logo
Former Vanity Fair editor says just one person was banned from famous Oscars party for life

Former Vanity Fair editor says just one person was banned from famous Oscars party for life

Independent23-03-2025

Graydon Carter, the former Vanity Fair editor who launched the magazine's famous Oscars party, has revealed that just one guest received a lifetime ban from the annual event.
Carter, 75, took over the monthly Condé Nast title in July 1992 back when he was known for founding the satirical magazine Spy with Kurt Andersen.
He is now poised to release a new memoir, When the Going Was Good, about his time at Vanity Fair, including what he describes as the 'poisonous atmosphere' of his first few years.
Just one person was banned for life from the famous Oscars gala, he wrote: Harvey Weinstein.
Page Six reports that Carter divulged how the now-disgraced film producer and convicted rapist would regularly show up with 'more guests than his invitation indicated and would bully the staff'.
'He got banned from everything because he was rude to the staff and I didn't like that,' Carter told the publication, adding that the ban was temporarily lifted, then reinstated again.
He said this behaviour was 'not from drink… it was just within him'.
The Independent has contacted Weinstein's representative for comment.
Carter came up with the idea to host a new Oscars party following the death of famed Hollywood agent Swifty Lazar, who represented legends such as Humphrey Bogart, Lauren Bacall, Cary Grant, Noel Coward and Truman Capote.
Until then, Lazar was known for his Oscar Night galas thrown in Beverly Hills, an invite to which was deemed as important as making an appearance at the Governors Ball.
'I don't know why I thought [ Vanity Fair could fill the gap],' Carter said. 'I had not thrown any big parties up to that point. But I do believe that, if you think there is a possibility of failure, don't have too many eyes on it.'
The Vanity Fair party grew to the point that editor Sara Marks, who handled the guest list, became the object of 'bribery, threats and even abuse', but Carter was firm in his stance of getting 'as many movie stars with Oscar statues in one room as humanly possible'.
Carter stepped down as editor of Vanity Fair in 2017, announcing that he wanted to leave 'while the magazine is on top'.
'I want to leave while it's in vibrant shape, both in the digital realm and the print realm,' he told The New York Times. 'And I wanted to have a third act – and I thought, time is precious.'
, is scheduled for release by Penguin Press on Tuesday 25 March.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jury deliberations to resume in Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes retrial
Jury deliberations to resume in Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes retrial

The Independent

time4 hours ago

  • The Independent

Jury deliberations to resume in Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes retrial

A Manhattan jury will resume deliberations Friday in Harvey Weinstein 's sex crimes retrial after ending its first day without reaching a verdict in a case that encapsulated the #MeToo movement. The panel, which was handed the case Thursday morning, has requested to hear a readback of some testimony from two of Weinstein's accusers, as well as to see medical records from one of those women. The jury of seven women and five men is considering two counts of criminal sex act and one count of rape against the 73-year-old Oscar-winning movie producer, with the criminal sex act charges the higher-degree felonies. Weinstein has pleaded not guilty. Sexual misconduct allegations against Weinstein propelled the #MeToo movement in 2017. He was eventually convicted of sex crimes in New York and California, but the New York conviction was overturned last year, leading to the retrial before a new jury and a different judge. Jurors heard more than five weeks of testimony, including lengthy testimony from three accusers.

Jury deliberations begin in Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes retrial
Jury deliberations begin in Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes retrial

Glasgow Times

time14 hours ago

  • Glasgow Times

Jury deliberations begin in Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes retrial

The seven-woman, five-man jury is considering two counts of criminal sex act and one count of rape, each relating to a different accuser and a different date. In this case, the criminal sex act charge is the higher-degree felony. Weinstein, 73, has pleaded not guilty. Harvey Weinstein (Olga Fedorova/Pool Photo via AP) Nearly eight years ago, a series of sexual misconduct allegations against the Oscar-winning movie producer propelled the #MeToo movement. Some of those accusations later generated criminal charges and convictions in New York and California. The New York conviction from 2020 was subsequently overturned, leading to the retrial before a new jury and a different judge. Jurors heard more than five weeks of testimony, including lengthy and sometimes fiery questioning of Weinstein's three accusers in the case. Jessica Mann said he raped her in 2013, when she was trying to build an acting career. Miriam Haley accused him of forcibly performing oral sex on her in 2006, when she was looking for work in entertainment production. Kaja Sokola, who was not involved in Weinstein's first trial, told jurors that he forced oral sex on her, too, during 2006. At the time, she was a teenage fashion model trying to break into acting. 'They all had dreams of pursuing careers in the defendant's world, the entertainment industry,' prosecutor Nicole Blumberg told jurors in her closing argument on Tuesday. She contended that Weinstein let the women think he was interested in their careers when what actually interested him were their bodies, and 'he was going to have their bodies and touch their bodies whether they wanted him to or not'. Weinstein chose not to testify. His defence called other witnesses, including some former friends of Ms Sokola's and Ms Mann's. Weinstein's attorneys argued that all three accusers consented to Weinstein's advances because they wanted help with their Hollywood aims. All three stayed on friendly terms with him afterwards, a point the defence emphasised. 'It's transactional, folks. Yes, he wants to fool around with them, and yes, they want something from him,' defence lawyer Arthur Aidala said in his summation on Tuesday.

Jury deliberations begin in Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes retrial
Jury deliberations begin in Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes retrial

South Wales Guardian

time14 hours ago

  • South Wales Guardian

Jury deliberations begin in Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes retrial

The seven-woman, five-man jury is considering two counts of criminal sex act and one count of rape, each relating to a different accuser and a different date. In this case, the criminal sex act charge is the higher-degree felony. Weinstein, 73, has pleaded not guilty. Nearly eight years ago, a series of sexual misconduct allegations against the Oscar-winning movie producer propelled the #MeToo movement. Some of those accusations later generated criminal charges and convictions in New York and California. The New York conviction from 2020 was subsequently overturned, leading to the retrial before a new jury and a different judge. Jurors heard more than five weeks of testimony, including lengthy and sometimes fiery questioning of Weinstein's three accusers in the case. Jessica Mann said he raped her in 2013, when she was trying to build an acting career. Miriam Haley accused him of forcibly performing oral sex on her in 2006, when she was looking for work in entertainment production. Kaja Sokola, who was not involved in Weinstein's first trial, told jurors that he forced oral sex on her, too, during 2006. At the time, she was a teenage fashion model trying to break into acting. 'They all had dreams of pursuing careers in the defendant's world, the entertainment industry,' prosecutor Nicole Blumberg told jurors in her closing argument on Tuesday. She contended that Weinstein let the women think he was interested in their careers when what actually interested him were their bodies, and 'he was going to have their bodies and touch their bodies whether they wanted him to or not'. Weinstein chose not to testify. His defence called other witnesses, including some former friends of Ms Sokola's and Ms Mann's. Weinstein's attorneys argued that all three accusers consented to Weinstein's advances because they wanted help with their Hollywood aims. All three stayed on friendly terms with him afterwards, a point the defence emphasised. 'It's transactional, folks. Yes, he wants to fool around with them, and yes, they want something from him,' defence lawyer Arthur Aidala said in his summation on Tuesday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store