Steep international tuition fees may prevent Ukrainian teen refugee from attending university
B.C. has become home for 18-year-old Hanna Ushkanova.
She fled war in Ukraine three years ago and was living in a refugee camp in Greece when she was connected with a Chilliwack family, who took her in as their own.
"They gave me a place, and they gave me so much love and support," said Ushaknova.
Her dream is to build a life in B.C., pursuing a career in medical research. But in the face of high international tuition fees, she is fighting to attend the University of British Columbia this fall.
Ushkanova has been accepted to study sciences at the university. She says she wants to work in the medical field, specifically doing cell research to help find cures for diseases.
Gord Robertson and Julie Veer, who Ushkanova refers to as her Canadian mom and dad, say they would like to continue supporting Ushkanova financially but are unable to afford high international tuition rates—which range from around $40,000 to $60,000 a year depending on the program.
Ushkanova's parents in Ukraine are also unable to help with tuition. She says they are struggling to make ends meet amidst the war.
WATCH | Ukrainian student in B.C. faces tuition spike:
Change to B.C. university tuition rule leaves Ukrainian student in limbo
1 day ago
Duration 2:05
A young Ukrainian refugee has built a life in B.C. after fleeing the war. She hopes to pursue a career in medical research, but steep international tuition fees may prevent her from attending university. As CBC's Michelle Gomez reports, the foreign student is hoping officials will make an exception for those in her position.
According to UBC's policy, the university offers domestic tuition rates for people with refugee status. However, those who fled the war in Ukraine are not considered refugees by the Canadian government.
In 2022, the province temporarily mandated that universities offer domestic tuition rates to Ukrainian students entering under the Canada-Ukraine Authorization for Emergency Travel visa (CUAET).
But the University of British Columbia has ended that policy, noting its last intake offering domestic rates to CUAET visa holders was in September 2023.
"The war is still going. . . we are still in the same situation," said Ushkanova, "I don't think it's fair for Ukrainians."
The family says they have reached out to UBC as well as the province but haven't heard back yet.
UBC said in a statement to CBC that it is aware the federal government recently extended the deadline for Ukrainian refugees to apply for a new study permit and will review possible implications in the days ahead.
"We can certainly understand the end of the CUAET program is concerning for prospective Ukrainian students," said a statement from UBC.
"We strongly encourage any affected prospective students to research and apply for scholarships that can help them."
The B.C. Ministry of Post Secondary Education said in a statement that universities may have options for financial assistance on a case-by-case basis but did not respond to specific questions about Ushkanova's case.
Ushkanova says she knows there are other young Ukrainians completing high school in B.C. and hopes the university will make an exception for those in her position.
'This place is my home'
When the war first broke out in Ukraine, Robertson and Veer's 14-year-old daughter, Amelie, knew she wanted to do something.
"Amelie came to us and said I want to help," said Robertson. "Help them get settled in Canada, away from the war."
After doing some research, Amelie found a volunteer organization that connected her with Ushkanova, who joined the family in Canada in February 2023.
Since arriving, Ushkanova and Amelie say they have become like sisters.
And Roberson says Ushkanova has thrived in school, earning a grade average in the high 90s and participating in extracurricular activities.
There are other universities in Canada that still offer domestic tuition to Ukrainian refugees, such as the University of Alberta.
But for Ushkanova, moving would mean no support system.
"I feel like this place is my home now," she said.
Robertson said that after everything Ushkanova has been through at a young age, uprooting her life would be tough.
"If she stays in B.C., we're here to support her. We'll continue to be right by her side through everything," said Robertson.
He said moving abroad was not a choice for many young Ukrainians like Ushkanova, but a survival move.
"They're not like a regular international student who's coming from perhaps a position of wealth, so it's impossible for them," he said.
Ushkanova hopes to continue her education beyond an undergraduate degree, eventually pursuing a master's or PhD. She also wants to become a Canadian citizen.
She says she wants to be an example to other young Ukrainians, showing that they can rise above challenges and pursue their dreams.
But without guaranteed access to education close to home in the fall, she says this future remains uncertain.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
34 minutes ago
- CBC
Ottawa turns down St. John's $5M plan to turn commercial space into homes
The federal government has turned down a $5 million plan from the City of St. John's to turn commercial property to residential units, according to a member of city council. While the money would not have been limited to downtown properties, St. John's city councillor Ron Ellsworth said the proposal was part of a push to get more people living in the city's downtown area. "If we want the downtown businesses, if we want the downtown services and programs to continue to serve, we need people living in the downtown and we have a lot of older commercial buildings that are very hard for conversion," he said in an interview with The St. John's Morning Show. The city applied for the money through the housing accelerator fund, a Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) initiative paid for by the federal government, intended to speed up housing development. The city of St. John's received $10.4 million from the fund last year, after the rejection of another previous application. CBC News has asked the CMHC to comment on why it turned down the city's proposal. Ellsworth said the city applied for the money in response to former federal housing minister Sean Fraser's challenge for "aggressive" ideas to tackle housing. "This was an opportunity to do something different, something unique. And while it was well received, obviously like all of us, you have a limited amount of funding and the federal government decided other projects ranked higher and we were not successful," he said. Ellsworth said the city wouldn't take on the task of converting commercial properties itself; rather, it would use the money to work with commercial property owners. Downtown business association in favour Scott Cluney, executive director of the Downtown St. John's business association, said he's all for commercial to residential conversions in the downtown area. "One of the things that makes a strong, vibrant downtown is more people living in the downtown," he said. "The more people who live in the downtown supports the business community in the downtown." Cluney said he doesn't necessarily believe converting commercial properties to residential units would drive commercial rent up — especially if buildings remained as mixed-use, with businesses at street level and residential units on upper floors. Though the city wasn't successful with its proposal, Cluney said he's heard from property owners who are considering commercial to residential conversions. "It's something that a lot of property owners have been looking at a fair bit in the past as especially as it relates to some of the older stock buildings," he said. Some projects are already under development. On June 3, St. John's city council advanced a proposal to convert 275 Duckworth St., a commercial property built in 1911, to residential units. Raising the Roof, a non-profit group, is planning to turn the building into 34 affordable micro-units. Ellsworth voted in favour of the proposal. "We're trying to encourage our diversity of housing options and this is the real first option we've had for the downtown core," he said. The city is in Year 2 of a housing master plan, using the $10.4 million to modernize regulations and eliminate certain fees for developers. Ellsworth said the next phase for the city is working with community organizations on further housing initiatives.
Toronto Star
40 minutes ago
- Toronto Star
Canadians favour other countries over Donald Trump's America, survey suggests
As G7 leaders gather in Kananaskis, Alta., a new poll suggests Canadians are souring on the U.S. and embracing relations with other world powers. The Pollara Strategic Insights survey found net impressions of the U.S. have plunged since President Donald Trump returned to office in January. At the same time, Canadians are feeling positive about the other G7 member nations: Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, France and Germany. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW 'We've kind of lost our best friend in the United States and maybe, as a country, Canada is now looking toward some of its older friends to reconnect with as a result of that,' said Dan Arnold, Pollara's chief strategy officer, referring to Trump's tariffs on Canadian goods that have led to a trade war between the neighbouring countries. Indeed, the firm polled people in Canada and the U.K. and found similar results on both sides of the Atlantic. Five out of six Canadians — 83 per cent — said the bilateral relationship with Britain was 'important' with only 17 per cent saying it wasn't. Across the pond, 76 per cent of Britons said their country's relationship with Canada was 'important' while about one in four said it was not. The British have a more positive view of Canada (+78 per cent) than any other country in the poll — ahead of Japan (+61 per cent), Germany (+60 per cent), France (+50 per cent) and Ukraine (+47 per cent). But the poll found they have a negative view toward India (-1 per cent), the U.S. (-3 per cent), China (-24 per cent) and Russia (-63 per cent). ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW Among Canadians, Italy has a +66 per cent favourability rating followed by Japan at +64 per cent, the U.K. at +59 per cent, France at +57 per cent, Germany at +54 per cent and Ukraine at +41 per cent. China was at -27 per cent, India at -29 per cent, the U.S. at -47 per cent and Russia at -63 per cent. That's a 60 percentage point drop in Canadian sentiment toward the American since Pollara's survey last year when Joe Biden was U.S. president. Using online panels, Pollara surveyed 3,400 Canadians on May 16-20. While opt-in polls cannot be assigned a margin of error, for comparison purposes, a random sample of this size would have one of plus or minus 1.7 percentage points, 19 times out of 20. Similarly, the firm polled 2,511 Britons on May 2-16. The margin of error for comparable surveys is within 1.9 percentage points, 19 times out of 20. 'If the Americans aren't going to be the number-one ally in many respects for the next three years (of Trump's presidency) … then the Canada-U.K. relationship is something that bears some noting,' said Arnold, pointing out Canada's recently elected Prime Minister Mark Carney used to be governor of the Bank of England. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW Because of that, 60 per cent of Britons are familiar with him, and of those, 80 per cent had a positive view of Carney, who succeeded Justin Trudeau as Liberal leader on March 9 and was elected April 28. Just seven per cent had a negative view and the rest had no opinion. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is not as well known among Canadians. Only 26 per cent were familiar with him. Of those, 58 per cent had a positive view with 30 per cent negative and the remainder had no opinion. That's an overall +28 per cent for Starmer, who won power last summer. The most admired foreign leader among Canadians was Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who will attend the G7 summit that begins Sunday. Zelenskyy, whose country was invaded by Russia in 2022, was at +53 per cent, ahead of French President Emmanuel Macron (+46 per cent), German Chancellor Friedrich Merz (+33 per cent), Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba (+31 per cent) and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni (+29 per cent). On the negative side of the ledger, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who will also be at the G7, was at -17 per cent, ahead of Chinese President Xi Jinping (-52 per cent), Trump (-66 per cent) and Russian President Vladimir Putin (-69 per cent). Neither Xi nor Putin was invited to Kananaskis. Politics Headlines Newsletter Get the latest news and unmatched insights in your inbox every evening Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. Please enter a valid email address. Sign Up Yes, I'd also like to receive customized content suggestions and promotional messages from the Star. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Politics Headlines Newsletter You're signed up! You'll start getting Politics Headlines in your inbox soon. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page.
National Observer
44 minutes ago
- National Observer
Ford's new energy plan for Ontario increases reliance on nuclear, fossil fuels
The Ford government is projecting a major shift toward nuclear power to meet rising electricity demand and support Ontario's transition to net-zero emissions by mid-century. Its newly released long-term Energy for Generations plan — billed as the province's first-ever integrated energy strategy — also shows an increased reliance on fossil fuels over the next decade, with emissions expected to rise before declining after 2030. The province describes the plan as 'a comprehensive roadmap to meet future energy needs, support new housing, and power the most competitive economy in the G7.' 'As energy demand soars, our plan leverages 'Made-In-Ontario' to build affordable, clean, and always reliable power, built by and for Canadians,' Ontario's Minister of Energy and Mines Stephen Lecce said in a statement. The plan will help the province meet growing electricity demand while achieving over 99 per cent zero-emissions electricity by 2050, he added. Critics say the plan misses key opportunities to scale-up renewables, puts energy affordability at risk and increases Ontario's dependence on foreign energy supplies. The plan projects total electricity production in 2050 to be just under 275 terawatt-hours (TWh), with nuclear making up the largest share at over 200 TWh. That means nuclear plants could supply more than 70 per cent of Ontario's electricity by 2050, up from about 50 per cent today. The plan projects the province could need up to 17,800 MW of new nuclear power by 2050, equivalent to building five new Darlington nuclear power stations. Currently, Ontario's nuclear fleet — Bruce, Darlington, and Pickering — provides 12,000 MW of capacity. The plan projects the province could need up to 17,800 MW of new nuclear power by 2050, equivalent to building five new Darlington stations. To support this buildout, the province says it is preparing new nuclear sites and has already begun early engagement with First Nation and local communities. A new nuclear technology panel will guide technology choices and project timelines, with input from Ontario Power Generation, Bruce Power, the Independent Electricity System Operator and government officials. The province says nuclear projects are complex and costly, and it plans to explore new ownership models and equity partnerships to attract private capital and help finance the expansion. It aims to attract investment from Canadian pension funds and institutional investors to 'keep more Canadian energy dollars working here at home,' the province said. 'This isn't a plan — it's a policy statement' Mark Winfield, professor at York University and co-chair of its Sustainable Energy Initiative, said the plan lacks a clear decision-making framework and basic accountability mechanisms. He said there is no process in place to evaluate whether the government's chosen energy path is the most affordable or lowest-risk for the province. 'There is no oversight or review process to assess whether this represents the least-cost or lowest-risk option for Ontario,' Winfield said. By 'review,' Winfield refers to independent assessments — such as those typically conducted by regulatory bodies or outside experts — that evaluate costs, risks, and alternatives before major infrastructure decisions are finalized. Winfield also questioned the long-term focus on nuclear. 'All of the proposed reactor technologies rely on enriched fuel that comes from the United States,' he said. 'This exposes Ontario to new energy security risks.' In recent months, the Ford government has committed billions to nuclear energy, announcing new builds and refurbishments it says will create tens of thousands of jobs. Earlier this year, it unveiled plans for a massive nuclear plant near Port Hope, projected to generate 10,000 megawatts — enough to power 10 million homes — though key details like costs and timelines remain undisclosed. Last week, the province introduced legislation to expand access to Ontario's public clean energy fund for nuclear projects. Industry groups welcomed Ontario's new energy plan, with major players praising the government's commitment to both nuclear power and natural gas. Enbridge Gas called the plan a 'clear affirmation' of the essential role natural gas will continue to play, citing its importance for affordability, grid stability and economic growth. The company said investments in gas infrastructure are foundational to Ontario's prosperity. The Organization of Canadian Nuclear Industries also applauded the plan, calling it a bold step toward clean energy leadership. The group highlighted Ontario's strong nuclear track record and said the proposed expansion — including large reactors and SMRs — positions the province to secure long-term clean energy supply. 'Where are the renewables?' Aliénor Rougeot, climate and energy program manager at Environmental Defence, said Ontario's new energy plan could lead to higher household bills, more air pollution and increased reliance on the US fossil gas. While she welcomed the idea of a long-term, integrated approach, she argued that the plan should be replaced with one built on publicly shared modelling. To Rougeot, the most glaring problem is the plan's failure to prioritize wind and solar — Ontario's cheapest and cleanest energy sources. 'I kept flipping through the document, asking: Where are the renewables?' Rougeot said. The supply forecast is particularly troubling to her, as it shows Ontario having less wind and solar in 2050 than in 2030. She believes the refusal to give renewable energy a central role in the province's future grid will come at a high cost — both economically and environmentally. Wind and solar make up approximately nine per cent and two per cent of Ontario's current electricity generation, respectively. In its plan, the government says their role is expected to grow over time. Starting in 2025, nearly 3,000 megawatts of energy storage will be added to the grid. However, the plan argues that nuclear is more cost-effective and land-efficient than wind and solar. It claims that to generate the same amount of energy as a proposed 10,000 MW nuclear station at Wesleyville, Ontario would need roughly 100 times more land for solar and 500 times more land for wind. But new analysis suggests solar doesn't require large tracts of land — for example, more than half of Toronto's electricity needs could be met through rooftop and parking lot solar alone. A new report from the Ontario Clean Air Alliance argues that wind and solar could meet the same energy needs as the proposed Wesleyville nuclear station much faster and at far lower cost — potentially saving the province up to $19 billion annually. It highlights Ontario's untapped potential for offshore wind in the Great Lakes and large-scale solar at the Port Hope site. Another report warns that electricity from new nuclear could cost up to 3.6 times more than onshore wind, three times more than solar, and 1.7 times more than offshore wind. Lia Codrington, a senior analyst at the Pembina Institute, said the province's new energy plan represents a positive step toward long-term planning, noting that many jurisdictions around the world are already moving quickly toward clean energy and decarbonization. She viewed it as important for Ontario to follow that trend — and even potentially lead — by modernizing its electricity system. Codrington questioned the government's argument that land use limits renewable energy expansion. She said wind turbines allow for shared land use — such as farming — and solar panels can be installed on rooftops, parking lots, and other built environments. In her view, decisions about land use should reflect what Ontarians want in their communities when it comes to energy sources, not just technical comparisons in megawatts per square kilometre.
