
Prince William, Kate Middleton ‘argue' over Prince George's future: experts
Prince William and Kate Middleton face a "huge dilemma" as parents to a future king.
The Prince and Princess of Wales reportedly have strong opposing views about which school their eldest son, Prince George, should enroll in. The 11-year-old is second in line to the British throne.
"There has been much speculation surrounding Prince George's next school," British broadcaster and photographer Helena Chard told Fox News Digital. "The discussions have been circulating for years, with the Prince and Princess of Wales reportedly arguing and debating the decision for years. I'm surprised the bookies haven't initiated a bet on which school Prince George will attend next autumn!"
"Most parents find choosing a good secondary school for their children daunting, even more so for the Prince and Princess of Wales, who want the best for Prince George," she added.
Chard's claims came shortly after sources told the U.K.'s Daily Mail that the family had already kickstarted the hunt for George's next school earlier this year. According to the report, they have already visited several renowned schools in and around London.
Kate, 43, recently joined her eldest on a tour of her old school, Marlborough College, in Wiltshire. The report noted that George also toured Eton College, the former school of William and his younger brother Prince Harry. It has long been a popular choice for royals, aristocrats and politicians.
Fox News Digital reached out to Kensington Palace, which handles the offices of the Prince and Princess of Wales, for comment.
Chard said there's a good reason why William and Kate are reportedly sparring over their choices.
"There has been a long line of unhappy schooling within the family," Chard explained. "King Charles was very unhappy at Gordonstoun. Eton wasn't suitable for Prince Harry. Even Princess Catherine was bullied at a secondary school. Therefore, she is committed to securing the perfect fit for Prince George. And let's face it, the world is their oyster — they have the pick of all schools."
"Princess Catherine has allegedly made it clear that she would rather Prince George attend an unstuffy co-ed school," Chard claimed.
"However, Eton College, the Berkshire-based school that educates boys aged between the ages of 13 and 18, has several high-profile alumni and has educated generations of the aristocracy. Referred to as 'the nurse of England's statesmen,' the school is the largest boarding school in England, ahead of Millfield and Oundle."
WATCH: KATE MIDDLETON'S DORMMATE RECALLS BEFRIENDING THE FUTURE PRINCESS OF WALES
"Sources claim there's been a debate between the prestigious all-boys school, Eton College, and Marlborough College, the co-ed school which all three of the Middleton siblings attended," Chard continued. "Eton College is the most suitable location and security-wise. It is close to their cottage in Windsor. The college is located in the Windsor security corridor and is financially covered. This is a big brownie point."
Royal expert Ian Pelham Turner claimed to Fox News Digital that Kate wants to prevent her son from being bullied, just as she was as a child. She believes her choice is more laid-back for the young royal versus the stuffier Eton.
"School days for Kate at times were not the happiest as she experienced bullying, so she leaned more towards a less conventional education for George than William," Turner claimed.
"William, on the other hand, wanted to keep his traditional education by sending George to Eton College, which he enjoyed, and let him keep in close contact with Harry. Kate favors a more relaxed education for George rather than the structured life at Eton which, although it has many opportunities, is steeped in tradition."
"Who will win? I suspect George will go to Eton," said Turner.
While William, who is next in line to the throne, had a positive experience at Eton, Harry admitted in his 2023 memoir "Spare" that he struggled with his grades. Consequently, he headed straight to the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst. The Duke of Sussex wrote that Eton was "heaven for brilliant boys," but it could only be "purgatory for one very unbrilliant boy."
Royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams claimed to Fox News Digital that Kate is leaning toward a more "contemporary choice" for her son and wants him closer to home.
"Time is fast approaching for a decision, as George is in his final year at Lambrook, and he will move to secondary education by September this year," said Fitzwilliams
"The traditional choice would be Eton, a prestigious boys' boarding school where the Dukes of Gloucester and Kent and Prince Michael of Kent were educated, as well as Diana's brother, Earl Spencer, and her father. It is also near Adelaide Cottage, which would be ideal for the princess."
"William and Catherine have always prioritized their family, especially during this difficult time when she has been so ill," he noted. "As a future king, George is undoubtedly special. Where he goes to school will be an indication of the way his parents are thinking regarding the future of the monarchy."
British royal expert Hilary Fordwich claimed to Fox News Digital that Kate prefers a co-ed institution because it aligns with having more of a "normal" upbringing.
"She was raised with strong family bonds and, therefore, prefers him to be at school with his siblings," Fordwich claimed. "She also would prefer Prince George to live at home versus a boarding school, a tradition for many generations of the royal family."
Fordwich also noted that Kate isn't afraid to break away from royal tradition if it means that her children will have as normal an upbringing as possible.
"One of their biggest departures from royal tradition has been concerning household chores and staff," said Fordwich. "Each of the children has chores, and they don't have a staff living with them to serve them. This was all due to Princess Catherine's influence, to which Prince William acquiesced, since he so enjoyed all his visits to Middleton's home and saw how bonding, natural and 'normal' family life could be."
"It's a balancing challenge between royal traditions and their desire to modernize the monarchy, which Prince William and Princess Catherine are most carefully navigating," said Fordwich. "Their differing views are… rather healthy as it demonstrates how much thought is going into the process."
Chard pointed out that William broke a royal precedent by going to Eton, rather than Gordonstoun. The BBC also reported that when Charles attended Gordonstoun, he became the first Prince of Wales to be educated at a school, rather than by private tutors. The institution also became the first senior school to educate a British monarch.
And other perks at Eton would make mother and son happy, she shared.
"Eton has a long and notable connection to the British military, but it also provides a robust arts education and opportunities for students to engage with the creative world," she said.
"Prince George is very creative and even remarked that he would like to try his hand as a chef. Princess Catherine will be happy with the creative options. What we can be certain of is they will have explored every option."
According to the Daily Mail, Eton's "world-class" theater department caught Kate's eye. However, its 30-mile distance from Windsor is still questionable for her.
Still, Chard admitted, "I will put my money on Eton."
"The only thing it doesn't have at the moment is the co-ed facility," she said. "… Princess Catherine, whose royal work focuses on the social and emotional well-being of the early years of a child's life, is well aware that 'one size doesn't fit all.'"
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Huawei founder says chips still lag 'one generation' behind US
Chinese tech giant Huawei's chips still "lag behind the United States by one generation", state media quoted its founder and CEO Ren Zhengfei as saying in a rare interview on Tuesday. Washington last month unveiled fresh guidelines warning firms that using Chinese-made high-tech AI semiconductors, specifically Huawei's Ascend chips, would put them at risk of violating US export controls. The Shenzhen-based company has been at the centre of an intense standoff between the economic supergiants after Washington warned its equipment could be used for espionage byBeijing, an allegation Huawei denies. Speaking to the People's Daily, the official newspaper of the ruling Communist Party, 80-year-old Ren insisted the United States had "exaggerated" Huawei's achievements. Tougher controls in recent years have prevented US chip giant Nvidia, one of Huawei's rivals, from selling certain AI semiconductors -- widely regarded as the most advanced in the world -- to Chinese firms. As a result, it is now facing tougher competition from local players in the crucial market, including Huawei. Nvidia's chief executive Jensen Huang told reporters last month that Chinese companies "are very, very talented and very determined, and the export control gave them the spirit, the energy and the government support to accelerate their development". But Ren said Huawei was "not that great yet", according to the article published on the newspaper's front page Tuesday. "Many companies in China are making chips, and quite a few are doing well -- Huawei is just one of them," he added. When asked about "external blockades and suppression" -- a veiled reference to US export restrictions on Beijing -- Ren said he had "never thought about it". "Don't dwell on the difficulties, just get the job done and move forward step by step," he added. Sanctions since 2019 have curtailed the firm's access to US-made components and technologies, forcing it to diversify its growth strategy. China has accused the United States of "bullying" and "abusing export controls to suppress and contain" the country's firms. isk/oho/dan
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Unemployment nears four-year high in wake of Reeves tax raid
UK unemployment has hit its highest level in almost four years as businesses shed jobs and freeze hiring in the wake of Rachel Reeves's tax raid. Official figures showed the unemployment rate rose to 4.6pc in the three months to April, up from 4.4pc in the previous three months. This is the highest since the summer of 2021 when Britain was only just emerging from lockdowns. The Chancellor's tax rises came into effect in April, but employers had warned that the Chancellor's £25bn National Insurance tax raid and another inflation-busting minimum wage jump were forcing them to freeze hiring in the months beforehand. Meanwhile, employers put the brakes on hiring with the number of vacancies falling from to 736,000 in the three months to May, compared with 760,000 in the previous quarter, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) said. Wage growth also slowed, to rise by 5.2pc in the three months to April on a year earlier, the slowest pace in seven months. Andrew Griffith, shadow business secretary, said: 'It is disappointing but no surprise that unemployment is up again. 'Businesses are still absorbing a £25bn jobs tax but things are about to get even worse as Labour's £5bn unemployment bill hits businesses with higher regulation.' Despite the surge in unemployment, jobs in the public sector jumped to the highest level in 14 years as the Chancellor prepares to unveil a £300bn spending spree this week. Almost 6.2m people were employed in the public sector in March, official figures show, 35,000 more than a year earlier. This is the highest number of public sector employees since December 2011. It comes ahead of Ms Reeves's spending review on Wednesday, which is expected to offer big increases to defence and health while squeezing other departments. The Chancellor has raised departmental spending by nearly £400bn since Labour won the election. It comes as economists have warned more tax rises are 'inevitable' in autumn. The figures from the ONS also show that the number of civil servants is the highest since 2006, at 550,000, rising by 6,000 from a year earlier. This helped to push the total figure of central government workers to a record high of 4m, up by 93,000 from a year ago. The ONS said the rise was driven by the NHS, the Civil Service and some local authority schools becoming academies, which changes how their staff are classified in the numbers. Private sector workers experienced slower pay growth than those in the public sector when excluding bonuses, at 5.1pc to 5.6pc in February to April compared with the same period last year. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.


New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Washington Post media critic admits failure in scrutinizing Biden coverage after ‘Where's Jackie' gaffe
Advertisement Washington Post media critic Erik Wemple reflected on his own 'failure' Monday in scrutinizing press coverage of Joe Biden and his cognitive decline, particularly after the infamous 'Where's Jackie?' gaffe. As the legacy media continues to face a reckoning over how it handled covering the former president's mental acuity before his disastrous 2024 debate performance, Wemple wrote a scathing piece calling out news organizations for not admitting any errors with the headline, 'Did legacy media fail in its Biden coverage? Not if you ask them!' In his lengthy critique, Wemple revisited an episode from a September 2022 event where Biden called for Rep. Jackie Walorski, R-Ind., who had died just weeks earlier in a car accident. Biden previously released a statement acknowledging her death after it happened and the event he attended similarly honored her memory. Advertisement 4 Erik Wemple wrote a scathing piece calling out the media's lack of self-reflection. Fox News 'Jackie, are you here? Where's Jackie?' Biden said in the viral moment. White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre defended the president at the time, insisting Walorski was simply 'top of mind.' 'It's time to turn this exercise on my own byline,' Wemple wrote Monday. 'The 'Where's Jackie' episode was my cue to start hammering mainstream outlets for not pushing on this story. Never happened — that was a failure.' Wemple noted, as Fox News Digital did at the time, that neither CNN nor MSNBC offered any coverage of the 'Where's Jackie' comment. Advertisement 4 Former President Joe Biden speaks during the White House Conference on Hunger, Nutrition, and Health, at the Ronald Reagan Building, Wednesday, Sept. 28, 2022, in Washington. AP 4 Rep. Jackie Walorski, R-Ind., is seen before a House Ways and Means Committee markup in Longworth Building on July 12, 2018. CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Imag While acknowledging some in the press, like Axios' Alex Thompson and The Wall Street Journal's Annie Linskey and Siobhan Hughes for their pre-debate reporting that shed light on Biden's cognitive decline, Wemple knocked the media for broadly lacking the vigor to get to the bottom of it sooner. 'White House coverage must involve more than observing the president in action and writing up analysis pieces about his comings and goings,' Wemple wrote. Advertisement 'It needs to include a muckraking component detailing behind-the-scenes strategies, conflicts and debates over all manner of issues, particularly those relating to the president's mental acuity. An adjacent question relates to whether Biden himself was fully abreast of and in charge of day-to-day decisions.' 4 The Washington Post office in Washington, DC, US, on Thursday, June 27, 2024. Bloomberg via Getty Images 'And it's on these fronts that major media organizations fell short: Though Biden's declining faculties were clear to all, they never ignited one of those glorious mainstream-media investigative frenzies that colonizes television and radio broadcasts,' he added. Thompson's 'Original Sin' co-author, CNN anchor Jake Tapper, said there should be 'soul-searching' in the legacy media for how Biden's clearly apparent issues were covered. 'Few souls are undergoing a pat-down,' Wemple wrote.