Shropshire blood donors frustrated by lack of appointments
People in Shropshire have said they are "very frustrated" by a campaign for more blood donors, as they are finding it near-impossible to find somewhere to donate themselves. It comes as the NHS warned it continued to face a "challenging" blood shortage, and called for 200,000 new donors to sign up.Ann from Wellington is close to donating 100 pints of blood, but said she "just can't see [the milestone] happening" as she cannot find anywhere nearby to donate. NHS Blood and Transplant said it still hosted donation sessions in Shrewsbury and Telford, offering around 5,600 appointments per year.
There are 27 permanent donor centres in England, including seven in London alone and two in the West Midlands - Birmingham and Stoke.The NHS's Give Blood website encourages potential donors to book appointments for these venues.The Birmingham centre is closed on Sundays, and the Stoke facility does not open at all at the weekend. Some would-be donors from Shropshire, particularly those with full-time jobs, have told the BBC this makes it difficult to donate.
'A bit miffed'
"I've been a blood donor for years and years," Ann, who did not want her surname to be used, told BBC Radio Shropshire. She added that she previously donated blood regularly in Shifnal and Telford before sessions were cut. "I just can't get an appointment locally," she said, noting that her last two appointments had been cancelled last-minute. "I feel a bit miffed, basically."Ann added that she felt "a bit annoyed" by the new calls for more donors when regular donors like her were unable to get appointments.
Peter Williams, from Waters Upton, recalled the ease of donating blood when he was an apprentice at GKN Sankey in Telford in 1970."The blood wagons used to come round - seven-and-a-half tonne vans they were," he recalled."They'd set up in the ballroom with 50 or 60 beds [...] Hundreds of [workers] must have gone through there each day."Mr Williams noted that he "doesn't know any blood donors" in Shropshire anymore.
Jeff Lawrence from Shrewsbury said he was keen to donate blood as "quite a few people have probably helped me in the past, and I'd like to repay the favour.""There aren't many places you're able to give blood, unfortunately."Mr Lawrence said he wants to see more local places made available for donating blood."Less places means less donations, and less donations for people who need it."
Tim Dalton, who lives near the Shropshire-Staffordshire border, said the campaign for more donors made him feel "very angry and very frustrated."When trying to book a donation slot, Mr Dalton said "any appointment offered was always in Birmingham or Wolverhampton, but very difficult to get to and always far into the future."
Darren Bowen, Assistant Director for Blood Supply Chain at NHS Blood and Transplant, stated that the service "currently [hosts] blood donation sessions in both Shrewsbury and Telford, offering around 5,600 appointments per year."He continued: "We are incredibly grateful to all donors across Shropshire for their unwavering support in ensuring our sessions remain consistently well attended."While our community sessions across the county do get booked up quickly, we are currently appealing for people who live or work near one of our donor centres in towns and cities to help fill these venues where we have greatest availability."
Follow BBC Shropshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Guardian
16 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Council tax bills set to rise at fastest rate for two decades, economist warns
Paul Johnson said that local government in England did 'perhaps a little bit better than it might have expected' out of the Chancellor's statement on Wednesday, but the 'sting in the tail' is the assumption that 'council tax bills will rise by 5% a year' as part of the funding. The core spending power of councils is set to increase by 2.6% a year from next year, and 'if English councils do choose 5% increases – and most almost certainly will – council tax bills look set to rise at their fastest rate over any parliament since 2001-05', Mr Johnson said on Thursday. On Wednesday, Ms Reeves said that ministers will not be 'going above' the 5% annual increases in council tax. She told ITV: 'The previous government increased council tax by 5% a year, and we have stuck to that. We won't be going above that. 'That is the council tax policy that we inherited from the previous government, and that we will be continuing.' The biggest winner from Wednesday's statement was the NHS, which will see its budget rise by £29 billion per year in real terms. Ruth Curtice, the chief executive of the Resolution Foundation, has said that Britain is turning into a 'National Health State'. Overnight, the think tank said Ms Reeves' announcements had followed a recent trend that saw increases for the NHS come at the expense of other public services. Ms Curtice said: 'Health accounted for 90% of the extra public service spending, continuing a trend that is seeing the British state morph into a National Health State, with half of public service spending set to be on health by the end of the decade.' Defence was another of Wednesday's winners, Ms Curtice said, receiving a significant increase in capital spending while other departments saw an overall £3.6 billion real-terms cut in investment. The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) made similar arguments about 'substantial' investment in the NHS and defence coming at the expense of other departments, although Mr Johnson warned on Wednesday the money may not be enough. In his snap reaction to the review, Mr Johnson said: 'Aiming to get back to meeting the NHS 18-week target for hospital waiting times within this Parliament is enormously ambitious – an NHS funding settlement below the long-run average might not measure up. 'And on defence, it's entirely possible that an increase in the Nato spending target will mean that maintaining defence spending at 2.6% of GDP no longer cuts the mustard.' Ms Curtice added that low and middle-income families had also done well out of the spending review 'after two rounds of painful tax rises and welfare cuts', with the poorest fifth of families benefiting from an average of £1,700 in extra spending on schools, hospitals and the police. She warned that, without economic growth, another round of tax rises was likely to come in the autumn as the Chancellor seeks to balance the books. She said: 'The extra money in this spending review has already been accounted for in the last forecast. 'But a weaker economic outlook and the unfunded changes to winter fuel payments mean the Chancellor will likely need to look again at tax rises in the autumn.' Speaking after delivering her spending review, Ms Reeves insisted she would not have to raise taxes to cover her spending review. She told GB News: 'Every penny of this is funded through the tax increases and the changes to the fiscal rules that we set out last autumn.' Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch described rising health spending as a 'conundrum', with a similar approach having been taken 'again and again' as she spoke at a business conference in central London on Thursday morning. In reference to a pro-Brexit campaign stunt, Mrs Badenoch said: 'I mean, who remembers the side of a red bus that said 'we're going to give the NHS £350 million more a week'? 'Many people don't know that we did that. We did do that, and yet, still we're not seeing the returns. 'We've put more and more money in, and we're getting less and less out.' The Government have not explained how and why the NHS will be better as a result of its spending plans, the Tory leader added, and claimed the public know 'we need to start talking about productivity reforms, public sector reforms'.
Daily Mirror
32 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Period tracking app users warned of 'frightening safety risk' amid data concerns
Period tracking apps may pose a huge privacy risk to users amid concerns about companies selling the data, according to a recent report from the University of Cambridge Women who use period tracking apps have been warned over privacy fears that their data is being sold to third party companies. These cycle tracking apps are an increasingly popular way for women to understand their menstrual cycle and there have been over 250 million downloads of the three biggest apps - Flo, Clue and Period Tracker. However a damning report from University of Cambridge's Minderoo Centre said the tracking apps were a "gold mine" for consumer profiling. By collecting information, it could allow companies to produce targeted advertisements linked to information users think is kept private. The researchers also warn that if this data gets into the wrong hands, it could even affect access to abortion, health insurance discrimination and cyberstalking as well as risks to job prospects. READ MORE: 'We're empowering women to take charge of their health - new police guidance pushes us back' "There are real and frightening privacy and safety risks to women as a result of the commodification of the data collected by cycle tracking app companies," said Dr Stefanie Felsberger, the lead author of the report. The report calls on organisations such as the NHS and other health bodies to create a "safer" alternative that is trustworthy. Under EU and UK law, the data from these period-tracking apps comes under a special category, which means it should have special protections from being sold on - but this report highlights that consent options are not always enforced or implemented. This then allows the data can be sold to advertisers and tech giants such as Facebook and Google. If the data is sold on, it can be used to target women with tailored adverts for different parts of their cycle such as beauty ads popping up during ovulation, as well as ads relating to pregnancy. According to BBC, researchers said data on who is pregnant, and who wants to be, was some of the "most sought-after information in digital advertising" as it led to a shift in shopping patterns and can be up to 200 times more valuable than data on gender, age and location. Help us improve our content by completing the survey below. We'd love to hear from you! Dr Felsberger added: "Menstrual cycle tracking apps are presented as empowering women and addressing the gender health gap. Yet the business model behind their services rests on commercial use, selling user data and insights to third parties for profit. There are real and frightening privacy and safety risks to women as a result of the commodification of the data collected by cycle tracking app companies." Worryingly, the data can also be used against women when it comes to having an abortion. In the UK, data from apps designed to aid women's health has been requested by police in investigations into women illegally accessing abortion services, according to a Tortoise Media investigation. The guidance released in January 2025 by the National Police Chiefs' Council stated that women who experience a sudden unexpected pregnancy loss, and if the police suspect a miscarriage, stillbirth or early labour is the result of an illegal abortion could be investigated by the authorities. The Mirror spoke to Rhiannon White, CEO of period tracking app Clue on the report, who said she was "disappointed" to see these headlines. "Clue was created, to give women and people with cycles the knowledge and agency around our menstrual and reproductive health that our public health systems have historically failed to. "We firmly believe that as women and people with cycles, our health data must serve us and never be used against us or for anyone else's agenda or commercial benefit. Our app serves our user community–not the agendas of advertisers, insurance companies, data brokers, or anyone else." The CEO continued: "We are a women-led company, CE-marked as a Class I medical device and independently governed under the strictest guidelines of the EU/UK GDPR. We always treat our member data with utmost care, taking all necessary precautions (and more) to ensure it's secure and protected. "We are disappointed to see in these headlines how the female health experience is continually framed from a narrow fertility lens, when we know the vast majority of our members (over 97%) use the app to track a variety of menstrual and cycle related symptoms." She added: "Our de-identified dataset powers critical research into conditions like PCOS, endometriosis, and cycle-related pain, helping to close historic gaps in women's health. The assumption that an overwhelmed public health system can exceed the quality of data protection, medical research, and user-first insight that Clue has prioritised for over a decade is something we welcome a discussion around. We see value in collaboration with any partner or public health entity who wants to join us in moving women's health forward." Sue Khan, VP of Security and Data Protection Officer at Flo told the Mirror: "We support all efforts and research to ensure women feel as safe as possible when using their period tracking apps, and believe the highest standards of data protection must be applied by femtech services in order to protect the rights and freedoms of users. "At Flo, implementing and advocating for best-in-class privacy practices so women's health data can be treated with the utmost respect and care is our priority, and that will never change. We have never - and will never - monetise or sell user data. We do not see personal data as a commodity, and categorically reject the notion that women's health data should be treated as a goldmine for advertising. Our business model is solely subscription-based and does not depend on the exploitation of reproductive information. "We firmly believe it's 'your body, your data'. In 2022, Flo created Anonymous Mode, a first-of-its-kind, award-winning technology that gives users the option to access the Flo app without name, email address, or any technical identifiers being associated with their health information. This means that no one — not Flo, not authorities, no one — can identify the user upon request. We also open-sourced our Anonymous Mode, meaning that any femtech or health tech company could use this technology if they wish. Because safeguarding women's rights isn't a competitive advantage—it's a collective responsibility."
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Bad news for hairy hipsters as scientists warn men with beards carry more germs than dogs
Hairy hipsters have received some shocking news as scientists have revealed men with beards carry more germs than dogs. Hollywood heartthrobs including Jason Momoa and Zayn Malik are known for their luxuriant facial hair, but a new report may make clean-shaven men more attractive. An expert revealed beards provide a unique environment for bacteria to thrive, and in extreme cases hirsute guys carry more germs than the average toilet. SCROLL DOWN FOR VIDEO Dr Primrose Freestone, an expert in clinical microbiology at the University of Leicester, in England, explained the findings in an article for The Conversation. She said: 'Beards create a warm, often moist environment where food debris and oils can accumulate – ideal conditions for microbial growth. 'These microbes thrive not just because of the warm, moist conditions beards provide, but also because of constant exposure to new contaminants and microbes, especially from hands that frequently touch surfaces and the face.' Studies dating back 50 years show that facial hair can retain bacteria and bacterial toxins even after it has been washed. This led to the longstanding idea that beards harbor bacteria and could pose an infection risk to others. One study, published in 2018, looked at whether it would be hygienic to evaluate dogs and humans in the same MRI scanner. Analysis revealed most beards contained significantly more microbes than dog fur – including a greater number of harmful bacteria. The study, published in the Nature journal European Radiology, said: 'Our study shows a significantly higher bacterial load in specimens taken from men's beards compared with dogs' fur. 'All 18 men showed high microbial counts, whereas only 23 out of 30 dogs had high microbial counts and seven dogs moderate microbial counts.' Beards can also sometimes spread skin infections such as impetigo – a contagious rash often caused by Staphylococcus aureus, which is commonly found in facial hair. Sometimes, in rare cases, parasites like pubic lice, which usually live in the groin area, can also show up in beards. However, other studies have challenged the idea that beards increase infection risk. One investigation concluded there was no significant difference in bacteria colonization between bearded and clean-shaven healthcare workers. But Dr Freestone said: 'Neglected beards can foster irritation, inflammation and infection. 'The skin beneath a beard – rich in blood vessels, nerve endings and immune cells – is highly sensitive to microbial and environmental stressors. 'When sebum, dead skin, food debris and pollutants accumulate, they can irritate the skin and provide fuel for fungal and bacterial growth.' Bearded men should wash their beard and face every day, experts say, to help remove dirt, oils, allergens and dead skin. Other tips include moisturizing to prevent dryness, using a beard comb to remove debris, and trimming to control loose hairs. 'With daily hygiene and proper grooming, beards pose little risk and may even be healthier than we once thought,' Dr Freestone concluded.
