Olympic champion Faith Kipyegon falls short in her attempt to break 4-minute mile
Three-time Olympic champion Faith Kipyegon failed in her bid Thursday to become the first woman to run a mile in under four minutes.
Kipyegon, the Olympic 1,500-meter gold medalist from Kenya, ran in 4 minutes, 06.42 seconds — the fastest mile in history by a woman — at Stade Charléty in Paris.
Her time was better than her world record of 4:07.64 but won't be recognized by the international federation because the Nike-sponsored event dubbed ' Breaking4: Faith Kipyegon vs. the 4-Minute Mile ' was unofficial. She was supported by pacemakers and equipped with Nike's latest innovations, from her aerodynamic track suit to her spikes.
'I gave everything today to try, it was not about running a tactical race' Kipyegon said. 'It was the first trial. I've seen it's possible.
'And I think next time we will catch up with the light,' she added, joking about the Wavelight, the pace-setting system using a series of LED lights on the inside of the track making it easier to follow whether an athlete is ahead, or falling behind.
The 31-year-old Kipyegon looked exhausted as she reached the finish and fell on her back as she was surrounded by photographers.
Her attempt took place on a balmy summer's evening with a temperature of 25 degrees Celsius (77 Fahrenheit) and limited wind, in front of an audience of a few thousand people.
She used a team of 13 elite pace setters made of 11 men and two women who were positioned in front and behind her to reduce drag.
But Kipyegon appeared to struggle midway through the race and failed in her attempt to shave at least 7.65 seconds off her world record. To achieve the feat, Kipyegon would have needed to run each of her four laps an average of about two seconds faster.
Among the guests in Paris were Carl Lewis and Kipyegon's fellow Kenyan runner, longtime friend and training partner Eliud Kipchoge.
It was more than 71 years ago when British runner Roger Bannister became the first man to eclipse four minutes in 3:59.4.
Kipyegon set the women's mile world record nearly two years ago during a Diamond League meet in Monaco.
She won her third straight 1,500 Olympic title in Paris last August. A month before that, she broke her own 1,500 record on the same track where she ran on Thursday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
20 minutes ago
- Hans India
Neeraj Chopra sponsors fan a 'full VVIP experience' and accommodation for NC Classic in Bengaluru
New Delhi: Two-time Olympic medallist Neeraj Chopra surprised a fan on Friday by offering him a "full VVIP experience" and accommodation for the upcoming Neeraj Chopra Classic on July 5 at the Sree Kanteerava Stadium in Bengaluru. Ahead of the much-anticipated athletic event of the season on Indian soil, Chopra's fan named Ranjith, from Coimbatore, asked for money on social media to attend next month's showpiece event. "If anyone sponsor me 2000 rupees, I can go to watch this from Coimbatore," he posted on X on June 25. Replying to his post on Friday, Chopra not only agreed to give him free "VVIP" ticket but also assured his stay at a nearby luxury hotel. Chopra responded on Ranjith's post saying, "Hi, Ranjith. You've got a full VVIP experience waiting for you in Bengaluru because your trip to the @nc_classic is on me! And thanks to @RadissonHotels, you'll be staying about 90 metres away from me. See you soon!" Initially scheduled for May 24, the event was deferred due to India-Pakistan conflict, keeping security in mind, and to show solidarity with the nation. As a World Athletics-sanctioned Gold event, the Neeraj Chopra Classic promises to elevate India's status on the global athletics map. It will feature a stellar line-up of elite javelin throwers, including The event will see the participation of several Olympic medallists, including Tokyo Olympics gold medallist Chopra, Thomas Rohler, Anderson Peters and others. Chopra played a pivotal role in the staging of the event in India and sending invitations to global stars of the game to participate. Chopra won the javelin throw title in the Ostrava Golden Spike 2025 meet with a best throw of 85.29 metres on Tuesday. He had clinched victory in the prestigious meet with one throw remaining as his best effort of 85.29m remained unbeaten after six rounds, securing him yet another top podium finish this season. It was the second title for Chopra within a month after he triumphed in the Paris Diamond League meet last week.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Hockey: Indian women's team face relegation from Pro League – here are scenarios and what's at stake for Harendra Singh's side
Over this weekend in Berlin, the women's FIH Pro League season will come to a close with six teams in action in double-headers. There has been little doubt about which team will finish top of the table, because there really is no one close to the Netherlands in women's hockey at the moment. Having wrapped up the title, the Olympic champions will face Belgium in a no-stakes top three clash. It is at the bottom of the table where the real drama lies. And it involves an Indian team desperate to earn some points to stay in the league for the next season. The three teams that are locked in the battle to avoid relegation are Germany, England and China. While India will face Asian rivals – and arguably the most-improved women's international hockey side in the recent year or so – China, Germany and England go up against each other. With 9 teams competing in the Pro League (both men's and women's), there are two main storylines to follow. Closer to the top, there is a spot to be won at the World Cup next year (for teams that have not already qualified). And at the bottom, the last-placed team gets relegated from the Pro League for the following year. When the Pro League began, there were initially doubts around the importance of the tournament in the calendar and not many teams were sold on it – including India. But gradually, it has gained prominence and relevance. Many teams still see it as a platform to groom talent but results have a meaning because there are end-goals to work towards. After 14 matches played, India are at the bottom of the table with 10 points, having won twice in regulation time, and once earning the shootout bonus after a draw. Germany and England have 13 points and 11 points, respectively. A reminder of the points system: An outright win within regulation time of four quarters means a team will be awarded 3 points. A draw means both teams will earn 1 point before a shootout is played. Then 1 bonus point is awarded to the winner of the shootout. There are no points to the loser of a match in normal time. For tiebreakers, the first criterion is number of wins, followed by goal difference and then goals for. Former India coach Janneke Schopman is the current head coach of Germany and she'd have been mighty relieved after beating China in a tense match on Wednesday, getting one over a familiar rival in Alyson Annan. Germany have destiny in their own hands as they just have to avoid losing outright against England in both matches. England, just below Germany, would be hoping to pull off at least one outright win. David Ralph's side had a fairly productive home leg in London, where they registered two important wins to earn six massive points – one against Australia and another versus Spain, a mighty impressive 4-1 win in the last match at Lee Valley. It is that result that pushed them above India into a relatively comfortable position. India meanwhile, face two daunting matches against Alyson's China, who'd be smarting after the defeat against Germany. China are, of course, the Paris Olympics silver medallists too and will be red-hot favourites to win the Asia Cup later this year. India coach Harendra Singh, on the other hand, has seen his side suffer two close defeats against Australia, and managed to hold Argentina to a draw, and then lost twice against Belgium. For Schopman's Germany, it's simple and in their own hands. They just have to win more points than England. Two draws against England would be enough if they lose both the shootouts. Given their much better goal difference, one outright win for Germany would be enough as India can only equal them in that case. If they lose both matches, however, they'd be under pressure. England are just one point ahead of India, so they are vulnerable too if they can't get a couple of points at least from Germany. England will be safe if India lose both their matches. If England win at least one match against Germany, India will need at least four points from six against China. Finally, India have the toughest task of all three teams. They need at least one positive result from the two matches against China, not easy to begin with. If India get 3 points at least out of 6, England will be forced to win at least one match against Germany. If India somehow get 6 points, they'd still be dependent on England dropping at least one point against Germany. If India do get relegated, then they would have to compete in the next edition of FIH Nations Cup – which is the route they took to earn their current spot in the league. The biggest downside of not being in the Pro League, especially leading up to a World Cup-cum-Asian Games year in 2026, would the lack of structured matches against the best teams in the world. Teams outside the Pro League would be dependent on arranging bilateral Test matches against top teams, and that would be contingent on said teams having time off from their calendars. Even when Pro League wasn't always a priority tournament, it played a big role in the Indian men's team's run to bronze in Tokyo – just the regularity of competing at the top. Having already suffered the setback of not qualifying for Paris 2024, this would further set Indian women's hockey back. Vinayakk Mohanarangan is Senior Assistant Editor and is based in New Delhi. ... Read More
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
After Saina Nehwal and PV Sindhu's highs, Indian badminton hits a new low
Saina Nehwal and PV Sindhu Badminton was the sport that India regarded with most promise. Over the past decade and half, it quietly managed to make its own corner in a sporting landscape dominated by cricket and its various versions. The reasons were straight and simple. The girls and boys of Indian badminton delivered often – and usually with minimum fuss and fanfare. Today, however, the shuttle game is experiencing diminishing returns. Poor results in the last two years are a cause for concern, but what is more alarming is that far from being a blip in the larger scheme, the future appears bleak. There are no names to succeed or build on the exploits of the once-fabled Saina and Sindhu, the former, a pioneering star now 35, and the 29-year-old double Olympic medallist struggling to clear the initial hurdles. From once clinching three women's singles medals in successive Olympics, scaling the peak of men's badminton by winning the Thomas Cup in 2022 and winning the first Asian Games men's doubles gold in 2023, giving the Chinese an almighty scare with our rise and intent, to currently not having a single player in the semifinals of the All England in 2025, the fortunes of Indian shuttlers have plummeted. Barring Satwiksairaj Rankireddy and Chirag Shetty and to an extent Lakshya Sen , the rest of the Indians are no longer pulling their weight. The days of Saina Nehwal , PV Sindhu , Kidambi Srikanth, Sai Praneeth, HS Prannoy and Satwik-Chirag being the tournament favourites look a distant memory now. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 목에 주름이 생기는 '진짜' 이유 뷰앤디 더 알아보기 Undo But it had been coming for a while now. Ever since HS Prannoy's Malaysia Open Super-500 title in January 2023, a worrying trend has emerged with the Indians not being able to win a singles title. Only the doubles duo of Satwik-Chirag managed to win a couple of titles. In April this year, India registered one of its poorest performances at the Sudirman Cup. Having lost to Denmark and Indonesia with an identical margin of 1-4, India exited in the group stage. Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW! Singles, a worry Things could not have been more promising than in the years of the last decade. A year after Saina Nehwal won the Olympic bronze at the London Games, Sindhu arrived on the scene with a bronze at the World championships in 2013. While Saina and Sindhu were winning medals, Parupalli Kashyap, Kidambi Srikanth, Prannoy and B Sai Praneeth too started gaining attention in men's section. Srikanth would go on to become the World No. 1 and in 2017, win four Super Series titles. In 2019 Sindhu was crowned world champion. The same year Sai Praneeth won bronze at the World championships. This May, Srikanth gave us glimpses of his former self when he made the final of the Malaysia Masters. The outing fizzled out even though it would prove a tremendous personal boost for the 32-year-old former Thomas Cup-winning captain (2022). Owing to his low ranking (65th during the Malaysian event) Srikanth failed to get entry in the next few tournaments. At the time of writing, Srikanth had bowed out of the US Open (Super 300) in the first round. The Satwik-Chirag pair arrived on the scene to assert India's dominance in men's doubles, notably at the Commonwealth Games. Of late, they too have been struggling with fitness issues and are yet to reach a final despite competing in six tournaments this year. The onus to lead the men's singles challenge is on Lakshya Sen. Despite showing a lot of promise, reaching the All England final and winning a bronze at the Worlds, the Almora shuttler has won only two Super-500 titles. The wait for a Super-750 or Super-1000 title continues. Lakshya apart, there's no one at the level of even a Srikanth or Prannoy. It is the women's scene, however, that's more worrisome. There's no clear answer to who'll lead the Indian challenge. Understandably, Saina and Sindhu are big shoes to fill, but the younger lot is nowhere near the standards the illustrious duo set as they took rapid strides early on in their careers. Malvika Bansod, Aakarshi Kashyap, Unnati Hooda, Anmol Kharb, Tanvi Patri and others are trying to fill in the gap, but to no avail. Dipping fortunes When Pullela Gopichand took over as the chief coach of the Indian team in 2006, he promised to make it a formidable force. It was a time when no Indian was in the top 10 and only a handful figured in top 100. Having set himself a lofty target, Gopichand achieved his first success at the Commonwealth Games in 2010. The major achievement by an Indian was when Saina bagged the first-ever badminton medal at the London Olympics in 2012. With Sindhu joining the bandwagon, Indian badminton was well and truly on the upward path, till it hit a roadblock. One reason contributing to the fall could be that Indian badminton was flourishing under a golden generation. And as happens with most over-achieving generations, their replacements struggle once the originals wither away. Unlike the Chinese or Malaysian feeder systems, in India, there was no proper plan to put a system in place that would produce players regularly. A talent-search team to identify potential players was never in place. Though Saina and Sindhu inspired lakhs of youngsters to take up badminton, there are very few trained coaches to nurture them. Crucially, as the numbers grew, even incumbent coaches present were not groomed to address the rising demand. Identifying the core If a core group of emerging players had been identified, and groomed, dividing it into two groups, elite and developing, to facilitate competition, things would never have been this poor. Players like Malvika, Aakarshi, Tanvi and others could have been brought under one roof and trained better. But in typical Indian sporting short sightedness, there was never any move in this direction. This lacuna widened the gap between the elite and emerging players. While the internationals kept playing at the top level, the second-string suffered for want of competition. Even now, there is little effort to bridge the gap. Promising players lack guidance While the national association would disagree, fact remains that there is no one to take care of promising junior and sub-junior players across the country. Badminton Association of India (BAI) secretary Sanjay Mishra acknowledged that progress has not been on expected lines. 'Undoubtedly our performances suffered a setback due to injuries to key players. However, transition of the next generation also requires time to strengthen and sustain our competitive edge,' Mishra told TOI. 'BAI is focused on enhancing coaching, injury management and talent development to ensure longterm excellence. While we are committed to building a strong ecosystem for global success, we must acknowledge that progress takes time,' he added, 'At the National Centre of Excellence, under the guidance of Olympic medallist coach Ivan Sozonov and coach Park, we are focused on nurturing the next generation of champions along with other academies in Hyderabad and Bengaluru. ' The former junior national coach sounded optimistic about the future. 'A notable number of junior players are already ranked in the top 10, the intensity of competition at domestic events reflects the rising calibre of emerging talents. Players are challenging and even surpassing established champions. With a growing talent pool and focus on structured coaching, we are confident of a strong future in Indian badminton,' Mishra said. Coaches should be trained and categorised At its recent annual general meeting (AGM), BAI unveiled a Rs 9.75-crore annual plan to drive the growth of badminton. While there are several interesting provisions, more emphasis should have been given on grooming the coaches. Why Team India will practice behind closed doors in Birmingham, details of bonding session and more 'There should be three categories of coaches. The first category for identifying nascent talent and grooming them. The second should see them through their formative years and send them to national camps when they reach 12-14 years. At the third stage, well-trained coaches should nurture them and turn them into international talents. Nothing of this is happening,' a source said. BAI allocated Rs 73 lakh to offer monthly retainership to Olympians and former internationals now training players at national camps. But will their experience be enough to get the next Saina and Sindhu? Very few champions transitioned into successful coaches. There is a long-term demand for trained coaches. Talent identification and grooming deserve top priority. More trained coaches should be picked and programmes charted. Overhaul is the need of the hour There is nothing BAI can do with the results, but if they want to improve Indian badminton's standing, a proper system is the need of the hour, with a clear three to five-year plan up and ready. The association and coach should decide the tournament schedule of top shuttlers, particularly during the Olympic and Asian Games years. Several veteran players and administrators are of the opinion that a plan like one implemented by Pullela Gopichand should be applied all over the country. If so many champions can come from one academy, why can't a few more come from other parts of the country? There is no dearth of talent, but a proper system should be put in place at the earliest, otherwise this shuttle service will chug along the road to mediocrity. Game On Season 1 continues with Mirabai Chanu's inspiring story. Watch Episode 2 here.
