Attorney General's higher education reform package gets stopped in committee
SANTA FE, N.M. (KRQE) – A controversial multi-million dollar payout at Western New Mexico University was blasted by a chorus of top state leaders while lawmakers heeded calls for reform, and now they've tabled a bill aimed at doing that. Attorney General Raul Torrez backed a reform package after the WNMU spending scandal, but today, opponents are saying the changes go too far.
'I mean we're talking about one incident but they continue to happen and continue to happen,' said Senator George Muñoz, (D- Gallup).
That feeling from one lawmaker is about what happened at Western New Mexico University. That university's president stepped down late last year after the state auditor found misspending. However, before he left, the board also approved a buyout.
Lawmakers look to set aside $5M for UNM/NMSU athletics
'The board of regents for Western New Mexico took the opportunity to negotiate the severance agreement which gave Dr. Shepard $1.9 million in severance compensation, full tenured-track professorship, and a sabbatical,' said Billy J. Jimenez, Deputy Attorney General, New Mexico.
Aiming to stop that in the future, the Attorney General has proposed a series of reforms, under Senate Bill 266. The bill would, in part, empower the state's Board of Finance and the A.G. to review contracts for high-level university administrators before they're approved, but that idea is raising opposition.
'We are not going to have that ability if we have to tell a candidate, 'You have thirty days, and guess what? This contract may not be upheld by the attorney general or the board of finance,' said James Chavez with Central New Mexico Community College.
Democrats, Republicans weigh in on Public Safety Package bills
Others think the proposal would affect university accreditation, saying higher education institutes must have independent governing boards. 'It threatens institution's ability to obtain institutional accreditation as the board will have outside influence placed on it, in the hiring of the president,' said Vanessa Hawker, Executive Director for New Mexico Independent Community Colleges.
Before tabling the bill on Monday, some lawmakers claimed the changes could scare away potential candidates for New Mexico University leadership positions.
'It is not just review, it is oversight and the ability to stop those. This bill, in my opinion, has already caused huge damage and harm to higher education, particularly those universities that are looking to hire new leaders,' said Senator William Soules (D- Doña Ana).
Lawmakers tabled that bill unanimously in a committee hearing today, meaning it's unlikely to go any further this session. Responding to the decision, the New Mexico Department of Justice said in a statement they are quote 'profoundly disappointed' with lawmakers choice.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
23 minutes ago
- Fox News
Bernie Sanders urges Democrats not to work with ‘right-wing extremist' Musk after Trump fallout
Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., ruled out the idea that Democrats should work with Elon Musk after his explosive falling out with President Donald Trump, labeling the Tesla CEO a "right-wing extremist." Musk said that he "strongly supported Obama" but felt that the modern Democratic Party had been "hijacked by extremists" in an April 2022 post on X. "Musk has evolved over the years. My understanding is he actually voted for Obama in 2008. But over the years, he has developed into a right-wing extremist," Sanders told CNN "State of the Union" host Dana Bash after she asked if Democrats should work with the tech billionaire after his "breakup" with Trump. Sanders dismissed the idea out of hand and said Trump and Musk's drama was further proof that the United States was devolving into an oligarchic society. The self-proclaimed democratic socialist dismissed the episode as a fight among oligarchs, and slammed it as an "embarrassment" to people who believe in democracy and the rule of law. "Musk said to Trump, 'hey listen, I spent $270 million to get you elected. I bought you the presidency because we have a corrupt campaign finance system and billionaires can do that.' And Trump said, 'well, I gave you the right to run the government for three or four months, but I don't like the guy you want to run NASA, and we're going to get rid of him' and Musk got upset," Sanders said. Musk endorsed Trump after he survived his assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania, and subsequently served as one of his top surrogates and spent hundreds of millions of dollars to get him elected. Trump selected Musk to serve as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and tasked him with cutting waste, fraud and abuse from the federal bureaucracy. Musk's tenure at DOGE was tumultuous. Although he found billions of dollars in spending cuts, his reductions in federal outlays fell far short of the trillion dollars he promised. Backlash to Musk's work within the administration caused his businesses to suffer. Trump and Musk's relationship took a turn for the worse after the president withdrew Musk-ally Jared Isaacman's nomination to lead NASA. Musk proceeded to trash the "big beautiful bill" Trump is trying to get through Congress, claiming Trump only won because he donated $270 million to aid his campaign and alleging, without proof, that the president is featured in the so-called Epstein files in an X post he subsequently deleted. Trump warned that Musk will have to face "very serious consequences" if he funds Democratic candidates as a result of their rupture. When asked by Bash if he feels that Musk is correct in claiming that Trump only won because of Musk's money, Sanders responded affirmatively.


New York Times
28 minutes ago
- New York Times
Newsom Tried to Placate Trump This Year. That Approach Might Be Over.
For most of this year, Gov. Gavin Newsom of California has chosen his own way to engage the man in the White House: conciliation over confrontation. Mr. Newsom went to the Los Angeles airport in January to greet President Trump, who had flown to California after the devastating wildfires. The Democratic governor started a podcast in which he interviewed leaders of the MAGA movement, including Steve Bannon, to the distress of many on the left. Mr. Newsom broke with Democrats when he said it was unfair for trans athletes to compete in girls sports. And on Friday, he spent 40 minutes talking to Mr. Trump on the phone, during which the president told him to get the local police in line because things were getting out of control with protesters confronting immigration agents, White House officials said. To many Democrats, Mr. Newsom's pursuits have seemed like an exquisitely calculated effort by one of the nation's highest-profile Democrats to thread the needle. But the president's decision to bypass Mr. Newsom and send National Guard troops to demonstrations in his state seems likely to shatter whatever balance the governor was trying to maintain. It was a moment that has long-term implications for Mr. Newsom's legacy as governor, his ability to lead the state through yet another crisis, and his to run for president in 2028. 'He has no choice but to fight back directly — the base is demanding it,' said Mike Madrid, a Republican political consultant and critic of the president. 'I think his tone, direction, strategy will adjust.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Epoch Times
an hour ago
- Epoch Times
Speaker Johnson Downplays Musk's Influence, Suggests Republicans Will Pass Budget Bill
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) on June 8 downplayed tech billionaire Elon Musk's critical comments and said that House Republicans will pass the One Big Beautiful Bill Act backed by President Donald Trump. Last week, Musk and Trump got into a heated back and forth after the Tesla CEO repeatedly bashed the spending bill on social media. Trump suggested that it was because of its cuts to electric vehicle mandates, and at one point floated cutting federal money to Musk's companies. Meanwhile, Musk took credit for Trump and the GOP winning the 2024 election and threatened to decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft.