logo
Late-night beach find highlights sad reality of Aussie state's $88 million pledge

Late-night beach find highlights sad reality of Aussie state's $88 million pledge

Yahoo2 days ago

While most Aussies were sitting down to dinner, watching TV on the couch, or out grabbing a beer at the pub, a small group of beachgoers was waist-deep in water to start the weekend. They were crowded around a manta ray, a large protected species of fish that visitors flock to Queensland's warm waters to photograph.
But what occurred in the popular tourism town of Noosa on Friday night isn't something you'll see in holiday brochures. This manta ray had rope and chain wrapped around it, and a hook deep in its mouth. Scratches around its body, and bites from tiny fish around its mouth and long lobes it uses for communication, indicate it had been unable to move for a long time.
When wildlife rescuer William Watson arrived at the beach, his first thought was that the fish was wrapped in a boat's anchor. He worked with a group of locals for more than an hour to try and cut it free.
'He was very tired and very weak. He must have been thrashing and got himself twisted around,' the Wildlife Noosa founder told Yahoo News. 'He had a hook through the side of his mouth, I had to pull it out backwards, because you couldn't cut it.'
As the creature slowly swam away, he began to process what had happened. The equipment that had caught the manta ray wasn't from an anchor. It appeared to have been deliberately set.
The chain and hook looked to be part of a drumline, a type of baited hook placed strategically around the coast by the state government. The purpose of these devices is to catch seven target species of shark and make beachgoers feel safe, which is important given the tourism industry has an estimated value of $33 billion a year.
Related: Queensland bureaucrats accused of 'sanitising' bloody act against shark
However, Friday's incident highlights that more often than not, it's not just sharks that are being snared in drumlines and nets, but also protected species like manta rays, endangered sea turtles, and dolphins.
Documentarian and Envoy Foundation director Andre Borell told Yahoo News the problem could potentially get worse, with the Crisafulli government announcing last week it would be expanding upon a decades-old shark control program with an $88 million investment, a plan it linked to "upholding Queensland's international tourism reputation".
'It's anti-science. Lethal methods don't make beaches any safer… They're proclaiming it as a great step forward, but in reality, they're investing in something that doesn't work,' he claimed to Yahoo News.
His concerns mirror those of the RSPCA, which responded to the Crisafulli Government announcement by joining the Nets Out Now coalition and warning nets create a 'false sense of security' among beachgoers. 'These devices are not physical barriers. Sharks can swim around or beneath them, and yet they continue to kill marine life indiscriminately, including protected species that pose no threat to humans,' its head of policy Rachel Woodrow said.
Both also raised concerns about the legality of the expansion of the program, which in its current state has an exemption from the Commonwealth's threatened species protection laws, the EPBC.
Queensland's government has claimed shark controls like drumlines and nets 'likely' lessen the chances of attacks. Its primary industries minister, Tony Perrett, said the planned expansion of the program was 'big and bold'.
'It puts swimmer safety first, and it's the largest overhaul of funds this program has seen in over 60 years," he said.
Responding to questions about Queensland's shark control program and bycatch of animals like manta rays, Perrett told Yahoo the government will "prioritise the safety of people above all else."
Referring to a report by international audit group KPMG, he said nets and drumlines are "still the most effective way of protecting swimmers".
'Until the new technology is scientifically proven as effective at protecting beach goers as traditional methods, we will continue to invest in what keeps Queenslanders and our beaches safe," he said in a statement.
The expansion of the shark control program will see nets installed at up to seven new locations, and they'll be checked every day, which the department of primary industries claims will improve swimmer safety and lessen bycatch.
With some of the money being directed to research, education and innovation, and the doubling of drone surveillance from 10 to 20 locations, the department said the plan "strikes a balance" between lethal and non-lethal methods.
Looking generally at shark control in Australia, there is evidence that attacks are less likely at netted beaches. However critics argue that's because the same stretches are patrolled by lifeguards.
Queensland's tourism industry is already under pressure, with a major drawcard, the Great Barrier Reef severely degraded due to mass bleaching and extreme weather linked to climate change. Borell believes the shark control program will damage other ecosystems that draw holidaymakers to the Sunshine State.
'Manta rays, dolphins, whales, turtles, everything you can picture on a tourism poster for Queensland, we're catching and killing it in the shark control program,' he said.
Anger erupts as tourist site 'totally destroyed' in violent act
Young Aussie's fears over ancient sites under threat from controversial plan
Excited tourists watch 'nature documentary' unfold as predator hunts
While shark nets cover just 0.03 per cent of Queensland's coast, because they are placed in populated areas, their impact on protected wildlife is routinely observed.
So with whales now migrating towards Queensland's warmer waters from Antarctica, it's almost certain they'll soon be seen entangled in the nets. While NSW removes its shark nets during the winter migration, Queensland keeps them in place, and mothers and their inexperienced calves are regularly caught — an average of six per year.
And that's something that keeps Watson and his Noosa Wildlife rescue volunteers up at night.
'Everyone's got anxiety over them. It's horrible. I'd love to be waiting for the whales to be coming in, rather than thinking, please don't,' he said.
In Queensland, it is illegal for members of the public to remove drum lines or shark nets.
Love Australia's weird and wonderful environment? 🐊🦘😳 Get our new newsletter showcasing the week's best stories.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Four-day work week trend blasted by multi-millionaire businessman Kevin O'Leary: ‘Stupidest idea'
Four-day work week trend blasted by multi-millionaire businessman Kevin O'Leary: ‘Stupidest idea'

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Four-day work week trend blasted by multi-millionaire businessman Kevin O'Leary: ‘Stupidest idea'

A multi-millionaire businessman has ripped into the growing trend of four-day work weeks, calling them the 'stupidest idea' he has ever heard. Shorter working weeks are becoming increasingly popular around the world, with big names like Medibank and Bunnings in Australia among those trialling the change. Kevin O'Leary, best known as one of the investors on Shark Tank, criticised the push for a reduced work week. The outspoken businessman, who is worth an estimated $US400 million, was asked about his thoughts on the push during a recent appearance on Fox News, following the popularity of the four-day week in France. 'That's the stupidest idea I have ever heard,' he said. 'I think we should let the French go to a two-day work week and then kick their ass internationally.' RELATED Four-day week 'wave' coming to Australia: '80 per cent hours for 100 per cent pay' Centrelink cash boost over 400,000 Aussies have weeks left to confirm: 'Get what's yours' Right to disconnect warning as worker sues former employer for $800,000: 'People are nervous' France announced plans to trial four-day working weeks for parents sharing custody of kids last year. The country introduced a 35-hour work week in 2000. Roughly 10,000 workers are already thought to be working four-day weeks. O'Leary, who has also been critical of Australia's right to disconnect laws, was against following in the country's footsteps. 'There is no such thing as a work week anymore anyways in a digital economy post-pandemic,' he said. 'I look at my staff, 40 per cent of them work remotely, all around the world. It's project-based. 'Can you get it done by the 15th of June? Yes, I can. I don't care when you do it, four-day, three-day, five-day.' His comments have divided people online, with some agreeing with him that results rather than work time was the most important thing. 'It's not about days or weeks anymore. It probably never was. It's about productivity in whatever period of time the business decides,' one said. 'Very true. Norms surrounding work are slowly going away between remote work and everything being digital,' another wrote. Others said they supported four-day work weeks and had experienced the benefits themselves. 'I have a four-day work week. I can't express the difference in how much better my work week is given one extra day to decompress,' one said. 'I have been running my company on a four-day work week for a few years now. I can't imagine going back to a five-day week,' another added. The four-day work week has been gaining traction in Australia, with major companies like Medibank and Bunnings testing out the working model. One common approach is the 100:80:100 model, where workers retain 100 per cent of their salary while reducing their hours to 80 per cent and committing to 100 per cent productivity. Medibank announced it would be moving another 250 employees to the trial in October, bringing the total number of participants to 500. Medibank head of people and sustainability Kylie Bishop said it had helped cut down on unnecessary meetings and workloads as staff were committed to getting everything done in the new timeframe. 'We've seen significant and sustained improvements in employee engagement, job satisfaction and the health and wellbeing of participants, while maintaining business performance and customer outcomes,' she said. A Robert Half poll of 1,000 workers and 500 hiring managers last year found 65 per cent of employees wanted a four-day work week with retention of their full salary. The Senate Inquiry into Work and Care recommended the government undertake a four-day work week trial back in in to access your portfolio

ATO warning as Aussies follow growing trend to boost tax returns: ‘Big difference'
ATO warning as Aussies follow growing trend to boost tax returns: ‘Big difference'

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

ATO warning as Aussies follow growing trend to boost tax returns: ‘Big difference'

The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) is urging taxpayers not to use ChatGPT for their tax advice. Tax time is just around the corner and many people are looking for ways to boost their return. AI tools like ChatGPT have been booming in popularity and people are going to them to ask everything, including help with their work, meal planning and even tax advice. But ATO second commissioner Jeremy Hirschhorn has pleaded with people not to do this. 'I would caution against using AI for your tax advice,' Hirschhorn told the audience at the Financial Review AI Summit. RELATED ATO warning to millions of Aussies desperate for $1,519 cash boost: 'Misconception' Tradie reveals surprising industry where he makes '$300,000 to a million' a year Centrelink cash boost over 400,000 Aussies have weeks left to confirm: 'Get what's yours' 'Whether it's an agent or not, it's probably only a slightly better version of the barbecue [advice] for a couple of reasons. 'Tax is small changes in facts that make a big difference in outputs, and so it's very hard for an AI model to get those nuances.' 'And indeed, how do you know you're getting an Australian tax answer? If the audience is to take something from this speech, please don't use ChatGPT for your tax advice.' CPA Australia tax lead Jenny Wong has issued a similar warning and told people to treat ChatGPT and other OpenAI tools with caution. 'AI tools are only as good as the information you put into them,' she said. 'It may be tempting to ask AI bots for tips, but they are simply not able to compute the nuances of the Australian tax system or your specific circumstances.' The ATO said it was aware of taxpayers using AI to produce fraudulent documents, including false invoices. 'There have been recent examples of fraudulent documents submitted by taxpayers during the audit process,' a spokesperson said. The ATO said it can double-check financial data against bank records, and anyone found to have used AI tools to fabricate documents can face financial penalties and a criminal investigation. Taxpayers are ultimately responsible for all information in their tax return, including if they rely on inaccurate information from ChatGPT. Exaggerating a claim could have severe consequences, while making false tax claims could result in hefty fines, a criminal record or even in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data

Workplace surveillance of employers at Australian businesses exposed: 'Utterly insane'
Workplace surveillance of employers at Australian businesses exposed: 'Utterly insane'

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Workplace surveillance of employers at Australian businesses exposed: 'Utterly insane'

Victoria is calling for a major overhaul in workplace surveillance legislation after a large-scale investigation revealed just how much workers are being watched. The Legislative Assembly Economy and Infrastructure Committee found this type of surveillance had "accelerated" in recent years, thanks to huge technological advancements. Workers have been monitored through their telephone calls, computer cameras, keystrokes, and biometrics. But the Committee determined current legislation hadn't kept pace with these "dramatic" advancements, and workers have very little to defend themselves against being spied on. Peter Leonard from UNSW Business School told Yahoo Finance the problem of surveillance at the workplace "will only get bigger" and more intrusive if the law doesn't catch up. 'Terrible' work act driving Aussies to quit: 'No one will trust each other' Tradie reveals surprising industry where he makes '$300,000 to a million' a year Right to disconnect warning as worker sues former employer for $800,000 "The technologies have become so cheap, so easy to install, so easy to use, that every employer seems to be doing it," he said. The adjunct professor from UNSW's School of Private and Commercial Law said workplace surveillance mainly started out from a safety point of view. Cameras might have been installed to track a truck driver's eyes to ensure they're alert when they're on the road, or to ensure warehouse workers are wearing the proper protective gear. However, this quickly changed when the Covid pandemic forced everyone to work from weren't able to keep a close eye on their staff like they would have in an office, so they turned to systems and technologies that allowed them to do that from afar. "Whenever you install technologies like this without controls or safeguards, there's a real danger and probably a likelihood of mission creep," he told Yahoo Finance. "There is a real risk that they will be used in ways that are unreasonable, or that the data collected from the technology for reasonable purposes suddenly starts getting used for quite unreasonable purposes. "That is, until regulators step in and put some requirements and controls on this." The Committee's report found work devices like computers, webcams, mobile phones and handheld scanners gathered a raft of data on a person's work activities. This data can then be processed and used to determine a worker's location and task speed, and assess their performance, sentiment and concentration level. But the University of Melbourne's Jake Goldenfein said this creates problems for workers when they know they're being watched. "I'm working in a coolroom. I have a little iPad with a countdown clock telling me how much time I have left to finish packing this box, and when it hits zero it goes red, right, and I know I'm in trouble," he said. "At the same time, I'm a smaller person and I need to grab things off the shelf, but the stairs, the ladders, are all the way down the other end of the room. So I just climb the shelf." The investigation put a call out to businesses like Amazon, Australia Post, Coles Group, DoorDash, Optus, Qantas, Telstra, Uber, Virgin Australia, Woolworths Group and the Big Four banks. None of them responded, except for Commonwealth Bank (CBA). The Committee heard how CBA staff had to download an app called Navigate onto their personal devices to access buildings, book a workstation, register visitors and report faults. But the app also collected data on a person's location and "some workers have been asked to apply for leave when they are away from their desk or appear unproductive". There is plenty of software on the market that can do far more than that. Some can monitor login times, your search history, and the amount of time a worker spends on a certain app. These platforms can take screenshots of your computer at regular intervals to determine if a staffer is distracted or on the ball. CallMiner can record and transcribe telephone calls and uses AI to scan for certain words and phrases or to analyse how well a worker handled a call. Finance Sector Union national assistant secretary Nicole McPherson told the inquiry that one of their members had been flagged for a disciplinary process after an AI monitoring system picked up the person saying "unfortunately it's been really rainy lately" while on the phone with a client. That member was hauled into a disciplinary hearing because of the negativity. Fujitsu has also developed an AI model that can monitor a worker's facial expressions and can latch onto the tiniest changes to determine whether they're concentrating or not. The report highlighted how neuro-surveillance could be adopted en masse in the next five years. This uses neurotechnology to measure electrical activity in a person's brain to work out their cognitive state, such as their level of attention and effort. It can even decode mental images and intended speech, which could be used to understand a worker's mind and their outlook on their job. They're already being used in the mines to monitor fatigue, but it could be installed in workplaces in the not-too-distant future. The Committee flagged this "has the potential to be problematic and in some cases discriminatory" because these systems overlook other relevant factors like "empathy and creativity". One of the recommendations from the inquiry was introducing new legislation in Victoria to crack down on workplace surveillance before it gets too much. Under this proposed change, employers would be forced to notify and consult with workers about workplace surveillance practices and disclose how workers' data would be collected, used and stored. "Victoria has the opportunity to lead the way with dedicated laws requiring workplace surveillance to be necessary and reasonable," Committee chair Alison Marchant said. Leonard told Yahoo Finance surveillance should only be used for "reasonable and necessary" circumstances that are "proportionate to achieving a lawful purpose". But there might have to be a national law handed out to ensure workers across the country are protected. If you live in one state and work remotely in a business based in a different jurisdiction with different workplace surveillance rules, what protections do you have? Australian workers backed the proposal to change the law after hearing about the raft of technologies being used to watch them. "This is utterly insane and draconian as f**k WTF," wrote one person. "This is absolute insanity," added another. "My workplace has well-documented 'surveillance' policies, but nothing to this extent (yet??). I often worry the place is bugged and the bosses will be listening to conversations." "I work at this big firm and I've slowly realised we're living in a full-blown corporate Black Mirror episode," said a third. New South Wales and the ACT have the clearest definitions on what is and isn't allowed when it comes to workplace surveillance. However, the rest of the country is a bit murkier. The Workplace Surveillance Act 2005 states: Employers have to give 14 days' written notice before surveillance (CCTV, computer, tracking) begins Covert surveillance requires a magistrate's approval and is limited to certain investigations like theft Employees must be notified where and when they are being monitored Employers cannot use surveillance in private areas like toilets or changing areas The Workplace Privacy Act 2011 is similar to NSW's rules, but also stipulates that employers have to have consultation with employees before installing surveillance on them. The state is governed by the Surveillance Devices Act 1999, which prohibits the use of listening, optical, tracking and data devices without consent. There isn't a specific rule around workplace surveillance, but any attempt to surveil a staffer has to comply with the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006. The Invasion of Privacy Act 1971 (QLD) and Listening Devices Act 1991 (TAS) cover audio surveillance, however, don't touch on visual or other types of tracking devices. Workers can rely on general principles from the federal Privacy Act 1988, but its lack of clear definitions for modern surveillance could leave them with limited protections. That Act also only applies to businesses making more than $3 million annually. WA's Surveillance Devices Act 1998 and the NT's Surveillance Devices Act 2007 regulate the use of listening, optical, tracking, and data surveillance. However, there is no obligation for employers to notify workers of surveillance and no workplace-specific regulations. The Listening and Surveillance Devices Act 1972 prohibits the installation and use of surveillance devices without consent. However, there is no law that specifically addresses workplace nel recupero dei dati Effettua l'accesso per consultare il tuo portafoglio Errore nel recupero dei dati

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store