-helmet United Nations peacekeepers to help fight criminal armed gangs, the head of the world agency said he is ready to present a proposal to the U.N. Security Council.
But Secretary-General António Guterres' request doesn't appear to be an endorsement of a traditional peacekeeping mission, the last of which ended in Haiti in 2017 after 13 years. Instead, Guterres' plan appears to be more of a hybrid that takes into account the current Kenya-led Multinational Security Support mission and its partial financing through a U.N.-controlled trust fund.
Speaking at the opening ceremony of the 48th annual meeting of the 15-member regional bloc known as CARICOM in Barbados, Guterres said he will soon present to the Security Council a proposal similar to one the U.N. has in Somalia to boost the struggling security response in Haiti, where armed gangs now control up to 90% of the capital.
The plan, he said as he went off script from prepared remarks, is one in which 'the U.N. assumes the responsibility of the structural and logistical expenditures that are necessary to put the force in place, and the salaries of the force are paid through the trust fund that already exists.'
'If the [Security Council] accepts the proposal, we'll have the conditions to finally have an effective force to defeat the gangs in Haiti and create the conditions for democracy to thrive,' Guterres said during his address that called on Caribbean leaders to unite to address the climate crisis and other issues.
Funding for the multinational mission has not amounted to what was either expected or promised, and the lack of resources has hampered the force's ability in Haiti to stop the violence and expansion of gangs that control key routes in and out of the capital, have forced more than a million to flee their homes and left six million people in need of humanitarian assistance.
After providing more than $600 million — the lion's share of the funding —to support the Kenya-led mission, the Biden administration last year moved to have the mission transformed into a formal U.N. peacekeeping operation to address the shortfall. Instead of relying on the good will of donors, the administration wanted the funding to be guaranteed by having the money come from the assessed contributions of U.N. member states. Though the return of peacekeepers has widespread support in the region and on the Security Council, Guterres is a known critic of peacekeeping missions, and on the council both China and Russia have both balked at the idea.
Neither nation has contributed to the mission's trust fund, which thus far has raised just over $100 million.
In November, after weeks of negotiations between Beijing and Washington failed, the Security Council agreed to send a letter to Guterres asking him to provide 'a full range of options' for U.N. support in Haiti.
His proposal comes amid uncertainty about whether the Trump administration would support changing the mission into a U.N. peacekeeping operation, and on whether the proposal would deal with the current gaps in the mission's operations. Also unclear is whether Russia and China would back the idea now that the U.N. would not be shouldering the full financial burden.
Guterres' proposal is due by Feb. 28. A report released on the current political and gang crisis in Haiti by the International Crisis Group noted that given the current challenges in Haiti, any changes to the mission would likely need levels of uniformed personnel comparable to the former U.N. Stabilization Mission in Haiti, which at its peak had approximately 7,000 military troops and 2,000 police officers. The report noted that even if the Haitian national police and international forces receive financial and logistical support, 'it seems highly unlikely that gangs, which have amassed so much power, can be pushed back from most of the densely populated areas they hold in a few months.'
Guterres is among several special guests attending the three-day gathering of Caribbean heads of government. The security crisis in Haiti, a member country, as well as the changing geopolitical landscape and the climate crisis were repeatedly mentioned by speakers
'The exquisite beauty of the Caribbean is famed the world over. But there is trouble in paradise,' Guterres said, calling for the region to unite. 'Wave after wave of crisis is pounding your people and your islands — with no time to catch your breath before the next disaster strikes.'
There are three key areas where, together, they must drive progress, Guterres said, mentioning unifying for peace and security 'particularly to address the appalling situation in Haiti, where gangs are inflicting intolerable suffering on a desperate and frightened people.'
As he and other spoke in Bridgetown, hundreds of miles away in Port-au-Prince panic was spreading through several neighborhoods amid fears that armed groups were once more on the move to attack neighborhoods.
Both the outgoing and incoming chair of the Caribbean Community addressed the situation in Haiti and said it remains a priority for the regional bloc.
'The Haitian people must be at the center of all that we reflect upon,' said Mia Mottley, the prime minister of Barbados and chair of CARICOM.
'Their situation continues to be of major concern to us, and it is not going to be sufficient just to be able to say that Haiti will have an election on Nov. 15. It is not going to be sufficient to just stabilize the security situation,' she said, referring to the date the head of the country's transitional council recently proposed for elections.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
Israel Defends Strikes, Iran Asks for Help Before U.N. Security Council
Israel's ambassador to the U.N. lashed out at his Iranian counterpart during an United Nations Security Council meeting. Iran called on the Security Council to determine that Israel had committed a 'breach of peace.' Photo: Angela Weiss/AFP/Getty Images/Sarah Yenesel/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock


UPI
an hour ago
- UPI
Supreme Court OKs challenge to California stricter emission standards
1 of 2 | Electric cars sit on a Tesla parking lot in Fremont, Calif. (May 2020). Fossil fuel companies can challenge California's stricter standards to reduce pollution from vehicles, the U.S Supreme Court ruled Friday. File Photo by Terry Schmitt/UPI | License Photo June 20 (UPI) -- Fossil fuel companies can challenge California setting stricter emissions standards for cars, the U.S Supreme Court ruled Friday. California has stipulated that only zero-emission cars will be able to sold there by 2035, with a phased increase in ZEV requirements for model years 2026-2035. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has set a fleet-wide average of 49 mpg by model year 2026, with higher standards in the following years. In the 7-2 opinion authored by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, the court ruled that oil producers have legal standing to sue over California's clean car standards approved by the U.S. EPA. Dissenting were Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, two of the court's three Democratic-appointed justices. "This case concerns only standing, not the merits," Kavanaugh wrote in the 48-page opinion that included two dissents. "EPA and California may or may not prevail on the merits in defending EPA's approval of the California regulations. But the justiciability of the fuel producers' challenge to EPA's approval of the California regulations is evident." The Clean Air Act supersedes state laws that regulate motor vehicle emissions, but it allows the EPA to issue a waiver for California. Other states can copy California's stricter standard. The states are Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington and the District of Columbia. The EPA, when Barack Obama was president, granted a waiver for California, but President Trump partially withdrew it during his first term. When Joe Biden became president in 2021, the EPA reinstated the waiver with the tougher emissions. Last week, Trump signed a bi-partisan congressional resolution to rescind California's electric vehicle mandate. California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, called this move illegal and will sue over this order. "You couldn't buy any other car except an electric-powered car, and in California, they have blackouts and brownouts," Trump said last week. "They don't have enough electricity right now to do the job. And, countrywide, you'd have to spend four trillion dollars to build the firing plants, charging plants." Gasoline and other liquid fuel producers and 17 Republic-led states sued, arguing California's regulations reduce the manufacturing of gas-powered cars. The lead plaintiff was Diamond Alternative Energy, which sells renewable diesel, an alternative to traditional petroleum-derived diesel. Valero Energy Corp. also joined in the suit. Automakers were involved in the case. California lawyers argue the producers have no legal standing, which requires showing that a favorable court ruling would redress a plaintiff's injury. The EPA said consumer demand for electric cars would exceed California's mandate and hence the regulations wouldn't have an impact. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit rejected the lawsuit. "If invalidating the regulations would change nothing in the market, why are EPA and California enforcing and defending the regulations?" Kavanaugh wrote. "The whole point of the regulations is to increase the number of electric vehicles in the new automobile market beyond what consumers would otherwise demand and what automakers would otherwise manufacture and sell." Sotomayor and Jackson separately wrote the case may become moot. "I see no need to expound on the law of standing in a case where the sole dispute is a factual one not addressed below," Sotomayor wrote. She said she would have sent the case back to the lower court to look at the issue again. Jackson said her colleagues weren't applying the standing doctrine evenhandedly and it can erode public trust in judges. "This case gives fodder to the unfortunate perception that moneyed interests enjoy an easier road to relief in this Court than ordinary citizens. Because the Court had ample opportunity to avoid that result, I respectfully dissent," Jackson wrote. The ruling does not prevent California and other states from enforcing standards, Vickie Patton, general counsel of the Environmental Defense Fund, told The Guardian. "The standards have saved hundreds of lives, have provided enormous health benefits, and have saved families money," Patton said. "While the Supreme Court has now clarified who has grounds to bring a challenge to court, the decision does not affect California's bedrock legal authority to adopt pollution safeguards, nor does it alter the life-saving, affordable, clean cars program itself."


Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Former Haiti mayor who lied about killing opponents is sentenced to 9 years in U.S.
The former mayor of a small rural village in Haiti, accused of torturing and killing opponents in his homeland, was sentenced Friday in a Massachusetts federal court to nine years in prison for lying about the atrocities in order to obtain a U.S. green card. Jean Morose Viliena, 53, who served as mayor of Les Irois, in the country's Grand'Anse region, had previously been ordered by a federal court in Boston to pay $15.5 million in damages after being found guilty in a civil case of torture, extrajudicial killings, attempted killing and arson. On Friday Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor IV of the District of Massachusetts sentenced him to do time in prison, plus three years of supervised release, after a federal jury in March convicted him of three counts of visa fraud to obtain his permanent resident or green card. After completely his sentence, Viliena is expected to be deported to Haiti, which is routine for foreign nationals convicted of crimes in the US. Prosecutors said that when Viliena, already two years into his mayoral term, presented himself at the U.S. Embassy Consular Office in Port-au-Prince in 2008 to apply for a U.S. visa, he falsely responded 'no' to a question about whether he was 'a member of any class of individuals excluded from admission into the United States, including those who have 'ordered, carried out or materially assisted in extrajudicial and political killings and other acts of violence against the Haitian people.' That response allowed him to be granted the visa, which he used to visit the U.S. before deciding to settle in the Boston area. READ ME: Boston bus driver and former mayor in Haiti sued for human rights abuses in U.S. court Two months before his appointment at the U.S. embassy, Viliena and his associates had carried out an attack against an opposition radio station in Les Irois. Viliena, at the time the mayor, and his political associates beat a student during the attack and when the student tried to flee, a bullet struck his face, leaving him permanently blind in one eye. 'According to multiple witnesses' testimony, Viliena mobilized armed members of his staff and supporters to forcibly shut down the radio station and seize its broadcasting equipment,' the U.S. Justice Department said Friday in a statement announcing the sentencing. 'Viliena distributed firearms to his men, some of whom also carried machetes and picks. According to the evidence presented at trial, during this incident, Viliena beat one man and ordered an associate to shoot him when he tried to flee. As a result, the man's leg was later amputated above the knee.' Viliena first became mayor in December 2006 and served until February 2010. He returned to the office in 2012 as an appointee of then President Michel Martelly despite many questions around his appointment. At the time, United Nations staff flagged the appointment due to a murder conviction in Haitian courts against Viliena, but their concerns were ignored by Haitian authorities. As both a candidate and mayor, Viliena was backed by Korega, a political machine that used armed violence to exert power throughout the southwestern region of Haiti. Viliena personally supervised his mayoral staff and other armed supporters aligned with Korega and directed them to engage in armed violence to quash opposition to his authority, U.S. authorities said, citing evidence presented during trial. In addition to the radio station attack, witnesses testified about another brutal incident on July 27, 2007, when Viliena violently retaliated against an activist who had previously spoken at a judicial proceeding on behalf of a neighbor whom Viliena had assaulted. In an of reprisal that evening, Viliena led an armed group to the activist's home, where he and his associates shot and killed the activist's younger brother and then smashed the brother's skull with a large rock before a crowd of bystanders. 'His lies to U.S. immigration authorities allowed him to unlawfully enter this country and obtain lawful permanent resident status,' said Matthew R. Galeotti, head of the Justice Department's criminal division. Viliena's past eventually caught up with him in 2017 after three of his victims filed suit against him with help from San Francisco-based Center for Justice & Accountability and the multinational Dentons law firm. By then, he had obtained his green card and had built a comfortable home as an Uber and bus driver. He also had raised a U.S.-born son. U.S. Attorney Leah B. Foley said while Viliena's victims were forced to live with the pain of his human rights abuses, he was able to build a life in the United States 'by burying the truth about his violent past — a past marked by by political persecution, bloodshed and the silencing of dissent in Haiti. 'For more than a decade, he lived freely and comfortably in this country while the victims of his brutality lived in fear, exile and pain. Today's sentence brings a measure of justice for the lives he shattered and sends a clear message: the United States will not be a safe haven for human rights abusers.,' Foley added. 'Lying to gain entry into this country and then lying again under oath to avoid accountability strikes at the heart of our immigration and legal systems. ' Both said Viliena's conviction serves as a reminders to those who commit violent crimes in their home countries: The U.S. will not be a refuge, and those who carry out human rights abusers and lie take refuge here will be investigated and prosecuted.