logo
Tontitown residents respond to Waste Management statement regarding landfill

Tontitown residents respond to Waste Management statement regarding landfill

Yahoo01-03-2025

TONTITOWN, Ark. (KNWA/KFTA) — Tontitown residents responded to a statement released by Waste Management regarding the Eco-Vista Landfill's air permit application.
The statement comes from Senior Communications Specialist Jennifer McKay and states as follows:
The Eco-Vista Landfill (Eco-Vista) has submitted this Air Permit Renewal Application (Renewal) because all facilities required to obtain these Air Permits must submit Renewals at least six months prior to expiration of the existing Operating Permits. The safety and environmental protection of WM Eco-Vista employees, customers and communities is our highest priority and we meet or exceed strict regulatory criteria in accordance with our operating permits. Eco-Vista systems are designed and monitored by a team of experts and we are confident that they are protective of the environment and community health.
Senior Communications Specialist Jennifer McKay
Timeline: Tontitown's landfill controversy
After hearing the statement released by Waste Management, Tontitown City Council Alderman Tim Burress felt that the corporation's comment was laughable.
'It is laughable that they would say that their highest priority is the safety and welfare of the environment and the people in this area,' said Burress.
He believes that their actions have said otherwise and that the city of Tontitown has no confidence in ADEQ's ethical actions.
'Waste management has been a terrible neighbor. They break our ordinances, our noise ordinances. They have trash that's strewn all over. They're supposed to cover their waste every night with dirt cover,' said the alderman.
Burress is not the only resident who believes Waste Management does not exhibit 'neighborly' traits.
Potentially toxic chemicals found in Tontitown's air in latest round of testing
Tontitown resident Mark Calcagni spoke at the public hearing on Feb. 27 held by the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality.
Many residents, like Calcagni, voiced frustrations and concerns about the landfill and the believed effects on the city.
After hearing Waste Management's statement, Calcagni expressed dissatisfaction with what was said in a statement:
After hearing WM's statement, I feel they have not been the best neighbor as they have operated without regard to the health and safety of the area. We have constantly complained of odors and gases and finally got on the radar of the Arkansas National Guard to test the air and they performed two air tests that showed harmful chemicals in the air and ADEQ tried to dis-prove those tests as they found 5 harmful chemicals that exceeded EPA levels and two of them are carcinogens Acrolein which was 4,900% above EPA Regional Screening Levels and Benzene that was 209% above EPA Regional Screening Levels. Both very dangerous. If ADEQ gives WM an air permit it would be like giving whiskey to an alcoholic that has flunked three AIR DUI tests. Sad as that agency is supposed to protect people, wildlife, and the environment. I guess ADEQ does not want to bite the hand that feeds them as ADEQ gets almost 2 million a year from WM-Eco-Vista Tontitown.
Tontitown resident Mark Calcagni
The ADEQ informed residents at the meeting that the public hearing is a part of the application process for Eco-Vista Landfill. You can learn more about the public hearing here.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

WPAFB working to combat forever chemicals, water contamination
WPAFB working to combat forever chemicals, water contamination

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

WPAFB working to combat forever chemicals, water contamination

DAYTON, Ohio (WDTN) — Wright-Patterson Air Force Base officials gave 2 NEWS an inside look at efforts to combat forever chemicals in their water. Wright-Patt is working to reduce water contamination on base through several water treatment sites. This comes after the EPA updated the maximum PFAS containment levels in 2024. Trump administration moves to roll back Biden-era PFAs water protections PFAS stands for Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, which are synthetic compounds with properties to repel oil, water and other liquids. This water contamination comes from 'film forming foam' used in firefighting, wastewater treatment plants, agricultural runoff and more. The Air Force Base plans to have five treatment sites in total — currently, two are active. WPAFB has treated more than 31 million gallons of water so far. The deadline to meet the new EPA standards is 2029. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

EPA holds hearing on fate of contaminated Waukegan site
EPA holds hearing on fate of contaminated Waukegan site

Chicago Tribune

time3 days ago

  • Chicago Tribune

EPA holds hearing on fate of contaminated Waukegan site

Citing concerns of asbestos-contaminated material surfacing adjacent to the infamous Johns Manville site due to a freeze and thaw cycle, the EPA held a public meeting in Waukegan on Wednesday sharing proposals to best monitor and clean the 1-acre area. A few dozen residents and local officials gathered at Waukegan City Hall for the presentation by David Nadel, remedial project manager with the EPA. A public comment period on the proposed plan will run until June 27. The Johns Manville site, about 350 acres sitting along Lake Michigan, was once home to a manufacturing facility that contaminated the area with asbestos. Johns-Manville ceased operations on the site in 1998, according to the EPA, and its former manufacturing buildings were demolished in 2000 and 2001. Today, it's one of five Superfund sites in Waukegan, areas that the federal government recognizes as especially hazardous and manages cleanup efforts. The area discussed on Wednesday is a relatively small, roughly 1-acre section that is within the Illinois Beach Nature Preserve, known as Operable Unit 6, or OU6. Representatives of the EPA emphasized during the meeting that the areas in question are not readily accessible to residents, and area neighborhoods are not at risk of exposure. Material contaminated with asbestos was discovered and removed from a road in OU6 in 1998, but more fragments were found the following year. The freeze and thaw cycle of the area was causing the contaminated material to come to the surface, Nadel said. This is especially dangerous because weathering can cause the asbestos to become more 'friable,' he said, meaning it can be more easily broken down and spread. Two potential action plans were presented. The first, estimated to cost $554,000, consisted of 'periodic manual removal' of asbestos contamination and disposal at an approved facility. This would also include visual monitoring, maintaining existing access restrictions, land-use control and maintaining existing fencing at the property line. However, that option doesn't 'provide adequate warning to authorized users or trespassers' of the hazards, according to Nadel, and lacks measures to evaluate effectiveness beyond visual monitoring. The second proposed plan, which is estimated to cost $967,000, would expand on the previous plan, including enhanced monitoring, additional access control and new signage, among various other efforts. The EPA considered the second the 'most effective remedy in the long term.' Residents shared comments and concerns during the meeting. One, pointing to the area's sizable Spanish-speaking community, asked if there would be translations of communications offered going forward. An EPA representative responded positively to the recommendation during the meeting. OU6 is subject to controlled burns, and residents discussed what risks those could pose for the area. While Nadel said they had found asbestos air contamination increased during burns, it remained under what is considered the safe limit. Some were concerned about the future of the site, noting the decades of work already done and questioning when the site will be safe. Lake County Board member Mary Ross-Cunningham, whose district includes the site and who attended the meeting, said she hoped it would one day be determined to be clean sooner rather than later. 'That'll be a big hit for Waukegan residents,' Ross-Cunningham said. She voiced her support for the cleanup proposal and praised the EPA for its continuing work to monitor and clean the site.

Air quality alert in effect for Chicago area due to Canadian wildfires
Air quality alert in effect for Chicago area due to Canadian wildfires

CBS News

time3 days ago

  • CBS News

Air quality alert in effect for Chicago area due to Canadian wildfires

As wildfires continue to rage in western Canada, the Environmental Protection Agency issued its first alert of the year for the Chicago area. The EPA is warning wildfire smoke will cause particle pollution on Thursday. This can bring potential health hazards to anyone with respiratory or pulmonary disorders. The air quality index is at 154 in the orange category. For reference, "good" air quality in the green category is an index of 0 to 50. In Illinois, an alert is prompted only when air quality is forecasted to be at or above the orange category for two or more consecutive days. The action day includes Cook County, DuPage, Kane, Kendall, Grundy, Lake, McHenry, and Will counties. The Canadian fires began in mid-May. Officials declared a state of emergency in Manitoba and Saskatchewan, where crews and military forces were battling this week to try to contain dozens of out-of-control fires. There have been dozens of active fires and over 33,000 people have been forced to evacuate their homes. So far, two people have died.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store