Voice of America parent terminates over 600 more staff in likely death knell
The parent agency of Voice of America said on Friday it had issued termination notices to over 639 more staff, completing an 85% decrease in personnel since March and effectively spelling the end of a broadcasting network founded to counter Nazi propaganda.
Kari Lake, senior adviser to the U.S. Agency for Global Media, said the staff reduction meant 1,400 positions had been eliminated as part of U.S. President Donald Trump's agenda to cut staffing at the agency to a statutory minimum.
"Reduction in Force Termination Notices were sent to 639 employees at USAGM and Voice of America, part of a long-overdue effort to dismantle a bloated, unaccountable bureaucracy," Lake said in a statement.
She said the agency had been "riddled with dysfunction, bias, and waste."
Lake said the move meant USAGM now operated near its statutory minimum of 81 employees. She said 250 employees would remain across USAGM, Voice of America, and the Office of Cuba Broadcasting, which transmits news into communist-run Cuba. She said none of OCB's 33 employees had been terminated.
The move likely marks an end to VOA, which was founded in 1942 to counter Nazi propaganda, operated in nearly 50 languages and reached 360 million people a week, many living under authoritarian regimes.
In May, nearly 600 VOA contractors were dismissed.
Some Republicans have accused VOA and other publicly funded media outlets of being biased against conservatives, and called for them to be shuttered as part of wider efforts to shrink the government.
Another USAGM station, Radio Free Asia, which has already been reduced to skeleton staffing, said in a staff email on Friday that it was implementing additional furloughs in its human resources, ordinance, journalist security, and research, training and evaluation teams.
Various court cases are in train against the USAGM cuts.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yomiuri Shimbun
2 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Europeans Press Iran on Nuclear Curbs, but Geneva Talks Yield No Breakthrough
GENEVA – European foreign ministers pressed their Iranian counterpart on Friday for curbs to Tehran's nuclear program, but the high-stakes meeting in Geneva yielded no quick off-ramp from the conflict in which President Donald Trump is threatening to bomb Iranian nuclear sites. Hours of talks at a luxury hotel ended without a breakthrough, officials said, even as all the ministers came out declaring their readiness to keep talking. The clock is ticking, though: Trump has set a two-week deadline to decide whether the United States will join Israel in the military campaign it launched last week vowing to cripple Iran's nuclear sites. Trump on Friday said that 'two weeks would be the maximum.' Washington is now in a standoff with Tehran over whether Iran should be allowed to enrich uranium at all, even for civilian purposes. After Friday's meeting, European ministers said they had pushed Tehran to restrict nuclear activities and negotiate with Washington, while Iran's foreign minister countered that Israeli strikes must stop before Tehran resumes any bargaining with the White House. A European diplomat, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive diplomacy, said that there was no date set for a future meeting but that officials intend to reconvene within two weeks – before Trump's self-imposed deadline. Trump, however, characterized the European intervention as unhelpful and unlikely to achieve results. 'Nah, they didn't help,' he said Friday afternoon. 'Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us. Europe is not going to be able to help on this one.' European leaders have been thrown off balance by Trump, who denied U.S. involvement in Israel's attack only to warn days later that he may join the Israeli campaign, which has spiraled into a deadly tit-for-tat with mounting civilian casualties and risks inflaming the region. The attacks continued Friday as the officials sat down for talks in Geneva. America's traditional European partners are deeply wary that U.S. involvement would lead to a wider, unpredictable war and that their nations could be drawn in. They have been working the phones hoping to carve out a diplomatic path before any U.S. strikes. Trump, who had promised to reach a deal with Iran over its nuclear program and lambasted the era of U.S. interventions in the Middle East, has since demanded Iran's 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER.' Despite the absence of a swift agreement, European officials hope Friday's meeting in Geneva – involving France, Britain, Germany and the European Union, which all had a central role in negotiating the 2015 Iran nuclear agreement along with Russia, China and the United States – leads to a more prominent mediation role for American allies that have been sidelined under Trump. European officials cast the latest diplomacy as an 11th-hour scramble to influence the crisis: to extract greater concessions from Iran, whose position they believe has now been weakened, and to get Trump to back away from his threats of a bombing campaign and suggestions of regime change. The Europeans acknowledged that it was a tall order on both fronts. It is far from clear that Trump will heed – or is even listening to – their calls for restraint. And Iran may not be willing to accept any ultimatum, officials concede. On Friday, the Europeans – French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot, British Foreign Secretary David Lammy, German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul and the European Union's foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas – gathered at the German Consulate in Geneva, where they conferred around a table on an outdoor terrace. They met with Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, later Friday afternoon. 'Regional escalation benefits no one, and that's why we need to keep the discussions with Tehran open,' Kallas told reporters after the meeting. Trump's wavering and his two-week deadline opened a small window for the diplomatic bid by the Europeans – who share Washington's insistence that Iran must not obtain a nuclear weapon. The meeting was coordinated with Washington, four officials familiar with the planning said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive diplomacy. Still, Araghchi told reporters that Iran was 'ready to consider diplomacy once again, once the aggression is stopped and the aggressor is held accountable.' The European diplomat said Friday's talks broached the U.S. demand of zero enrichment of uranium by Iran, though there was little movement on this and other issues. While Tehran has said it is open to negotiating over its nuclear activities, it has rejected giving up all uranium enrichment, maintaining that it has the right to enrich nuclear fuel for civilian use. Previous talks contemplated allowing Iran to continue a limited amount of uranium enrichment for civilian energy purposes. Iran in the past pledged never to acquire nuclear weapons under the 2015 deal that Trump abandoned in 2018. Barrot, France's foreign minister, has said European conditions include a path to 'a substantial and durable rollback of Iran's nuclear program, of its ballistic missile program and its regional destabilization activities.' He suggested Friday without elaborating that the Iranians appeared ready to make concessions that previously were not on the table. But Araghchi said Iran's defense capabilities, an apparent reference to ballistic missiles, were 'nonnegotiable.' France, Germany, Britain and the E.U. were central to negotiations that resulted in the landmark 2015 deal to contain Iran's nuclear activities in exchange for sanctions relief under the Obama administration. After Trump abandoned the deal and reimposed U.S. sanctions, Iran gradually increased the quality and quantity of its enriched-uranium production. The Europeans would be instrumental in enforcing a new deal, including at the International Atomic Energy Agency, the global nuclear watchdog. Trump mostly shut out the Europeans when he came into office again this year and instead kick-started negotiations with Iran, which included promises of peace until the Israeli strikes began last week. French President Emmanuel Macron said at a Group of Seven meeting this week that Trump had indicated he would seek discussions to stop the hostilities. Soon after leaving the G-7, Trump denied that he was working on a 'ceasefire' and warned Iranians to 'immediately evacuate Tehran' – the nation's capital with around 10 million residents – putting the world on edge. Tehran has warned it would retaliate against a U.S. attack by hitting American bases in the region. European calls for de-escalation have done little to move Israeli officials, who have also framed the conflict as a chance to topple Iran's leadership. Israel launched its strikes last week despite Trump's stated ambitions for diplomacy, derailing U.S. negotiations and vowing to end Iran's ability to build a nuclear weapon. Israel is widely known to possess nuclear weapons but has never publicly acknowledged such an arsenal. Though the Europeans all urge de-escalation and agree on restricting Iran's nuclear program, they are not speaking with a single voice. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz this week praised the Israeli attacks and described them as 'the dirty work Israel is doing for all of us.' Macron, meanwhile, warned against 'regime change because nobody can say what would come after that' and asked whether anyone had learned from the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq. The conflict has also raised questions about an E.U. review of trade ties with Israel over its devastating war in Gaza. European officials had recently toughened their criticism of Israel. But some E.U. countries, now keen to see Iran's capabilities targeted, appear less inclined to consider punitive action against Israel, which had been expected to be debated by the 27-nation bloc in the next few weeks. Israeli fighter jets continued the blitz on Iran overnight Thursday and throughout Friday, attacking sites linked to Iran's missile systems and dozens of targets in Tehran, including a weapons research center, the Israeli military said Friday. Israel's Army Radio reported that Israel assassinated an Iranian nuclear scientist, bringing the number of Iranian scientists Israel claims to have killed since it launched the conflict last week to at least 11. During an Iranian barrage Friday, some missiles broke through Israel's vaunted air defenses and hit near government buildings by Haifa's port, injuring about 31 people, a hospital said. Iranian strikes hit sites in central and southern Israel, including a building bearing the logo of a military cyberdefense training center in Beersheba. The intensifying strikes and threats have also triggered a diplomatic scramble in the Middle East, where Iran and Israel's neighbors are rattled by the prospect of an widening war. Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi visited Paris on Thursday and described European talks with Iran as important for 'protecting the region.' Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty spoke with Trump envoy Steve Witkoff for the second time in a week and separately with Araghchi, urging them to 'utilize the available diplomatic channels' to halt the hostilities, the Foreign Ministry said Friday. – – – Parker reported from Cairo. Natalie Allison and Nilo Tabrizy in Washington, Lior Soroka in Tel Aviv, Victoria Bisset in London and Suzan Haidamous in Beirut contributed to this report.
Japan Times
2 hours ago
- Japan Times
Trump confirms Republic of Congo-Rwanda peace deal, gripes about Nobels
U.S. President Donald Trump took credit Friday for a peace deal negotiated in Washington between the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda — and complained that he would not get a Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts. The warring African nations said in a joint statement on Wednesday that they had initialed an agreement aimed at ending the conflict in eastern DRC — to be formally signed in the U.S. capital next week. "This is a Great Day for Africa and, quite frankly, a Great Day for the World!" Trump said in a Truth Social post confirming the breakthrough. But his triumphant tone darkened as he complained that he had been overlooked by the Norwegian Nobel Committee for his mediating role in conflicts between India and Pakistan, as well as Serbia and Kosovo. He also demanded credit for "keeping peace" between Egypt and Ethiopia and brokering the Abraham Accords, a series of agreements aiming to normalize relations between Israel and several Arab nations. Trump campaigned for office as a "peacemaker" who would use his negotiating skills to quickly end wars in Ukraine and Gaza, although both conflicts are still raging five months into his presidency. Indian officials have denied that he had any role in its ceasefire with Pakistan. The government of Pakistan, meanwhile, said Friday it would formally recommend Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize "in recognition of his decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership" during the recent conflict. However, Trump's claims for the Abraham Accords being able to "unify the Middle East" have yet to be realized, with war breaking out between Israel and Iran, and no end in sight to the conflict in Gaza. And critics say the Republican greatly exaggerated the significance of the 2020 Serbia-Kosovo agreements, which were statements of intent that were thin on details and quickly unraveled. The president said officials from Dr. Congo and Rwanda would be in Washington on Monday for the signing, although their joint statement said they would put pen to paper on June 27. The resource-rich eastern DRC, which borders Rwanda, has been plagued by violence for three decades, with a resurgence since the anti-government M23 armed group went on a renewed offensive at the end of 2021. The deal — which builds on a declaration of principles signed in April — was reached during three days of talks between the neighbors in Washington, according to their statement. Trump has received multiple Nobel Peace Prize nominations from supporters and loyal lawmakers over the years. He has made no secret of his irritation at missing out on the prestigious award, bringing it up as recently as February during an Oval Office meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Former U.S. President Barack Obama won the prize soon after taking office in 2009, and Trump complained during his 2024 election campaign that his Democratic predecessor was not worthy of the honor.
Japan Times
3 hours ago
- Japan Times
Can NATO keep Trump on-message about Russia threat?
When leaders from NATO's 32 countries gather for a summit in The Hague next week, most want to send a clear message: Russia is the main threat to their alliance. But the loudest voice in the room likely won't be on the same page. Since coming back to office, U.S. President Donald Trump has upended the West's approach toward Russia's war on Ukraine by undercutting Kyiv and opening the door to closer ties with Moscow. While the volatile leader has expressed some frustration with Russia's Vladimir Putin for refusing a ceasefire, he has steered clear of punishing the Kremlin. At a Group of Seven summit this week Trump made waves by saying the group of industrialized countries should never have expelled Russia. Ahead of the Hague gathering, diplomats at NATO have been wrangling over a five-paragraph summit statement, with many countries pressing for a full-throated assertion of the menace from Moscow. That, they say, will help explain the main thrust of the meeting: an agreement for countries to ramp up defense spending to satisfy Trump's demand for it to reach 5% of GDP. Since the Kremlin launched its 2022 invasion of Ukraine, the alliance has called Russia "the most significant and direct threat to allies' security and to peace and stability in the Euro-Atlantic area." But this time around the United States — backed up by Moscow-friendly Hungary and Slovakia — has been intent on watering that down. Diplomats have been juggling with variants such as referring to "threats, including Russia" or mentioning "the long-term threat posed by Russia to Euro-Atlantic security." The verbal nuances may seem slight, but they mean a lot to those countries being asked to massively ramp up spending and those on NATO's eastern flank most threatened by the Kremlin. NATO has warned that Russia could be ready to attack an alliance country within five years. "If we can get Trump to sign off on calling Russia a long-term threat then that would be a good result," a senior European diplomat said. As U.S. peace efforts between Russia and Ukraine have stalled, the diplomat said that Washington appeared to have "moved a centimeter in our direction" on taking a stronger stance on Russia. "Of course more hawkish countries want to go further — but just getting Trump to agree that would still be fine," the diplomat said. Part of the U.S. reasoning is that Washington is more worried about the threat China poses worldwide — and that Russia is more a problem just in Europe. "Russia is the near threat," said U.S. Ambassador to NATO Matthew Whitaker. "But China is obviously a big challenge for all of us, and we need to be allied and address those threats as well." Camille Grand of the European Council on Foreign Relations said that beneath the diplomatic fine-tuning, NATO was being confronted by a "fundamental question." "How does the United States view Russia?" he said. "So far we haven't really got an answer." Even if NATO does opt for stronger wording on Moscow, there is always the possibility that Trump could show up in The Hague and directly contradict it. But the debate could come into sharper focus in the months after the summit when the United States could announce a pullback of forces in Europe as part of a review of its global deployments. One area where Washington appears clearly not on board with most other allies is on backing Ukraine. Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelenskyy is set to attend on the sidelines of the summit but his involvement is being kept to a minimum to avoid a bust-up with Trump. Diplomats said there should be a reference in the summit statement linking new defense spending to helping Ukraine — but there will be no talk of Kyiv's long-term push to join NATO. "The U.S. does not see Ukrainian security as essential to European security," said Kurt Volker, a former U.S. ambassador to NATO. "Our European allies do, so they feel that if Putin is allowed to prevail in Ukraine, or if Ukraine does not survive as a sovereign, independent state, they are at risk."
