logo
Drones in Ukraine show the way Western militaries are run is 'outdated,' UK warns

Drones in Ukraine show the way Western militaries are run is 'outdated,' UK warns

Yahoo4 days ago

The war in Ukraine shows that the way Western militaries are run is outdated, a UK minister warned.
Drones evolve so fast that "we have to fundamentally challenge our assumptions," Luke Pollard said.
He was speaking at a summit of more than 100 drone companies, military officials, and ministers.
The war in Ukraine has shown that the way Western militaries are run is "outdated" because of how fast battlefield tech like drones evolves, a defence minister has warned.
Luke Pollard, the UK's armed forces minister, said Ukraine's fight against Russia's invasion showed "the way we have run our militaries, the way we have run our defense, is outdated. And that is the case across the NATO alliance."
Pollard said that drones had "shifted the tectonic plates of warfare," and the speed of their innovation showed how much faster procurement and innovation have to happen.
Drone tech "iterates every two to three weeks on the front line" with a "fundamentally different" model, Pollard said Wednesday, adding, "That means we have to fundamentally challenge our assumptions about how we procure."
He said that NATO militaries "build and procure really expensive high-end bits of kit. And it will take you five, 10 years: five years to run a procurement challenge, another 10 years to build it."
"If we allow ourselves to be stuck in old-world thinking, we will not be providing the tech that Ukraine needs, we will not be providing the security that we need," Pollard added.
Pollard was speaking at the Drone Summit, which brought together drone companies, military officials, and government ministers in Latvia, a NATO member bordering Russia.
Drones have played a bigger role in Russia's invasion of Ukraine than in any other conflict in history, and have upended many traditional fighting rules by taking the place of some artillery and infantry.
Cheap drones have also destroyed pieces of weaponry that are worth millions, like tanks and air defenses.
Oleksandr Yabchanka, the head of the robotic systems for Ukraine's Da Vinci Wolves Battalion, which operates ground drones, told Business Insider in March: "What was up to date and relevant half a year ago is not up to date and relevant anymore."
Pollard was echoing previous warnings that the West needs to change its approach to weaponry to fight an adversary like Russia.
Military officials and warfare experts have warned that the West must amass a larger volume of cheaper weaponry and shift its focus away from fewer pieces of more advanced and expensive kit.
In January, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte gave a similar warning, saying, "speed is of the essence, not perfection."
Officials also questioned the value of some high-value weaponry in the face of drones. US Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll said earlier this month that the US can't keep developing and buying expensive weaponry that can be destroyed by far cheaper drones.
Pollard told the summit that, with drones, there must be a change "that is built into all our procurements that says what we can buy and build and scale faster than we have done before."
He said this change would be harder for larger companies, but there needs to be a startup-style culture for companies to "not go along with the guide rails and the rules of the game but to innovate based on what is working."
Pollard said that, while a coalition of 18 countries had delivered tens of thousands of drones to Ukraine, the war shows how much more needs to be done.
"Big numbers need sustainable supply chains that can scale up when wartime demand requires it. Our industrial bases across Europe, across the globe, must become as agile as the systems we seek to produce with our people as skilled as the operators who deploy them on the frontline of Ukraine," he said.
The gathering saw repeated warnings that the West's work is not enough.
Ruben Brekelmans, the Netherlands' defense minister, told the summit that, in much of Europe, "We are quite fast at developing drones, but we are not producing drones on a massive scale. And I think that's a step that we need to take."
He added Ukraine's allies had to work together to achieve "mass production quite quickly, because Ukraine needs it. We need it as well."
Many European countries have warned that they could be attacked next, and supply Ukraine not only to keep Russia's war machine occupied, but to test battlefield tech.
Russia still has a large military, and it has kept some of its advanced equipment out of Ukraine and unscathed from the war. Many current and former Western military officials also warn that Russia's war machine is far more spun up than Western ones.
"Russia has surpassed us technologically. And more dangerously, it has surpassed us in terms of speed and scale," Valerii Churkin, Ukraine's deputy defense minister, said at the summit.
"The enemy moves faster than we do," he added.
Churkin urged more collaboration, telling his country's European allies, "Ukraine is not just a recipient of aid. We are your test."
Read the original article on Business Insider

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gen. Clark on European Union Push for Air Defenses
Gen. Clark on European Union Push for Air Defenses

Bloomberg

time14 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Gen. Clark on European Union Push for Air Defenses

Retired General Wesley Clark, Former NATO Supreme Allied Commander Europe, discusses NATO pushing the European Union to boost air defenses and how quickly this could happen. He also shares his reaction to the notion that warfare is changing, reflecting on the Ukraine drone strike on Russia. Retired General Wesley Clark speaks with Kailey Leinz and Joe Mathieu on the late edition of Bloomberg's 'Balance of Power.' (Source: Bloomberg)

Anti-immigrant leader quits Dutch cabinet, toppling government
Anti-immigrant leader quits Dutch cabinet, toppling government

Boston Globe

time17 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Anti-immigrant leader quits Dutch cabinet, toppling government

Officials from other parties in the coalition said they were prepared for negotiations over the immigration plan and accused Wilders of ditching the coalition to avoid responsibility for tough government decisions, including potential budget cuts needed to increase defense spending. Advertisement Wilders, who is known for anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim views, has led the Euroskeptic right-wing political movement in the Netherlands for nearly two decades and was found guilty by a Dutch court in 2016 of insulting an ethnic group. The PVV scored a shocking first-place finish in the 2023 parliamentary elections after the relatively abrupt resignation of Mark Rutte, the longest-serving prime minister in the country's history. Rutte is now secretary general of NATO. Wilders, however, was unable to claim the position of prime minister as part of coalition talks, showing resistance even by other conservative parties to back him personally given his controversial views, often criticized as extremist. As a result, the PVV's power in the Netherlands has been constrained. Still, the PVV's victory demonstrated the increasing appeal across Europe of nationalist, anti-immigrant parties. Advertisement In the Netherlands on Tuesday, critics of Wilders accused him of putting his party's political interests ahead of the needs of the country. Analysts said the country faced a period of uncertainty in the days ahead. 'Wilders has plunged the Netherlands into another round of political chaos,' said Mujtaba Rahman, managing director for Europe at the Eurasia Group. 'The Dutch parliament can try to find a new majority or else there will be early elections. But the immediate outlook is one of chaos and uncertainty.' The country has been in turmoil since Rutte resigned in 2023 after his coalition failed to pass comprehensive immigration legislation. The collapse of the Rutte government demonstrated 'how sensitive of an issue immigration is politically,' said Armida van Rij, head of the Europe program at Chatham House. The position of prime minister went to former spy chief Dick Schoof, whom Wilders backed. But Schoof has made it clear he would act independently from Wilders. In the 11 months that the coalition government has been in power, PVV was unable to push forward its immigration agenda, and the party has been losing support. 'Wilders wanted the government to collapse as the support for his [party] continues to drop in the polls,' van Rij said. Wilders presented his immigration plan just weeks ahead of the Netherlands hosting the annual NATO leaders' summit in The Hague on June 24 and 25. Van Rij said Wilders may have planned to 'use this as leverage to force his coalition partners back to the negotiating table, knowing that having a caretaker government would not be a good look nor useful to advance key policy positions.' Advertisement To advance his immigration plan, Wilders had demanded that the three other ruling parties - the centrist New Social Contract (NSC); the center-right People's Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD); and the right-wing, populist Farmer-Citizen Movement (BBB) - reopen the coalition agreement they negotiated, and 'VVD, NSC, and BBB were not willing to do this,' van Rij said. Now, the more likely outcome is a snap election, she said. Leaders of the coalition parties hammered Wilders for his decision on Tuesday. BBB President Caroline van der Plas said in a statement that many of Wilders's desired changes were on the table and had the necessary support - 'it's just a matter of doing it.' 'Anyone who stops now will hand the Netherlands over to the left on a silver platter,' she said. VVD President Dilan Yesilgozaccused Wilders of putting 'his own interests above the interests of our country' by 'walking away … in a time of unprecedented uncertainty.' 'This wasn't about migration. Everything that could be done, we were already going to do,' she added, blaming the inaction on 'blundering' by Wilders's party. NSC leader Nicolien van Vroonhoven called Wilders 'irresponsible' and said, 'we could have achieved a lot - especially when it comes to stricter migration policies.'

Hegseth will skip a meeting on organizing military aid to Ukraine in a first for the US

time18 minutes ago

Hegseth will skip a meeting on organizing military aid to Ukraine in a first for the US

WASHINGTON -- For the first time since the U.S. created an international group to coordinate military aid to Ukraine three years ago, America's Pentagon chief will not be in attendance when more than 50 other defense leaders meet Wednesday. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who returned from a national security conference in Singapore on Sunday, will not arrive in Brussels until Wednesday evening, after the Ukraine Defense Contact Group's meeting is over. A U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss scheduling details, confirmed that Hegseth also will not participate by video conference. It is the latest in a series of steps that the U.S. has taken to distance itself from the Ukraine war effort. And it comes on the heels of French President Emmanuel Macron's warning at the security conference last weekend that the U.S. and others risk a dangerous double standard if their concentration on a potential conflict with China is done at the cost of abandoning Ukraine. France and other NATO nations are concerned that the U.S. is considering withdrawing troops from Europe to shift them to the Indo-Pacific. Macron said abandoning Ukraine would eventually erode U.S. credibility in deterring any potential conflict with China over Taiwan. Hegseth's predecessor, Lloyd Austin, created the group after Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022. Since then, more than 50 member nations have collectively provided Ukraine with some $126 billion in weapons and military assistance, including over $66.5 billion from the U.S. Under Austin's leadership, the U.S. served as chair of the group, and he and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff attended monthly meetings, which were both in person and by video. Hegseth has upended that position by stepping away from a leadership role, providing no new military aid and now abandoning the gathering altogether. During his first meeting with the group and a subsequent NATO defense ministers gathering in Brussels in February, Hegseth warned that Ukraine should abandon its NATO bid and its push to reclaim all Russian-occupied territory. And he signaled that President Donald Trump is determined to get Europe to assume most of the financial and military responsibilities for Ukraine's defense. Since Trump took office, there have been no new announcements of U.S. military or weapons aid to Ukraine. Hegseth also turned leadership of the group over to Germany and the United Kingdom. While he will not attend Wednesday's session, Gen. Christopher Cavoli, head of U.S. European Command and NATO's supreme allied commander, will be there. In Washington, meanwhile, a senior Ukrainian delegation led by First Deputy Prime Minister and Economy Minister Yulia Svyrydenko is in town for talks about defense, sanctions and postwar recovery, said Andrii Yermak, the head of Ukraine's presidential office. The Ukrainians met with U.S. special envoys Steve Witkoff and Keith Kellogg, discussing recent talks with the Russians and conditions on the battlefield, Yermak posted on social media. Svyrydenko and Yermak also are expected to meet with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and other officials Wednesday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store