logo
Public sector workers who refuse to come into office should be sacked

Public sector workers who refuse to come into office should be sacked

For some reason this service, covering something as basic as food, is no problem at all for the private sector to deliver.
Yet if there is any suggestion of the private sector being involved in providing things like universal healthcare or education there is mass hysteria and the First Minister has to make a reassuring statement in Parliament that those nasty private sector people will be kept out.
Read more Guy Stenhouse
This even extends, rather daftly, to the provision of ferry services. Just how much evidence do we need that the private sector can deliver ferry services better than the public sector. CalMac has the wrong sort of ferries, travelling in some cases on the wrong routes, too slowly, too unreliably, too infrequently at far too much cost. Yes, you meet some wonderful staff on a CalMac vessel but that isn't good enough. The service is poor and costs too much.
Unusually, ferries provide a laboratory quality example of a private sector operator providing a superior and more cost-effective service compared with the state-owned operator.
CalMac used to have a monopoly on the Gourock to Dunoon route. Then along came the privately owned Western Ferries; no catering, smaller vessels, fewer crew, more frequent sailings for longer hours each day.
The public voted with their feet. Western Ferries, despite attempts at unfair competition by CalMac, flourished. So much so that CalMac gave up the route. Western Ferries continues to provide an excellent service today. Given the chance they and others like them could do the same on other routes but the Scottish Government won't entertain it. This is madness, the poor service from CalMac is not what people on our islands need and its crazy cost is not fair to taxpayers.
Education. In England they allow academy schools run on private sector lines with their own board of Governors but within an effective regulatory framework to provide education. It works. England used to be behind Scotland on things like reading attainment and maths but now it is the other way around, Scotland trails. Have we looked south to see what we could learn? We have not.
Would private firms be better than CalMac at delivering ferry services? (Image: free) The NHS is doomed to failure. Each dollop of extra money at best moves the situation temporarily from one of imminent failure to merely crisis.
The demand for healthcare, and add to that adult social care, is almost limitless. The population who need help grows, the population who can give that help and pay for it diminishes, the overall cake is not growing so if we spend more on health and social care we have less to spend on other things. The economy already groans under the weight of taxation and debt.
We need bravery, leadership and a willingness to take radical action if we are going to be able to rescue our health and social care services.
In England there is some evidence the Government understands just shovelling in more and more money to the NHS is simply not sustainable. Reform is absolutely necessary. In Scotland we celebrate that we pay our healthcare workers more than in England but there is no debate about radical reform, we still believe more money and state control of everything is the solution when it clearly is not.
Democratic control of the regulatory framework, the setting of standards and priorities is absolutely vital but why is it that we just cannot stomach the private sector delivering healthcare?
The private sector will expect to make a profit but what if in return they bring additional financial resources which revolutionise the technical capability of our hospitals; if they can treat, to a high standard, 5 people instead of 3 people for the same money as now, what exactly is the problem with that?
Read more
The state is not good at actually delivering things well and efficiently. We all make increasing demands of public services. Our public debt is too high and still rising. If we don't do something new the wheels will soon come off.
Yes, the Government should work hard boosting growth but that is the relatively easy bit. The harder, but even more vital, part of their work should be on increasing efficiency so that public money goes further. Public servants who go on strike because they are asked to come into the office for at least two days a week should be replaced as not fit for the job. Unions who won't talk about ending unsustainable, gold-plated public-sector pension scheme should be faced down.
The relentless rise in the number of civil servants must not just be stopped but reversed. The list is endless, hard, grinding, relentless focus on delivering more with less. This is what the private sector does every day.
Sticking our heads in the sand and confusing the state doing more with actual progress is the road to ruin. In Scotland we are well down that road.
Guy Stenhouse is a notable figure in the Scottish financial sector. He has held various positions, including being the Managing Director of Noble Grossart, an independent merchant bank based in Edinburgh, until 2017

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Alarming' figures show 400 oil and gas jobs could be lost every fortnight
'Alarming' figures show 400 oil and gas jobs could be lost every fortnight

STV News

time31 minutes ago

  • STV News

'Alarming' figures show 400 oil and gas jobs could be lost every fortnight

A new report has warned that the oil and gas industry could lose up to 400 jobs every two weeks for the next five years unless action is taken. The major report from Robert Gordon University said on Tuesday that the UK risks losing tens of thousands of offshore energy jobs by 2030 unless urgent and coordinated action is taken immediately. In the worst-case scenario, it could mean the loss of up to 400 jobs a fortnight – the same number lost as a result of the recent Grangemouth refinery closure. The report said: 'Depending on which scenario will play out, the direct and indirect UK oil and gas workforce is expected to fall from 115,000 to between 57,000 and 71,000 by the early 2030s, with further declines to between 33,000 and 48,000 by 2035.' North East Scotland MSP Douglas Lumsden called the report 'alarming' and said it 'lays bare the economic vandalism caused by both Labour and the SNP's opposition to oil and gas'. 'Yes, the Labour Government have shamefully abandoned our oil and gas industry – but so too have the Nationalists,' the Scottish Conservative energy spokesman said. 'Like Keir Starmer, the SNP oppose all new oil and gas projects in the North Sea. In fact, the only real difference between the two on energy policy is that John Swinney's party also, absurdly, oppose nuclear power.' In a ministerial statement on Tuesday, acting minister for climate action Alasdair Allan acknowledged the 'concerning series of announcements' about jobs in the region – including the most recent job losses at Harbour Energy in Aberdeen. However, he claimed that most of the key policy areas around oil and gas are 'matters reserved to the UK Government'. He said Scottish ministers will 'learn' from the report, but 'hoped the UK Government will too'. 'Clarity on the direction of travel from the UK Government will be vital,' Allan said. '[Planning for the needs of oil and gas] is not something we can do alone, and the UK Government urgently needs to provide certainty and stability in key areas'. While some areas regarding energy are devolved to Holyrood, Allan added that others are reserved to Westminster and 'we must get helpful decisions from the UK Government'. He said the UK Government could provide a 'full funding package' for the Acorn carbon capture and storage project in Aberdeenshire in next week's comprehensive spending review. He also urged Westminster to set an end date for the energy profits levy, which Allan said was 'always supposed to be temporary'. 'The Scottish Government is clear in our support of the economy of the north east. We are working for a just transition for Scotland's oil and gas sector, which recognises the maturity of the North Sea basin and is in line with our climate change commitments and energy security,' Allan said. 'We appreciate that this report comes in the context of recent and concerning reports of job losses in the oil and gas sector. 'Workers are at the heart of Scotland's just transition to net zero. The Scottish Government is working with the energy sector to plan for a multi-skilled workforce and enable our skilled offshore workers to carry their experience and expertise into different roles.' The report from Robert Gordon University captured the latest industry forecasts and employment data – highlighting the widening gap between policy intent and real-world outcomes for oil and gas. One of the key findings claimed that there is 'likely to be limited capacity' for the UK offshore renewables sector to accommodate the number of oil and gas workers looking for jobs as a result of industry decline before 2027. The report added that it 'may be necessary to sustain selective oil and gas activities until the early 2030s if Scotland is to retain its offshore energy workforce, skills, supply chain, and economic contribution'. A spokesperson for the UK Department for Energy Security and Net Zero said: 'We have taken rapid steps to deliver the next generation of good jobs for North Sea workers in a fair and orderly transition as part of our Plan for Change, including by making the biggest investment in offshore wind and two first-of-a-kind carbon capture storage clusters. 'This comes alongside Great British Energy, headquartered in Aberdeen, which has already announced a £300m investment into British supply chains, unlocking significant investment and helping to create thousands of skilled jobs.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

Former Stirling care home site could be sold off for housing
Former Stirling care home site could be sold off for housing

Daily Record

time35 minutes ago

  • Daily Record

Former Stirling care home site could be sold off for housing

The facility was briefly used for people recuperating from Covid more recently, but was once the focus of a campaign to save it from the axe. A former Stirling care home site, which was once at the heart of a heated local campaign, looks to be on the cusp of being sold for housing. Beech Gardens, off Polmaise Road in Torbrex, is situated within the original curtilage of the listed Batterflatts House and was purpose-built as a care facility. In recent years the home was closed and declared surplus as a part of the reconfiguration of care services across the Forth Valley, following the creation of the Stirling Care Village. In 2009, however, it was at the centre of a local campaign to keep it open after it was threatened with the axe in council cuts. While the heated battle resulted in it being given a stay of execution, its use was eventually phased out and it was used for respite care for a period. During the Covid pandemic it was upgraded, along with Allan Lodge, to support NHS patients in recovery being moved out of the hospital environment. NHS used the facility briefly, and the building was returned to the council. In a report due before a special meeting of Stirling Council on Thursday, officials said: 'Since the pandemic, the property has attracted interest from several parties, from within the council, and a formal asset transfer request was subsequently withdrawn. 'Current running costs for 2024-2025 were £32,953, which includes £11,641 of rates, £6,404 standing charges on utilities, and £14,908 on security. 'An external marketing agent was appointed to market several council-owned surplus properties and development sites, including Beech Gardens.' The officials said any changes to the site must protect the character and appearance of the designated conservation area and the adjacent listed building - with a single-story structure essential. Any future development should also prioritise the use of the existing building, unless it can be demonstrated that the structural condition makes retention 'unfeasible at a reasonable cost and all reasonable efforts to retain, repair and reuse the building have been exhausted'. The site is said to be 'well-suited for residential purposes, including private housing, social housing, or residential care'. At the closing date in March, there were five offers received, ranging from £500,000 to £150,000. Two offers had no suspensive conditions, or the offer was unconditional. Two offers were subject to either condition surveys or title and site services investigations. One offer was subject to obtaining satisfactory funding. The report added: 'Given its position as the most financially advantageous and that it is not subject to any suspensive conditions, it is recommended that Urban Nest Scotland Limited's offer be taken forward as the preferred bidder. ‌ 'Urban Nest Scotland Ltd proposes to develop the site for private housing and is in a position to progress with the conclusion of missives on the council approval. 'Urban Nest has held initial discussions with the Planning team regarding their development plans. 'This disposal will result in the release of the property, the achievement of the capital receipt, and the reduction of revenue budget pressure in this fiscal year.' At Thursday's special meeting, councillors will be asked to approve the preferred bidder and disposal of Beech Gardens.

Ministers reject Bannockburn track and golf range plans over battlefield fears
Ministers reject Bannockburn track and golf range plans over battlefield fears

Daily Record

timean hour ago

  • Daily Record

Ministers reject Bannockburn track and golf range plans over battlefield fears

The plans for a trotting track and a separate bid for a golf range complex had rumbled on through the planning process - but have been given a final thumbs down by Scottish ministers. Scottish Ministers have rejected two significant planning applications for Whins of Milton, citing their impact on the Bannockburn battlefield. Controversial plans for a trotting track - and a separate bid for a golf driving range - have now been refused, having been called in by Ministers. ‌ But - while the driving range plans had also failed to find support from the Scottish Government's independent planning appeals reporter - the trotting track plans had been recommended for conditional approval by the same department before Ministers vetoed the move. ‌ The harness racing experts had argued that the track application, lodged by Mr H Muirhead for land west of New Line Road and south of Fairhill Road, was vital to safeguard the future of their sport. But the proposals also attracted strong objections from those concerned about protection of the battlefield and views from the nearby Battle of Bannockburn Centre and rotunda. In their decision, Ministers said they disagreed with the reporter's findings 'that the proposed development would not have significant effects on the battlefield or listed buildings and that it accords overall with the development plan.' The Ministers added: 'The proposed development would introduce new development and urbanisation into one of the few remaining undeveloped parts of the battlefield and it would have a significant adverse effect on the character of the battlefield, its setting and sense of place.' They also said it would 'detract from the prominence of the listed buildings'. ‌ Both the Ministers and the reporter agreed there was no reason to doubt what supporters had said about the need for a new permanent harness racing track for the future of the sport, but that that was primarily a question for the applicant rather than Ministers. The Ministers were 'sympathetic' to points raised by supporters of the application but did not feel the benefits would outweigh 'the adverse impacts on a nationally significant battlefield and its associated listed buildings'. One of the fiercest critics of the trotting plans, Scotland's largest conservation charity, the National Trust for Scotland, welcomed the decision and thanked Ministers, members of the local community and NTS supporters 'worldwide' for backing its campaign. ‌ The Trust's Acting Director of Conservation and Policy, Diarmid Hearns, said: 'Ministers' conclusions closely accord with our stated views that this development was simply in the wrong place and would have badly impacted upon the setting of the battlefield. 'We hope that this decision brings this matter to an end and that the developer withdraws to a new site elsewhere that will not impinge on places of historical importance.' On the separate golf driving range application, both the Scottish Government planning appeals reporter and then Scottish Ministers refused permission for the proposal near the battlefield. ‌ Local businesswoman Lianne Muirhead has long wanted to create the driving range, clubhouse and multi-purpose community space 250 metres east of Bridge Cottages. In their decision, this week Scottish Ministers said they agreed with the DPEA reporter that the proposed development did 'not effectively protect the cultural significance or the key landscape characteristics of the battlefield' and would have a 'significant adverse impact on the landscape features, character and setting of the battlefield and that the overall integrity and character of the battlefield area would be compromised'. ‌ The decision also stated: 'The Scottish Ministers agree with the reporter that the proposed development would be clearly visible to the observers directly beyond the [battlefield] interpretation panels and that the driving range building would be a prominent addition to the restricted and framed landscape view when observed from this viewpoint. 'The proposed development does not effectively integrate with its sensitive landscape context owing to its scale and position and therefore, does not accord with the relevant development plan policies regarding siting and design.' A 'very disappointed' Lianne told the Observer this week they would not be submitting new plans, adding she felt elected members had not given local support for the facility due consideration. ‌ 'We felt we had a very good case to provide a facility that would reinvest in our community and benefit those both living and working in Stirling. 'While we appreciate the significance of the battlefield, we hoped that the mitigations we had put in place to limit the view, allowed us to provide a community and economic benefit that would outweigh any detriment to the site of a possible battlefield. 'A lot of time, effort and money went into us putting in the very best application we could. ‌ 'Two golf facilities, along with a racetrack, have been removed from our area with no plans to have these facilities replaced anywhere.' Local SNP councillor Gerry McLaughlan said: 'As a local councillor I worked with local people to ensure that their voices were heard. 'I am therefore delighted that both developments were refused. ‌ 'In our area in the South of Stirling there is a great deal of homes being built in the next few years. 'Protection of vital open green space in this area is crucial to the growth of Stirling. 'I know in particular the refusal of the trotting track will be met with disappointment to the supporters of trotting locally. 'But to balance that there was almost universal objections locally to the development, so I believe the correct decision has been made.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store