logo
Coles, Woolworths respond after Aussies accuse supermarkets of 'same old tricks' for easter

Coles, Woolworths respond after Aussies accuse supermarkets of 'same old tricks' for easter

Yahoo01-03-2025

Coles and Woolworths have hit back at fresh claims they are engaging in sneaky tactics, after shoppers accused both retailers of inflating prices on tags before subsequently reducing them — claiming they are deceptively advertising items as "clearance" or discounted.
Online this week, several Australians raised concerns both supermarkets may be inflating prices on their specials tags. They claim the original prices listed on certain products were deliberately inaccurate, in an effort to make the clearance price seem like a better deal.
The allegations are similar to those made by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) last year when Coles and Woolworths were accused of raising prices before promoting price reductions.
"Woolies and Coles [are] up to the same old tricks," a frustrated customer wrote on social media this week.
"These chocolates have been $24 forever. Last week, [they] raised the price to $29, an increase of 22 per cent. Now, Woolies is trying to position $24 as a clearance price. We were told this shouldn't happen."
A similarly upset customer of Coles questioned the $20 price tag of a box of Lindt Easter eggs, marked down from $40, asking "when were these ever $40?".
Somebody else who claimed to be a Woolworths employee said her co-worker was asked to replace a $5 price tag on a box of coffee capsules with an $11 one. "My co-worker was putting up new tickets and came to show me... she said doing tickets makes her so angry and this is exactly why," the woman wrote.
In September 2024, the ACCC initiated legal action against both Coles and Woolworths, alleging deceptive pricing practices.
The ACCC accused the retailers of artificially inflating prices on hundreds of everyday items, only to later advertise them as discounted under campaigns like Coles' "Down Down" and Woolworths' "Prices Dropped."
This strategy allegedly involved raising product prices by at least 15 per cent for a short period before offering a "discount" that matched or exceeded the original price, misleading consumers about genuine savings.
During a Federal Court hearing in Melbourne in October 2024, representatives from both supermarkets denied the allegations, attributing price increases to supplier costs and market conditions.
They contended that their pricing strategies were transparent and in line with industry standards. The ACCC, however, maintained that such practices erode consumer trust and called for substantial penalties to deter future misconduct.
A final report on the supermarket sector was scheduled for submission to the government yesterday, February 28, aiming to address market concentration and enhance competition. The Federal Treasurer is expected to reveal the findings of the report in the coming days.
In the online thread this week, numerous examples were present, including instances at other retailers as well. Yahoo News questioned both Woolworths and Coles over the allegations levelled at them.
A Coles spokesperson told us that with regard to the Easter eggs, the product is seasonal (not available all year round). They said the $40 recommended retail price (RRP) is accurate, and encouraged direct contact with the supplier for additional information.
Coles recognised the price of chocolate had increased due to cocoa shortages, leading to higher global commodity prices. "We are working closely with our suppliers to offer competitive prices for our customers this Easter," a spokesperson told Yahoo.
"Ingredients play a crucial role in determining prices at the checkout. We know there are significant global challenges in the supply of cocoa beans, which have impacted production costs across the industry for many suppliers."
As for Woolworths, it also cited the wholesale cost of goods when it came to the increased price of the box of coffee. "The industry is managing higher commodity prices of green coffee beans and cocoa, and we are working with our suppliers to ensure we have a range of products in these categories to suit all budgets," a spokesperson told us.
However it did acknowledge the price of the "clearance" chocolates was incorrect, which it suggested may have been an isolated incident, due to human error. Or, potentially due to the fact the chocolates were going out of date.
Woolworths increased the price of the Guyliana Seashells 250g pack in February, 2025 following a supplier cost request. In December, a Woolworths catalogue priced the same pack at $24.
Meanwhile, both supermarket announced on Thursday their latest profit margins — each experiencing contrasting outcomes.
Woolworths reported a 20.6 per cent decline in net profit, amounting to $739 million for the first half of the financial year. This downturn is in part attributed to a 17-day industrial action in December in addition to what it said was a major shift in consumer behaviour towards more value-oriented shopping.
Chief executive Amanda Bardwell admitted the decline was "a difficult and disappointing result", citing the "financial pressures" facing Australians, coupled with the fact customers are "cross-shopping significantly more".
As a result, the supermarket heavyweight announced plans to reduce costs by $400 million. It said it has cut its interim dividend by 17 per cent to 39 cents per share.
Coles Group, on the other hand, reported a net profit after tax of $576 million, a slight, three per cent decrease from the previous year. Despite the decline, the results met market expectations, bolstered by strong holiday sales and benefiting from disruptions faced by Woolworths due to industrial action.
Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@yahoonews.com.
You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Child grooming practices hiding in plain sight
Child grooming practices hiding in plain sight

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Child grooming practices hiding in plain sight

Parents are being urged to learn the red flags that could indicate their child is being groomed. Grooming is one of the most insidious precursors to child sexual abuse as the manipulative practice targets parents and children. In Australia, more than one in three girls and almost one in five boys experience child sexual abuse. The stark reality is that 79 per cent of survivors knew their abuser, be it a relative, friend, acquaintance or neighbour. Survivor and advocate Amelia Ayris said there was not enough education about grooming for children or their parents. "Grooming can look harmless and be very harmful," she said. "It needs to be communicated to children and adults because it is so prevalent in child sexual abuse cases." The 19-year-old is now studying law and politics at university, hoping to one day work in family law. "I've seen what needs to change within the legal system and where it failed me and so many other young people," she said. Grooming is the calculated process perpetrators use to gain a child's trust, isolate them and ensure their silence, often happening in plain sight. But it's not just the child who is groomed. Parents, caregivers and other significant adults are also groomed by the perpetrator. Almost one in four Australians are not confident in identifying indicators of sexual abuse and only one in five feel confident talking to a child or parent about sexual abuse. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Bravehearts (@braveheartsprotectkids) These statistics underscore the critical need for education, particularly in the area of grooming, Bravehearts CEO Alison Geale said. The leading child protection organisation has launched a national awareness campaign titled "grooming hides behind harmless" in a bid to expose the subtle behaviours of perpetrators. "This campaign is designed not from a vigilante perspective but it's rather about vigilance," Ms Geale told AAP. "We want parents to be educated through knowledge, not experience." The campaign was directed by award-winning actor, singer and writer Leah Purcell who got involved after learning close friends had been impacted by child sexual abuse. "There's too much silence around it, and people think it will never happen to them," she said. "The campaign is about giving people the tools they need to stop this happening." Bravehearts is encouraging all Australians, including parents, teachers, carers, neighbours, coaches and community members to get educated, stay alert and be willing to act. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028 Lifeline 13 11 14 Kids Helpline 1800 55 1800 (for people aged 5 to 25)

Health Department Awards Optus $33M Contract for Medicare Communications Infrastructure
Health Department Awards Optus $33M Contract for Medicare Communications Infrastructure

Time Business News

time17 hours ago

  • Time Business News

Health Department Awards Optus $33M Contract for Medicare Communications Infrastructure

The Department of Health has awarded Australian telecommunications giant Optus a $33 million contract to provide critical communications services underpinning Australia's Medicare and e-health systems, marking a significant vote of confidence in the carrier following recent cybersecurity challenges. The three-year deal, with potential extension to six years, was confirmed through a contract notification posted on the government's AusTender procurement website. The agreement consolidates Optus's position as a strategic telecommunications provider to the federal government. Under the arrangement, Optus will deliver what the company describes as 'a fully managed Network-as-a-Service (NaaS) solution for the Department of Health, Disability and Ageing, supporting its digital transformation.' The contract represents a consolidation of various telecommunications services previously spread across multiple arrangements. Optus has historically maintained substantial portions of the Health Department's carrier contracts, but the new deal brings together disparate services under a unified framework. The award comes as the Albanese government prioritizes securing core digital infrastructure supporting Medicare and broader e-health services. The telecommunications backbone provided under the contract will underpin the delivery of essential health services to millions of Australians. The deal also signals renewed government confidence in Optus following a turbulent period for the carrier. The company was among several major Australian corporations targeted by Russian-linked ransomware attacks, drawing criticism from former Home Affairs Minister Clare O'Neil. The cyberattacks resulted in the application of sanctions following what officials described as malicious raids on critical infrastructure providers. Despite these security challenges, the Health Department's decision to award the substantial contract to Optus suggests the government views the carrier as having adequately addressed previous vulnerabilities. The Network-as-a-Service model allows the Health Department to access telecommunications infrastructure without the need for significant capital investment in physical network equipment, while ensuring reliable connectivity for critical health system operations. The contract timeline provides flexibility for both parties, with the initial three-year term allowing for performance evaluation before potential extension to the full six-year period. This structure enables the government to maintain service continuity while preserving options for future procurement decisions. TIME BUSINESS NEWS

Average Australian homes tops A$1m amid housing crisis
Average Australian homes tops A$1m amid housing crisis

Yahoo

time18 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Average Australian homes tops A$1m amid housing crisis

The average price of an Australian home has surpassed A$1m ($652,000; £483,000) for the first time, as the nation grapples with a housing affordability crisis. Figures released by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) this week estimate the average home was worth A$1,002,500 in the March quarter, up 0.7 per cent from the previous quarter. The nation is home to some of the least affordable cities on Earth, where buying or renting a place is increasingly out of reach for many Australians. Experts say the crisis is being driving by a lack of homes, a growing population, tax incentives for property investors, and inadequate investment in social housing. The country's most populous state, New South Wales (NSW), continues to have the priciest homes on average, at A$1.2m, followed by Queensland at A$945k, according to the ABS. The agency's Mish Tan said the states of Western Australia, South Australia and Queensland were the "main drivers of the rise". While the average price of homes climbed in all states and territories in the March quarter, the annual growth rate is slowing, she added. The figures take in Australia's 11.3m dwellings - including the full gamut of property types, from freestanding homes, to terrace houses and apartments. Michael Fotheringham, head of the Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute, is not surprised to see the $1m benchmark crossed. Though a "daunting" and "compelling" statistic, he says it is the result of a years-long national trend of home prices outpacing wages and leaving the housing system "very strained". "This isn't just an affordability problem for lower income households - this is very much a problem for medium-income households as well," he said. "Globally we're seeing the term housing crisis being used in many developed countries," he added, "[but] our housing prices have risen sharply so it's one of the less affordable countries overall." Rental availability has also been a problem in recent years, and there isn't enough social housing to meet demand either. Australia's looming election brings housing crisis into focus The year the Australian Dream died Canada is facing similar challenges, Dr Fotheringham said, but the UK was markedly different as it has more council estates and social housing in the mix. However, the UK and Australia do share what he called "ambitious housing targets" with Australia hoping to build 1.2m homes and the UK 1.5m homes within the next five years. Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese - who won a second term last month at an election where housing was a top issue - on Tuesday said his government was looking to further reduce red tape for developers. They have long complained that planning laws prevent them from building enough homes. "One of the things that we have to do is to make it easier," he said, according to the Sydney Morning Herald, adding "developers say that it's just too complex [and it] adds to costs as well".

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store