Mother stabbed four-year-old son to death hours after school pick-up, court told
Officers found Kobi Dooly-Macharia cold to the touch in his cot with dozens of knife wounds, Inner London Crown Court heard on Monday.
There were also signs of attempted strangulation, the court heard.
Court artist drawing of Keziah Macharia, was charged with murder but has been deemed unfit to stand trial (Elizabeth Cook/PA)
Keziah Macharia, 43, has been charged with murdering Kobi on or about December 20 2023 but she has been deemed unfit to stand trial.
Mrs Justice Thornton said there should be a 'fact-finding hearing' to decide if Macharia killed Kobi but not if she murdered him.
She told jurors not to 'consider her state of mind and whether she is at fault', which would be needed for a murder verdict.
Ben Dooly and Macharia started a relationship after meeting in 2018 and their son Kobi was born on September 21 2019, prosecutor Mukul Chawla KC said.
The couple lived together with Kobi in Macharia's first-floor flat in Montague Road, Hackney, but the relationship deteriorated after his birth, he added.
Mr Dooly moved out and started sleeping on the sofa two or three days a week but this ended after he met his current girlfriend, Sasha Sasheva, the court heard.
Macharia was 'very unhappy' with Kobi spending any time with Ms Sasheva, Mr Chawla said, adding that Ms Sasheva blocked Macharia on her phone and on social media because of messages she received.
Mr Dooly last saw Kobi alive at his school nativity play the day before the alleged attack, jurors heard.
CCTV played to the court shows Macharia collecting her son from Nightingale Primary School, Hackney, by car at around 4.30pm on December 20.
Four-year-old Kobi Dooly-Macharia (Met Police/PA)
Kobi could be seen leaving the building wearing a coat and carrying a red balloon, accompanied by Macharia.
'You see nothing of distress or anything out of the ordinary in terms of her demeanour', the prosecutor said.
He added: 'It appears that at some point that evening the defendant started drinking alcohol; when she started drinking and how much she drank cannot be established'.
The court heard that at 10.42pm Macharia sent a WhatsApp message to Mr Dooly that said: 'Hi Ben, good Luck with the biteme_cups five days before Xmas!
'I hope you and Sasha enjoy your lives together. I can't live knowing that she'll have the same surname as my son Kobi, and I will not be in your life anymore. Have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. Goodbye x'
Bite Me cups was Mr Dooly's recently established business, the prosecutor added.
Macharia then messaged Ms Sasheva's phone and said 'this is all your fault' and 'you will never have the same surname as my son', the court heard.
At 10.48pm, Macharia sent Mr Dooly WhatsApp messages less than a minute apart that said 'Kobi is dead' and 'you can thank Sasha for that', the prosecution said.
The pair contacted the police with Mr Dooly reporting he had just been told by the mother of his child that his son is dead, jurors were told.
The court also heard that Macharia at 10.49pm texted 'Kobi is dead' to a WhatsApp group chat recently created by a woman called Reena Life.
Police attended the property at 10.59pm and body-worn footage showed officers repeatedly banging on the door, ringing the bell, and shouting without receiving a response.
Macharia and Ms Life were on a WhatsApp call as police hit the door outside, jurors were told.
During the call, Ms Life heard the buzzer go and the two women talked about police arriving, Mr Chawla said.
Ms Life made notes of the conversation that said the defendant admitted killing Kobi, according to the prosecutor.
At 11pm, after the call ended, Macharia texted Ms Sasheva saying 'you bitch' and at 11.01pm messaged Mr Dooly to say 'I hate iger both (sic)', jurors heard.
Officers broke through the door and the prosecutor said: 'While the police were entering and coming up the stairs we can see the message that Ms Macharia sent by text to Ms Sasheva.
'As they're coming up the stairs there is another message, this time to Mr Dooly, you can tell it's typed in haste – 'I hate iger both', she clearly meant 'you both'.'
Jurors were shown footage of Macharia in blood-stained clothes sitting on the living room floor in front of the sofa.
As officers entered, she moved to a kneeling position and during her arrest, a knife could be seen behind her.
Police were heard asking 'who did this?' and Mr Chawla said 'she raises her hand to her chest, acknowledging it was her'.
Officers documented her saying she tried to take an overdose and harm herself, the prosecutor added.
Kobi was found in the bedroom, in his cot next to a double bed.
He was pronounced dead at 12.06am on December 21.
Macharia was taken to Stoke Newington Police station and had 'a very blunted muted affect' and intermittently sobbed, Mr Chawla said.
'She told officers repeatedly she just wanted her baby back, and she just wanted to see his sweet face', he added.
The only injuries that Macharia sustained were bruises consistent with her being arrested and placed in handcuffs, the prosecutor said.
The case continues.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Telegraph
Defendants should have right to choose judge-only trial, says Leveson
Defendants are to get the right to ask for a judge-only trial without a jury. Under plans for 'once-in-a-generation' reform to reduce court backlogs, an independent review set up by the Government will recommend ministers should follow the example of Canada, Australia and New Zealand and allow defendants in the crown court to opt for a judge-only trial. Sir Brian Leveson, the senior judge heading the review, will recommend the move as a way to speed up trials to tackle the record backlog of more than 75,000 cases which is forcing some victims to wait up to four or five years for justice. He told a conference on modernising justice: 'I can see the advantage in lots of cases. You will get a reasoned judgment [from a judge]. In front of a jury, you don't get a judgment at all, you get guilty or not guilty. 'The case will be undeniably speedier because the judge doesn't have to explain to the jury all the basic premises of the criminal law.' Sir Brian is also expected to recommend that the public should be spared jury service if a case is going to last more than 12 months because of the 'unfairness' of it taking a year out of their lives and livelihoods. Instead, such cases would be heard by a judge without a jury. Other proposals will further scale back people's right to a jury trial for some lower level offences such as assault of a police officer while resisting arrest, racially aggravated criminal damage, dangerous driving and possessing a class B drug like cannabis. These are likely to be tried either by an intermediate court comprising a judge and two magistrates or by extending the powers of magistrates to try cases carrying sentences of up to two years, rather than only those with maximum jail terms of one year, as at present. Sir Brian was appointed by Shabana Mahmood, the Justice Secretary, who said that 'once-in-a-generation reform' of the courts was the only way to tackle justice delays for victims. Internal Ministry of Justice forecasts suggested the backlogs could rise to 100,000 without radical action. Sir Brian said there was a 'real risk that the system will collapse' as defendants take advantage of cases being delayed as long as 2029 and 'threw the dice' in the hope their victims or witnesses disengaged and prosecutions were abandoned. He also said it would be up to the Government to decide which types of cases it felt were appropriate for defendants to have the right to spurn a jury but he said the judges would have the discretion to overrule any request if it was in the public interest to do so. 'There are some cases, which I would not consider appropriate for a judge to try alone, and I would give the judge a discretion,' Sir Brian said. 'So a defendant may say, 'I would like to be tried by a judge alone', and the judge would be perfectly entitled to say, 'I think not'.' Public opprobrium He suggested one type of case judge-only trials could be where there was significant 'public opprobrium' over the case such as sexual or sadistic violence and could sway the jury. 'I can see defendants, perhaps charged with cases that attract public opprobrium being concerned about a jury coming in from their daily lives to face that trial,' he said. 'Equally, I can see if it's that much public opprobrium, why a judge may say, 'I'm not sure about that.' So there is a balance to be done, but judges make judicial decisions all the time.' He said it could also apply to factually or legally extremely complex cases where a jury may struggle to fully understand the case. A third type could where there had been alleged confession or identification, where judges tended to be more rigorous in scrutinising its validity than necessarily a jury. Sir Brian said there had been a limited number of cases where judges had heard cases alone such as where a jury had to be discharged due to evidence of jury tampering. He is expected to deliver his report to Ms Mahmood next week with publication expected in early July. It follows a similar review of sentencing by David Gauke, the former Tory justice secretary, which recommended freeing some prisoners as little as a third of the way through sentence to tackle prison overcrowding.
Wales Online
7 hours ago
- Wales Online
Company boss pocketed £150,000 in fraudulent Covid business loans
Company boss pocketed £150,000 in fraudulent Covid business loans A judge told Zahid Afzal that at a time of national emergency the government had set up a system to help businesses which he had abused A company boss fraudulently obtained £150,000 in loans designed to help businesses hit by the Covid pandemic, a court has heard. Zahid Afzal made two legitimate applications for "Bounce Bank" loans but then used his knowledge of the application process to acquire three more loans he was not entitled to. A judge at Swansea Crown Court told the defendant that at a time of national emergency the government had set up a system to help businesses which he had abused to obtain loans he was not entitled to. Harry Dickens, prosecuting, told the court that the UK government established "Bounce Back" loans to help small and medium businesses during the coronavirus pandemic, and that the scheme allowed companies to borrow between £2,000 and £50,000 at a low interest rate. He said the defendant made two legitimate applications for his companies Phones Onn and Phone Bits Ltd to HSBC and NatWest respectively, and the applications were successful. However, he said Afzal subsequently made three more applications to Lloyds, Starling, and Metro Bank during 2020 for the same phone companies and in each case falsely declared there had been no previous applications for those firms. The court heard the defendant also inflated the turnover figures of the firms in order to access the maximum £50,000 loan amounts. Article continues below The prosecutor said the three loan applications were successful and a total of £150,000 was paid into the companies' accounts, much of which was subsequently transferred out into personal accounts. Zahid Afzal, aged 37, of Albert Street, Haverfordwest, Pembrokeshire, had previously pleaded guilty to three counts of fraud by false representation when he appeared in the dock for sentencing. He has no previous convictions. Jon Tarrant, for Afzal, said the defendant employed eight people, and said six of those needed the employment to maintain their UK visas. He said the father-of-three was a successful businessman who had established himself in a positive light to many people but that position "has now been reversed". He said the defendant's remorse for his "unwise decisions" had been "palpable" during their conferences. For the latest court reports sign up to our crime newsletter Judge Catherine Richards said at a time of nation emergency the UK government had established a system to help businesses that was paid for by society and which "relied on the trust and confidence that each gives the other as a member of this society". She told Afzal he had deliberately abused that by applying for loans he knew he was not entitled to and which, ultimately, were not for business use. The judge said while she had no doubt the offending justified immediate custody she was concerned that "the public finances are not further prejudiced" by Afzal's actions. She also said she was mindful of the impact of immediate custody on others. With one-quarter discounts for his guilty pleas Afzal was sentenced to two years in prison suspended for two years and was ordered to complete 300 hours of unpaid work. A proceeds of crime investigation will now be launched into the defendant's finances. Article continues below The prosecution barrister said he wanted to out the court on notice that a written application would be made for a restraint order to be made in respect of the defendant's personal Santander bank account which currently contains some £74,000.
Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
Lord Brittan's widow blasts police watchdog for dropping probe into officer who pursued him over false VIP paedophile claims
The widow of Lord Brittan, whose husband was falsely accused of being part of a VIP paedophile ring in Westminster, said her trust in the Met and the police watchdog has been 'severely undermined'. An investigation into how former Met deputy assistant commissioner Steve Rodhouse handled the claims has been dropped, the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) said last week. The probe was brought to an end by the watchdog after a 'large volume of relevant material was recently disclosed to the IOPC by the Metropolitan Police '. Mr Rodhouse was due to face a disciplinary hearing for potentially breaching police professional standards of behaviour for honesty and integrity and discreditable conduct. The allegations centred around comments made to the media in March 2016 concerning his beliefs about the honesty of two witnesses to Operation Midland - a Met investigation which he led into allegations of non-recent sexual abuse. They also involved remarks he is alleged to have subsequently made to former High Court judge Sir Richard Henriques, who had been commissioned to carry out an independent review of the handling of Operation Midland in August 2016. For nearly a decade, Operation Midland has been mired in allegations of criminality, misconduct and incompetence, yet not one officer involved in the fiasco has been held to account. In an interview with BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Lady Diana Brittan, widow of the former home secretary, said she had hoped the investigation would bring a sense of 'closure'. She said: 'My husband was a high-profile individual, but at every level of society there are people who are falsely accused, and for them (also) it's the ruining of reputation, it's the anxiety that goes with it. 'I feel that it would have at least put a closure, to use that odd word, on the whole episode if somebody had been held to account, either for misconduct, or even for incompetence.' Operation Midland was launched off the back of lurid and false allegations made by fantasist Carl Beech, known as 'Nick' – real name – whose wild accusations of an Establishment paedophile ring were deemed 'credible and true' by the Met. The Metropolitan Police's 16-month investigation, led by Mr Roundhouse, into fake claims of a VIP paedophile ring saw raids on the homes of Lord Brittan, as well as D-Day veteran Lord Bramall and ex-Tory MP Harvey Proctor. The £2.5 million inquiry closed in March 2016 without any arrests or charges and Beech was later jailed for 18 years for perverting the course of justice, fraud and child sexual offences. The force was heavily criticised for believing Beech too readily despite inconsistencies in his evidence, including naming witnesses who did not exist. The IOPC said there was 'no evidence' within the material provided from the Met that there was 'any inappropriate motivation in Mr Rodhouse's comments to the media' or which 'supports that he made those remarks during Sir Richard's review'. Mr Rodhouse said the allegations made against him were 'ill-founded and incorrect'. Mr Proctor said he was 'appalled' by the 'disgraceful decision' not to proceed, adding he would be writing to Sir Mark Rowley, commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, to 'demand a meeting and an explanation'. Lady Brittan said she felt her husband's legacy had been permanently tarnished by the episode, telling the BBC: 'What I really feel very sorry about is the fact that my husband was a great public servant. 'When he died, his obituaries referred to all of this.' In response to Lady Brittan's comments, an IOPC spokesperson said: 'Our recent decision does not change our finding that - by failing to follow Sir Richard Henrique's recommendation to investigate the witnesses in his independent review of the Met's handling of Op Midland - the Met's service was unacceptable and its subsequent reviews concluding no investigation was needed were flawed. 'During our investigation we reported a potential crime to the Met, which is being actively investigated by another force.' A Met Police spokesperson said: 'We recognise the impact that this lengthy investigation and the prospect of a hearing will inevitably have had on former DAC Rodhouse. We are pleased the matter is now concluded. 'An assessment of the Met's email retention policy led to the assumption that emails sent and received before a certain date would no longer be on our systems. 'As soon as we became aware that some older material was still held, we informed the IOPC and arranged for it to be shared. Any impact this had on the investigation or proceedings was entirely unintentional.'
