US' G-III Apparel holds FY26 sales forecast, posts higher Q1 earnings
American clothing company G-III Apparel Group has reaffirmed its net sales outlook for fiscal 2026 (FY26) at approximately $3.14 billion, slightly below the $3.18 billion recorded in fiscal 2025. However, it has withdrawn its net income, non-GAAP income, and adjusted EBITDA guidance issued in March due to uncertainty surrounding tariffs and broader macroeconomic conditions.
As of June 5, 2025, current tariff rates are expected to add around $135 million in unmitigated costs, largely in the second half of the year. The company aims to offset these impacts through diversified sourcing, selective pricing adjustments, and cost-saving measures, it said in its financial statement.
G-III Apparel Group has reaffirmed its FY26 net sales outlook at $3.14 billion but withdrawn earnings guidance due to tariff-related uncertainty, which may add $135 million in costs. Q1 FY26 sales dipped 4 per cent, but net income rose to $7.8 million. Q2 sales are projected to decline year-on-year. The company cut debt by 96 per cent and repurchased $19.7 million in shares.
For the second quarter (Q2) ending July 31, 2025, net sales are projected at $570 million, down from $644.8 million year-on-year, impacted by supply chain disruptions and timing shifts in key programmes. Gross margin is expected to remain stable. Net income is forecast between $1 million and $6 million, or $0.02–$0.12 per diluted share, sharply down from $24.2 million, or $0.53 per diluted share, in Q2 FY25.
For the first quarter (Q1) ended April 30, 2025, G-III Apparel Group has reported a 4 per cent year-on-year decline in net sales to $583.6 million, down from $609.7 million in the same period last year. Despite the revenue drop, net income rose to $7.8 million, or $0.17 per diluted share, compared to $5.8 million, or $0.12 per diluted share, in Q1 FY25.
On a non-GAAP basis, net income per diluted share came in at $0.19, excluding $1.0 million in one-time severance expenses related to a closed warehouse. This adjustment accounted for a $0.02 per share impact. There were no non-GAAP adjustments in the prior year's first quarter.
As of the end of the quarter, inventories declined 5 per cent to $456.5 million, while total debt was slashed by 96 per cent to $18.7 million from $426.4 million. The sharp reduction followed the company's voluntary redemption in August 2024 of its $400 million senior secured notes, financed through cash reserves and borrowings from its revolving credit facility, the statement added.
Additionally, the company repurchased 807,437 shares for $19.7 million during the quarter, underscoring its continued commitment to shareholder returns.
Morris Goldfarb, G-III's chairman and chief executive officer , said, 'G-III delivered solid first quarter results, marked by earnings that exceeded the high end of guidance. Our performance was fuelled by double-digit growth of our key owned brands, DKNY, Karl Lagerfeld and Donna Karan, which largely offset the exit of the Calvin Klein jeans and sportswear businesses. These results underscore the strong demand and desirability of our brand portfolio and are a testament to our team's outstanding execution.'
Goldfarb concluded, 'We are reaffirming our net sales guidance for fiscal 2026 and working diligently to mitigate the impact of tariffs. Our experienced management team has a proven track record of successfully navigating periods of uncertainty, and we view the ongoing disruptions as an opportunity to strengthen our competitive position and capture incremental market share. As we advance our strategic priorities, we have never been more confident in the global resonance of our brands and the significant growth potential ahead to drive long-term profitability and shareholder value.'
Fibre2Fashion News Desk (KD)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
India seeks exemption from US' 10% baseline tariff
The fate of the 10% baseline tariffs that the Trump administration invoked on imports from all countries on April 2 is among the issues now at the heart of negotiations between New Delhi and Washington as they attempt to hammer out an early tranche of the trade deal, people aware of the matter have said. Delhi is not in favour of replicating, as suggested by the American negotiators, the approach in the trade deal struck between the US and the UK, where British goods are still subject to the baseline tariffs, these people added. According to a person with direct knowledge of the discussions, Indian negotiators are pushing for their American counterparts to remove the baseline 10% rate as well as commit to assurances that the additional 16%, due to be implemented on July 9, will be left off. An American negotiating team led by assistant US Trade Representative Brendan Lynch 4 landed in Delhi on June for what is the fifth time negotiators from either side have gone to the other's capital for face-to-face talks. The American delegation is expected to be in Delhi till June 10, longer than the previously expected two-day visit. ALSO READ | India-US trade negotiations hit top gear, American delegation extends Delhi stay 'Ideally, both the 10% baseline tariff on Indian goods and the additional 16% from July 9 must end simultaneously after an interim deal is signed. Else, India will also have rights to continue proportionately similar tariffs on American goods till the time the US withdraws the entire 26% reciprocal tariff,' one of them said, citing a joint statement by the two countries' leaders issued on February 13 in Washington. While expounding 'Mission-500' to double bilateral trade to $500 billion by 2030 on February 13, the two leaders – Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Donald Trump – in their joint statement mentioned the need for new 'fair-trade terms' that are 'mutually beneficial', the person said. A second person aware of the matter corroborated India's stance: 'Only a mutually beneficial deal would have a long life'. 'Both India and the US are sovereigns. One is the oldest democracy and the other is the largest democracy. While the US is the largest economy, India is the fastest growing major economy of the world. Hence, the deal must be balanced, equitable, fair and acceptable to their people,' the first person said. The second person added that India sees trade interests between both nations as being 'complementary and not competitive', hence New Delhi is open to giving greater market access to the American goods in the Indian market provided Washington reciprocates. 'The trade negotiations continue in New Delhi covering all these matters in a constructive manner as we speak and both sides are hopeful for a win-win,' he said. ALSO READ | Donald Trump claims India willing to cut 100% tariffs on US goods, 'but…' After UK industries faced American tariffs of 25% on all aluminium, steel and derivatives (announced on March 12), 25% tariff on passenger vehicles (announced on April 3), 25% tariff on automobile parts (beginning May 3), and a 10% baseline tariff on all imports (from April 5) – the UK and the US on May 8 announced an economic prosperity deal (EPD). The mini deal secured some concessions for the UK, but the 10% baseline tariff continued. Both partners are racing to conclude an interim, or regarded as an 'early harvest', deal before July 9, which will be followed by a wider first tranche of Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) by September-October 2025. After that a comprehensive BTA will be negotiated, they said. ALSO READ | How Donald Trump decided the tariff for India The current negotiations for an early harvest deal involve greater market access for goods by eliminating tariffs and non-tariff trade barriers, and improving supply chain integration, they said. The current New Delhi round is followed by a face-to-face negotiation between the two teams in the US. During that period, Union commerce and industry minister Piyush Goyal was also in the US from May 17-22 where he held meetings with his counterparts, US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick and USTR Jamieson Greer.
India Gazette
3 hours ago
- India Gazette
Himachal CM Sukhu inaugurates Rs 75.10 crore development projects in Gagret, criticizes BJP for financial distress
Shimla (Himachal Pradesh) [India], June 7 (ANI): Himachal Pradesh Chief Minister Thakur Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu on Saturday inaugurated and laid the foundation stones for development projects worth Rs 75.10 crore in the Gagret Assembly Constituency while launching a sharp critique against the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) for pushing the state into financial distress through mismanagement and excessive borrowing during its previous regime, as per an official release. Addressing a public meeting at Daulatpur Chowk in Una district, Sukhu announced initiatives like a 400-metre span bridge on the Swan River, water supply schemes, and healthcare improvements, alongside his government's commitment to economic recovery through tough decisions, as the state aims to become self-reliant amidst ongoing challenges. Sukhu stated that during its regime, the BJP kept on boasting about the 'double engine Sarkar' but could not significantly contribute to the development of the state and raised loans from the Centre, thus pushing the state into a financial crisis. He stated that to make Himachal Pradesh self-reliant, the government was determined to take some harsh decisions to improve the economy with the cooperation of the people of the State. Sukhu highlighted projects like the Daulatpur-Bhadrakali road, in which Rs 15 crore had been spent; Gagret Hospital's new building; and the upcoming Hoshiarpur-Nadaun four-lane road, while assuring the filling of vacant doctor posts and addressing water scarcity through tube wells. The Himachal Pradesh CM also mentioned the Bulk Drug Park in Haroli, set to begin construction soon. He further criticised the BJP's education policies for dropping Himachal's ranking to 21st, leading to school mergers for quality education. As per the release, the other development initiatives include a Rs 42.82 crore bridge on the Amb-Ambota road, four bridges under PMGSY-III costing Rs 2.70 crore, and infrastructure projects like the Government Degree College Daulatpur Chowk building at Rs 2.79 crore and water schemes totalling Rs 16.57 crore across multiple villages. Deputy Chief Minister Mukesh Agnihotri also noted a Rs 170 crore investment in Gagret's water schemes, criticising the Centre for sanctioning only Rs 137 crore of the expected Rs 2,000 crore, and affirmed the state's advocacy for its due funds. The Chief Minister said that Una has emerged as the fastest-growing district in the state and is being developed as a 'Solar Hub' of the state, with 163 MW projects under construction and promising job creation and industrial growth. (ANI)
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
After Trump and Bannon, Musk's friendship with Stephen Miller turns nasty as the Tesla CEO walks away with his wife
Elon Musk and Stephen Miller, once allies, are now feuding. The clash involves policy disagreements over Donald Trump's bill. Miller criticized Musk's "pork-filled" comment on Fox Business. Rumors suggest a personal conflict involving Miller's wife, Katie. Katie Miller reportedly left her job and marriage to work for Musk. The former allies have unfollowed each other amid the fallout. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What triggered the political clash between Musk and Miller? What happened during Stephen Miller's Fox Business interview? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Did Miller respond directly to Musk's criticism? How did Katie Miller get involved in the fallout? How close were the Katie Millers and Elon Musk before the fallout? Are the personal rumors making things worse? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs What began as a political alliance between Elon Musk and top Trump adviser Stephen Miller has unraveled both professionally and personally. The drama now includes heated policy disagreements and tensions are escalating specifically naming the billionaire, Stephen Miller responded to Elon Musk's criticism of Donald Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill."Stephen Miller slammed Elon Musk in the Fox Business interview while defending Trump's contentious bill, which Musk called "pork-filled." Beyond politics, their feud has taken a personal turn, as per a report by the Daily fallout is messy, and the former allies have unfollowed one another. Rumors of a personal dispute between Miller and Musk are still circulating at the time of the Miller lamented, "Tax cuts and reforms. American energy independence. Full, complete, permanent border security and the largest welfare reform in American history.' 'That's not pork. That's not waste. That's not new spending. That is the most conservative piece of legislation in my lifetime,' as quoted in a report by the Daily remarks were a clear jab at Musk, who has called the bill a "disgusting abomination" and "pork-filled." The tech billionaire's criticisms have sparked a contentious split with Trump, with the two titans trading barbs on social responded to a critique of the formerly Musk-led organization where his wife worked by saying, "There's this myth out there that we could do the DOGE cuts in this bill." "But that's a different procedure."Miller didn't directly mention Musk, but host Larry Kudlow, a Trump ally, assisted him in drawing this reference to the intricacies of the law, Kudlow stated, "I don't think Elon understood that. "I prefer not to discuss that stuff. Okay, so he has $180 billion listed on his website. May he be blessed by God for that. He's been really helpful with that.' Miller grinned but remained has it that Elon Musk fled the White House with Miller's wife, Katie. Katie has left Stephen Miller and her job to apparently work for Musk after serving as a top aide at Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, as per a his time in government, Musk developed a close relationship with the Millers. Katie Miller was with Musk "all the time," according to the Wall Street Journal, before she followed him out the door. Even outside of work, Musk reportedly spent time with the to Miller's X post this week, the only "new" expenditure in the bill is to defend the homeland and deport illegals, with increased visa fees covering the costs."All the other provisions? Massive spending cuts. There is no 'pork' in the bill. Just campaign promises.'This comes as a blow to Musk's relationship with Katie Miller's at odds over Trump's latest bill, and rumors of a personal feud involving Miller's wife have added fuel to the Miller reportedly left her government position and marriage to continue working for Musk, sparking widespread speculation.
