logo
Jamie Sarkonak: Looks like the courts aren't actually systemically racist

Jamie Sarkonak: Looks like the courts aren't actually systemically racist

National Post22-05-2025

Article content
But overall, the study showed that the creeping evil of systemic discrimination that has allegedly corrupted the justice system (and, really, all of Canada) isn't actually there. Yes, it's true that Indigenous people are overrepresented in the justice system, but that's just a function of that population being charged with more crimes. Accounting for offence severity, they're guilty at just the same rate as the privileged whites. And, on a number of metrics, they receive gentler outcomes, as well: stayed charges, shorter prison terms, house arrest.
Article content
There's even room to suggest white people are treated with more punitive force: the study found that half of Indigenous offenders had five or more prior convictions, compared to one-quarter of white offenders. 'This finding is important,' the authors noted, 'because evidence suggests that accused with more prior convictions are more likely to be reconvicted.' If that's the case, and both groups were found guilty at equal rates (when accounting for severity), one could infer that the criminal history of white offenders is taken into greater consideration.
Article content
Then, there's the fact that white offenders were given more long-term sentences, and were less likely to get house arrest. That tracks with the aggressive nudging the federal government has been giving the courts regarding Indigenous offenders: lower jail sentences and more house arrest. The federal prosecution deskbook even tells Crown prosecutors to seek lighter sentences for Indigenous offenders. Heck, it's the law: the Supreme Court has required judges to consider race-based discounts for Indigenous people since the 1999 decision of R v. Gladue.
Article content
White offenders did indeed have a higher acquittal rate, which could be attributed by some to anti-Indigenous racism by the courts — but it could also be a result of more white accused persons being taken all the way to trial. If weaker cases against Indigenous people are being habitually dropped, but the same isn't being done for white offenders, you'd likely see relatively more white acquittals. Indeed, federal prosecution guidelines instruct Crowns to consider Indigenous identity and 'the impact of systemic racism' in deciding whether to drop charges.
Article content
Article content
Another explanation for the relatively higher jail rate for Indigenous offenders could be their greater likelihood to commit 'administration of justice offences' — these include charges for not showing up to court, as well as breaches of bail and probation conditions. These offences theoretically come with a greater likelihood of jail, because the offender has demonstrated trouble following court orders while out in the community. So, if a group was committing them at greater rates, one would expect that group to end up in jail at greater rates. Which is exactly what was found.
Article content
There are still plenty of unknowns in the data, but what is certain is that we don't have definitive proof of a systemically racist justice system. Liberals will point to the demographics of the prison population as a sign of Canada's sins, but any further perusal of the data shows that the system isn't, in fact, tilted in all ways against Indigenous people.
Article content
And yet, the Liberal government is almost certain to carry on with the Trudeauvian crusade against 'systemic racism,' which involves doling out vast sums to Indigenous groups and assisting them in setting up a parallel justice system, a 'decarceration strategic framework' and all sorts of other racially-restricted programs that erode the notion of equality in Canada. Evidence-based policy, indeed.
Article content

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Injured Workers' Day rally taking place in London on Sunday
Injured Workers' Day rally taking place in London on Sunday

CTV News

time25 minutes ago

  • CTV News

Injured Workers' Day rally taking place in London on Sunday

Rallies will be taking place across Ontario today - including in London - to mark Injured Workers' Day. Injured and ill workers across Ontario will gather to mark the 43rd Annual Injured Workers' Day - the first to be officially proclaimed by the Ontario Legislature following the passage of Bill 118 - The Injured Workers' Day Act. While workers and advocates state this official recognition of the day is an important milestone, they state that meaningful change must follow. Ontario Network of Injured Workers Groups (ONIWG) is calling attention to ongoing injustices faced by injured workers such as denied healthcare and systemic discrimination, especially against migrant workers, over $20-billion in WSIB employer rebates, and harmful practices that cut compensation benefits. The rally in London will take place at 11 a.m. on June 1 on the northwest corner of Victoria Park. 060125_occupy WSIB injured workers day London rally June 1 is Injured Workers Day and there will be a rally in London (Source: Occupy WSIB) Kendal McKinney, member of the research and action committee with ONIWG, says the group has been marking the day unofficially before this year. 'This is the first Injured Workers' Day that is officially recognized by the Province of Ontario as Injured Workers' Day. So we're trying to bring attention and awareness to the plight of injured workers, and the state of the workers comp system.' He says the current system is failing for these individuals. 'We actually do have a replacement act that is hopefully going to be introduced by a private Member's bill in the legislature in the fall. So, the idea is to raise awareness, and hopefully rally support behind this drive to put workers in a much, much better situation than they're in right now.' McKinney says these workers are not alone. 'One of the things that this is for that is also really, really important just as much if not more so then reaching the general public with this information is for injured workers to see each other, and understand that they are not alone.' This year's Injured Workers' Day events will take place in six cities including Toronto, London, Oshawa, Peterborough, Thunder Bay, and Windsor. More information can be found by clicking here. - by Meagan Delaurier, Rob Hindi, AM800, with files from CTV News London's Bailey Shakyaver

Injured Workers' Day rally taking place in Windsor on Sunday
Injured Workers' Day rally taking place in Windsor on Sunday

CTV News

time27 minutes ago

  • CTV News

Injured Workers' Day rally taking place in Windsor on Sunday

Rallies will be taking place across Ontario today - including in Windsor - to mark Injured Workers' Day. Injured and ill workers across Ontario will gather to mark the 43rd Annual Injured Workers' Day - the first to be officially proclaimed by the Ontario Legislature following the passage of Bill 118 - The Injured Workers' Day Act. While workers and advocates state this official recognition of the day is an important milestone, they state that meaningful change must follow. Ontario Network of Injured Workers Groups (ONIWG) is calling attention to ongoing injustices faced by injured workers such as denied healthcare and systemic discrimination, especially against migrant workers, over $20-billion in WSIB employer rebates, and harmful practices that cut compensation benefits. The rally in Windsor will take place at 11 a.m. on June 1 at the corner of Ouellette Avenue and Tecumseh Road. 060125_workers rights injured strike windsor An Injured Workers' Day rally will be taking place in Windsor on Sunday, June 1, 2025. (Source: Ontario Network of Injured Workers Groups) Kendal McKinney, member of the research and action committee with ONIWG, says the group has been marking the day unofficially before this year. 'This is the first Injured Workers' Day that is officially recognized by the Province of Ontario as Injured Workers' Day. So we're trying to bring attention and awareness to the plight of injured workers, and the state of the workers comp system.' He says the current system is failing for these individuals. 'We actually do have a replacement act that is hopefully going to be introduced by a private Member's bill in the legislature in the fall. So, the idea is to raise awareness, and hopefully rally support behind this drive to put workers in a much, much better situation than they're in right now.' McKinney says these workers are not alone. 'One of the things that this is for that is also really, really important just as much if not more so then reaching the general public with this information is for injured workers to see each other, and understand that they are not alone.' This year's Injured Workers' Day events will take place in six cities including Toronto, London, Oshawa, Peterborough, Thunder Bay, and Windsor. More information can be found by clicking here. - by Meagan Delaurier, Rob Hindi, AM800

How the fate of a herd of ostriches on a small B.C. farm caught the attention of the Trump administration
How the fate of a herd of ostriches on a small B.C. farm caught the attention of the Trump administration

CBC

time40 minutes ago

  • CBC

How the fate of a herd of ostriches on a small B.C. farm caught the attention of the Trump administration

Edgewood, B.C. isn't usually the sort of place that would be on the radar of high-ranking White House officials. On the west shore of Lower Arrow Lake and surrounded by the Monashee Mountains, it's a roughly 200-kilometre drive from Kelowna, B.C. on a windy road. An unincorporated community, the latest census put it at a population of 235 people working in farming, forestry and tourism. But since December 2024, it's been making international headlines over the fate of a group of ostriches living on one particular farm near the end of a rural road: Universal Ostrich, owned by Karen Espersen and Dave Bilinski and whose spokesperson is Katie Pasitney, Espersen's daughter. In December, Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) officials were tipped off that some of the large birds on the farm had died, with tests confirming the presence of avian flu. That resulted in a cull order, which the farm has fought, picking up high-profile allies along the way and a court ruling allowing the cull to move forward. Among the farm's supporters are U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., former TV host and current administrator for the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Dr. Mehmet Oz, and U.S. billionaire John Catsimatidis, all of whom who have now publicly urged Canadian officials to allow the ostriches to live. WATCH | U.S. officials seek to reverse ostriches' fate: Dr. Oz, U.S. billionaire offer to take B.C. ostriches ordered killed 4 days ago Duration 2:42 Meanwhile, the CFIA argues that as difficult as the decision is, the cull must move forward to protect public health and Canada's agriculture industry. On May 30, the agency said the farm has been fined $20,000 for its failure to report the initial infection and deaths of birds, and for its later failure to adhere to quarantine and cull orders. And at the centre of it is a farm full of ostriches in a tucked-away part of the province. "We've taken years to be able to pet these guys, walk among these guys," Espersen said in a Facebook video, surrounded by her birds, in early May. "If we don't stand for this … then what kind of world have we become?" Here's what you need to know about this story, so far: The avian flu context The government of Canada, as well as other governments worldwide, are currently monitoring an outbreak of a strain of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) known as H5N1. Though it mainly infects birds, it can spread to other animals and humans, which typically happens through direct contact with infected birds or contaminated environments, the government says. While human infection is rare, the fatality rate is "approximately 52 per cent", the government says, though it cautions that number may be an overestimate "given that mild infections can go undetected and under-reported." The first human case of H5N1 contracted in Canada was reported in B.C. in November 2024. Avian flu's primary impact has been seen among domestic birds, particularly chickens. Because poultry live together in close quarters, the virus can spread quickly among the flock, leading to high mortality rates and potential mutations. The disease has been blamed as a primary factor for high egg prices in the United States as laying hens were killed. In response to the virus, the CFIA has a "stamping out" policy which requires all domestic birds in a flock to be killed even if the virus is detected in just one bird. Thousands of birds have been culled under this policy. What you should know about the H5N1 strain of avian flu 6 months ago Duration 2:56 "Allowing a domestic poultry flock known to be exposed to HPAI to remain alive allows a potential source of the virus to persist," the CFIA said in a statement. "A human case of H5N1 in B.C. earlier this year required critical care, and an extended hospital stay for the patient, and there have been a number of human cases in the United States, including a fatality." Disease detected at Universal Ostrich According to court documents, in early December 2024 the farm was home to about 450 ostriches, some more than three decades old. Partway through the month, several ostriches on the farm developed "flu-like" symptoms, which started about a week after 300-500 ducks landed on the premises. The farm says that from Dec. 14, 2024 to Jan. 14, 2025, "69 young male and female breeders died, most of them under four years old." This ostrich farm survived wildfires. Now, avian flu means 400 birds need to be culled On Dec. 28, the CFIA investigated following an "anonymous report of multiple ostrich deaths" at the farm, the court document says, and a quarantine was ordered the same day four more ostriches died. Samples were collected from two of the dead ostriches and by Dec. 31 they had tested positive for avian flu at the Canadian Animal Health Surveillance Network laboratory in Abbotsford, B.C.. On Jan. 3 the National Centre for Foreign Animal Disease in Winnipeg confirmed H5N1. The order to cull the flock was given on Dec. 31. Quarantine orders not followed Inspectors also noted the ostriches were in open pens, allowing for free access by wild birds and animals, and that staff at the farm shared equipment and "moved freely among open pens", posing a biosecurity hazard when the disease was present. Even in January, after quarantine orders were in place, inspectors noted wild animals were still freely interacting with the ostriches and other safety measures weren't being followed. "The record also shows that the Applicant's farm also exhibited sick ostriches being moved to treatment pens in contravention of quarantine requirements, dead ostriches dragged through pens populated with living ones without robust separation measures, and unauthorized individuals walking inside the infected zone," the judge wrote. In its May 30 statement, the CFIA wrote that the farm's failure to quarantine its birds increased the chance of transmission and "reflect a disregard for regulatory compliance and animal health standards." Claims of herd immunity When the cull order was given on Dec. 31, 2024, the farm was given a compliance deadline of Feb. 1, 2025. They used that time to try and build a case for the ostriches to be spared. According to the court case, the farm's operators began raising the ostriches in the mid-1990s, and Espersen and Bilinski say they incorporated Universal Ostrich Farms, Inc. in 2001 with a focus on "ethical breeding and care." In court, the farm's lawyer says that the farm's operations include selling breeding stock, raising birds for slaughter and meat and agri-tourism. However, the farm also says it pivoted during the COVID-19 pandemic to focus instead on research, specifically on trying to use ostrich eggs to produce antibodies for COVID-19 or other viruses. "Meat processing ceased in the summer of 2019," it said in a statement. The farm says it partnered with Yasuhiro Tsukamoto of Kyoto Prefectural University in Japan for this work. Neither Tsukamoto nor the university have responded to CBC News in relation to the story but the researcher, known in some circles as "Dr. Ostrich," has previously made headlines for his work with ostrich eggs and COVID-19. CBC News also heard from a researcher who has confirmed his work with Universal Ostrich. "Dr. Yasuhiro Tsukamoto and I are Co-CEOs of Ostrich Pharma USA (OPUSA)," said Stuart Greenberg in an email. "OPUSA has been tasked with commercializing the specialized ostrich antibodies produced by Dr. Tsukamoto and his research team in Japan. We have been working with Universal Ostrich in B.C. to develop the techniques for large-scale production of ostrich antibodies derived from the yolks of their eggs," the email continues. "Our focus has been on the production of antibodies against human digestive enzymes to produce a dietary supplement for weight loss." Tsukamoto has not confirmed his work in this area. Additionally, Universal Ostrich maintains that all of the birds that died due to avian flu were acquired "after 2020." This is important to them because they say that in March 2020, a flu-like disease infected their herd which they believe gave the survivors "natural and eventual herd immunity," and say that since January the remainder of the ostriches are "happy and healthy" showing no sign of sickness. Exemption denied According to the court case, the farm first raised the possibility that its ostriches had developed immunity to avian flu during a Jan. 2 phone call with a CFIA case officer, who explained the process for receiving an exemption to the cull order. In followup emails, the officer provided the forms and documentation that would be needed to make the case that the birds should not be killed, and the farm made its application. However, by Jan. 10 the exemption was rejected. According to the courts, the CFIA concluded the farm "failed to demonstrate the existence of any distinct epidemiological unit," that was not likely to be exposed to avian flu, nor had it submitted "sufficient evidence to support its claims of genetic rarity and value qualifying the flock for an exemption," the latter of which could be proven through breeding books, recognition from breed associations, or genomic testing. The May 30 statement from the CFIA also said the farm failed to provide "research documentation" and that the farm lacks facilities "suitable for controlled research activity or trials." The court case also noted that there has only been one exemption to the "stamping out" policy granted in Canada during the current H5N1 outbreak, in the case of a turkey farm infected in 2022 that was able to demonstrate the complete separation, including biosecurity measures, of turkey flocks where some birds had been infected. Not only were the spared birds kept in separate barns from the infected animals with distinct ventilation and a "shower in/shower out" procedure, but the facility was also able to demonstrate the birds had "rare and valuable genetics" used for "high value pedigree birds." The CFIA also refused the ostrich farm's request that it do follow-up testing on its surviving birds. Legal courts and court of public opinion The farm went public with its plight early, with Pasitney first speaking to CBC News on Jan. 9. The story was also covered by local outlets and was later picked up as a campaign by the Ezra Levant-owned website the Rebel, which in a Jan. 24 post encouraged readers to begin emailing the CFIA and other officials, claiming the cull was in part because of the influence of major pharmaceutical companies. Also involved is B.C. Rising, a group with a website that includes a section arguing that COVID-19 was part of a United Nations-led plot to take control of vast swaths of land and that 15-minute cities, an urban planning tool aimed at creating walkable neighbourhoods, is actually a plot to trap people in individual sectors of their city. The site now has a section titled "Save Our Ostriches" and helped organize a "convoy" of people to visit the farm and show their opposition to the kill order. The farm welcomed supporters, while also posting a disclaimer stating it did not necessarily agree with all of the material being circulated by those who had taken up the cause of saving the ostriches. "We're just trying to do what's right," Pasitney said. In the meantime, the farm contracted a lawyer to apply for the cull to be stayed until the case could be heard by the courts, arguing Universal Ostrich would suffer "irreparable harm" should it move ahead. That stay was granted, and the case went to federal court for two days of hearings on April 14 and 15. Legal and scientific debate During the hearings, Universal Ostrich pleaded its case for an exemption, reiterating many of its previous claims about herd immunity and the scientific value of its birds. It also called on three individuals who argued that the stamping-out policy used by the CFIA was not required, at least in the case of the ostriches. Those individuals were Steven Pelech, a UBC professor and biochemist with training in immunology and virology, Bryan Brindle, an immunologist at the University of Guelph and Jeff Wilson, a former senior epidemiologist and manager at the Public Heath Agency of Canada. Collectively, the trio made the case that ostriches should be treated as different from hens or other poultry due to a combination of their long lifespan (three to five decades) and the fact that they don't live in as densely populated conditions as hens. They also argued that the CFIA should have been open to further testing of the surviving birds after the initial deaths occurred. But the CFIA pushed back. "Whether or not the birds recover and appear healthy is not the concern when implementing a cull policy," said Paul Saunders, the agency's lawyer. "That concern also includes the potential for the mutation of the virus among healthy birds.... an infection in birds could be a precursor to a human flu pandemic. Regardless of how likely that is, once it happens, it's happened, so that is a concern motivating the CFIA's response." The CFIA also relied on a report from Shannon French, a veterinary epidemiologist trained in epidemiology, virology and poultry health management, outlining the international scientific standards that inform its decision-making. The agency's legal team also attacked the trio of scientists put forward by the farm, stating none have ever worked with ostriches, and that much of their testimony was "speculative" and "well outside mainstream peer-reviewed literature." Likewise, the farm's lawyers attacked French for not being impartial given her professional association with the CFIA. "Unsurprisingly, each side seeks to narrow the evidentiary footprint of the other, and asks this Court to rely on the opinion of their experts should opinions diverge," Justice Russel Zinn wrote, ultimately declaring it would be inappropriate for him or any other judge to do so. Instead, he focused on the fact that the CFIA was the agency in Canada tasked with managing the complex scientific and technical decisions in relation to avian flu. "When Parliament leaves technical or scientific assessments to specialized administrative bodies, it signals that those bodies, not the courts, are best positioned to make judgments on complex, expertise-driven matters," he wrote, allowing the cull to proceed. A difficult decision Both Zinn and the CFIA noted the emotional and economic toll any cull takes on farmers. They also noted that the cull is not punishment but instead based on the pubic good, which is also why farms receive financial compensation when they take place — up to $3,000 per animal in the case of the ostriches. "While compensation may not offset the emotional toll of depopulation, it can provide resources to recover and reestablish operations," CFIA said. But that's not feasible for Universal Ostrich, Pasitney said. Her mother is in her 60s, her business partner in his 70s, and they don't feel they can start over with a new set of birds, especially ones as finicky as ostriches. "They're in the pecking order," Pasitney said. "They know them." Scientists not involved in the court case say the CFIA and Universal Ostrich are trying to navigate a difficult position. Jean-Pierre Vaillancourt, a professor at the University of Montreal's veterinary school, says Canada has signed a treaty with the World Organisation for Animal Health, which means it has agreed on certain specific measures, like culls, when it comes to controlling avian flu. "We try to extinguish the fire — so essentially the virus can't feed and replicate if it has other birds around," he said. J. Scott Weese, a professor at the Ontario Veterinary College, told CBC News in an email that a decision to cull animals at a farm is a cost-benefit decision, where the costs and benefits can't be quantified easily. "In general, culling makes more sense when there's widespread infection, risk to people around the animals, limited other exposure risk, where disease is more severe and where there's less value — economic, conservation, human-animal bond — of the animals," he said. But Weese added that H5N1 is now well established in Canada, and there may be less justification for culling from the standpoint of controlling disease. "An individual group of birds is a drop in the bucket now," he said. "Culling probably has little population benefit." He added, though, that from a "risk aversion standpoint," a cull is the "easiest thing" to do. And Fiona Brinkman, a professor at Simon Fraser University's department of molecular biology and biochemistry called the spread of avian flu "a tragedy," saying that she had hoped the CFIA would conduct new tests of the ostriches while she also recognized the worry that they could be reinfected or asymptomatic, passing the flu back and forth with wild birds. "There's a real problem with the birds not being able to be sheltered," she said. "Poultry, for example, you can put them in a barn. That's not appropriate for ostriches." And rights group Animal Justice has become involved, arguing that rather than mass culls, Canada should focus on improving conditions at large-scale poultry farms where birds are kept in more confined conditions. Political pushback Despite the ruling, B.C.'s premier has expressed frustration with the CFIA for not showing more "flexibility" in its decision making. "We understand the importance of containing the bird flu and the important role that agency plays," he said following the court ruling. "What's hard to watch is a lack of discretion and ability to evaluate case-by-case scenarios." He said putting the specifics of the ostrich case aside, it's a "consistent experience the province has had with federal agencies." Conservative MP Scott Anderson has visited the farm, which is in his riding, and says he has asked the CFIA to "hold off" on the cull and be open to other solutions. Another politician to visit is independent MLA Jordan Kealey of Peace River North, who is a farmer himself. He told CBC News the case had struck fear into many independent farmers who worry that with avian flu so prevalent among wild birds, it will be nearly impossible to avoid exposure and, ultimately, will lead to the loss of animals. Meanwhile, the Regional District of Central Kootenay voted to not accept the carcasses of any killed ostriches at local landfills unless followup testing of the birds was done, and the results made public. That meeting was attended by nearly 300 supporters of the farm via Zoom. Threats, deaths and RCMP involvement Since the ruling, a few dozen supporters have camped out at the farm, at the encouragement of its owners, with Espersen encouraging them to "come surround the farm" and "don't let them do this to these beautiful animals." WATCH | Supporters gather at Universal Ostrich: Supporters back ostrich farm fighting cull despite past cases of avian flu 8 days ago Duration 3:36 The remote community of Edgewood, B.C., is now ground zero for a fight to save 400 ostriches. Protesters have descended on Universal Ostrich Farm this weekend, defying an avian flu cull order. Radio-Canada's Camille Vernet was there this week, exploring why people are so deeply invested in this flock's fate. The farm has urged its supporters to be peaceful and spoken out against threats of violence that have been made by some opposed to the cull. The union representing CFIA workers says it has fears over some of the rhetoric being posted online, including death threats against members. "Nobody likes to see their flocks culled, and we certainly don't take any pleasure in doing it, but ... it is our jobs, it's our mandate for the safety of Canadians to ensure that we carry out our job," said Milton Dyck, the president of the Agriculture Union, in an interview with CBC News. In its May 30 statement, the CFIA said the farm owners and supporters had gathered in "an apparent attempt to prevent the CFIA from carrying out its operations at the infected premises. "This has delayed a timely and appropriate response to the HPAI infected premises, resulting in ongoing health risks to animals and humans," the statement read. On the other side, Universal Ostrich says two of its birds have been shot, one on the night of March 21 and the other on the night of May 23. RCMP has not confirmed the cause of the deaths but says it is investigating both instances. RCMP liason officers have also been paying regular visits to the farm in what they describe as an effort to maintain safety for everyone involved. Universal Ostrich says it supports the RCMP's presence. RFK Jr. and Dr. Oz weigh in In the meantime, word of the ostriches' fate has continued to grow through dedicated coverage from independent streamers and websites dedicated to pushing back against what they view as government overreach. One of the most high-profile supporters to jump on the cause has been U.S. billionaire John Catsimatidis, who told CBC News he had been following the story through a website called Broken Truth. That website, published through the Substack platform, describes itself as a network aimed at "exposing fraud and corruption, particularly in medicine and beyond," and says it has its roots in pushing back against public health policies stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic. Catsimatidis then used his platform, which includes a radio show on a New York-based station he owns, to bring the topic up to other leaders, including Kennedy. During an April episode of his program with the health secretary, Catsimatidis claimed the ostriches were being killed because of corruption and pharmaceutical companies, with Kennedy responding that it was a "huge mistake." Kennedy then followed up with a letter posted X on May 23, stating that he had met with the president of the CFIA and was requesting that Canada consider not culling the herd but rather work with the United States to research them. The U.S. health secretary has previously suggested in interviews that farmers should allow avian flu to "run through" their flocks in order to "preserve the birds that are immune to it" — a significant departure from Canadian, U.S. and international health guidelines that has received widespread criticism from those tasked with controlling the disease. Additionally, former TV host Dr. Mehmet Oz, who is now the administrator for the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, has offered to take the ostriches in at his ranch. The farm has rejected the offer but said it appreciates the support. "They see the science, they see the potential," Pasitney said in an interview with CBC News. Fate unknown Through all this, the CFIA has remained steadfast in its policy to have the flock culled, saying stamping out is a necessary policy needed to protect public health and Canada's argriculture industry. It says the cull will be done humanely, and under veterinary supervision, but that it will not be sharing details of the operation — including when it might take place — in advance. But on May 28, Canada's minister of agriculture indicated the birds will "not necessarily" be killed. "We're in a process," Heath MacDonald, the minister of agriculture and agri-food, said. "We're taking all facts into consideration. And we'll move forward on the best possible solution for everybody involved." Asked directly if the birds would be killed, he said, "The process is in place. And not necessarily." And Universal Ostrich is hoping to go back to court, having filed an appeal of the earlier court ruling on May 26. According to the Canadian Press, the farm's appeal claims the court made "multiple reversible errors" in its earlier ruling upholding the cull order, and that its own lawyers provided "ineffective assistance" that "amounted to incompetence, and resulted in a miscarriage of justice." The farm's appeal says "prior counsel had a financial stake in the destruction of the appellant's ostriches, resulting in a blatant conflict of interest." Lee Turner, one of the farm's former lawyers, told The Canadian Press he "certainly did not" have a conflict of interest, and his co-counsel Michael Carter did a "a remarkable job with the short window of time that he had."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store