North Cork hospital to get over €7m in funding for the completion of capital projects
The funding will also stretch to provide the outpatient/day clinic ward with 10 clinical rooms and establish an obesity clinic on the ground floor of the hospital.
Cork North West Fine Gael TD John Paul O'Shea said he is looking forward to seeing the project progress during the year.
'This extension was built during Covid times and it's great now to see this part of the project moving forward.
'The different wards are very busy in Mallow General Hospital and it has a very busy Local Injury Unit open to the public each day.
'I look forward to seeing this project progress during 2025,' he said.
Mallow General Hospital is part of the Cork University Hospital group and provides a range of services including acute in-patient medicine, injury unite, medical assessment unit, an endoscopy suite and theatre.
Mr O'Shea welcomes further investment in the hospital in the future.
'I welcome the further investment in the hospital for 2025 and once operational, the entire new building will be providing many vital services to the people of the area.
'The staff there do great work and there is always such positive feedback from the patients there.
'I look forward to this continuing into the future,' he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
5 hours ago
- Irish Independent
After trials of the pandemic, Dr Tony Holohan begins a new chapter of his life
Five years ago today, Ireland marked 100 days since the first case of Covid-19 here. After three months of restrictions, the government announced an acceleration of the easing of social distancing – against the advice of the chief medical officer (CMO).
Irish Daily Mirror
15 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Three new Covid symptoms flagged as NB.1.8.1 strain may be different
Experts have identified three important symptoms of the latest Covid strain to reach the UK. The latest signs to look out for may be different to typical virus expectations. While it has been over five years since the pandemic first made waves, coronavirus hasn't gone away and continues to impact people across the globe as it mutates into different variants. The latest strain, known as NB.1.8.1, has spread in several countries, including major holiday destinations, after being identified earlier in January as a follow on from the Omicron variant. The Health Protection Surveillance Centre (HPSC) reports that Covid samples linked to NB.1.8.1 has risen from 3.7 to 33 percent in the past five weeks alone. In addition, it is also a "variant under monitoring" by the World Health Organisation (WHO) because of its rapid spreading, reports the Mirror. While Covid symptoms have been heavily associated with the respiratory system, such as struggling to breath and coughing, NB.1.8.1 symptoms are related to the digestive system. It now accounts for more than 10 per cent of sequenced Covid infections worldwide and is already the dominant strain in China and Hong Kong. The variant has also been detected in the UK, US and Australia, as well as a number of popular holiday destinations like Egypt, Thailand, and the Maldives. Writing for The Conversation, Dr Lara Herrero, associate professor and virology research leader at Griffith University in Australia, explained that this variant could be faster spreading than others. She said: 'The evidence so far suggests NB.1.8.1 may spread more easily and may partially sidestep immunity from prior infections or vaccination. 'These factors could explain its rise in sequencing data.' However, she added: 'But importantly, the WHO has not yet observed any evidence it causes more severe disease compared to other variants.' Many of us are aware of the 'classic' symptoms of a Covid injection, such as a cough, sore throat, an aching body and loss of taste or smell. However, there could be some lesser-known symptoms linked to the NB.1.8.1. 'Reports suggest symptoms of NB.1.8.1 should align closely with other Omicron subvariants,' Dr Herrero said. She added that gastrointestinal symptoms could occur in some cases. As reported by The Independent, these could include: This could mean that it is easier to mistake a Covid infection for a different illness. But Dr Herrero added that this variant could also be accompanied by a sore throat, fatigue, fever, mild cough, muscle aches and nasal congestion. While there are no longer any self-isolation mandates in the UK, the NHS recommends avoiding contact with others if you experience symptoms. It says you should try to stay at home and avoid contact with other people if you or your child has symptoms and either: You can go back to your normal activities when you feel better or do not have a high temperature. But if you test positive, you should:
Irish Daily Mirror
17 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Irish midwife who told pregnant women Covid was 'Trojan horse' struck off
A midwife who shared contentious remarks on social media about the Covid pandemic has been removed from the register. Seana Kerr, from Northern Ireland, made comments suggesting that the virus was a 'Trojan horse intend[ed] to introduce a new era for humanity' and that 'babies were being attacked in the womb through vaccination'. She also criticised healthcare professionals and approached a pregnant woman, referred to as Patient A, telling her that if 'she received a flu vaccination this would increase the risk of her baby being stillborn'. According to a report issued on June 3, Patient A and her family 'were caused significant emotional harm'. Details of the findings against Ms Kerr, who was employed by the Southern Health Trust, are included in a ruling from a Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise panel. The panel, according to the ruling, 'decided to make a Striking-off order'. This action followed a 'substantive suspension order originally imposed for a period of 12 months by a Fitness to Practise Committee panel on 20 June 2024', reports Belfast Live. The NMC report states that "On or around 14 August 2020, identified yourself as a midwife and advised a member of the public: a. That she should not be wearing a face mask whilst pregnant. b. That wearing a face mask whilst pregnant was reducing the amount of oxygen her baby was receiving. c. That she should not receive a flu vaccination. d. That if she received a flu vaccination this would increase the risk of her baby being stillborn." The NMC panel concluded that: "Your actions at charge 1 were unprofessional in that the advice you purported to give was: a. unsolicited. b. given outside of a clinical relationship. c. contrary to the position of your employer and/or the World Health Organisation and/or mainstream medical opinion and provided without this qualification or caveat." The panel's findings further noted: "Between 27 September 2020 and 19 December 2021, identified yourself as a midwife on social and/or other media and advised the public at large: a. On 27 September 2020, that babies were being attacked in the womb through vaccination of mothers during pregnancy. b. On 04 March 2021, that: i. Professionals who were 'complicit' in the national response to Covid-19 no longer had the 'I didn't know what I didn't know get out clause'. ii. the current health crisis was a Trojan horse intend to introduce a new era for humanity. c. On 19 December 2021, that 'they' had been 'planting the seeds' about Covid-19 over Christmas 2020 by referring to 'some bat in China'." The panel came to a verdict that "in the light of the above, your fitness to practise is impaired by reason of your misconduct". Previously, the original panel investigating Ms Kerr's conduct before her suspension found that "Patient A and their family were put at risk and were caused significant emotional harm as a result of Ms Kerr's misconduct". They remarked: "The panel noted that it is a reasonable expectation of everyone working in a public environment, such as a shop, that they will not be approached and given personal, clinical advice and that such advice would normally only be given during a private clinical appointment or at an antenatal class. "Thus, by accosting Patient A in her workplace without a prior clinical relationship, and without invitation, Ms Kerr exposed her to substantial risk. The panel recognised that during the encounter, being at work, Patient A could scarcely avoid the exchange. Moreover, being pregnant and amidst the Covid-19 pandemic, the panel deemed Patient A to have been at an enhanced vulnerability. "Ms Kerr's misconduct had breached the fundamental tenets of the midwifery profession and therefore brought its reputation into disrepute. Regarding insight, the panel considered that Ms Kerr has demonstrated no insight at all. The panel considered that by making repeated comments online after the concerns were raised to Ms Kerr by the Trust, she has shown a disregard for the Trust's disciplinary process and a total absence of insight or remediation. "The panel was satisfied that the misconduct in this case is capable of being addressed. However, the panel had no information before it that Ms Kerr has taken any steps to reflect on her conduct or shown any insight or to strengthen her practice. Therefore, in light of the above, the panel is of the view that there is a risk of repetition. The panel therefore decided that a finding of impairment is necessary on the grounds of public protection." The NMC acknowledged Ms Kerr's right to freedom of expression as protected under Article 10 of the European Convention of Human Rights. However, they pointed out: "However, Ms Kerr's advice and social media comments were given when she identified herself as a midwife, promoting her opinion on matters of clinical importance. Ms Kerr's actions therefore engaged her professional responsibilities as a registered midwife. "The panel considered that the actions of Ms Kerr took place during an exceptionally unusual time, where the entirety of the NHS was mobilised to protect the public from the international Covid-19 pandemic. Therefore, by expressing the view that other healthcare professionals, who Ms Kerr was working with in the Trust, were acting in ways which may cause harm, a view Ms Kerr held which was against the recognised guidance at the time, Ms Kerr risked seriously undermining the public confidence in the profession. "It further noted that by making these accusations that Ms Kerr's colleagues may have suffered harm while working in an unprecedented and challenging situation. The panel concluded that in light of the above a finding of impairment on public interest grounds is required." The panel remarked that Ms Kerr "has not shown remorse for her misconduct, nor has she demonstrated any insight into her previous actions" and they believed "of the view that considerable evidence would be required to show that Ms Kerr no longer posed a risk to the public". In their final statement, the panel resolved: "The panel determined that a further period of suspension would not serve any useful purpose in all of the circumstances. The panel determined that it was necessary to take action to prevent Ms Kerr from practising in the future and concluded that the only sanction that would adequately protect the public and serve the public interest was a striking-off order."
