logo
Montana legislature begin discussions on Medicaid

Montana legislature begin discussions on Medicaid

Yahoo29-01-2025

Kaiden Forman-Webster ICT + MTFP
While many had the day off for Martin Luther King Jr. Day, the Montana Legislature was hard at work focusing on a number of issues affecting the state.
One particular committee meeting for public comment centered on tribal leaders and communities interests in Medicaid and its effects on tribes. The hearing room was jam packed with dozens of individuals ready to voice their concerns for reservations and the surrounding urban areas.
Many of those that attended the meeting at the Capitol had to drive multiple hours to ensure the chance to do so. Montanans know how roads can be during the winter and how difficult a high mileage trip can be.
Maria Roundstone, Northern Cheyenne, drove more than six hours to represent her tribe through hazardous conditions. She works for the tribes Revenue Department, which handles coding and billing with medicaid.
'It's a long travel,' Roundstone said. 'But looking back at our ancestors, we just had a Fort Robinson Run Breakout and that was from Nebraska and the kids actually run it.'
Roundstone was referring to the Fort Robinson Run Breakout, a 400 mile journey back to the Northern Cheyenne Reservation, done on foot to represent the original breakout of Fort Robinson by the Northern Cheyenne in 1879.
'So I mean for someone to run that far, all the way back to our reservation. Driving by car is not too bad.'
Others drove anywhere between two and five hours to attend the meeting. Todd Wilson, Crow, is the CEO of the Helena Indian Alliance, stressed the importance of attending in-person, saying it's always best to do so if possible.
While the discussion focused on the impact of the Medicaid expansion and the damage that would ensue immediately if the legislature fails to renew it for the state, multiple points of interest were continually focused on by those who attended.
Medical providers would see a major cut on all reservations and tribal residents living on reservations, often rural areas, would be put in the category of 'life or limb,' meaning if it doesn't threaten your life or one of your limbs to the point of amputation, it may be difficult getting medical attention.
Another main focus regarded the Tribal Relations Manager position that once provided a seat at the table in the Department of Public Health and Human Services. The position provided a tribal voice to speak on health issues affecting tribes.
Lesa Evers, Blackfeet, was the last to hold the position and retired in 2023. The position has since been left vacant by the department and was eventually removed entirely.
Dr. Anna Sorrell spoke strongly on this matter. She has a PhD in Indigenous and rural health and an extensive background of working for the state, the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes, federal government, and was previously the director of Department of Public Health and Human Services.
State representative Mike Fox, a member of the American Indian Caucus, resides on the committee and asked about the Tribal Relations Manager position to get a clearer understanding of its importance.
It was at this time that Sorrell voiced her disapproval with the removal of the Tribal Relations Manager position.
'What I learned in that time was that if you're not sitting at the table, your voice is not heard,' Sorrel said. 'What the Tribal Relations Director position did at DPHHS, that was under the direct supervision of the Director, was keep our voice at the table every day for every issue.'
After the session was over, many individuals openly discussed the position, how they felt government-to-government relationships were during Evers time and how it had changed for the worse after she retired and the position was terminated.
During his time as Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribal Health Director, Joe Durglo worked closely with Evers and has an intimate understanding of the communication she provided for tribes.
'She had a formal process that she used to go out and meet with the tribes directly. That was her formal process. She also shared her contact information, so if I ran into a problem with a particular pass order or a contract or had questions about specific things within the department, we could reach out to her directly,' Durglo said. 'So, she helped solve problems, she recognized the formal relationship between the State governments and the tribal governments. So she was very aware of that. She had a process where she presented information and representatives of that department to the tribes, formally in the government-to-government relationship.'
After Evers left Durglo added that it's been difficult to identify a person within the department to help solve problems and navigate the organization.
When asked about how a position similar should be designed, Durglo said it is important to work within and closely with the director.
'Tribes need to have a voice at that table, and that needs to be a tribal voice, not a state agency rep, speaking for us,' he said. 'We just need a voice in those decisions, in those conversations, and I guess vice versa, if the state or that department has questions from the tribe, she was also that liaison. She helped navigate, she understood tribes enough to help navigate that conversation going the other way. So it was a two way pact.'
Many want to see the position reinstated. Ted Russette, an enrolled citizen of the Cree Tribe and Vice Chair on the Chippewa Cree of Rocky Boy Executive Branch, said tribes have been left in the dark since her retirement.
'There was no cohesiveness after she left,' Russette said. 'Everything dropped, because she used to keep us, the tribes, informed about what was happening and what was coming down the pipe. After she left, nothing.'
The bureaucracy and the frustration that many people in the U.S. have towards it was echoed by Russette's frustration to the challenge of not being able to reach the right person in government, an issue many have faced in all facets of government.
For the issue of healthcare Russette had enough of the workarounds and came directly to the capital for answers.
'Finally, we just got to come up here and talked to the governor. Then he gets kind of mad at us. But what do you do?,' he said.
Mike Comes At Night, a more recently elected member of the Blackfeet Tribal Council, never interacted with Evers while she was in her position, yet still spoke on his thoughts about the communications with government-to-government relations.
'There needs to be communication between the tribe and state. A position similar to Lesa's would be a chance for that,' Comes At Night said.
Roundstone had communicated with Evers in the past and found her to be an integral part of keeping relations intact during her time at the department. Her office now faces the same issue of lack of communication and people suffer because of this.
'Reestablishing this position is instrumental to keeping tribes informed', Roundstone said.
From the many voices that described just how influential Evers and her position was, understanding how she created the communication pipelines needed for government-to-government relations will be paramount to this position if the department reinstates it once again.
During her tenure, Evers explained the efforts she made to do so. She consistently went to each of Montana's reservations to get contacts from every tribe and also took individuals from the many health departments to the reservations to create relationships between all parties.
It was important to her to maintain open and honest lines of communication, even when the news may not have been favorable to tribes.
'I saw tribal governments as partners in our work, communicating with them, keeping them informed about the position that the department had on things which sometimes wasn't favorable to them. You know, being honest, there was a lot of things that I did,' Evers recalled. 'I did tribal tours every spring and fall, I went out and I met with every single tribal government in their chambers. Met with health facilities, the health CEOs, executive directors, and I took staff with me. I would take the Medicaid director. I've taken previous directors, deputy directors, other leadership in the agency, to have that experience out in Indian Country, to sit in tribal chambers and have this formal conversation all the way to Fort Peck, or over to Browning, or wherever it might be. But we did this trip every spring and every fall.'
Evers office was two doors down from the director's and she credits working in such a close proximity to the success she was able to have.
The funding is still available for a position of similar status. Republican state senator Dennis Lenz wondered why the position went away and where those responsibilities now lie.
'Have some of those functions been dispersed throughout the department? I mean did the actual function get dispersed? I can't speak to why he would have done that. That is kind of unusual,' Lenz said.
A letter signed by all members of the Montana American Indian Caucus will be submitted voicing their displeasure with the removal of the position and hope to see it reinstated once again in the department.
A representative from the Department of Public Health and Human Services declined to be interviewed for this story.
This story is co-published by Montana Free Press and ICT, a news partnership that covers the Montana American Indian Caucus during the state's 2025 legislative session

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's big bill also seeks to undo the big bills of Biden and Obama
Trump's big bill also seeks to undo the big bills of Biden and Obama

San Francisco Chronicle​

time15 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Trump's big bill also seeks to undo the big bills of Biden and Obama

WASHINGTON (AP) — Chiseling away at President Barack Obama's Affordable Care Act. Rolling back the green energy tax breaks from President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act. At its core, the Republican 'big, beautiful bill' is more than just an extension of tax breaks approved during President Donald Trump's first term at the White House. The package is an attempt by Republicans to undo, little by little, the signature domestic achievements of the past two Democratic presidents. 'We're going to do what we said we were going to do,' Speaker Mike Johnson said after House passage last month. While the aim of the sprawling 1,000-page plus bill is to preserve an estimated $4.5 trillion in tax cuts that would otherwise expire at year's end if Congress fails to act — and add some new ones, including no taxes on tips — the spending cuts pointed at the Democratic-led programs are causing the most political turmoil. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said this week that 10.9 million fewer people would have health insurance under the GOP bill, including 1.4 million immigrants in the U.S. without legal status who are in state-funded programs. At the same time, lawmakers are being hounded by businesses in states across the nation who rely on the green energy tax breaks for their projects. As the package moves from the House to the Senate, the simmering unrest over curbing the Obama and Biden policies shows just how politically difficult it can be to slash government programs once they become part of civic life. "When he asked me, what do you think the prospects are for passage in the Senate? I said, good — if we don't cut Medicaid," said Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., recounting his conversation last week with Trump. 'And he said, I'm 100% supportive of that.' Health care worries Not a single Republican in Congress voted for the Affordable Care Act, known as Obamacare, in 2010, or Biden's inflation act in 2022. Both were approved using the same budget reconciliation process now being employed by Republicans to steamroll Trump's bill past the opposition. Even still, sizable coalitions of GOP lawmakers are forming to protect aspects of both of those programs as they ripple into the lives of millions of Americans. Hawley, Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and others are wary of changes to Medicaid and other provisions in the bill that would result in fewer people being able to access health care programs. At the same time, crossover groupings of House and Senate Republicans have launched an aggressive campaign to preserve, at least for some time, the green energy tax breaks that business interests in their states are relying on to develop solar, wind and other types of energy production. Murkowski said one area she's "worried about' is the House bill's provision that any project not under construction within 60 days of the bill becoming law may no longer be eligible for those credits. 'These are some of the things we're working on,' she said. The concerns are running in sometimes opposite directions and complicating the work of GOP leaders who have almost no votes to spare in the House and Senate as they try to hoist the package over Democratic opposition and onto the president's desk by the Fourth of July. While some Republicans are working to preserve the programs from cuts, the budget hawks want steeper reductions to stem the nation's debt load. The CBO said the package would add $2.4 trillion to deficits over the decade. After a robust private meeting with Trump at the White House this week, Republican senators said they were working to keep the bill on track as they amend it for their own priorities. Senate Majority Leader John Thune said the president 'made the pitch and the argument for why we need to get the bill done." The disconnect is reminiscent of Trump's first term, when Republicans promised to repeal and replace Obamacare, only to see their effort collapse in dramatic fashion when the late Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz, voted thumbs down for the bill on the House floor. Battle over Medicaid In the 15 years since Obamacare became law, access to health care has grown substantially. Some 80 million people are now enrolled in Medicaid, and the Kaiser Family Foundation reports 41 states have opted to expand their coverage. The Affordable Care Act expanded Medicaid to all adults with incomes up to about $21,500 for an individual, or almost $29,000 for a two-person household. While Republicans no longer campaign on ending Obamacare, advocates warn that the changes proposed in the big bill will trim back at access to health care. The bill proposes new 80 hours of monthly work or community service requirements for able-bodied Medicaid recipients, age 18 to 64, with some exceptions. It also imposes twice-a-year eligibility verification checks and other changes. Republicans argue that they want to right-size Medicaid to root out waste, fraud and abuse and ensure it's there for those who need it most, often citing women and children. 'Medicaid was built to be a temporary safety net for people who genuinely need it — young, pregnant women, single mothers, the disabled, the elderly,' Johnson told The Associated Press. 'But when when they expanded under Obamacare, it not only thwarted the purpose of the program, it started draining resources.' Initially, the House bill proposed starting the work requirements in January 2029, as Trump's term in the White House would be coming to a close. But conservatives from the House Freedom Caucus negotiated for a quicker start date, in December 2026, to start the spending reductions sooner. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer has said the changes are an Obamacare rollback by another name. 'It decimates our health care system, decimates our clean energy system,' Schumer of New York said in an interview with the AP. The green energy tax breaks involve not only those used by buyers of electric vehicles, like Elon Musk's Tesla line, but also the production and investment tax credits for developers of renewables and other energy sources. The House bill had initially proposed a phaseout of those credits over the next several years. But again the conservative Freedom Caucus engineered the faster wind-down — within 60 days of the bill's passage. 'Not a single Republican voted for the Green New Scam subsidies,' wrote Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, on social media. 'Not a single Republican should vote to keep them.'

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth reveals why military recruitment has soared under Trump
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth reveals why military recruitment has soared under Trump

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth reveals why military recruitment has soared under Trump

Joining "Fox & Friends" live from Normandy, France, where Allied forces once stormed the beaches to turn the tide of World War II, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth honored the 81st anniversary of D-Day with a message that looked not only to the past but to the future. As the nation honors the bravery and sacrifices of World War II veterans, Hegseth emphasized a new wave of patriotism among today's young Americans – one he says is driving an uptick in military recruitment. "It's historic. Of course it's a morale shift. It shifts back to the day President Trump was elected and then inaugurated," he said Friday. World War Ii Veterans Travel To Normandy For Emotional D-day Commemoration The Army alone has posted the best recruiting numbers in years, reaching 61,000 for fiscal year 2025, with four months remaining. That's an increase of more than 6,000 from 55,150 in fiscal year 2024. Hegseth told co-hosts Ainsley Earhardt, Lawrence Jones and Brian Kilmeade that the spirit inside the U.S. armed forces is "incredible" right now, and the morale shift isn't isolated to the Army. Read On The Fox News App "It's also the Air Force, it's also the Navy, it is also the Marine Corps, Coast Guard and, as the president says, law enforcement," he continued. "Across the board, the spirit of our country, [there's a] willingness and desire to serve, because they see leadership that believes in the country that's going to have their back, that says, 'We want you to be warriors. We're not doing this politically correct garbage anymore. We're doing war fighting. We're training, we're preparing, we're focused on [getting] back to basics, and… the young people of America have responded, and they'll continue to respond." Trump Declares May 8 As 'Victory Day' For World War Ii: 'Going To Start Celebrating Our Victories Again!' Hegseth attended this year's ceremony where military officials and veterans commemorated the 81st anniversary of D-Day. He started his morning with a physical training session with rangers from the 75th Ranger Regiment on Omaha Beach at nearly the same time as the first landing craft would have hit in 1944. "These men [World War II soldiers] were willing to charge toward the guns with almost no chance of success, especially in those first waves, and they did it for us," he said. Days ago, the defense secretary honored the sacrifices of U.S. armed forces at Arlington National Cemetery in Washington, D.C., where he greeted a number of World War II veterans whose resolve remains high more than half a century later. "The contrast of those 100-year-old World War II vets and then those 25-year old Army Rangers that I did a workout with this morning – the blood of fighting for freedom still pumps in the veins of Americans, and we still raise those types, and that's what was really cool to see."Original article source: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth reveals why military recruitment has soared under Trump

Federal cuts force families to make difficult, and potentially deadly, choices
Federal cuts force families to make difficult, and potentially deadly, choices

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Federal cuts force families to make difficult, and potentially deadly, choices

A mother rushes into the emergency department cradling her 6-month-old baby. He is lethargic, seizing and in critical condition. The cause? Severely low sodium levels in his blood — a result of formula diluted with extra water to make it last longer. With grocery prices climbing and her SNAP benefits running out before the end of the month, she felt she had no other choice. This story is not an outlier. Pediatric clinicians across Wisconsin are seeing the real and devastating consequences of policies that fail to prioritize the health and well-being of children and families. And now, the situation could get worse. The Trump Administration's proposed 'skinny' budget for Fiscal Year 2026 includes deep and dangerous cuts to federal programs that form the backbone of public health in our communities. These proposed reductions include: $18 billion from the National Institutes of Health – stalling critical pediatric research and innovation $3.5 billion from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention – compromising disease surveillance, immunization programs, and emergency response efforts $1.73 billion from the Health Resources and Services Administration – cutting access to essential primary and preventive care services for children and families $674 million from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services – threatening the Medicaid and CHIP programs that provide health coverage to nearly half of Wisconsin's children. Opinion: We asked readers about wake boats on Wisconsin lakes. Here's what you said. And as if that weren't enough, further reductions to SNAP and other nutrition support programs are also on the table. These aren't just numbers on a spreadsheet. These are lifelines. Vital services that help children survive and thrive. When families can't afford formula, when clinics lose funding for immunization programs, when children lose health coverage, the consequences are immediate and, in many cases, irreversible. As front-line providers, we witness this every day. We can do better. Our federal budget is a reflection of our national values. It should not balance its books on the backs of our youngest and most vulnerable. I implore Wisconsin's elected officials to reject this harmful budget proposal. Think of that infant in the emergency room. Think of the thousands of other children across our state whose health and future depend on robust public health infrastructure, access to care, and support for families in need. We urge lawmakers to work toward a bipartisan budget that invests in children, strengthens public health, and protects the building blocks of a healthy society. Wisconsin's children deserve every opportunity to grow up healthy and strong. Our chapter of the National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners stands ready to partner in this effort. Let's move forward — not backward — when it comes to the health of our children. Christine Schindler is a critical care pediatric nurse practitioner at Children's WI, a clinical professor at Marquette University, and the President of the Wisconsin Chapter of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners. She has been caring for critically ill and injured children for almost 30 years. All opinions expressed are her own. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Trump budget jeopardizes health of American children | Opinion

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store