Texas lawmakers consider child care bills that could impact 95K children, 850 communities
Texas lawmakers are considering two child care bills that would prioritize child care workers' access to child care themselves and could mitigate child care deserts seen in low-income communities.
The bills were discussed on Monday, March 17, by the Senate Committee on Economic Development with testimony from advocates and child care providers urging lawmakers to push the bills forward. They said the passage of the bills would address two critical gaps exacerbated by the state's lengthy waiting list and child care funding disparities. Now, it's up to the discretion of Committee Chair Phil King, a Republican from Weatherford, on what happens next. It remains to be seen when or if these bills would move forward in the legislative process.
Senate Bill 462, sponsored by Sen. Lois Kolkhorst, would put qualifying child care workers' children among those at the top of the state's list of 95,000 children awaiting tuition subsidies and other services. These staffers must work at least 25 hours a week and must stay in their roles for at least a year from the time their child receives priority on the list. If the parent leaves the child care workforce before the one-year anniversary, their priority status would be removed.
'How do you go to work if you don't have child care? That's a question for all of Texans. But then to say that I want to go to work in the child care industry, but I have no place to put my child — (It's) just a little bit of common sense tweak here that would allow us to potentially get more workers, and qualified workers,' said Kolkhorst, a Republican from Brenham. 'It's a tweak, but not an overhaul.'
Latoya Mayberry, owner and operator of Toya's Precious Jewels Academy in Midland, testified the bill would ensure hardworking parents could receive needed financial assistance without 'unnecessary delays.' She noted how one of her employees will soon return to work from maternity leave, as long as her child care scholarship is in place when she comes back. If not, this could impact staffing ratios at Mayberry's center, causing her to close a classroom. She also shared an example of a different employee who was unable to secure financial assistance for child care before returning to work.
'I made the decision to provide care for her baby at no cost. I did this not because it was a sound business decision at all, but because I know the value of every employee who works for me. If we do not support our child care workers and our workforce, we risk losing the very people who make quality early education possible,' Mayberry said. 'This isn't an isolated issue.'
🚨 More top stories from our newsroom:
→ Gateway Church founder Robert Morris booked at Oklahoma jail
→ Grand Prairie police search for missing 5-year-old
→ Threat of deportation leaves some families wary of submitting FAFSA
[Get our breaking news alerts.]
Committee members also heard from other advocates who spoke in favor of Senate Bill 972, which would give local workforce development boards the flexibility to provide the maximum amount of reimbursement funding for providers who accept child care tuition subsidies. The boards, which operate under the Texas Workforce Commission, distribute these funds at the local level to centers part of the state's quality improvement program — Texas Rising Star. The centers with higher ratings receive more funding, but the dollar amounts are limited by an area's market rate. This means low-income communities receive less dollars.
The bill — sponsored by Sen. Judith Zaffirini, a Democrat from Laredo — would not decrease the average number of children served daily through subsidized care. Kim Kofron, senior director of education at Children at Risk, told the Star-Telegram that communities with philanthropic funding could fill in the gaps of providing higher reimbursement rates in the case that no additional state funding is provided. Currently, local workforce boards are unable to even accept private funding, so the bill would address that obstacle.
'It's a simple but critical change that supports child care providers, stabilizes our workforce and ensures all families, regardless of their ZIP codes, to have access to high quality education,' Kofron told the committee.
There are 850 child care deserts statewide for low-income working families, meaning there are 850 ZIP codes where the demand for child care is three times higher than the number of available child care seats, she said.
Sen. Charles Schwertner, a Republican from Georgetown, asked if the bill would drive up prices for providers in the same region or if providers would want to enroll only children who receive state subsidies. Reagan Miller, a director of the child care and early learning division at the Texas Workforce Commission, said the funding change would only affect the children receiving subsidies and underscored how there's a limited amount of state funding for those subsidies.
'If I have a program that serves 100 kids, and I have five that receive a scholarship through the Child Care Services program, only those five children would receive a higher reimbursement rate above that provider's published rate. The other 95 children that are paid for by the family, the cost of their care would not increase so it's limited to the subset of children that are enrolled in our program,' Miller said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

an hour ago
Hegseth says the Pentagon has contingency plans to invade Greenland if necessary
WASHINGTON -- WASHINGTON (AP) — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth appeared to acknowledge that the Pentagon has developed plans to take over Greenland and Panama by force if necessary but refused to answer repeated questions during a hotly combative congressional hearing Thursday about his use of Signal chats to discuss military operations. Democratic members of the House Armed Services Committee repeatedly got into heated exchanges with Hegseth, with some of the toughest lines of questioning coming from military veterans as many demanded yes or no answers and he tried to avoid direct responses about his actions as Pentagon chief. In one back-and-forth, Hegseth did provide an eyebrow-raising answer. Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., asked whether the Pentagon has plans to take Greenland or Panama by force if necessary. 'Our job at the Defense Department is to have plans for any contingency,' Hegseth said several times. It is not unusual for the Pentagon to draw up contingency plans for conflicts that have not arisen, but his handling of the questions prompted a Republican lawmaker to step in a few minutes later. 'It is not your testimony today that there are plans at the Pentagon for taking by force or invading Greenland, correct?' said Rep. Mike Turner, R-Ohio. As Hegseth started to repeat his answer about contingency plans, Turner added emphatically, 'I sure as hell hope that is not your testimony.' 'We look forward to working with Greenland to ensure that it is secured from any potential threats,' Hegseth responded. Time and again, lawmakers pressed Hegseth to answer questions he has avoided for months, including during the two previous days of hearings on Capitol Hill. And frustration boiled over. "You're an embarrassment to this country. You're unfit to lead," Rep. Salud Carbajal snapped, the California Democrat's voice rising. 'You should just get the hell out.' Hegseth's use of two Signal chats to discuss plans for U.S. strikes on Houthi rebels in Yemen with other U.S. leaders as well as members of his family prompted dizzying exchanges with lawmakers. He was pressed multiple times over whether or not he shared classified information and if he should face accountability if he did. Hegseth argued that the classification markings of any information about those military operations could not be discussed with lawmakers. That became a quick trap, as Hegseth has asserted that nothing he posted — on strike times and munitions dropped in March — was classified. His questioner, Rep. Seth Moulton, a Massachusetts Democrat and Marine veteran, jumped on the disparity. 'You can very well disclose whether or not it was classified,' Moulton said. 'What's not classified is that it was an incredible, successful mission,' Hegseth responded. A Pentagon watchdog report on his Signal use is expected soon. Moulton asked Hegseth whether he would hold himself accountable if the inspector general finds that he placed classified information on Signal, a commercially available app. Hegseth would not directly say, only noting that he serves 'at the pleasure of the president.' President Donald Trump has said multiple times that he wants to take control of the strategic, mineral-rich island nation of Greenland, long a U.S. ally. Those remarks have been met with flat rejections from Greenland's leaders. 'Greenland is not for sale,' Jacob Isbosethsen, Greenland's representative to the U.S, said Thursday at a forum in Washington sponsored by the Arctic Institute. In an effort not to show the Pentagon's hand on its routine effort to have plans for everything, Hegseth danced around the direct question from Smith, leading to the confusion. 'Speaking on behalf of the American people, I don't think the American people voted for President Trump because they were hoping we would invade Greenland," Smith said.

Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Gov. Abbott deploys over 5,000 Texas National Guard troops ahead of planned ‘No Kings' protests
AUSTIN, Texas — Texas Gov. Greg Abbott said Thursday he has ordered the deployment of more than 5,000 Texas National Guard troops, along with more than 2,000 state police, to help local law enforcement manage protests against President Donald Trump and the ongoing federal immigration raids. Abbott's announcement did not detail where the troops were sent, but some were seen at a protest Wednesday night in downtown San Antonio near the Alamo. That protest drew hundreds of demonstrators but did not erupt into violence. More protests are planned on Saturday in San Antonio and across Texas in cities such as Houston, Austin and Dallas as part of the national 'No Kings' movement. Protests earlier this week in Austin and Dallas led to brief clashes with police who used chemical irritants to disperse the crowds. About a dozen were arrested. 'Peaceful protests are part of the fabric of our nation, but Texas will not tolerate the lawlessness we have seen in Los Angeles in response to President Donald Trump's enforcement of immigration law,' Abbott said. 'Anyone engaging in acts of violence or damaging property will be arrested and held accountable to the full extent of the law.' The Republican Texas governor's move stands in sharp contrast to California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, who has publicly clashed with Trump over his decision to deploy National Guard and Marine personnel in Los Angeles. Mayors in San Antonio and Austin have said they did not ask for Abbott to mobilize the National Guard to their cities. Abbott, who has been governor since 2014, has been aggressive in deploying the Guard in the past, particularly for immigration enforcement on the border. Since 2021, the Texas Guard has played a prominent role in Abbott's Operation Lone Star, and thousands of troops have been deployed to help clamp down on border crossings. An agreement with the Trump administration in February gave Texas National Guard soldiers the authority to arrest and detain people for entering the U.S. illegally from Mexico. Texas also has established a permanent border base for Guard troops, an 80-acre (30-hectare) installation that will house up to 1,800 troops when completed. Vertuno writes for the Associated Press.


Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Hegseth says the Pentagon has contingency plans to invade Greenland if necessary
WASHINGTON (AP) — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth appeared to acknowledge that the Pentagon has developed plans to take over Greenland and Panama by force if necessary but refused to answer repeated questions during a hotly combative congressional hearing Thursday about his use of Signal chats to discuss military operations. Democratic members of the House Armed Services Committee repeatedly got into heated exchanges with Hegseth, with some of the toughest lines of questioning coming from military veterans as many demanded yes or no answers and he tried to avoid direct responses about his actions as Pentagon chief . In one back-and-forth, Hegseth did provide an eyebrow-raising answer. Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., asked whether the Pentagon has plans to take Greenland or Panama by force if necessary. 'Our job at the Defense Department is to have plans for any contingency,' Hegseth said several times. It is not unusual for the Pentagon to draw up contingency plans for conflicts that have not arisen, but his handling of the questions prompted a Republican lawmaker to step in a few minutes later. 'It is not your testimony today that there are plans at the Pentagon for taking by force or invading Greenland, correct?' said Rep. Mike Turner, R-Ohio. As Hegseth started to repeat his answer about contingency plans, Turner added emphatically, 'I sure as hell hope that is not your testimony.' 'We look forward to working with Greenland to ensure that it is secured from any potential threats,' Hegseth responded. Time and again, lawmakers pressed Hegseth to answer questions he has avoided for months, including during the two previous days of hearings on Capitol Hill. And frustration boiled over. 'You're an embarrassment to this country. You're unfit to lead,' Rep. Salud Carbajal snapped, the California Democrat's voice rising. 'You should just get the hell out.' Questions emerge on Signal chats and if details Hegseth shared were classified Hegseth's use of two Signal chats to discuss plans for U.S. strikes on Houthi rebels in Yemen with other U.S. leaders as well as members of his family prompted dizzying exchanges with lawmakers. He was pressed multiple times over whether or not he shared classified information and if he should face accountability if he did. Hegseth argued that the classification markings of any information about those military operations could not be discussed with lawmakers. That became a quick trap, as Hegseth has asserted that nothing he posted — on strike times and munitions dropped in March — was classified. His questioner, Rep. Seth Moulton, a Massachusetts Democrat and Marine veteran, jumped on the disparity. 'You can very well disclose whether or not it was classified,' Moulton said. 'What's not classified is that it was an incredible, successful mission,' Hegseth responded. A Pentagon watchdog report on his Signal use is expected soon. Moulton asked Hegseth whether he would hold himself accountable if the inspector general finds that he placed classified information on Signal, a commercially available app. Hegseth would not directly say, only noting that he serves 'at the pleasure of the president.' Democrats ask about plans for action against Greenland and Panama President Donald Trump has said multiple times that he wants to take control of the strategic, mineral-rich island nation of Greenland, long a U.S. ally. Those remarks have been met with flat rejections from Greenland's leaders. 'Greenland is not for sale,' Jacob Isbosethsen, Greenland's representative to the U.S, said Thursday at a forum in Washington sponsored by the Arctic Institute. In an effort not to show the Pentagon's hand on its routine effort to have plans for everything, Hegseth danced around the direct question from Smith, leading to the confusion. 'Speaking on behalf of the American people, I don't think the American people voted for President Trump because they were hoping we would invade Greenland,' Smith said. ___ AP writer David Klepper in Washington contributed to this report. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .