
Tucker Carlson takes on Fox News
For years, Tucker Carlson made a name for himself on cable television and built a loyal following through attacks on Democrats, rival network news hosts, and other leading enemies of the right.
Now the conservative political podcaster and social media personality is turning his fire on the company that helped build him up — and then terminated him three years ago after he served as a staple of its prime-time lineup: Fox News.
Carlson, who opposed U.S. intervention in the Israeli-Iran war, has ripped Fox over its coverage of the conflict.
'The Murdochs really hate Trump,' Carlson said during a recent episode of his online commentary and interview show. 'I got fired in April of 2023. In May of 2023, they asked me to run for president against Trump and said they would back me.'
His battle with his former employer underscores the MAGA fight for the president's ear.
Anti-war MAGA figures like Carlson are worried that Fox News, which has been reliably supportive of calls to attack Iran, has had too much influence on President Trump, who last Saturday ordered strikes on three Iranian nuclear plans.
Trump is known to watch media coverage of his decisionmaking as president closely and in real time, placing particular stake in how things 'play' on Fox, those around him say.
The New York Times reported several top advisers to the president are irritated Carlson is no longer at Fox, fearing Trump was not hearing enough of a more isolationist argument when deciding whether to attack Iran's nuclear facilities.
Carlson has made this argument explicit, saying Fox is engaging in pro-war 'propaganda' as part of an effort to 'scare old people' and benefit the 'warmongers' running the network.
As Carlson hosted a conversation with Steve Bannon, a former top White House aide who also is known for taking shots at the Murdoch family, Carlson remarked it 'feels like Fox is playing a central role in the pro-war push.'
'They're doing the thing they always do,' he said. 'Turning up the propaganda hose to full blast and just knock elderly Fox viewers off their feet and make them submit to a new war.'
Mark Levin, a weekend Fox News host and conservative talk radio firebrand, has been a target of Carlson's and has often pushed back.
Levin, who often raises his voice and shakes as he speaks with passionate bombast, has advocated for more military action against Iran and called Carlson out by name over his previous positions on the Middle East when he worked as a host on the more liberal CNN and MSNBC.
'His preposterously hysterical warnings about what would happen if the president acted militarily against Iran's nuclear sites were illustrative of his unhinged bravado,' Levin wrote on social media of his former fellow Fox host. 'He's very proud of his depraved insanity.'
Levin then called Carlson 'Qatarlson,' a play on Qatar, an ally of Iran.
'Qatarlson has been a liberal, a libertarian, an actual neo-con, a conservative, and today just a simple reprobate who has much in common with Bernie Sanders and Rashida Tlaib,' Levin said.
Fox News did not comment on criticisms from Carlson, Bannon and others in recent days, though the network did send a press release on Tuesday celebrating its industry-leading ratings during the U.S. military strike on Iran.
Carlson has turned some of his criticism on Trump himself, surprising many in media and political circles when he blasted the president as 'complicit' in the escalating violence in the Middle East.
Those comments earned the commentator a rare rebuke from the president, who called him 'kooky' in a social media post last week.
Later, Trump told reporters he had spoken to Carlson by phone and the two had reconciled.
'DJT and Tucker are good,' one source with knowledge of the dynamic told The Hill this week. 'And this thing getting wrapped up so quickly basically stopped a major civil war on the right.'
But the war between Carlson and Fox appears far from over.
'All of this is deranged,' Carlson said again this week after playing for his online audience clips from Fox hosts and guests warning about the dangers of Iran obtaining nuclear weapons and advocating for regime change in Tehran.
'These are all people who hate Trump,' he said of GOP Sens. Lindsey Graham (S.C.), Ted Cruz (Texas) and others featured in the montage, all of whom see themselves as allies of the president.
Carlson earned a flurry of headlines and even some rare praise from liberals last week for an interview he conducted with Cruz days earlier questioning the lawmaker on the merits of U.S. involvement in the Middle East and quizzing him on basic facts about Iran.
The two battled when Cruz — who has made regular appearances on Fox in recent weeks to advocate for a stronger U.S. posture toward Iran, primarily on pundit Sean Hannity's prime-time program — acknowledged he did not know the population of Iran.
Some observers say Carlson is also playing a game to his own benefit.
'Tucker Carlson is doing what he does best, which is playing the role of Tucker Carlson,' said Peter Loge, a professor of politics and communications at George Washington University. 'If he isn't outraged or shouting at people in power, he isn't doing his job. Biting hands is how Tucker Carlson pays the bills.'
If Fox News's coverage leans pro-Trump and approves of his decision to launch strikes at Iran, that is also a conscious choice by the network, one GOP political operative said.
'This is pretty made for TV, all of it. It's a deliberate strategy by Fox to keep people watching,' the Republican political operative said.
This source also said Trump will continue to play to both sides.
'Trump recognizes the following Tucker has but he also knows he needs Fox. He's one for flattery, so he's going to weigh both sides of it, but we know he's ultimately going to do what he sees fit,' the operative said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
31 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump's Approval Rating Falls to Lowest Point
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Several polls show that Trump's approval rating has fallen to an all-time low for his second term. The latest Gallup poll, conducted between June 2-19 among 1,000 adults, shows that Trump's net approval rating stands at -17 points, with 40 percent approving and 57 percent disapproving. That is done from -10 points in May, the previous lowest result recorded by Gallup. The poll had a margin of error of ± 4 percent. Meanwhile, the latest YouGov/Economist poll, conducted between June 20-23 among 1,590 adults, shows Trump with a net approval rating of -14 points, with 40 percent approving and 54 percent disapproving—down slightly from -13 last week. The poll had a margin of error of ± 3.5 percent. Similarly, a new Bullfinch Group poll, conducted between June 17-20 among 1,006 registered voters, puts his net approval at -13 points, with 41 percent approval and 54 percent disapproval. That marks a sharp drop from -5 in May. The poll's margin of error was ± 3.1 percent. Why It Matters The drop comes amid a broader downward trend in Trump's approval rating, which was particularly pronounced after his "Liberation Day" tariffs. But the question of direct U.S. involvement in the conflict between Israel and Iran has visibly contributed to the drop as polls have shown the majority of voters do not support it. Trump ordered airstrikes against three key Iranian nuclear facilities over the weekend. In retaliation, Iran fired missiles at a U.S. military base in Qatar on Monday. President Donald Trump speaks with reporters before boarding Marine One on the South Lawn of the White House, Tuesday, June 24, 2025, in Washington. President Donald Trump speaks with reporters before boarding Marine One on the South Lawn of the White House, Tuesday, June 24, 2025, in Washington. Evan Vucci/AP What To Know The latest Ipsos/Reuters, American Research Group polls also show Trump's net approval rating at record lows for his second term. In the Ipsos/Reuters poll, conducted between June 21-23 among 1,139 registered voters, Trump's net approval rating stood at -16 points, with 41 percent approving and 57 percent disapproving. That is down from a previous low of net approval of -12 points in last week's poll. The poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points. Similarly, in the latest American Research Group poll, conducted June 17-20 among 1,100 adults, Trump's net approval rating hit -21 points, with 38 percent approving and 59 percent disapproving, down from a low of -14 points in the previous poll conducted in May. The latest Morning Consult poll, conducted between June 20-22 among 2,205 registered voters, did not show Trump's approval rating at an all-time low. But it did show a notable decline in Trump's approval rating, with 45 percent approving and 53 percent disapproving, giving him a net approval rating of -8 points. That is down from a -6 net approval rating in the previous poll. The margin of error is plus or minus 2 points. Other polls have shown a downward trend in Trump's approval rating in recent days. In the latest J.L. Partners poll, conducted on June 16-17, Trump's approval held steady at 48 percent. But disapproval was up 11 points to 51 percent since the last poll in February. Still, a handful of polls recorded slight gains for Trump, though largely within the margin of error. In the latest Echelon Insights poll (June 17-18), Trump's approval rating was up 2 points at -4, while disapproval was down by 1 point compared to last month. Poll Date Approve Disapprove YouGov/Economist June 20-23 40 54 Ipsos/Reuters June 21-23 41 57 Morning Consult June20-22 45 53 Bullfinch Group June 17-20 41 54 American Research Group June 17-20 38 59 Trafalgar Group June 18-20 54 45 RMG Research June 11-19 53 46 Gallup June 2-19 40 57 Echelon Insights June 17-18 48 52 J.L. Partners June 16-17 46 51 And the most recent RMG Research poll, conducted between June 11-19, put his approval rating up one to 53 points, while his disapproval rating remained the same at 46 points. In the latest Trafalgar Group poll, conducted between June 18-20, 54 percent approved of Trump's job performance, while 45 percent disapproved, giving him a net approval of +9 points. That is up from +8 in last month's poll, when 54 percent approved and 46 percent disapproved. What Happens Next Trump's approval rating could fluctuate in the coming weeks, depending on the outcome of key events.


Fast Company
31 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Trump's Iran-Israel ceasefire is holding. Why hopes for lasting peace are uncertain
The fragile ceasefire between Israel and Iran appeared to be holding on Wednesday after a rocky start, giving rise to cautious hope that it could lead to a long-term peace agreement even as Tehran insists it will not give up its nuclear program. The ceasefire took hold on Tuesday, the 12th day of the war between Israel and Iran, with each side initially accusing the other of violating it until the missiles, drones and bombs finally stopped. On Wednesday, U.S. President Donald Trump, who helped negotiate the ceasefire, told reporters at a NATO summit in the Netherlands that it was going 'very well.' 'They're not going to have a bomb and they're not going to enrich,' Trump said about Iran. Iran has insisted, however, that it will not give up its nuclear program and in a vote underscoring the tough path ahead, Iranian parliament agreed to fast-track a proposal that would effectively stop the country's cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, the Vienna-based U.N. watchdog that has been monitoring the Iranian nuclear program for years. Ahead of the vote, Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf criticized the IAEA for having 'refused to even pretend to condemn the attack on Iran's nuclear facilities' that were carried out by the United States on Sunday. 'For this reason, the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran will suspend cooperation with the IAEA until security of nuclear facilities is ensured, and Iran's peaceful nuclear program will move forward at a faster pace,' Qalibaf told lawmakers. In Vienna, IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said he had already written to Iran to discuss resuming inspections of their nuclear facilities. Among other things, Iran claims to have moved its highly enriched uranium ahead of the American strikes and Grossi said his inspectors needed to re-assess the country's stockpiles. 'We need to return,' he said. 'We need to engage.' Questions over effectiveness of the US strikes The American strikes hit three Iranian nuclear sites, which Trump said had 'completely and fully obliterated' the country's nuclear program. From Tehran, Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesman, Esmail Baghaei, confirmed Sunday's strikes by American B-2 bombers using bunker-buster bombs had caused significant damage. 'Our nuclear installations have been badly damaged, that's for sure,' he told Al Jazeera on Wednesday, while refusing to go into detail. He seemed to suggest Iran might not shut out IAEA inspectors for good, however, noting the bill before parliament only talks of suspending work with the agency, not ending it. But he also insisted Iran has the right to pursue a nuclear energy program. 'Iran is determined to preserve that right under any circumstances,' he said. Trump's special envoy to the Mideast, Steve Witkoff, said on Fox News late on Tuesday that Israel and the U.S. had now achieved their objective of 'the total destruction of the enrichment capacity' in Iran, and Iran's prerequisite for talks — that Israel end its campaign — had also been fulfilled. 'The proof is in the pudding,' he said. 'No one's shooting at each other. It's over.' At the NATO summit, when asked about a U.S. intelligence report that found Iran's nuclear program has been set back only a few months, Trump scoffed and said it would at least take 'years' to rebuild. Israeli military spokesman Brig. Gen. Effie Defrin said Wednesday his country's assessment was also that Iran's nuclear facilities had been 'significantly damaged' and its nuclear program 'set it back by years.' Grossi said he could not speculate on how bad the damage was but that Iran's nuclear capabilities were well known. 'The technical knowledge is there, and the industrial capacity is there,' he said. 'That no one can deny, so we need to work together with them.' Hopes for a long-term agreement An Israeli official, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations, said the ceasefire agreement with Iran amounted to 'quiet for quiet,' with no further understandings about Iran's nuclear program going ahead. In the Fox News interview, Witkoff said Trump is now looking to land 'a comprehensive peace agreement that goes beyond even the ceasefire.' 'We're already talking to each other, not just directly, but also through interlocutors,' Witkoff said, adding that the conversations were promising and 'we're hopeful that we can have a long-term peace agreement.' However, Baghaei, the Iranian spokesman, said Washington had 'torpedoed diplomacy' with its attacks on Iran's nuclear sites, and that while Iran in principle was always open to talks, the country's national security was the priority. 'We have to make sure whether the other parties are really serious when they're talking about diplomacy, or is it again part of their tactics to make more problems for the region and for my country,' he said. China, a permanent member of the U.N. Security Council and close Iranian partner, also weighed in on Wednesday, saying it hoped a 'lasting and effective ceasefire can be achieved so as to promote' peace and stability in the region. China is a major buyer of Iranian oil and has long supported its government politically, blaming Israel for starting the latest conflict and destabilizing the region. Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun told reporters in Beijing that in the wake of the conflict, China is willing to 'inject positive factors to safeguard peace and stability in the Middle East.' Grossi said Iran and the international community should seize the opportunity of the ceasefire for a long term diplomatic solution. 'Out of the … bad things that military conflict brings, there's also now a possibility, an opening,' he said. 'We shouldn't miss that opportunity.' Iran executes 3 more prisoners on spying allegations During the war with Israel, Iran executed several prisoners accused of spying for Israel, sparking fears from activists that it could conduct a wave of executions after the conflict ends. It hanged three more prisoners on spying charges on Wednesday, bringing the total number of executions for espionage up to six since June 16. The hangings took place at Urmia Prison in West Azerbaijan, Iran's most northwestern province. State-run IRNA cited Iran's judiciary for the news, saying the men had been accused of bringing 'assassination equipment' into the country. Iran identified the three as Azad Shojaei, Edris Aali and Iraqi national Rasoul Ahmad Rasoul. Amnesty International had previously raised concerns that the men could be executed. During the 12-day war, at least 28 people were killed in Israel and more than 1,000 wounded, according to officials. Tehran on Tuesday put the death toll in Iran at 606, with 5,332 people wounded. The Washington-based Human Rights Activists group released figures Wednesday suggesting Israeli strikes on Iran had killed at least 1,054 people and wounded 4,476. The group, which has provided detailed casualty figures from multiple rounds of unrest in Iran, said 417 of those killed were civilians and 318 were security force personnel. During the war, Israeli airstrikes also targeted Iran's top military leadership and other sites associated with its ruling theocracy. With the ceasefire in place, Iranians are trying to return to their normal lives. State media described heavy traffic around the Caspian Sea and other rural areas outside of the capital, Tehran, as people began returning to the city.

Wall Street Journal
35 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
A Weakened Iran Poses an Alliance Test for China, Russia and North Korea
As Iran reels from its gravest threat in decades, its alliance with China, Russia and North Korea—an axis that has increasingly alarmed the U.S. and allies—is facing a vital test: Will its partners come to its aid? Beijing, Moscow and Pyongyang could offer Iran crucial assistance to recover from the damage inflicted by U.S. and Israeli strikes on its nuclear program and arsenal of conventional weapons. That could deepen the alliance, sending a powerful signal for potential conflicts in Taiwan, the Korean Peninsula and Eastern Europe.