logo
These 5 Republican senators are fighting for clean energy — here's why

These 5 Republican senators are fighting for clean energy — here's why

Yahoo2 days ago

Five U.S. senators may determine the future of clean energy growth in the United States.
As the Senate debates whether or not to repeal the Inflation Reduction Act, these five senators will have an outsized impact on whether the clean energy boom we've been witnessing over the past several years will slow significantly — and it's hard to overstate the stakes.
Since the IRA was passed in 2022, the U.S. has seen an incredible boom in clean energy production and manufacturing — and with it an industrial renaissance.
If the IRA is repealed as part of the so-called "Big Beautiful Bill," the result will be higher energy prices, a worse economy, and a weaker America.
I researched these five senators' comments and how clean energy is transforming their states. Here's what I learned:
North Carolina has benefited from $23 billion in clean energy manufacturing investments since the IRA passed. If the IRA is repealed, the state could lose 17,500 future jobs. Tillis has warned that an abrupt repeal would create "whiplash" for investors and "devastate" America's ability to stay an innovation leader.
An immediate phaseout, he told The Washington Post, would "have a chilling effect" on "future investments" in the domestic energy sector.
Alaska's electricity prices are 56% higher than average prices in other states. The state relies on diesel fuel shipped in from far away.
Sen. Murkowski sees renewables as a way to reduce energy prices, create jobs, and achieve energy independence.
In a recent press conference, Sen. Murkowski recounted her conversation with Interior Secretary Doug Burgum in which she advocated for renewable projects in Alaska that were in jeopardy because of funding freezes.
Do you think more places of worship should embrace clean energy?
Yes — it sets a positive example
Only if it saves money
No opinion
Absolutely not
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
"We're coming to the department and saying, 'I know that you put on pause funding for clean energy resources. If you don't like the vernacular that we're using, that's fine, but look at it from the perspective of energy independence for these small communities and what independence means and looks like for them,'" Murkowski said at the Alaska Infrastructure Development Symposium.
The repeal of the IRA puts a $4 billion Panasonic EV-battery plant in Kansas at risk. The factory is expected to create 4,000 high-paying jobs in Kansas.
Sen. Moran has advocated for an "all of the above" approach to energy policy in America. In a statement to KSHB 41 News, Moran said, "I will support policies, including tax credits that will benefit energy producers in Kansas. … We need more investments in energy production, and tax credits are one way to bring production to the U.S., promote our energy independence, support manufacturing jobs in the U.S. and further investments in domestic energy production."
He was one of four U.S. senators who called for clean energy tax credits to stay in place.
"A wholesale repeal, or the termination of certain individual credits, would create uncertainty, jeopardizing capital allocation, long-term project planning, and job creation in the energy sector and across our broader economy," the letter said.
"We urge a targeted, pragmatic approach that balances these priorities without undercutting current and future private-sector investments."
Power prices in Maine have risen by 55% since 2015 — the third fastest in the nation. Developers have proposed 145 renewable projects that could reduce electricity prices, which are expected to bring $8.8 billion in investment, 9,100 jobs, and nearly 5 gigawatts of new generation or storage capacity.
A spokesperson for Collins told the Maine Morning Star, in response to public pressure in the state to come out in support of the IRA incentives, that Collins supports clean energy and that "this issue is one of many the Senate is going to have to consider as it puts together its reconciliation bill."
The IRA has brought $12 billion in announced clean energy investment to Utah since 2022, which could bring 4,200 new jobs across 50 projects.
The IRA repeal would shave $1.34 billion off Utah's GDP and erase 7,300 jobs by 2030. Households would pay $289 million more for energy by 2035.
At a recent visit to a recently opened battery factory in Tooele County, Utah, Sen. Curtis praised clean energy tax credits: "As energy demand continues to grow, we need an all-of-the-above approach that supports Utahns and provides the long-term certainty businesses need to invest and expand," he said.
"In Utah, we've seen firsthand how smart policies — like energy tax credits — can drive innovation, strengthen our economy, and create real opportunity."
Senator Curtis founded the Conservative Climate Caucus as a member of the House of Representatives and hosts the Conservative Climate Summit every year, a gathering of conservatives talking about climate solutions.
Editor's note: If you want to use your voice to make a difference, you can look up how to contact your own state senators here — whether or not (and perhaps especially if not) they appear on this list.
Michael Thomas is the founder of Cleanview, a platform that helps clean energy leaders track the energy transition in real-time, and the author of a newsletter about climate change, Distilled, that has been read by more than 50 million people. Follow Michael on LinkedIn here, where this post appeared in its original form, or subscribe to his newsletter here.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stop Posting, and Start Legislating—A Message to the GOP from Gen Z
Stop Posting, and Start Legislating—A Message to the GOP from Gen Z

Newsweek

time21 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Stop Posting, and Start Legislating—A Message to the GOP from Gen Z

We remember. We remember the Paul Ryan years. We remember the lofty promises, the press conferences with tax cut charts, the selfies with Trump in the Roosevelt Room. And we remember the disappointment—because when Republicans controlled the House, Senate, and White House, barely anything bold got done. The border wasn't secured. Obamacare wasn't repealed. The swamp wasn't drained. The only thing that moved quickly was the clock—and opportunity slipped away. The bills stalled. The hearings dragged. The excuses piled up. And in the end, the status quo won. Again. A Make America Great Again (MAGA) baseball hat supporting President Donald Trump is pictured. A Make America Great Again (MAGA) baseball hat supporting President Donald Trump is here we are again. President Donald Trump is back in the Oval Office. Conservatives have momentum. The political stars are aligned like they haven't been in years. And yet? The same old D.C. inertia is setting in. Congress is snoozing through a once-in-a-generation opportunity to deliver real change. There's no sense of urgency. No fire. No strategy. Just more performative politics as usual. The difference is: this time, we're paying attention. Gen Z conservatives didn't get off the couch and show up to the ballot box to watch history repeat itself. We're tired of politicians who post more than they produce. House and Senate Republicans—stop acting like influencers and start acting like lawmakers. You don't get to post selfies with Elon Musk or tweet your appreciation to DOGE if you won't even codify basic spending cuts like the DOGE Act. You can't coast on vibes while the country's on fire. You were sent to legislate, not livestream. You weren't elected to trend on X—you were elected to fix what's broken. Brilyn Hollyhand and President Donald Trump are pictured at the University of Alabama on May 1, 2025. Brilyn Hollyhand and President Donald Trump are pictured at the University of Alabama on May 1, 2025. Photo Courtesy of the White House Despite facing one of the most pivotal moments in modern political history, Congress still isn't working full weeks. Many lawmakers fly in Tuesday afternoon and are wheels-up by Thursday. Three-day workweeks in the middle of a national crisis? That's not leadership—that's laziness. Meanwhile, families across America are grinding five, six, even seven days a week just to stay afloat. Blue-collar workers don't get to call it a week by Wednesday night. Neither should the people writing our laws. If our representatives can't even put in a full week's work during a make-or-break presidency, maybe they don't deserve the job. I will never forget my first ever dinner with a U.S. senator. It was my 12th birthday, and we were in D.C., eating downtown after I had recorded some episodes of my podcast on Capitol Hill. He leaned across the table to me and said, "Brilyn, the first thing you're going to learn in this business is that in politics there are work horses and show horses. The work horses bring home the pork for the state that sent them there. The show horses run to the TV cameras. Be a work horse, and only join a cable show when you have an accomplishment to tout." That stuck with me—and I'm reminded of it right now more than ever. Because D.C. is overflowing with show horses. They gallop into every hearing, prance onto every panel, and leave before the hard work begins. This isn't just about optics. This is about outcomes. Republicans were given a second chance to do what they promised the first time. It's not enough to give speeches about the border. Close it. It's not enough to post videos in front of the IRS. Defund it. It's not enough to warn about weaponized government. Dismantle it. This is the moment to act, not admire the problem. Stop playacting reform—deliver it. The base isn't looking for another firebrand quote; we're looking for a signed bill. We're not asking for the moon—we're demanding that you work. Get off the couch. Get off cable news. And get legislation on the president's desk. Defund the weaponized bureaucracy. Close the border. Cut the waste. Stop acting like your job is to coast to retirement and start acting like your job is to represent us. If you need inspiration, look outside the Beltway—real Americans are hustling every day without fanfare. Why can't Congress? Gen Z is watching. And we have receipts. We're the most online, most informed, and most fed-up generation to ever engage in politics. We can see through the talking points. We recognize when someone's all flash and no follow-through. And we're not afraid to call it out—publicly, loudly, and often. You can't gaslight us with headlines. You can't distract us with Instagram posts. We see the floor schedule. We track the votes. We know the difference between working and pretending. If the GOP wastes another Trump term, it won't just be a policy failure—it'll be a generational betrayal. My generation won't forget. We didn't come this far just to watch you do nothing, again. We showed up because we believe in a different future—one that isn't dictated by lobbyists, legacy institutions, and leadership that loves the camera more than the country. Clock in, Congress. Or clock out—and make room for someone who will. Brilyn Hollyhand is an 18-year-old political commentator, chairman of the Republican National Committee's Youth Advisory Council, and bestselling author of One Generation Away: Why Now is the Time to Restore American Freedom. For more of his hot takes you can follow him on socials @BrilynHollyhand or visit The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.

‘Bottle bill' battle intensifies as R.I. legislative session enters home stretch
‘Bottle bill' battle intensifies as R.I. legislative session enters home stretch

Boston Globe

time25 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

‘Bottle bill' battle intensifies as R.I. legislative session enters home stretch

Bottles placed in recycling bins end up being crushed and spread on the Central Landfill, leaving Rhode Island with a 'despicable' 17 percent recycling rate, she said. 'That's pathetic for a state like us, the Ocean State,' McEntee said. 'Something needs to change drastically.' But that's where the disagreement begins. McEntee and Senator Mark P. McKenney have introduced Advertisement 'I think all of us here today are sick and tired of seeing our communities littered with drink bottles, liquor nips, and other pieces of the trash,' McEntee said. " It's long overdue that Rhode Island enters the modern age of waste disposal and reuse by combining the proven and successful strategies of a bottle bill program." Get Rhode Map A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State. Enter Email Sign Up But the Greater Providence of Chamber of Commerce and other business groups are waging a high-profile 'Our members support increasing the state's recycling rate but not by imposing a financial burden on local businesses and consumers,' the Rhode Island Business Coalition said in written testimony. 'By adding a 10-cent fee to nearly every beverage sold in the state, these proposals would raise prices for retailers working to keep their shelves stocked — and for families simply trying to afford everyday essentials like bottled water and soft drinks." Related : Advertisement Bottle bills have been introduced off and on in Rhode Island since the early 1980s, but they have run into stiff opposition from the national beverage companies and local retailers. The most recent push began in 2023. McEntee, a South Kingstown Democrat, and McKenney, a Warwick Democrat, co-chaired a special legislative commission that delved into the issue for 18 months. Jed Thorp, director of advocacy for the environmental group Save the Bay, said the commission held 13 meetings, and the House and Senate have had about 15 hours of committee hearings on the topic. 'Every person in the state who's wanted to weigh in on this has been heard,' he said. 'At this point, it is time to vote on this bill. It is time to get this done.' Thorp said the study commission heard from experts from across the country. 'Through all of those hearings, it has become clear that yes, bottle bills work,' he said. 'Bottle bills we know are effective at both reducing litter and improving recycling.' Thorp said advocates listened to opponents who said they support bottle bills if they are crafted in the right way. For example, retailers said they did not want to have to take back the empty containers. So the bill would require a producer responsibility organization to instead create a system that might involve 'bag-drop programs' or 'reverse vending machines,' he said. But on Wednesday, a coalition of 73 small business owners signed onto a letter urging Governor Daniel J. McKee, House Speaker K. Joseph Shekarchi, and Senate President Valarie J. Lawson to reject the 'bottle bill.' Advertisement 'This legislation will raise costs for businesses and Rhode Island families at a time when many are already struggling with high prices due to inflation,' the coalition said. 'The cost of living and doing business in Rhode Island keeps going up, and this legislation would make matters worse.' The coalition includes businesses such as Eastside Mart in Providence, Iggy's Food Mart in Warren, Ollie's Pub in Warwick, and Sam's Food Store Woonsocket. While 10 cents per container may not sound like much, a 12-pack of soda would cost an extra $1.20, the coalition said. 'Rhode Island consumers and businesses cannot afford a bottle tax,' the letter stated. Both McEntee and McKenney disputed the idea that the 10-cent deposit amounts to a tax. 'This isn't a bottle tax,' McKenney said. 'I've been paying taxes for years, and I've never gotten all my money back. With this — real easy — you return the bottles, you get the money back." Ten states have bottle bills, including 'It's not like this is reinventing a wheel,' McKenney said. 'This is done in many states. My gosh, in Europe it's done in countries left and right.' Sam Tracy, director of legislative affairs for the CLYNK bottle recycling company, spoke at Thursday's news conference, saying the company's technology is used in five of the 10 bottle bill states. He said he also was representing a coalition of businesses that support legislation combining a 'bottle bill' with extended producer responsibility. That coalition includes Poland Spring, Guinness, and Red Bull, as well as local businesses like the Hot Club, and Frog & Toad, both in Providence. Advertisement With the 2025 legislative session entering its final weeks, the fate of the 'bottle bill' hangs in the balance. So what do legislative leaders have to say? Lawson, who is a cosponsor of the Shekarchi also issued a statement Friday, saying he appreciates the legislative commission's work during the past the past two sessions. 'I am reviewing all the options, looking at what other states are doing, and talking with the Senate,' Shekarchi said. 'I am fortunate to be receiving advice and guidance on this issue from former DEM Director Janet Coit, and will continue to consider the options.' Edward Fitzpatrick can be reached at

Trump may win the fight over the tax bill. But Musk is built for the long war.
Trump may win the fight over the tax bill. But Musk is built for the long war.

Boston Globe

time36 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Trump may win the fight over the tax bill. But Musk is built for the long war.

But while Trump still dominates the short-term politics of the Republican Party, Musk holds a very different kind of power, one that may ultimately outlast Trumpism. He's younger. He's vastly wealthier. And unlike most political rivals, Musk doesn't need a seat in Congress or a friendly Fox News hit to wield influence. He owns the platforms. He runs the systems. And his companies are increasingly intertwined with the United States' future — from space exploration to battlefield communications. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up This feud didn't erupt out of nowhere. Musk had reasons to be angry. First, the 'Big Beautiful Bill' Advertisement This isn't just a policy spat, it's a power struggle. Trump is playing to win the moment. Musk is building for the long haul. Advertisement Let's start with the obvious: Trump tuns 79 next week. Musk turns 54 at the end of June. Trump is focused on one last political chapter. Musk is laying groundwork for the next several decades. That generational difference shapes everything else. Trump's power is political. Musk's is infrastructural. The president can rally public opinion, bend Congress to his will, and weaponize regulatory agencies. But Musk operates on another level — embedding his companies into the very systems the government depends on. SpaceX is now central to NASA and Pentagon operations. Starlink powers military communications in Ukraine and is quietly becoming indispensable for disaster zones and geopolitical hotspots. Even Tesla, for all its recent volatility, helped create the EV market and still shapes infrastructure policy. If Trump wants to punish Musk, he has tools — the SEC, federal contracts, and regulatory pressure. Heck, one Trump ally believes Trump has reason to deport Musk back to his native South Africa. But the irony is that Trump's own administration might need Musk more than Musk needs Trump, particularly in the next moment of crisis. Then there's media. Beyond the powers of the presidency, Trump's strength is performative — rallies, TV hits, the occasional viral clip. Sure, he also has Truth Social, but that is a niche network. Musk, by contrast, owns the algorithm. As the proprietor of the much more mainstream X (formerly Twitter), he doesn't just post. He shapes the feed. He bans journalists, elevates allies, and controls what trends. But their falling-out signals a deeper shift on the American right — a movement once held together by Trump's gravitational pull is now already fragmenting. One can see that just in the fights over the Big Beautiful Bill. Musk represents a rising faction: tech-aligned, anti-woke, post-party, and less interested in governing than in redesigning systems altogether. Advertisement Of course, Musk is no model of discipline. His erratic tweets and ideological zig-zags make him an unreliable political force. But that's precisely what makes him dangerous. He's not a senator. He claims he is not a donor anymore. He's not trying to be president and, well, he is constitutionally ineligible anyway. Instead, he's trying to shape what the presidency needs. Trump still knows how to land a punch. But Musk might is laying claim to the terrain on which the next generation of political power will be fought. So yes, Trump can still win this fight over a tax bill. But Musk is playing a different game. He's not trying to win a news cycle. He's trying to build the operating system for what comes next. James Pindell is a Globe political reporter who reports and analyzes American politics, especially in New England.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store