
Letters: Restore access to the old Great Highway park's biggest group of users
Sunset Dunes is new, but there has been a park at Ocean Beach for decades. It was done the right way with planning and consultation with nearby neighbors. It had access to all, bike paths, a shared path and efficient car traffic.
Now, with the Great Highway closed, most of the park's previous users are denied access — drivers enjoying the efficiency and views, day and night, in any kind of weather.
There were always surfers, walkers, fishermen and crabbers. On good weather days, there were crowds of people. I never heard anyone say, 'I want to party on the blacktop, forget the beach.'
We taxpayers paid for that beautiful, pre-COVID park. We deserve to keep our access.
Give the Sunset, Richmond and Golden Gate Park back to those who've lived here for years. We don't deserve to have our neighborhoods taken away by ambitious politicians.
The fairest option is to open the highway to cars except during the day on weekends and holidays, when almost all recreational use occurs.
Eric Shackelford, San Francisco
No go on congestion fee
The two congestion zones proposed previously stretch from Mission Creek to Fisherman's Wharf and from Van Ness Avenue to the Bay. Much of this area is not congested at all.
The real congestion is caused mainly by vehicles heading for the Bay Bridge, a situation that has been exacerbated by changes to the approaches made by the city's street engineers, who only think in terms of restricting traffic and not facilitating it.
Public transit is just not an option for many trips, especially considering the sad shape of our transit systems.
I love San Francisco, but if this proposal is adopted, I will think twice about visiting the city.
Les Girouard, Berkeley
Add affordable housing
Regarding 'Controversial S.F. housing project in the Mission gets green light despite resistance' (San Francisco, SFChronicle.com, May 16): Our city government has once again betrayed the community by siding with a large developer.
More than 60 residents and 40 businesses were displaced by the fire that destroyed a building at 22nd and Mission streets — the Mission Market was a vibrant hub that served the needs of the community.
The landlord was permitted to leave the damaged building exposed to the elements. Two subsequent fires conveniently rendered it irreparable, enabling landlord Hawk Lou to tear it down.
Now, to add insult to injury, the city is allowing him to sell it to a developer who will flood the Mission with more units that are unaffordable to the people who live and work there.
If the city leaders understood that residents and workers represent the lifeblood of this unique barrio, it would constrain this negligent landlord to work out a deal that facilitates 100% low-income housing to be constructed there.
Anthony Holdsworth, San Francisco
Bad bogus bill
President Donald Trump's nightmarish 'Big Beautiful Bill' feels like a multipronged assault on the American people.
If enacted, the tax and domestic spending bill will hobble the government with oceans of red ink and trillions in additional debt at higher rates, thanks to the recent Moody's downgrade.
When combined with Trump's disastrous tariffs and the Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency's slapdash evisceration of federal spending, we'll likely see slower growth, higher prices, more limited supplies and diminished public services.
Trump and Musk have reduced the country to an out-of-control pariah state — unwelcoming, untrustworthy and uncharitable. But it'll be a bonanza for the likes of Trump, Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos and their oligarch buddies.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Editorial: Ax to the vax — RFK Jr. continues on his anti-vaccine warpath
It's time for President Donald Trump, despite his own casual relationship with the truth, to stop putting American lives at risk and get rid of his dangerous quack in chief, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. In his latest broadside against science, Kennedy is removing all 17 members of the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices, the CDC's main advisory body, to ostensibly restore 'public trust above any specific pro- or anti-vaccine agenda.' God protect us, as RFK won't. This is how a society becomes undone. Science and reason get stepped on by half-truths and conspiracy theories. Next comes preventable death and disease. The problem is that there is no anti-vaccine side in the legitimate practice of science and medicine. The department's accompanying press release denigrated 'public health ideology' as if the practice of public health wasn't the CDC's only function. Researchers and doctors should be biased in favor of evidence-based therapeutics that save lives. Railing against bias towards vaccines is like a politician condemning researchers biased in favor of seatbelts in cars or keeping lead out of household paint. It's idiotic. We understand that the Make America Healthy Again movement Kennedy leads is all about questioning medical and nutritional practice. On a really abstract level, we are in agreement that no scientific truisms should be entirely above questioning — such a perspective would be anti-science. But there is a specific and long-standing methodology for actually answering those questions, and it is not debate club or who can most incite crowds of followers. It is the scientific method, under which hypotheses can be rigorously tested in ways that are replicable and based on clear and clearly laid out evidence. In that arena — really the only arena that actually matters when it comes to public health — the safety and efficacy of vaccines has been conclusively established. There is no additional discussion necessary or appropriate, particularly when it comes to immunizations that have now been standard-issue for decades and have by all measures radically decreased illness and mortality where they've been successfully deployed. The measles vaccine will always be better for individuals and public health than getting the measles. The same is true for polio, tetanus, COVID and all else. Preying on public skepticism of the pharmaceutical and health industries to hawk alternative approaches that are often unregulated and don't work is damaging it enough. Yet a true believer like RFK is more dangerous, especially now that he stands at the pinnacle of our nation's public health bureaucracy, a position that allows him to substantively impose his own anti-science view on an unsuspecting public and take the choice away from the American people. If RFK's new picks for ACIP — which the secretary falsely promised Sen. Bill Cassidy he wouldn't touch during his confirmation process — step back from recommending various crucial vaccines, this could substantially prevent even those who want to make the informed decision to receive inoculations or have their children vaccinated from being able to do so. As much as Kennedy and his followers emphasize the need for people to be able to make individual choices about their health, they seem hell-bent on taking that choice away entirely, especially given that insurance is not required to cover vaccines that are not CDC-recommended. We wonder what RFK will have to say for himself as once-eradicated diseases begin cutting through the U.S. population again. Is there anything that will get him to veer off this disastrous course? If the answer is no, and we suspect it is, then he must be removed before he can further damage public health. _____
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oman confirms next round of US-Iran nuclear talks amid fears of regional risks
By Jana Choukeir and Ahmed Elimam DUBAI (Reuters) -The sixth round of U.S.-Iran nuclear talks will be held on Sunday in Muscat, the Omani foreign minister said on Thursday, after U.S. President Donald Trump reiterated that Tehran would not be allowed to have a nuclear weapon. Trump said on Wednesday U.S. personnel were being moved out of the Middle East because "it could be a dangerous place". Reuters reported earlier that the U.S. was preparing an evacuation of its Iraqi embassy and would allow military dependents to leave locations around the Middle East due to heightened security risks in the region, according to U.S. and Iraqi sources. The four U.S. and two Iraqi sources did not say what security risks had prompted the decision. Reports of the potential evacuation pushed up oil prices by more than 4% before prices eased on Thursday. Foreign energy companies were continuing their operations as usual, a senior Iraqi official overseeing operations in southern oilfields told Reuters on Thursday. A U.S. official said the State Department had authorized voluntary departures from Bahrain and Kuwait. The State Department updated its worldwide travel advisory on Wednesday evening to reflect the latest U.S. posture. "On June 11, the Department of State ordered the departure of non-emergency U.S. government personnel due to heightened regional tensions," the advisory said. The decision by the U.S. to evacuate some personnel comes at a volatile moment in the region. Trump's efforts to reach a nuclear deal with Iran appear to be deadlocked and U.S. intelligence indicates that Israel has been making preparations for a strike against Iran's nuclear facilities. "They are being moved out because it could be a dangerous place, and we'll see what happens," Trump told reporters. "We've given notice to move out." Asked whether anything could be done to lower the temperature in the region, Trump said: "They can't have a nuclear weapon. Very simple, they can't have a nuclear weapon." Trump has repeatedly threatened to strike Iran if stuttering talks over its nuclear programme fail and in an interview released earlier on Wednesday said he was growing less confident that Tehran would agree to stop enriching uranium, a key American demand. While the evacuation of non-essential personnel raised concerns about a possible regional escalation, a senior Iranian security official told Iran's Press TV on Thursday that U.S. military dependents leaving did not constitute a threat. SHIPPING WARNING On Wednesday, Iran's defence minister warned Washington that Tehran would hit U.S. regional bases if drawn into a war in the case of nuclear talks failing. The United States has a military presence across the major oil-producing region, with bases in Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates. U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had authorized the voluntary departure of military dependents from locations across the Middle East, a U.S. official said. Another U.S. official said that was mostly relevant to family members located in Bahrain - where the bulk of them are based. On Wednesday Britain's maritime agency warned that increased tensions in the Middle East might lead to an escalation in military activity that could impact shipping in critical waterways. It advised vessels to use caution while travelling through the Gulf, the Gulf of Oman and the Straits of Hormuz, which all border Iran. Tensions inside Iraq have heightened since the start of the war in Gaza in October 2023, with Iran-aligned armed groups in the country repeatedly attacking U.S. troops, though attacks have subsided since last year.
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rand Paul Slams ‘Incredibly Petty' Trump in Incredibly Petty Picnic Rant
Senator Rand Paul stood before the Capitol Hill TV cameras on Wednesday to complain—at length—that he was no longer invited to this year's White House picnic. 'The level of immaturity is beyond words,' Paul told reporters, adding that the move to withdraw his invite was 'just incredibly petty.' Paul said his invitation was pulled in retaliation for his refusal to support Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill.' He said he would consider voting for the GOP's budget if the debt limit portion was removed, but that is unlikely to happen by the time the Senate votes on it. 'I'm arguing from a true belief and worry that our country is mired in debt and getting worse,' Paul said. 'And they choose to react by uninviting my grandson to the picnic. I don't know. I just think it really makes me lose a lot of respect I once had for Donald Trump.' Paul said the move wouldn't make him come around. 'It's just, I think, a really sad day that this is the level of warfare they've stooped to,' the Kentucky Republican said, apparently unaware that there are far more serious disputes raging across the country. Paul said he was unsure who made the call to disinvite him and his family. It could be Trump or 'petty staffers who have been running a sort of a paid influencer campaign against me for two weeks on Twitter,' he said, before taking aim at Deputy White House Chief of Staff Stephen Miller. 'You have people that are basically going around casually talking about getting rid of habeas corpus,' Paul said. 'And the same people that are directing this campaign are the same people that casually would throw out parts of the Constitution and suspend habeas corpus. So, I think what it tells is they don't like hearing me say stuff like that, and so they want to quiet me down. And it hasn't worked, and so they're going to try to attack me.' Paul pointed out that in his time in the Senate, neither Presidents Obama nor Biden disinvited him to the bipartisan gathering on the South Lawn, which he had been planning on attending alongside his wife, son, daughter-in-law and six-month-old grandson. The invite revocation may have also been spurred by how Paul broke with Trump on another issue: Saturday's $45 million military parade in Washington, D.C., which is supposed to celebrate the Army's 250th anniversary but which conveniently falls on Trump's birthday. 'I've never been a big fan of goose-stepping soldiers in big tanks and missiles rolling down the street,' Paul explained this week. 'So if you asked me, I wouldn't have done it. We were always different than the images you saw of the Soviet Union and North Korea. We were proud not to be that.'