British couple imprisoned by Taliban faced 29 ‘interrogations', daughter says
An elderly British couple imprisoned in Afghanistan have faced 29 'interrogations' and several court appearances – while no charges have been brought against them, their daughter has said.
Peter Reynolds, 79, and his wife Barbie, 75, were arrested as they travelled to their home in Bamyan province, in central Afghanistan, in February.
The couple were detained alongside Faye Hall, an American friend who had rented a plane to travel with them, and a translator from the couple's Rebuild training business.
Their daughter, Susie Romer, told Channel 5's 5 News on Thursday that the pair had 'absolutely no idea' why they are being imprisoned and called on the UK government to do more to secure their release.
She said: 'They've been through so many investigations – I believe it's 29 interrogations that they've had to endure.
'They've been in court three or four times now, I believe, and various accusations that have been brought against them, they've been thoroughly investigated and shown up as empty accusations.
'So they've been told that there is not actually a charge against them.'
Ms Romer went on to say that while the British government has been assisting the family, she is not convinced that the message that her parents should be 'immediately released' has been conveyed by the Government to the Taliban.
She said the family had met Foreign Officer minister Hamish Falconer, who had told them the case was a 'priority' for him.
Ms Romer continued: 'We do want the Government to make it clear to the Taliban that my parents should be immediately released and we've told them this.
'It's been 10 weeks now, and we've not been reassured that this message has been conveyed, but this is really urgent.
'Each day that they remain in prison, they're at risk, so we'll keep on asking the Government to send that message.'
Ms Romer added that the conditions her parents were being held in were 'absolutely horrific', that they were receiving one meal per day and there were mice and cockroaches 'running around'.
She said that hearing her parents 'weep' on the phone was 'excruciating' for her.
In an interview with BBC News last week, their son, Jonathan Reynolds, said he had been 'interacting' with the US government after a video plea to President Donald Trump for help to get his parents released.
The couple, who originally met at the University of Bath, married in Kabul in 1970 and have run school training programmes for 18 years.
They remained in the country after the Taliban takeover in 2021.
After taking power, the Taliban introduced a ban on women working and education for girls older than 12.
In a statement to The Associated Press this week, the Taliban said the case 'will soon be resolved' and 'should not be a cause for concern'.
The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office has been contacted for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
8 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
US and Europe trade negotiators discuss tariffs in Paris
The European Union's top trade negotiator, Maros Sefcovic, met on Wednesday with his American counterpart, US trade representative Jamieson Greer, on the sidelines of a meeting of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 'We're advancing in the right direction at pace,' Mr Sefcovic said at a news conference. He said ongoing technical meetings between EU and US negotiators in Washington would be soon followed by a video conference between himself and Mr Greer to then 'assess the progress and charter the way forward'. Brussels and Washington are unlikely to reach a substantive trade agreement in Paris. The issues dividing them are too difficult to resolve quickly. US President Donald Trump regularly criticises America's persistent trade deficit with the European Union, which was a record 161 billion dollars (£119 billion)last year, according to the US Commerce Department. Mr Trump blames the gap between what the US sells and what it buys from Europe on unfair trade practices and often singles out for criticism the EU's 10% tax on imported cars. America's was 2.5% until Mr Trump raised it to 25% in April. The EU has argued its purchases of US services, especially in the technology sector, all but overcome the deficit. After the Trump administration's surprise tariffs last week on steel rattled global markets and complicated the ongoing, wider tariff negotiations between Brussels and Washington, the EU on Monday said it is preparing 'countermeasures' against the US. The EU has offered the US a 'zero for zero' deal in which both sides end tariffs on industrial goods, including cars. Mr Trump has rejected that idea, but EU officials say it is still on the table. US trade representative Jamieson Greer (Mark Schiefelbein/AP) The EU could buy more liquefied natural gas and defence items from the US, and lower duties on cars, but it is not likely to budge on calls to scrap the value added tax, which is akin to a sales tax, or open up the EU to American beef. 'We still have a few weeks to have this discussion and negotiation,' French trade minister Laurent Saint-Martin said in Paris on Wednesday ahead of the OECD meeting. 'If the discussion and negotiation do not succeed, Europe is capable of having countermeasures on American products and services as well.' Greta Peisch, who was general counsel for the US trade representative in the Biden administration, said the zero-for-zero proposal could provide a way to make progress if the Trump administration 'is looking for a reason not to impose tariffs on the EU'. But Ms Peisch, now a partner at the Wiley Rein law firm, added: 'How motivated is the US to come to a deal with the EU?' Mr Trump, after all, has longstanding grievances and complaints about EU trade practices. One target of his ire is the value-added tax. Mr Trump and his advisers consider VATs unfair protectionism because they are levied on US products. But VATs are set at a national level, not by the EU, and apply to domestic and imported products alike, so they have not traditionally been considered a trade barrier. There is little chance governments will overhaul their tax systems to appease Mr Trump. Likewise, the Europeans are likely to balk at US demands to scrap food and safety regulations that Washington views as trade barriers. These include bans on hormone-raised beef, chlorinated chicken and genetically modified foods. 'When you start talking about chickens or GMOs or automobile safety standards, you're talking about the ways countries choose to regulate their economies,' Ms Peisch said. 'We think that's protectionist. They think it's keeping their citizens healthy … It's been a sore point for 60 years.'
STV News
21 minutes ago
- STV News
Government 'won't change law' to introduce more drug consumption rooms
The UK Government has said it won't change the law to make it easier to set up safe drug consumption rooms like the one that opened in Glasgow earlier this year – even if it's a success. The Thistle facility in Glasgow is the first facility of its kind in the UK, aimed at bringing down Scotland's high number of drug deaths. It opened at the start of the year, and Scottish health secretary Neil Gray said initial evidence 'suggests the facility is proving successful'. The facility has been used more than 2,500 times since opening five and a half months ago. Gray told Westminster's Scottish Affairs Committee that the Scottish Ambulance Service has been called to the Hunter Street location seven times since January. He also said there have been 35 'medical emergencies' at the facility since it opened. Had those emergencies happened away from the facility, Gray said he believed the people involved in those medical emergencies would not have survived. However, despite what Gray sees as the Thistle's evidence of early success, UK Home Office minister Dame Diana Johnson said the law will not be changed to make it easier for other facilities like it to be opened. The Thistle facility was launched in Scotland following a decision by the Crown Office not to prosecute drug users, but there's uncertainty over its long-term legal status. The three-year pilot is only possible because the Lord Advocate has said prosecuting drug users who visit the site to inject isn't in the public interest. But under Westminster legislation, the facility still officially operates outside the law. On Wednesday, Scottish MPs were told that isn't going to change, despite reminding Johnson that it wasn't always what she believed. Asked if the Government could rethink that stance if the Thistle proves to be a success in driving down Scotland's high drug death rates, the minister said: 'We look at evidence, we have experts, we have the ACMD (advisory council on the misuse of drugs) who offer advice, we look at evidence all the time. 'But I just really want to be clear with you, we do not support drug consumption facilities, it's not our policy and we will not be amending the Misuse of Drugs Act.' Gray emphasised that he believes the Thistle is already saving lives, and the law should change, so other parts of the country can benefit. The Scottish Affairs Committee will publish its report on the Thistle later this year. MPs were promised that UK ministers will consider it carefully. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Leader Live
23 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Artwork featuring JK Rowling's name taken off display to stop ‘tampering'
Visitors who went to Hardwick Hall in Derbyshire between April and November 2024 were invited to nominate a 'contemporary Virtuous Woman', whose name was then sewn into the fabric. Since the project ended, the participatory artwork, A Virtuous Woman, has continued to be on display, featuring Rowling's name which was at an unspecified time 'stitched over by other participants'. Injustice to JK Rowling corrected. Don't erase the names of women from art or life. #TerfsDidThis @LightninLex – perfect wingwoman as always. — Jean Hatchet (@JeanHatchet) May 31, 2025 Last week on X, feminist campaigner Jean Hatchet said she had 'corrected' the work by taking off the stitching over Harry Potter author Rowling's name. It follows criticism of Scotland-based Rowling's views on gender issues that have seen her called transphobic by activists, which she has denied. A spokeswoman for the National Trust said: 'The artwork was open to contributions for eight months and closed in November when the piece was finished and put on public display. 'During the participation phase, JK Rowling's name was stitched onto the piece seven times and in two instances it was stitched over by other participants. 'At the time the artwork was completed and subsequently hung, JK Rowling's name appeared five times without any overstitching. 'We ask people not to damage or tamper with artworks once they are finished and on public display. 'The piece has been taken off display for investigation and to protect it from further tampering or damage. We take all claims and incidents of damage to items in our care seriously and investigate each one.' Ms Hatchet criticised the response from the National Trust, saying she removed the 'stitching with the correct tool', took 'great time and care', and did not damage it. The stitched names of British queens, artist Yoko Ono, former prime minister Baroness Margaret Thatcher, climate campaigner Greta Thunberg, and Taylor Swift among others appear not to have stitching over them on the recycled textile. The work comes from artist Layla Khoo in association with the University of Leeds and National Trust, and is inspired by wealthy Elizabethan woman Elizabeth Talbot, known as Bess of Hardwick, commissioning a series of large embroideries featuring noble women from the ancient world, such as Cleopatra. Any contributions to the piece have been made by those who chose to take part. None of the views expressed or actions taken by participants represent the views of the National Trust, the artist or the University of Leeds. (3/3) — National Trust (@nationaltrust) May 25, 2025 The trust had previously responded to criticism from the organisation, Women's Rights Network Derbyshire and Staffordshire, who advocated for 'a simple addition to their description', with a statement explaining why the crossing-out stitching on Rowling's name remains. Responding on X, the trust said that it is a 'collaborative piece of art formed of participants' views from a variety of age groups, life experiences and beliefs', and 'any contributions to the piece have been made by those who chose to take part'. 'None of the views expressed or actions taken by participants represent the views of the National Trust, the artist or the University of Leeds,' the organisation said Ellie Evans, from WRN Derbyshire and Staffordshire, criticised the artwork being covered up, saying the move would 'erase all the women'. Rowling declined to comment. Khoo and the University of Leeds have also been contacted.
