
Robust municipal governance holds the key to preventing waterlogging and health hazards during monsoon
Written by Lakshita Handa and Pragya Singh
As the monsoon inches closer and orange alerts are issued in multiple states, with a few more reeling under intense bouts of non-seasonal rainfall, urban local bodies (ULBs) need to step up before the condition of our cities turns worse. Given that most policy interventions in this domain are post-facto and reactive, there is a need to craft a resilient urban governance framework .
Whose responsibility is it?
As per the Constitution's 12th Schedule, matters pertaining to urban planning, including town planning, fall within the domain of ULBs. Issues such as flood control and drainage maintenance are squarely within the list of functions that state governments must devolve to urban local bodies (ULBs). Poorly maintained drainage systems, coupled with lackadaisical preparatory and responsive action frameworks, aggravate existing gaps in the governance of urban spaces. Paucity of funds and limited autonomy over how to spend allocated funds also impede the ability of ULBs to discharge their functions effectively.
In a 2024 compendium examining the health of ULBs in 18 States, the CAG noted a glaring 42 per cent disparity between the resources and expenditures of these agencies. It also found that only 29 per cent of the expenditure that ULBs incurred was channelled towards undertaking programmatic and development work. Most states did not devolve the urban planning function to ULBs, as mandated by the 74th amendment of the Constitution.
The CAG also found that self-collected funds accounted for only 32 per cent of the ULB's total revenue, underscoring their high dependency on state governments for funds.
Monsoon preparedness is not a new thing. States with geographic vulnerability to cyclones — such as Odisha and Bihar — have developed tailored schemes to address the urban governance challenges. This issue was addressed at the national level by the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs through the Urban Flooding SOPs released in 2017. The SOP outlines a three-phase urban flood management strategy.
(a) Pre-monsoon: Mitigation planning based on geographic characteristics of the urban area; (b) During-monsoon: Involving warning systems, citizen engagement and implementation of relief measures; and (c) Post-monsoon: Dedicated to restoring infrastructure and rehabilitating affected populations. The SOP, however, is only recommendatory in nature and has not been adopted in a uniform manner. As a result, the efforts of ULBs have been fragmented. There is also an overall lack of uptake for mechanisms that appropriately address the urban governance issues emerging during the monsoon season.
What can urban local bodies do better?
Each year, after heavy downpours, seemingly well-equipped cities, including those that are at the forefront of the smart city initiative, come to a complete standstill. Garbage clogs drains due to inefficient waste management practices. Often, it leads to health hazards.
To address these challenges, one must identify the vulnerabilities of existing urban infrastructure and systems. Creating a decentralised model for risk mitigation and management has historically proved to be more efficient than undertaking macro-level initiatives for larger areas. Any urban action plan should be responsive to the specific needs of vulnerable groups, and information should also be adequately disseminated to such groups to raise awareness.
The Odisha Government's urban flood and water management action plan for ULBs is one such example of a preventive, preparatory and response strategy. The Housing and Urban Development Department has ordered the identification of hotspots with a high propensity of waterlogging and has deployed necessary equipment for appropriate emergency responses in such areas. Another key feature of the plan includes inspecting and desilting drainage systems, while covering open drains to prevent blockages. As per the plan, authorities have been given the task to designate certain public buildings as emergency shelters with requisite food, water and sanitation facilities, particularly for vulnerable groups. Officers were appointed at the zonal level to oversee emergency responses in their respective areas, and ULBs have been required to maintain 24/7 control rooms for addressing public grievances.
Focussing on health management, the plan also includes larvicide spraying and regular fogging to prevent infections caused by the breeding of mosquitoes in stagnant water. Notably, the plan emphasises the need for community involvement through the participation of local volunteers and self-help groups.
For ULBs to discharge these functions effectively, there is a need for fiscal decentralisation and concomitant optimisation of revenue streams within local self-governments. Since the utilisation of funds remains a pressing issue, local bodies should formulate medium-term fiscal plans with clear budgeting and timelines to ensure that available resources are utilised towards carrying out civic work. This will enable such bodies to estimate their financing requirements and thus improve the quality of infrastructure and services. These budgeting exercises may be tracked through finance management systems and robust auditing mechanisms to monitor disbursals and promote transparency.
While the Centre may provide phased support to prevent urban flooding through schematic interventions, the responsibility of employing monsoon flooding mitigation measures is largely on ULBs and states. To effectively discharge this function, suitable budgetary allocations should be made at the very outset.
Key features from Odisha's monsoon preparedness and response action plan may be suitably emulated in other states. For instance, drain cleaning and desilting operations may be pre-emptively undertaken in the areas that are historically most susceptible to waterlogging. Encroachments should also be removed for the efficient movement of stormwater.
During the season, necessary equipment, such as to remove fallen trees, may be kept on standby to prevent traffic disturbances. Existing SOPs and guidelines on urban flooding should be operationalised through better inter-departmental coordination within state governments and ULBs.
The sponge city urban planning model, as implemented in China, could be considered at a broader level by strengthening green infrastructure like parks, wetlands and permeable pavements. Though radical, moving away from 'draining' to 'soaking' may serve as a long-term sustainable solution, which could ultimately improve the health of our waterways and ecosystems. Community engagement and consultation should lie at the heart of these action plans to foster a sense of ownership and responsibility.
The writers are Senior Resident Fellows at Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


United News of India
29 minutes ago
- United News of India
After 18 years, SC closes petitions on Human Rights Violations by Salwa Judum in Chhattisgarh
New Delhi, June 3 (UNI) Bringing closure to a long-running legal battle, the Supreme Court has disposed of all pending petitions filed by sociologist Nandini Sundar and others concerning alleged human rights violations committed by Salwa Judum activists and security forces in Chhattisgarh. These matters had remained before the apex court for nearly 18 years. The case traces back to the Chhattisgarh government's controversial deployment of local tribal youth as Special Police Officers (SPOs) to combat Maoist/Naxalite insurgency. The SPOs, often associated with groups like the 'Koya Commandos' and Salwa Judum, were accused of committing serious rights violations in the course of anti-insurgency operations. In a landmark 2011 ruling, the Supreme Court had directed the State of Chhattisgarh to disband and disarm all SPOs, noting grave concerns over state-sponsored vigilantism. Despite that judgment, two writ petitions and one contempt petition remained pending until recently. A bench comprising Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma disposed of the cases, holding that the writ petitions were closed on the ground that the reliefs sought had already been addressed through the 2011 judgment. The contempt petition, which challenged the Chhattisgarh Auxiliary Armed Police Force Act, 2011, was found to be outside the scope of contempt jurisdiction, as it effectively sought new writs in the guise of contempt, the court ruled. The bench clarified that the enactment of a law cannot be considered contempt of court merely because it follows a judicial order. 'The promulgation simpliciter of an enactment is only an expression of the legislative function and cannot be said to be an act in contempt of a Court unless it is first established that the statute so enacted is bad in law constitutionally or otherwise,' the Court held. Emphasising the separation of powers, the bench reiterated that any law passed by Parliament or a State legislature must be challenged solely on grounds of legislative competence or constitutional validity, not as contempt of court. The Court underlined, 'A legislature has the power to enact or amend a law, even to remove the basis of a judicial judgment, as long as it operates within the constitutional framework.' It also noted that Courts do not have the authority to treat the exercise of legislative power as contempt, simply for enacting or amending laws. Importantly, the bench observed that restoring peace and ensuring rehabilitation in Chhattisgarh remains the constitutional responsibility of both the State and the Union, citing Article 315 of the Constitution. 'It is the duty of the State of Chhattisgarh as well as the Union of India to take adequate steps for bringing about peace and rehabilitation to the residents of Chhattisgarh who have been affected by the violence from whatever quarter it may have arisen,' the Court said. UNI SNG RN


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
J&K LG sacks 3 UT staff for terror links
NEW DELHI/SRINAGAR: J&K LG Tuesday dismissed three J&K govt employees after they were found to be transporting arms, explosives and narcotics to and arranging logistical support for operatives of LeT and Hizb to carry out terror attacks in the UT. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now This takes the total dismissals ordered by Sinha under Article 311(2)(c) of Constitution, since he took office, to over 75. All three govt employees sacked in the latest round - Malik Ishfaq Naseer, a constable; Ajaz Ahmed, a teacher in school dept; and Waseem Ahmad Khan, a junior assistant in GMC, Srinagar - are currently in jail on terror charges. Naseer was recruited as a constable in J&K Police in 2007. His brother Malik Asif Naseer, a Pakistan-trained terrorist of LeT, was killed by forces in 2018. Malik, however, continued his terror activities, using his cover as a constable to avoid suspicion. His LeT link was exposed in Sept 2021 when cops found him to be helping LeT drop arms, explosives & narcotics, guided by GPS, at pre-shared coordinates facilitated by him to his Pakistani handlers. Ahmed was recruited as a teacher in 2011 but led a double life as a terror associate of Hizb in Poonch region. He was helping the outfit in smuggling arms and ammunition. Khan's terror links with Hizb were exposed with his arrest in Aug 2018. Sources said he was one of the conspirators behind killing of journalist Shujaat Bukhari in June 2018.


Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
SC: No contempt if Parliament and state legislature simply make laws
The Supreme Court has said that any law enacted by Parliament or a state legislature 'subsequent' to a court order cannot be held an act of contempt, and the enactment would have the 'force of law' unless declared 'null and void' by a Constitutional Court. A bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and S C Sharma said this in a May 15 order disposing of a 2012 contempt plea alleging that the Chhattisgarh government failed to comply with the SC's directions to stop support to vigilante groups like Salwa Judum and arming tribals in the name of special police officers (SPO) in the fight against Maoists. The contempt plea contended that even after the SC on July 5, 2011 ordered winding up of Salwa Judum's activities, the Chhattisgarh government in September that year legislated the Chhattisgarh Auxiliary Armed Police Force Act, 2011, which authorised an auxiliary armed force to assist security forces in dealing with Maoist violence and legalised existing SPOs by inducting them as members. The contempt plea — as well as the main petition on which the SC's 2011 order had come — were filed by former Delhi University professor Nandini Sundar, author Ramachandra Guha and former Andhra Pradesh Tribal Affairs Secretary E A S Sharma. 'The passing of an enactment subsequent to the order of this Court by the legislature of the State of Chhattisgarh cannot, in our view, be said to be an act of contempt of the order passed by this Court…', the bench said. 'Every State Legislature has plenary powers to pass an enactment and so long as the said enactment has not been declared to be ultra vires the Constitution or, in any way, null and void by a Constitutional Court, the said enactment would have the force of law.' The bench said that under the Constitution, the judiciary is vested with the power to resolve interpretive doubts and disputes about the validity or otherwise of an enacted law by the Parliament or any state legislature. 'However, the interpretative power of a Constitutional Court does not contemplate a situation of declaring exercise of legislative functions and passing of an enactment as an instance of a contempt of a Court,' it added. The bench sought to remind that 'central to the legislative function is the power of the legislative organ to enact as well as amend laws' and 'any law made by the Parliament or a State Legislature cannot be held to be an act of contempt of a Court, including this Court, for simply making the law.' 'A legislature has, inter alia, the powers to pass a law, to remove the basis of a judgment or in the alternative, validate a law which has been struck down by a Constitutional Court by amending or varying it so as to give effect to the judgment of a Constitutional Court which has struck down a portion of an enactment or for that matter the entire enactment,' it said. 'This is the core of the doctrine of separation of powers and must always be acknowledged in a constitutional democracy such as ours,' it said.