logo
Ed Davey urges China to ‘publish the tapes' after MP denied entry to Hong Kong

Ed Davey urges China to ‘publish the tapes' after MP denied entry to Hong Kong

Independent15-04-2025

Sir Ed Davey has called on China to release the tapes of the interrogation of a Liberal Democrat MP who was denied entry to Hong Kong to visit her family.
The party leader also urged Foreign Secretary David Lammy to summon the country's ambassador to Britain to demand an explanation for Wera Hobhouse's deportation, saying the UK should not be 'kowtowing' to Beijing.
Ms Hobhouse, the MP for Bath who is a member of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (Ipac) which has been critical of Beijing's human rights record, has said she believes the action was taken to silence her.
She had flown to Hong Kong to see her son and newborn grandson but was held at the airport, questioned and sent back to the UK.
Asked whether he agreed that she had been detained to 'shut her up', Sir Ed told the PA news agency: 'I think it's very likely the case.
'Liberal Democrats have stood up for the people of Hong Kong against oppression from Beijing, stood up for human rights, and I don't think the Chinese government likes that.
'And this may be a part of retaliation, even though Wera was only on a family visit, but I think that shows you that they behaved in a shocking way – they need to back down.'
He added: 'I very much hope the British Government, the Foreign Secretary, David Lammy, will call in the Chinese ambassador and demand an explanation. We shouldn't be kowtow(ing), I'm afraid, to Beijing.'
Speaking during a local election campaign visit to manufacturing business LJA Miers & Co in St Neots, Cambridgeshire, the party leader challenged China to be transparent about what had happened.
'They're trying to blame Wera,' he said.
'Let them publish the tapes. Let them be open. It's not like the Chinese, but they should be, because I'm afraid they're guilty of a very big mistake here.
'It's against the rights of (the) family, and… it actually should worry anyone in any part of the political sphere in Britain. This is not the way to expect MPs to be treated by China.'
The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region released a statement late on Monday saying: 'It is the duty of immigration officer to ask questions to ascertain that there is no doubt about the purpose of any visit.
'The person concerned knows best what he or she has done. It will be unhelpful to the person's case if the person refuses to answer questions put to him or her for that purpose.'
Ms Hobhouse accused Chinese authorities of attempting to 'smear' her by appearing to suggest she had failed to co-operate, and asked them to publish recordings of her interview.
'I was polite and co-operative throughout the interview, answering every question asked of me,' she said.
'I even volunteered personal information I wasn't asked for, such as showing officials a picture of my baby grandson who was waiting for me on the other side.'
She added: 'Following these damaging attempts to smear me, I hope the Foreign Secretary will now summon the Chinese ambassador in person to give a full and clear account of why I was refused entry to Hong Kong last week.
'Until that request is answered, it will have a chilling effect on all parliamentarians who stand up for freedom and democracy.'
In a piece for The Guardian, Ms Hobhouse later said there should be no ministerial visits to China until the UK had been given answers.
'We must be direct: if you will not be straight and don't answer legitimate questions we cannot engage with you on the basis of mutual trust,' she said.
'That's why, until we get a clear answer on why I was deported, no Government minister should be visiting China on official business.'
The Foreign Office has been contacted for comment.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Tories must stop agreeing with Farage and start attacking him to survive
Why Tories must stop agreeing with Farage and start attacking him to survive

Scotsman

time2 hours ago

  • Scotsman

Why Tories must stop agreeing with Farage and start attacking him to survive

Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... On April 15, 2010, the UK held its first-ever televised general election debate, pitting Labour's Gordon Brown, the then Prime Minister, against David Cameron of the Conservatives, with Nick Clegg expected to do little more than make up the numbers. However, if that was the anticipated script, no one told Clegg, who spoke so persuasively that the catchphrase of the night was 'I agree with Nick' as both Cameron and Brown sought to side with him. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In a snap YouGov poll after the contest, 51 per cent declared the Liberal Democrat leader to be the winner, with Cameron on 29 and Brown on 19. While 'Cleggmania' proved short-lived, the clear lesson was that agreeing with a political opponent tends to benefit them. Delegates at the Conservative party conference in 2023 pose for a photograph with Nigel Farage (Picture: Oli Scarff) | AFP via Getty Images A political cataclysm looms Fifteen years later, and the Conservatives' current strategy to defeat Reform UK, by echoing its rhetoric, is backfiring even more badly. While the 2010 debate was a one-off event, the Tories have effectively been campaigning for Reform for years. In Thursday's Hamilton by-election, the Conservative candidate received just 1,621 votes, down from 6,332 at the last Scottish Parliament election, while Reform got 7,088, not far behind the winner, Labour's Davy Russell, and the SNP in second. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad As the Scottish Tories prepare for their party conference this week, a major topic of discussion must be about finding ways to disagree with Reform, if they wish to survive what threatens to become a political event as cataclysmic as the collapse of the old Liberal party after the First World War. Farage is out to destroy the Tories, and they must be as determined and ruthless. There is much to go at. Many of Reform's policies are patently ridiculous and some are downright dangerous. Keir Starmer's claim that Farage would 'crash the economy' like Liz Truss was a good line, and the Conservatives need to find similarly resonant ways of highlighting the very real dangers of voting for Reform.

Council spelling howler sparks ridicule
Council spelling howler sparks ridicule

Telegraph

time11 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Council spelling howler sparks ridicule

A council has been criticised by residents after erecting a road sign with a spelling error. The sign, just outside the Berkshire town of Newbury, said 'road liable to flodding' instead of 'flooding'. The error was spotted by drivers along the Lambourn Road between the Woodspeen Restaurant and Snake Lane in Woodspeen, Berks. Liberal Democrat-led West Berkshire council has since received a wave of criticism on social media. Juliet Clarke wrote: 'Did our council tax pay for that sign?' while Sue Deacon said whoever made the sign 'doesn't know how to spell'. Another resident, Gill Lucraft, asked if the word flodding meant 'abuse', to which fellow local Ian Rees said it was an 'abuse of the English language'. The word 'flodding' is a slang term for cyberbullying and harassment where a person sends a large number of messages in a short period of time. It is not the first time a spelling mistake in Newbury has sparked a backlash. A Christmas tree sign erected in 2023 read 'bought to you by Visit Newbury' instead of 'brought'. The typo made waves in the town when a local posted it on Facebook with the caption: 'Spot the cock-up.' Visit Newbury apologised for the mistake and had it changed immediately. The council, which was gained by the Liberal Democrats from the Conservative Party in 2023, has been contacted for comment.

Zia Yusuf returns to Reform UK just 48 hours after quitting as chairman
Zia Yusuf returns to Reform UK just 48 hours after quitting as chairman

Western Telegraph

time13 hours ago

  • Western Telegraph

Zia Yusuf returns to Reform UK just 48 hours after quitting as chairman

The 38-year-old businessman said his decision to stand down had been the result of 'exhaustion' and working for 11 months 'without a day off'. Party leader Nigel Farage, speaking to the Sunday Times newspaper alongside Mr Yusuf, said the former chairman will now effectively be doing 'four jobs', though his title has not yet been decided. Mr Yusuf's new formal title is yet to be decided (Stefan Rousseau/PA) He will lead Reform's plans to cut public spending – the so-called 'UK Doge', based on the US Department of Government Efficiency which was led by tech billionaire Elon Musk. The ex-chairman will also take part in policymaking, fundraising and media appearances. Mr Yusuf said he was quitting Reform following the latest in a series of internal rows, in which he described a question to the Prime Minister concerning a ban on burkas from his party's newest MP as 'dumb'. Announcing his resignation on Thursday afternoon, he said: 'I no longer believe working to get a Reform government elected is a good use of my time, and hereby resign the office.' Mr Yusuf said he had been left feeling undervalued by some in the party and drained after being subjected to relentless racist abuse on X, and made the comments in 'error'. 'I spoke to Nigel and said I don't mind saying I made an error. It was a function of exhaustion,' he said. Asked about the row over talk of banning the burka, Mr Yusuf said he 'certainly did not resign because I have any strong views about the burqa itself' but felt blindsided by Sarah Pochin's question to Sir Keir Starmer. He said that 'if there were a vote and I was in parliament, I would probably vote to ban it actually' but that 'philosophically I am always a bit uneasy about banning things which, for example, would be unconstitutional in the United States, which such a ban no doubt would be'. Zia Yusuf's humiliating hokey-cokey is laughable but there is nothing funny about Farage's £80 billion in unfunded commitments Ellie Reeves, Labour Reform will hope the show of unity between Mr Farage and the former chairman is enough to quell concerns about internal personality clashes, amid recent scrutiny of the leader's fallings out with former allies. It follows the suspension of MP Rupert Lowe from the party following complaints about his conduct, which he denied, and suggested the leader had a tendency to row with colleagues he felt threatened by. Labour branded Mr Yusuf's return a 'humiliating hokey-cokey' and said working people could not afford 'the risk of economic chaos with Reform UK'. Party chairwoman Ellie Reeves said: 'Reform's revolving door shows that the party is all about one person – Nigel Farage. 'Zia Yusuf's humiliating hokey-cokey is laughable but there is nothing funny about Farage's £80 billion in unfunded commitments. 'His reckless plan is Liz Truss's disastrous mini-budget on steroids and would spark economic chaos that increases bills and mortgages. 'Working people simply can't afford the risk of economic chaos with Reform UK.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store