Ukrainian ambassador to US on Putin's nuclear weapons comments: ‘He is a threat'
Oksana Markarova, Ukraine's ambassador to the U.S., weighed in on Russian President Vladimir Putin's remarks about nuclear weapons, saying 'he is a threat' that should be taken at his word.
Markarova joined CBS News's 'Face the Nation' on Sunday, where host Margaret Brennan asked what she made of Putin's recent comment about how he hopes nuclear weapons 'will not be required' to end the Russia-Ukraine war.
'At this point, it doesn't matter how we interpret what he says. We just have to believe what he says and understand what he says,' Markarova said. 'He is a threat, not only to Ukraine, but also to anyone who believes that nations should live peacefully.'
In a recent interview with Russian state media, shared with The Associated Press, Putin said a reconciliation between Russia and Ukraine was 'inevitable.'
When asked about Ukrainian strikes in Russian territory, he said so far in the war, there has been no need for Russia to use nuclear weapons and he hopes 'they will not be required' in the future.
Markarova said it is 'very difficult to interpret' Putin, who has launched attacks on other nations and his own, but she highlighted the partnerships that Ukraine has sought with allied countries, including the U.S., with the hope that they can come together and 'bring peace not only to our part of the world, but globally.'
'Putin is doing it together with Iran and North Korea. They are not hiding it. They are supporting other terroristic regimes and we should also stay together in order to bring peace,' she said.
The comments come just days after the U.S. and Ukraine secured a long-awaited mineral deal, marking a step closer to ending the war, which has proved to be a more difficult task than the Trump administration anticipated.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
3 minutes ago
- Fox News
Ivy League bio smuggling suspect with ties to American adversary gets break from federal judge
A Russian-born scientist and Harvard University cancer researcher accused of smuggling frog embryos into the United States has been released following four months in federal custody Thursday. Kseniia Petrova, 30, was arrested in February after returning from a vacation in France, where she had obtained a package of superfine sections of frog embryos from a laboratory for research. Upon arriving at Boston Logan International Airport, Petrova was questioned by U.S. Customs and Border Protection regarding the materials. "I just want to thank everybody," Petrova said on the steps of the federal courthouse in Boston following her release. "A lot of people started contacting me and sending me letters, and it was a huge support without which I won't be able to survive." Following the interview, the researcher was informed her visa was being canceled. The Department of Homeland Security previously said in a statement posted on social media that Petrova was arrested for "lying to federal officers about carrying substances into the country," adding that messages on her phone "revealed she planned to smuggle the materials through customs without declaring them." The Department of Homeland Security and Harvard University did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment. In an April interview with The Associated Press, Petrova said she was unaware the samples needed to be declared upon her return and insisted she was not trying to smuggle anything into the country. Petrova was initially detained by immigration officials in Vermont before being sent to a facility in Louisiana. In May, she was formally charged with smuggling in Massachusetts, with a federal judge in Vermont setting a hearing date on her petition seeking release. The federal judge in Vermont later ruled that the actions of the immigration officers were unlawful and that Petrova "posed a threat to no one." She was subsequently released from ICE custody but remained in the custody of the U.S. Marshals Service due to the smuggling charge. On Thursday, Magistrate Judge Judith Dein approved an agreement between federal prosecutors and Petrova's immigration attorney, effectively releasing the researcher but limiting her ability to travel while maintaining custody of her passport. "I hear it's sunny," Dein told Petrova after her release. "Goodbye." Petrova's colleagues have previously testified on her behalf, telling the court she is conducting valuable research that aids in searching for a cure for cancer. Greg Romanovsky, the immigration attorney representing Petrova, said his client has not "decided whether she wants to stay in the United States yet." "She has offers from different countries around the world, countries that are eager to support the important research that she's doing," he said. "She's weighing her options at the moment, and she's very grateful to be out." Romanovsky did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment. Under the conditions of her release, Petrova must report any contact with law enforcement – including ICE – to her supervising officer within 24 hours, according to court documents obtained by Fox News Digital. Petrova is scheduled to return to court next week for a probable cause hearing regarding the smuggling charge.
Forbes
6 minutes ago
- Forbes
Brussels, Washington, And The Kremlin's Exports, Oil And Gas For War
Russia's President Vladimir Putin chairs a meeting on the state armament program for 2027-2036 at ... More the Kremlin. Given continued funding by gas exports to Europe, Moscow's economy may be able to support further conflict in Ukraine and beyond.(Photo by Gavriil Grigorov / POOL / AFP) (Photo by GAVRIIL GRIGOROV/POOL/AFP via Getty Images) A major Ukrainian drone operation dubbed 'Spiderweb', conducted on Sunday, June 1, damaged strategic bomber assets deep in Russia. The attack, combined with a strike against the multi-billion-dollar Kerch Strait bridge built after Moscow annexed the Crimea in 2014 to connect it to the Russian mainland, was a huge blow, both in image and in substance. However, it comes at a time when Russia's economic picture is quietly improving, and the offensive picking up steam, which has allowed Moscow to refuse to make any real progress on ceasefire talks despite U.S. President Donald Trump's best efforts. Financial improvement is excellent news for Russia's President Vladimir Putin, who is hellbent on outrunning economic decline at home and attaining victory on the battlefield. Money from energy sales continues to fill Russia's war chest, which is why now is the time for Washington and Europe to work together to turn off Moscow's spigot. Only by depriving the Kremlin of the funds needed to sustain the war can peace be restored at the battlefront. Unfortunately, things have been going in exactly the opposite direction during the first half of 2025. Despite sanctions, Russian gas exports to Europe through the Turkstream pipeline rose more than 10% from April to May, and Russia's oil and gas giant Gazprom posted an unexpected $8.4 billion Q1 profit, up from $7 billion in losses in 2023. On Tuesday, June 10th, the EU announced that it is working on a package of additional sanctions, lowering the price cap for Russian oil from $45 per barrel from $60, as well as banning the use of Russian banks by third countries and stopping any EU operators from being allowed to use Russia's Nord Stream pipelines. If the EU members approve these new proposed sanctions, they will certainly have an impact -- but this is by no means guaranteed. Slovakia and Hungary are two of the most pro-Russian regimes in the EU and have actively opposed sanctions on Russia. It may change, now that Prime Minister Viktor Orban of Hungary announced that Russia only understands the language of force. However, if Washington and Brussels cooperate to tighten the sanctions regime, this could be a game-changer and eventually force Moscow to negotiate. On the other side of the Atlantic, leaders in the United States are acting to decisively end Russia's benefit from its energy industries. The Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025, introduced by Senator Linsey Graham (R-SC), a Trump ally, contains measures to prohibit American entities from investing in or exporting to the Russian energy sector, impose a 500 percent tariff on Russian goods and services entering the and levy the same tariff on countries that sell, supply, transfer, or purchase oil, uranium, natural gas, petroleum products, or petrochemical products originating in Russia. These measures would serve the dual purpose of weakening Moscow's energy trade while putting pressure on states that hesitate to halt their purchases of Russian energy products, including the Europeans, if they fail to step up actively. Russia's economic turnaround through 2025 can primarily be attributed to surging energy exports. The Trump Administration's hesitancy to impose sanctions, despite Trump's willingness to threaten them, created room for this export surge. Without seeing sanctions ratchet up, and with rumors floating that sanctions might be lifted, more customers became willing to turn to Russia. Despite successful maneuver like Operation Spiderweb, a war economy fueled by oil and gas exports ... More still allows Russia to conduct large scale counterattacks, like that seen in Kyiv on June 6th. Russia's foreign currency reserves, once under pressure, as Moscow struggled to keep the ruble from imploding, have recovered, moving past their pre-war high of $630 billion to $680 billion. The Russian ruble made a strong recovery, becoming a top-performing currency of 2025 so far. The ruble has outperformed the Russian government's own budgetary projections with a 40% increase in value against the dollar, a jump of almost four times the next best-performing currency. While this can be attributed to increased domestic economic controls, rising oil prices, and continued exports, another factor may be the sustained trade and indirect financial flows from China, which has remained Moscow's most reliable economic partner. It isn't the entire EU that is importing Russian oil and gas, but a few key countries are more reliant on these imports than others. Hungary, Slovakia, and France were the largest importers in November 2024 with Austria and Spain rounding out the top five. Countries with pro-Russian leadership are not the only ones that have continued importing Russian energy. European governments that decry Russia's aggression continue to throw Moscow an economic lifeline due to their inability to find alternative energy sources. For now, Russian oil and gas are cheaper and more easily accessible despite sanctions, making them the primary solution for the energy security issues regularly experienced by the EU, like cold temperatures and lackluster wind generation. President Trump has also shaken the Europeans by using energy as a bargaining chip in trade negotiations, making some European countries realize that their reliance on the U.S. may be a vulnerability. This has, paradoxically, driven EU countries back towards Russia as an energy supplier—it remains to be seen whether they will reverse course and move in unison to stop funding Moscow's war. Europe's stance on Russia is only growing more divided, as the recent Polish election, which narrowly awarded right-wing candidate Karol Nawrocki the presidency, demonstrates, posing a further challenge for the EU. President Nawrocki has supported military aid to Ukraine but is against allowing it to join NATO, believing it could drag the alliance into conflict with Russia. The new Polish president's 'Eurosceptic' stance may lead to alignment with more pro-Russian leaders in Europe such as Hungary's Orban and Slovakia's Fico. The European Union has been far from united on sanctions regarding oil and gas exports since the invasion of Ukraine by Russia in early 2022. Despite sanctions, Russia's energy exports have proven more resilient than expected, thanks to strategic rerouting through the TurkStream pipeline and continued demand from nations unwilling or unable to pivot quickly. ISTANBUL, TURKEY - The TurkStream pipeline is a key avenue through which Russia continues to ... More transport gas to Europe. (Photo by Isa Terli/) The EU had set a goal of ending all Russian gas imports by 2027, but the road to that goal has been riddled with a lack of enforcement, exceptions, and relapses of reliance. While this plan sets a roadmap for measures to end energy dependence on Russia, it must be supported by baseload energy generation that will not fluctuate like solar and wind. The plan includes measures to reduce uranium and other nuclear energy imports from Moscow, but both individual states and the EU as a whole must focus on rebuilding a nuclear supply chain and stimulating domestic growth in nuclear power generation. Simply declaring long-term goals without follow-up and enforcement is ineffectual and undermines Europe's geostrategic credibility. Russia's 2025 economic gains demonstrate the need for sustained pressure and a united front that presses Moscow to the negotiating table. Despite impressive wins like the recent drone strike, allowing Russia to make economic gains, risks a weakening of Ukraine, and heightened Russian ambition looking toward the rest of the continent. The options seem clear—either the West moves to hit Russia in the pocketbook and press for a ceasefire and peace, or money will flow that allows Moscow to keep grinding on. While care must be taken not to destabilize the world economy and reignite inflation, a window of opportunity for cooperation is open now to help stop the bloodshed. And certainly, the world economy – including America's – will only suffer if Russia is emboldened to keep advancing aggressively in Ukraine and beyond.
Associated Press
12 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Sweden and the Netherlands say before NATO summit they will spend 5% of GDP on defense
BRUSSELS (AP) — Less than two weeks before a NATO summit, Sweden and the Netherlands said Friday that they intend to increase defense spending to 5% of their gross domestic product, in line with U.S. President Donald Trump's demands. Trump and his NATO counterparts meet for a summit in the Netherlands on June 24-25, where they're due to agree a new defense spending target. He insists that Europe must look after its own security, while Washington focuses on China and its own borders. Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson said that 'Sweden will reach a new NATO spending target to 5% of GDP, where at least 3.5% of GDP will be allocated towards core defense requirements to fulfill NATO's new capability targets.' 'We are in a specific geographical situation where we need to meet the future threats from Russia,' Kristersson told reporters in Stockholm, standing alongside NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte. After Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022, NATO's 32 allies agreed to spend at least 2% of GDP on their military budgets. But NATO's new plans for defending Europe and North America against a Russian attack require investment of at least 3%. The aim now is to raise the bar to 3.5% for core defense spending on tanks, warplanes, air defense, missiles and hiring extra troops. A further 1.5% would be spent on things like roads, bridges, ports and airfields so armies can deploy more quickly, as well as preparing societies for possible attack. According to the most recent NATO figures, Sweden was estimated to have spent 2.25% of its GDP on defense last year. The Netherlands spent 2.06%, among 22 of the 32 allies who reached NATO's old benchmark. The Dutch caretaker government announced on Friday that it would increase spending on defense to 3.5% of GDP in an effort to meet the 5% goal. It's not clear where the approximately 18 billion euros ($20 billion) will come from. Dutch Defense Minister Ruben Brekelmans called the decision 'historic' and told reporters after a Cabinet meeting that he hoped other NATO countries would also increase their spending. 'My expectation is that this will happen,' he said. Poland and the Baltic countries — Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania — have already publicly committed to 5%, and Rutte said last week that most allies were ready to endorse the goal. A big question still to be answered is what time frame countries will get to reach the new spending goals. A target date of 2032 was initially floated, but Rutte has said that Russia could be ready to launch an attack on NATO territory by 2030. The United States insists that a near-term deadline must be set. But Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani said on Thursday that his country would get to 5%,. but would require a decade to do so. ___ Molly Quell reported from The Hague, Netherlands.
