logo
Public sector banks drive record profits in India for FY25 amidst asset quality improvements

Public sector banks drive record profits in India for FY25 amidst asset quality improvements

Time of Indiaa day ago

Public sector lenders were at the vanguard of driving FY25 banking profits in India to the highest ever in history, as earnings from lending, treasury gains, and lower bad-loan provisions saw the industry's combined bottom-line soar nearly 14 times in a decade to Rs 3.71 lakh crore.
Last fiscal year, public sector banks — once weighed down by legacy stress and bad loans — reported a robust 26% rise in profits to `1.83 lakh crore, narrowing the gap with private banks, which saw a relatively circumspect 7% increase to Rs 1.87 lakh crore, data compiled by ET showed.
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Hanoi: Unsold Furniture Liquidation 2024 (Prices May Surprise You)
Unsold Furniture | Search Ads
Learn More
Undo
A research report by Motilal Oswal Finance Services on banking outlook said, 'Banks are prioritising asset quality over growth, with stricter credit filters, higher CIBIL score thresholds, and conservative underwriting—especially in retail segments… PSU banks' disbursements remain modest while private players have gained share.
State Bank of India
, the largest government asset by market capitalisation, posted the highest net profit of `70,900 crore, followed by private lender HDFC Bank— at Rs 67,347 crore.
ICICI Bank
's net profit was Rs 47,227 crore in FY25. However, a sharp fall in earnings reported by
IndusInd Bank
and
IDFC First Bank
dented the overall profits of private sector banks.
Live Events
Although in FY16, the net profit of all commercial banks was Rs 24,854 crore it was mainly because of higher earnings contributed by private banks. Lenders subsequently embarked on a balance sheet clean-up, nudged by the regulator and aided by a revamped bankruptcy legislation that aimed at quickly extricating billions of dollars stuck in leveraged assets.
'The key driver of the impressive rise in profits is the stable credit growth in FY25 on top of the good growth in FY24,' said VK Vijayakumar, chief investment strategist, Geojit Investments. A year ago, the total net profit of all commercial banks was Rs 3.19 lakh crore. 'A major concern at the beginning of the year was deposits lagging credit growth. But as the year progressed, the deposit growth converged with credit growth,' he added.
Asset quality
The impressive earnings come in the backdrop of the clean-up that started in 2015 with asset quality review (AQR) under the then central bank governor Raghuram Rajan. That caused PSU banks to report huge losses for three consecutive years while bad loans scaled past 8% of advances in FY16.
The government supported PSU banks with growth capital by infusing Rs 3.15 lakh crore since AQR in 2015, according to the Economic Capital Framework report released last week.
The AQR exercise led to better income recognition of non-performing loans and higher provisions. In the following year, the enactment of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code improved recovery for banks giving them an upper hand in negotiation with defaulters. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) data shows that creditors have recovered nearly Rs 3.9 lakh crore in 1,194 cases until March 2025.
Giving the outlook on stressed loans, Subha Sri Narayanan, director, Crisil Ratings, said 'Gross non-performing assets (NPAs) have bottomed at 2.4% as of March 31, 2025, and are seen rangebound at 2.4-2.6% by March 2026. While
corporate NPAs
would remain low on strengthened risk management of banks, and robust balance sheets of corporates.'
In a net interest margin (NIM)—a key profit indicator—outlook for FY26, Vishal Narnolia, analyst, ICICI Direct, said, 'In the first half, NIMs are expected to decline around 15 bps as there is a strong probability of policy rate cut which the banks will have pass to EBLR-linked borrowers.' He said that in the second half of this fiscal, deposit repricing is expected to aid recovery in margins and overall margins are likely to decline by around 10 bps for FY26.
For most banks, NIM—the difference between interest income earned and interest expense—is between 3% and 4%. According to Vijayakumar of Geojit, the outlook for the banking sector continues to be positive.
'However, there are some concerns arising out of rising delinquencies in unsecured loans, credit cards and stress in the microfinance segment which can moderate profit growth in FY26,' he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why MMRDA has scrapped the tendering process for Thane-Bhayandar mega infra projects
Why MMRDA has scrapped the tendering process for Thane-Bhayandar mega infra projects

Indian Express

time15 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Why MMRDA has scrapped the tendering process for Thane-Bhayandar mega infra projects

The Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) on Friday (May 30) informed the Supreme Court that it has decided to scrap the tender process for Thane-Ghodbunder to Bhayandar tunnel and elevated road projects worth over Rs 14,000 crore in 'public interest'. The Bench was hearing a challenge by Larsen & Toubro (L&T) Ltd to orders passed by the Bombay High Court on May 20 upholding MMRDA's position that the reasons for rejecting the technical bids need not be communicated to the company before the projects are awarded. The top court had on Thursday (May 29) asked Mumbai's infrastructure development authority whether it was willing to carry out a re-tendering process for the two major projects in the financial capital – and warned that failure to do so might lead the court to stay the current tenders. A Bench comprising Chief Justice of India (CJI) B R Gavai and Justice A G Masih had asked this question to Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) first on May 26. On Friday, taking MMRDA's statement on the record, the SC disposed of as 'infructuous' the pleas by L&T. What is the background of this major development, and how did the matter reach the Supreme Court? What are these two infrastructure projects? The two projects will link Thane with Mira-Bhayandar. They are part of an extension of the Mumbai Coastal Road project. The first project is a 5-km twin tunnel of 14.6-metre diameter, connecting Gaimukh near the mouth of Vasai Creek in Mira-Bhayandar to the Fountain Hotel junction at Shilphata in Thane. The project cost is estimated at Rs 8,000 crore. The second project, a 9.8-km elevated creek road bridge, will connect Bhayandar with Ghodbunder Road in Thane. The cost of this project is estimated at Rs 6,000 crore. The elevated bridge is likely to be second in length only to the Mumbai Trans Harbour Link (MTHL) bridge, also called Atal Setu, which, at almost 22 km, is both the longest bridge and the longest sea bridge in India. What was L&T's contention? MMRDA invited tenders for the two projects on July 27, 2024. L&T approached the Bombay HC claiming not enough time had been allowed to collect geotechnical data. On October 8, MMRDA assured that the last date for the submission of bids would be extended by 60 days. Earlier this month, L&T filed two petitions before the HC, contending that MMRDA did not follow a fair and transparent tender process. The company said that it had submitted its technical bid on December 13, 2024, and the bid was opened on January 1, 2025 – however, it had received no communication about the outcome of the evaluation. After learning that MMRDA had scheduled the opening of financial bids on May 13 and invited select bidders for it, L&T suspected that it had been excluded from the process, the company submitted. This, L&T said, violated the principles of natural justice. The Instructions to Bidders (ITB) – which are detailed guidelines for potential bidders to prepare and submit their bids for a specific project – are discriminatory, L&T said. What was MMRDA's stand? MMRDA claimed that as per the clauses of ITB, it was not required to intimate L&T that its technical bid had been found unresponsive before the opening of financial bids. Once L&T had accepted the terms of the tender, it could not oppose the opening of the financial bids, MMRDA submitted. It argued that public infrastructure projects should not be delayed, and L&T's pleas deserved to be dismissed. And what did the High Court rule? A Vacation Bench of the court dismissed L&T's pleas and declined to continue the stay on opening of financial bids for the elevated road. In the case of the tunnel project, the Bench rejected L&T's plea, noting a 'suppression of material facts'. The HC said it had to be 'mindful' that the matter involved 'mega infrastructure projects of significant public importance', and 'any delay…would adversely impact the execution of the project'. The court gave L&T the opportunity to approach the Supreme Court in appeal. What happened in the Supreme Court? L&T submitted before the SC that there was an arbitrary declaration of the L1 (Lowest one) bid for both projects to Hyderabad-based Megha Engineering and Infrastructure Ltd (MEIL), even though its bid was at a substantially higher project cost compared to L&T's. L&T claimed that compared to MEIL, its price bid was almost Rs 2,521 crore less in case of the tunnel project, and Rs 609 crore less for the elevated road project. MMRDA argued that the question of price did not arise if the petitioner was disqualified. However, the Bench disagreed, and said it shall be considered in case of 'public interest matters' and 'public money would be saved'. On May 26, the SC said it was difficult to comprehend that the technical bids submitted by L&T – the company which had been chosen to execute the Central Vista project in New Delhi – had been rejected for the Thane-Ghodbunder to Bhayandar tunnel and elevated road projects. On May 29, the SC reiterated that the difference of nearly Rs 3,100 crore between the two bidders was 'not a small amount'. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta representing MMRDA submitted that the disqualification was not on 'flimsy or fanciful grounds' and the authority would justify its decision and respond to the court's queries during the next hearing. This hearing took place on Friday.

‘Not a Single Project Completed on Time': Air Chief Marshal A.P. Singh on IAF's Delivery Delay Woes
‘Not a Single Project Completed on Time': Air Chief Marshal A.P. Singh on IAF's Delivery Delay Woes

The Wire

time22 minutes ago

  • The Wire

‘Not a Single Project Completed on Time': Air Chief Marshal A.P. Singh on IAF's Delivery Delay Woes

Menu हिंदी తెలుగు اردو Home Politics Economy World Security Law Science Society Culture Editor's Pick Opinion Support independent journalism. Donate Now Security 'Not a Single Project Completed on Time': Air Chief Marshal A.P. Singh on IAF's Delivery Delay Woes The Wire Staff 8 minutes ago 'While signing the contract itself, sometimes we are sure that it is not going to come up (in time), but we just sign the contract, thinking we will see what to do.' IAF Chief Air Chief Marshal A P Singh addresses the CII Annual General Meeting & Business Summit 2025, in New Delhi, Thursday, May 29, 2025. Photo: PTI Real journalism holds power accountable Since 2015, The Wire has done just that. But we can continue only with your support. Contribute now New Delhi: India's Chief of Air Staff Air Chief Marshal A.P. Singh expressed concerns on delivery delays, noting how the Air Force signs contracts knowing full well that there will be such a delay. 'Why should we promise something, which can't be achieved? While signing the contract itself, sometimes we are sure that it is not going to come up (in time), but we just sign the contract, thinking we will see what to do. Obviously, the process gets vitiated,' the Indian Air Force chief was quoted by Deccan Herald as having said. The air chief marshal was quoted having said this at the Confederation of Indian Industry annual business summit in New Delhi. The report notes that even though Air Chief Marshal Singh didn't identify the project he was talking about, the reference is possibly to the Hindustan Aeronautics Limited's inability to deliver a combat-ready Tejas light combat aircraft on time. The defence ministry had signed the contract for 73 fighters and 10 trainers at Rs 45,696 crore. Delivery was supposed to be in March 2024. Earlier this week the Ministry of Defence announced that it would fast-track development of its indigenous fifth-generation fighter via the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) programme. Air Chief Marshal Singh stated that AMCA project was a 'big step' and reflected confidence. But as Rahul Bedi noted in his latest analysis for The Wire, this is not its first brush with such lofty ambitions. Earlier, Bedi had noted how, following Operation Sindoor, which exclusively involved the Air Force's combat platforms in executing precision strikes across Pakistan, the clamour for the Indian Air Force to fast-track its long-pending requirement for 114 Multi-Role Fighters Aircraft (MRFA), initiated nearly a decade ago, is expected to gather momentum. 'Timeline is a big issue. Not a single project that I can think of was completed on time. This is something, which we have to look at,' Air Chief Marshal Singh was quoted as having said. The Hindu has noted additionally that he called upon stakeholders to ensure that they did their best on their part as links in the bigger chain at the national level to plug any shortcomings. 'Building trust is not required with the armed forces, but retaining that trust depends on a lot of actions… we have to keep reinforcing that trust,' he said. Make a contribution to Independent Journalism Related News Unexpected Fallout of Op Sindoor Has Been Tilt in Pakistan's Military Balance Toward Its Air Force Political Rent-seeking of Armed Forces is Detrimental to Democracy For Arms Dealers, Operation Sindoor Was Not a Crisis Conflict But a Business Opportunity Army Blames News Reports, Contradicts Corps Commander's Claim of Air Defence Guns at Golden Temple Pakistani Army Chief Asim Munir Elevated to Field Marshal Rank Asim Munir's Elevation to Field Marshal Likely to Disturb Military Norms, Succession Dynamics 'Losses Are Part of Combat', IAF Says But Declines to Share Details of What Platforms India Lost Second Speech in 24 Hours, Modi Invokes Religious Figures But No Mention of Trump Mediation Claims 'Projectiles Appear To Be Coming in Waves': Jammu Plunged in Darkness, Loud Explosions Heard View in Desktop Mode About Us Contact Us Support Us © Copyright. All Rights Reserved.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store