logo
Exclusive: David Cameron threatened to withdraw UK from ICC over Israel war crimes probe

Exclusive: David Cameron threatened to withdraw UK from ICC over Israel war crimes probe

Middle East Eye5 hours ago

The British government privately threatened to defund and withdraw from the International Criminal Court if it issued arrest warrants for Israeli leaders, Middle East Eye can reveal.
David Cameron, then foreign secretary in Rishi Sunak's Conservative government, made the threat last April in a heated phone call with Karim Khan, the British chief prosecutor of the court.
Less than a month later, Khan announced that he was seeking arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his then-defence minister, Yoav Gallant, as well as for Hamas leaders Yahya Sinwar, Ismail Haniyeh and Mohammed Deif.
In a statement at the time, Khan called for his office and the court to be allowed to carry out their work with 'full independence and impartiality'.
'I insist that all attempts to impede, intimidate or improperly influence the officials of this Court must cease immediately,' he said.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
MEE understands that on 16 March 2024, Khan's extensive team of lawyers and researchers had decided they would be in a position to apply for warrants by the end of April.
On 25 March, Khan informed the US administration of his decision and forewarned them the warrants would be applied for by the end of April.
Then on 15 April in London, the prosecutor told British Justice Secretary Alex Chalk that he would apply for the warrants. Khan had asked to meet the foreign secretary, but Cameron was out of the country.
Exclusive: UK believes Trump may sanction Amal Clooney over ICC Palestine role Read More »
Cameron, a former British prime minister who was appointed foreign secretary by Sunak in November 2023, phoned Khan while the prosecutor was on an official visit to Venezuela on 23 April.
MEE can reveal details of the call based on information from a number of sources – including former staff in Khan's office familiar with the conversation and who have seen the minutes of the meeting.
Cameron told Khan that applying for warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant would be 'like dropping a hydrogen bomb'.
Cameron said it was one thing to investigate and prosecute Russia for a 'war of aggression' on Ukraine, but quite another to prosecute Israel when it was 'defending itself from the attacks of 7 October'.
He claimed the warrants would have 'profound implications' in Britain and within his own Conservative Party.
Cameron then said that if the ICC issued warrants for Israeli leaders, the UK would 'defund the court and withdraw from the Rome Statute'.
Article 127 of the Rome Statute, the ICC's founding charter, allows countries to withdraw by written notification to the secretary-general of the UN.
'Lose the dressing room'
Cameron, who currently sits as a Conservative peer in the House of Lords, the upper house of the UK parliament, accused the prosecutor of singling Israel out.
He asked why Khan's office had not 'prosecuted Iran for its attacks on Israel'.
He told the prosecutor he would 'lose the dressing room' and be seen by many states including the US as 'losing the plot'.
'If [the UK] were to [withdraw from the ICC], we would have to accept that the rules-based system would be dead'
- ICC Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan
Cameron further said that if the ICC issued the warrants, the UK would be 'required to arrest' Netanyahu if he travelled to the country.
Khan told Cameron that his office had engaged with Israel for the past three years, but it had 'not resulted in any meaningful exchange of material relevant to investigations'.
According to MEE's sources, the foreign secretary spoke aggressively and repeatedly shouted over Khan, who had to ask to be able to complete his points.
The prosecutor noted that his office was investigating crimes committed by Hamas as well as Israel, but Cameron said this was drawing a 'moral equivalence' between the two.
He stated again that the UK would withdraw from the Rome Statute.
Khan replied that 'if this were to occur then we would have to accept that the rules-based system would be dead'.
Cameron insisted that 'the world is not ready for this'.
He told Khan he was 'on the brink of making a huge mistake. You sometimes need to take a step back and consider things'.
But Khan refused to back down and continued defending his position.
He said there was a 'serious risk' that many in the world would view the rules-based order as 'not being applied equally'.
Khan thanked the foreign secretary for his call and the conversation ended without the two reaching any resolution.
Approached by MEE for a response to the exchange with Cameron, Khan said: 'I have no comment to make at this time.'
MEE has asked Cameron and the British Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office for comment.
Cameron: Warrants 'a mistake'
When Khan announced he was applying for the warrants on 20 May, Cameron publicly called the decision 'a mistake' and accused the ICC of drawing a 'moral equivalence' between Israeli and Hamas leaders.
He claimed that 'no one, I think, has been tougher on the Israelis than me in direct call after call, and message after message, about having to meet their obligations'.
On 10 June the Conservative government filed an objection to Khan's application to the ICC, arguing that the court did not have jurisdiction over Israeli nationals – a position the Israeli government has held for years.
The next month, Keir Starmer's newly elected Labour government announced it would drop the objection.
'We're very clear about the importance of the rule of law and the independence of the court both domestically and internationally,' a spokesperson for Starmer said.
Palestine was accepted into the ICC in 2015, and in 2021 the court said it had the power to investigate war crimes in the occupied territories.
'I don't like being threatened'
Sources Khan spoke to in the hours following his phone call with Cameron told MEE he seemed surprised and upset by the exchange.
'I don't like being pressurised,' Khan said, according to sources present at the time.
'I don't like being - I won't say if it rises to blackmail - I don't like being threatened.'
ICC Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan attends a UN Security Council meeting on Sudan and South Sudan at the UN headquarters on 27 January 2025 (AFP)
Khan added that 'the sentiment is not unexpected".
'The gall of articulating it so bluntly and candidly I think was a surprise and a disappointment… countries that you love, that deserve better, how on earth can leaders that have held such high office, that are so well known, think you can get away with that?'
The British prosecutor added that 'if you did that to a director of public prosecutions… it would be a criminal offence, potentially'.
He said he was 'disappointed that a country like that and leaders that are so senior would debase themselves and their nation.
'They have no right to debase a nation… they're debasing something they have no right to debase, which is a people.'
'I don't like being threatened... How on earth can leaders that have held such high office, that are so well known, think you can get away with that?'
- Karim Khan
Sunak's government firmly supported Israel's war on Gaza and consistently resisted calls to restrict arms sales to Israel.
In a session of parliament's foreign affairs select committee in January 2024, its chair Alicia Kearns, a Conservative MP, asked Cameron whether 'you have never had a piece of paper put in front of you by a Foreign Office lawyer that says that Israel is in breach of its international humanitarian commitments under international humanitarian law'.
Cameron replied that 'I cannot recall every single bit of paper that has been put in front of me … I don't want to answer that question.'
He added that 'if you are asking me whether I am worried that Israel has taken action that might be in breach of international law … yes, of course I am worried about that.'
In March the Guardian reported that Kearns said she believed the government had received advice from its own lawyers saying Israel had breached international law in Gaza.
'I remain convinced the government has completed its updated assessment on whether Israel is demonstrating a commitment to international humanitarian law, and that it has concluded that Israel is not demonstrating this commitment, which is the legal determination it has to make,' Kearns said at a fundraising event on 13 March.
Khan sanctioned by US
The Labour government, elected in July, imposed a partial arms embargo on Israel that September and suspended free trade agreement talks with the country last month.
Speaking during Prime Minister's Questions last week, Starmer described Israel's actions in Gaza as 'appalling... counterproductive and intolerable,' and said the government would keep looking at further action including sanctions.
But it has stopped short of accusing Israel of breaking international law in Gaza.
After the ICC issued the arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant in November, the government refused to explicitly confirm it would arrest the politicians if they came to the country, although a spokesperson for Starmer said the government would 'fulfil its legal obligations'.
Other Israeli officials, who are not subject to arrest warrants, have since visited the UK.
In April, MEE reported that Foreign Minister Gideon Saar made a secret trip to London and met British Foreign Secretary David Lammy.
After the report, the attorney general's office confirmed to MEE that it had blocked an arrest warrant request made to the Metropolitan Police by legal groups alleging Saar had aided and abetted breaches of international law in Gaza.
Exclusive: US warns UK and France not to recognise Palestinian state Read More »
Khan is currently on leave after attempts to suspend him failed, and pending a UN investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct towards a colleague.
He denies the allegations, which have not been referred to Dutch police.
In 2022 the Russian Federation issued a warrant for Khan's arrest in response to ICC warrants issued against Russian President Vladimir Putin and his minister for children.
As of February, Khan has also been sanctioned by US President Donald Trump because of the arrest warrants issued for Netanyahu and Gallant.
He has had his US visa revoked and his wife and children have been banned from travelling to the US. His bank accounts have been frozen in the UK.
The warrants for Israeli leaders are currently in the hands of two deputy prosecutors.
Last Thursday, the US imposed further sanctions on four ICC judges whom it accused of being involved in 'illegitimate actions targeting the United States and Israel'.
Neither the US nor Israel are parties to the Rome Statute and have long rejected the authority of the court.
In a statement, the ICC said it deplored the sanctions against Khan and the four judges. It said it stood fully behind its personnel and would continue its work undeterred.
'These measures are a clear attempt to undermine the independence of an international judicial institution which operates under the mandate from 125 States Parties from all corners of the globe,' it said.
The court recently ordered that any further warrants issued in relation to its Palestine investigation cannot be publicised.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Amnesty says Israel's Madleen interception is illegal
Amnesty says Israel's Madleen interception is illegal

Middle East Eye

time44 minutes ago

  • Middle East Eye

Amnesty says Israel's Madleen interception is illegal

Amnesty International has branded the Israeli navy's interception of the Gaza-bound aid ship Madleen illegal. "By forcibly intercepting and blocking the Madleen, Israel has once again ignored its legal obligations towards civilians in the occupied Gaza Strip," Amnesty said in a statement posted to its social media accounts. "The crew were unarmed activists and human rights defenders on a humanitarian mission," the human rights group said, as it called on them to be "released immediately and unconditionally". Amnesty said that rather than ensure, as the occupying power, that the people of Gaza had access to food, medicine and other supplies, Israel "consistently and deliberately impeded the provision of impartial humanitarian assistance for civilians in desperate need". The rights group said that while the Madleen had "emerged as a powerful symbol of solidarity" with Palestinians in Gaza, "this very mission is also an indictment of the international community's failure to put an end to Israel's inhumane blockade".

Gaza flotilla: The Madleen shows us the world as it could be
Gaza flotilla: The Madleen shows us the world as it could be

Middle East Eye

time44 minutes ago

  • Middle East Eye

Gaza flotilla: The Madleen shows us the world as it could be

In the dead of night, Israeli speedboats encircled the Madleen. Drones loomed above. A strange white substance was sprayed across the deck. Then, in international waters, armed forces stormed the boat. One by one, the passengers - 12 unarmed civilians, from Brazil to Sweden - were captured and led away. There were no weapons aboard - only food, medicine and conscience. The Madleen's mission was simple yet profound: to deliver aid and solidarity to Gaza's starving population. Amid Israel's siege of Gaza, power speaks, morality is silenced, and even the open sea is not safe. The Madleen was not merely a boat. It was a message carved into waves. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Its name honoured Madleen Kulab, Gaza's first and only female fisher. At 13, she took her father's place and forged alone into a world of blockade and threat. She later became a small business owner - employing others, offering boat tours under a purple canopy, building a future in a place where hope was scarce. 'I am brave and have good will,' she once said. Her courage sailed under her name. 'It falls on us' The Madleen followed a history already soaked in violence. In 2010, Israeli forces boarded the Mavi Marmara, killing nine. Other flotillas have been blocked, detained, humiliated. Yet still, they sailed. Those on board the Madleen declared, by their very presence, that Palestine is no longer the cause of a region; it has become the conscience of the world. Among the passengers was Greta Thunberg, once the darling of western progressives, now vilified for refusing to stay silent. From the deck of the Madleen, she declared: 'When our complicit governments fail to step up, it falls on us … to do so.' Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war Portrayed as a threat to the establishment, she has been smeared by mainstream media as part of a 'woke elite' for standing with Gaza. Even US Senator Lindsey Graham joined the ugly chorus, sneering: 'Hope Greta and her friends can swim!' - gleefully contemplating the drowning of a young woman and her civilian companions in open waters. Greta's response was calm, unflinching: 'We can swim very well.' Nothing illustrates Israel's moral unravelling more than its reaction to this small civilian boat. Not just the threats, but the tone: rabid, delusional, utterly divorced from human reality. Palestine is no longer the cause of a region; it has become the conscience of the world Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz labelled Thunberg an 'antisemitic Hamas propagandist' and ordered the army to use 'any means necessary' to stop the Madleen - a threat of military force against civilians, against a boat named after a fisherwoman. In one grotesque video, Israeli children warned Thunberg: 'We're coming to get you!' Instead of grieving the dead or praying for peace, Israelis were celebrating the pursuit of an unarmed girl with a conscience. Even Uri Geller - the spoon-bending illusionist - joined the frenzy, claiming he had sent 'psychic' protection to Israeli forces and warning Greta not to underestimate the power of his mind. At any other time, it would be absurd. Today, it is pathological. This is not the voice of a confident democracy. This is a settler colony at the edge of its own delusion: armed, enraged and spiralling. Arab silence But amid the noise came a voice of moral clarity. Gabor Mate, a Jewish Holocaust survivor and world-renowned trauma expert, recorded a message to the flotilla from Poland, where he had just visited the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising memorial. With quiet conviction, he said: 'Today you represent those fighters. Today you represent that small group that's willing to stand up against one of the most murderous militaries in the world, supported by all the world's great powers. 'You are carrying all of humanity with you … all human beings whose hearts are open, who believe in justice, who believe in freedom, and who support and are moved by and full of admiration for what you're doing,' Mate added. Seizure of Madleen is the latest in more than a decade of Israeli attacks on aid flotillas Read More » The boat set sail not from Tangier, Latakia or Alexandria, but from Italy. A damning silence echoes from the Arab shores of the Mediterranean. Egypt watches from across the water. Holidaymakers cheer the boat's passing with videos and Eid greetings, but none board. Gaza, it seems, is nearer to a young Swede than to its own neighbours. Egypt has sealed the Rafah crossing, guarding it with soldiers as Palestinians starve metres away. Palestine is no longer the concern of governments, especially not those ruled by despots. It is the cause of the free, of those with conscience - of those who refuse to bow to silence, dictatorship or despair. The Madleen is not a miracle, but a model. It is a whisper of what could be done if humanity dared to act. What if this wasn't the only boat? What if thousands set sail, from every Mediterranean port? What if fishers, sailors, students and parents rose to say: not in our name, not on our watch? What if the sea became a corridor of conscience? Global inaction Remember Dunkirk. In 1940, civilian boats crossed the Channel to rescue trapped Allied soldiers. No orders, no permission. Just courage. And history remembers. What if Gaza had its own Dunkirk? What if people everywhere refused to stand by while a people is starved, slaughtered and erased? And remember this too: Sunday marked 58 years since Israel attacked the USS Liberty, a US naval intelligence ship in international waters. Israeli fighter jets and torpedo boats killed 34 crew members and wounded 171. Though Israel said it was a mistake, some still believe it was deliberate. Today, the same sea that ran red with American blood now receives the Madleen - a boat of unarmed civilians carrying food. And again, Israel, ever-backed by the US, threatens force. Israel wages this war emboldened by global inaction. It bulldozes international law, burns refugees in tents, starves children, bombs hospitals, flattens schools, executes medics, shoots children fetching bread. And it shrugs, confident nothing will happen. It has US bombs, a US veto, a complicit Europe, silent Arab regimes, and a hollowed-out Palestinian elite. But we, the people, are not powerless. We are not condemned to be spectators. We are not fated to live in a world where the strong devour the weak while the rest scroll by. Moral direction What is at stake is not only the survival of a people. It is the moral direction of civilisation. Do we want a world where law is meaningless, where genocide is rebranded as self-defence, where starvation is a military strategy and truth a liability? The Madleen is a mirror. It shows us the world as it is - and the world as it could be. Liberation is not a gift from the powerful. It is a project of the powerless. 'We think we are liberating Palestine. But it is Palestine that liberates us' - French politician Rima Hassan As French politician Rima Hassan, aboard the Madleen, wrote: 'When they arrest us, I will look at them as Larbi Ben M'Hidi looked at the colonisers of his land - calm, assured of liberation … We think we are liberating Palestine. But it is Palestine that liberates us.' Hassan continued: 'I accuse western colonial complicity. I accuse Arab cowardice. I accuse the corruption of the Palestinian elite. And I stand with the resisters, the rebels, the dreamers, the undisciplined, those who refuse the disorder of this world.' She went on to quote Ben M'Hidi, who once said: 'Throw the revolution into the street - the people will pick it up.' Today, it has been thrown into the sea. Will we follow? The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store