Kapil Sibal alleges bias in handling of Justices Varma, Yadav cases
New Delhi: Independent MP and senior lawyer
Kapil Sibal
has alleged "discrimination" in the attitude of
Rajya Sabha Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar
for citing information which is "in public domain" to write to the Chief Justice of India, through the RS Secretariat, to halt the (judiciary's) in-house proceedings against
Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav
, who is facing charges of hate speech.
However, Sibal alleged that the same stance has not been applied by the Chairman in the case of
Justice Yashwant Varma
, in the 'currency seizure' case.
Sibal warned the government of opposition if an attempt is made to
impeach Justice Varma
on the basis of the 'in-house proceedings' (SC-appointed panel) report, saying such a course will be tantamount to by-passing the proceedings of the
Judges Inquiry Act
(of conducting an independent panel's inquiry into the charges in impeachment motion) and would thus be in violation of the Constitution besides endangering the
independence of the judiciary
.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Mundfalten "bügeln" mit TV-Tipp (Löwen)
gesunde-apotheke24.de | bedrop
Undo
Addressing mediapersons on Tuesday, Sibal wondered why the government was trying to "save" Justice Yadav and asked why the RS Chairman and secretariat have not yet completed the process of verification of the pending impeachment motion signed by 55 Opposition MPs even six months after its submission.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
12 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Census, followed by delimitation or freeze? The road ahead, likely legal challenges
The current freeze on delimitation — which for the past 50 years has based the allocation of seats to states in the Lok Sabha on the census figures of 1971 — will expire in 2026, unless Parliament passes another Constitutional Amendment Bill by then to extend it. The reason: the Constitution under Article 82 mandates delimitation after each census to readjust the seats as per changes in population. It says, 'Upon the completion of each census, the allocation of seats in the House of the People to the States and the division of each State into territorial constituencies shall be readjusted by such authority and in such manner as Parliament may by law determine.' Article 81 of the Constitution provides for the 'one person, one vote, one value' principle. Article 81 (2) (a) says, 'There shall be allotted to each State a number of seats in the House of the People in such manner that the ratio between that number and the population of the state is, so far as practicable, the same for all States.' Article 81 (2) (b) says, 'Each State shall be divided into territorial constituencies in such manner that the ratio between the population of each constituency and number of seats allotted to it is, so far as practicable, the same throughout the State.' With the collection of data for the next census ending by March 1, 2027, the release of census data could coincide with the expiry of the freeze on delimitation. This freeze was put in place first for 25 years through a constitutional amendment in 1976, and again by 25 years through a constitutional amendment in 2002. The reason for the freeze was the concern of the southern states that because their population had stabilised by then, and the population of some northern states had begun to grow at a brisk pace, their representation in the Lok Sabha would go down. To freeze or not to freeze With the Constitution ensuring equality of representation to citizens and not states of the Union, and mandating delimitation every 10 years to adjust the allocation of the seats to population, the only way in which the southern states will not lose representation would have to be another Constitutional amendment. However, with government sources saying that the idea is to have delimitation and then women's reservation in the Lok Sabha elections of 2029, the census is likely to be followed by delimitation. The website of the Election Commission of India says, 'Under Article 82 of the Constitution, the Parliament by law enacts a Delimitation Act after every census. After the commencement of the Act, the Central Government constitutes a Delimitation Commission. This Delimitation Commission demarcates the boundaries of the Parliamentary Constituencies as per provisions of the Delimitation Act. The present delimitation of constituencies has been done on the basis of 2001 census figures under the provisions of Delimitation Act, 2002. Notwithstanding the above, the Constitution of India was specifically amended in 2002 not to have delimitation of constituencies till the first census after 2026. Thus, the present Constituencies carved out on the basis of the 2001 census shall continue to be in operation till the first census after 2026.' In other words, the release of census data will be followed by the passage of the Delimitation Bill in Parliament, unless Parliament suspends the constitutionally mandated process by amending the Constitution to freeze delimitation by, say, another 25 years. Potential legal issues Once the Delimitation Commission is constituted by the Centre, it will use the latest census data to redraw Lok Sabha constituencies. However, it will be bound by Article 81 of the Constitution to redraw these on the basis of the latest population data, unless Article 81 is itself amended. Article 81 may anyway require amendments. For instance, since it limits the strength of the Lok Sabha to 550 under clauses (a) and (b), the strength will have to revised through a constitutional amendment so as to ensure that one MP does not represent too large a population, and to pave way for the reservation of women without cutting down the seats available to men. Article 81 as of now makes one exception to the 'one person, one vote, one value' principle, by giving small states and Union Territories at least one seat even if their population is very low. Since the Constitution is clear about the centrality of this principle in all other cases, the only way the south does not lose relative strength in the Lok Sabha will be by amending Article 81 (2) (a). However, any move to amend Article 81 (2) (a) would be liable to challenge in the Supreme Court as violative of the right to equality enshrined in Articles 14 and 15. The fear in south India is that if delimitation is based purely on population, northern states will get much more seats and thus a very large voice in Parliament. But if the law is amended and they get more seats than they would through the population criterion, then voters in the north and the south are not being treated equally. Even if the principle of reasonable classification — likes be treated alike — is evoked, it will be based on the argument that better social and economic indicators require special protection for southern states. This logic is exactly opposite to the one that permits reservation on the grounds that the state can make special provisions for the backward classes. The delimitation question, thus, has no easy answers, and is likely to lead to much litigation. Vikas Pathak is deputy associate editor with The Indian Express and writes on national politics. He has over 17 years of experience, and has worked earlier with The Hindustan Times and The Hindu, among other publications. He has covered the national BJP, some key central ministries and Parliament for years, and has covered the 2009 and 2019 Lok Sabha polls and many state assembly polls. He has interviewed many Union ministers and Chief Ministers. Vikas has taught as a full-time faculty member at Asian College of Journalism, Chennai; Symbiosis International University, Pune; Jio Institute, Navi Mumbai; and as a guest professor at Indian Institute of Mass Communication, New Delhi. Vikas has authored a book, Contesting Nationalisms: Hinduism, Secularism and Untouchability in Colonial Punjab (Primus, 2018), which has been widely reviewed by top academic journals and leading newspapers. He did his PhD, M Phil and MA from JNU, New Delhi, was Student of the Year (2005-06) at ACJ and gold medalist from University Rajasthan College in Jaipur in graduation. He has been invited to top academic institutions like JNU, St Stephen's College, Delhi, and IIT Delhi as a guest speaker/panellist. ... Read More
Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
Israel says Hamas 'weaponising suffering in Gaza' as aid workers killed
AP image Israel charged Thursday that Hamas was "weaponising suffering in Gaza" after a US and Israeli-backed charity accused the Palestinian militant group of killing five of its aid workers in the territory. The distribution of food and basic supplies in the blockaded and war-ravaged Gaza Strip has become increasingly fraught and perilous, exacerbating the territory's deep hunger crisis. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) said a bus carrying its staff to a distribution site near the southern city of Khan Yunis was "brutally attacked by Hamas" around 10:00 pm (1900 GMT) Wednesday, killing at least five Palestinian aid workers. "Hamas is weaponising suffering in Gaza -- denying food, targeting lifesavers and forsaking its own people," Israel's foreign ministry said on X. The GHF said: "There are at least five fatalities, multiple injuries and fear that some of our team members may have been taken hostage." Dozens of Palestinians have been killed while trying to reach GHF distribution points since they began operating in late May, according to Gaza's civil defence agency. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Egypt: New Small Electric Car For Seniors. Prices Might Surprise You. Electric Cars | Search Ads Undo The agency said another 16 people were killed while waiting for aid on Thursday, adding that they were among 22 people across the territory who were killed by Israeli fire. The Israeli army said it was looking into the latest deaths. Israeli restrictions on media in the Gaza Strip and the difficulties of access on the ground mean AFP is unable to independently verify the casualty tolls provided by the civil defence agency or the deaths reported by the GHF. 'Died while waiting' An officially private effort with opaque funding, the GHF began operating on May 26 after Israel cut off supplies into Gaza for more than two months, sparking international condemnation and warnings of imminent famine. During its first week of operations, the GHF said it distributed more than seven million meals' worth of food, but its operations were widely criticised even before the deadly shootings near its sites. The United Nations and major aid groups have refused to work with the GHF, citing concerns over its practices and neutrality. "The so-called new way of handling assistance in Gaza is most degrading, humiliating & puts lives in danger," the head of the UN Palestinian refugee agency, Philippe Lazzarini, said on X on Thursday. Gaza medics have said hospitals are being inundated with people wounded while trying to obtain food. At Gaza City's Al-Shifa Hospital on Wednesday, the emergency department said it had received dozens of people who had been killed or wounded while waiting for aid in recent days, including 200 in a single day. "Many Gazans went to the Nabulsi and Netzarim areas to receive aid and were shot at and shelled with tanks," said Mutaz Harara, head of Al-Shifa's emergency department. But with few medical supplies and no operating theatres, "many patients died while waiting for their turn", he said. The war has caused major damage to infrastructure across Gaza, including water mains, telecommunication cables, power lines and roads. The Palestinian Authority said internet and fixed-line communication services were down in Gaza on Thursday following an attack on the territory's last fibre optic cable which it blamed on Israel. The Palestinian Red Crescent said the outage was affecting its emergency response by impeding communication with first responders. Convoys through Egypt? Meanwhile, two activist convoys travelling through north Africa were attempting to reach the Gaza border to highlight the blockaded territory's plight. Organisers of a planned march said Egyptian authorities had detained more than 200 activists in Cairo ahead of the planned event. Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz had said he expected Egyptian authorities "to prevent the arrival of jihadist protesters at the Egypt-Israel border". Egypt said while it backs efforts to put "pressure on Israel" to lift its Gaza blockade, any foreign delegations seeking to visit the border area must obtain prior approval. The Gaza war was sparked by Hamas's October 7, 2023, attack on Israel. Israel said late on Wednesday that its forces had retrieved the bodies of two hostages from southern Gaza. Prior to the latest announcement, out of 251 taken hostage during the Hamas attack, 54 were still held in Gaza, including 32 the Israeli military has said are dead. Hamas's assault resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people on the Israeli side, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally of official figures. The health ministry in Hamas-run Gaza says Israel's retaliatory offensive has killed at least 55,104 people, the majority of them civilians. The United Nations considers the figures reliable.
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Bombay HC stays govt mandate for quota in minority institutions for Class 11 admissions
The Bombay High Court has temporarily suspended the Maharashtra government's order mandating minority educational institutions to reserve seats for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and Other Backward Classes for junior college admissions. Justices Karnik and Borkar issued the stay following petitions challenging the May 6 resolution. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The Bombay High Court on Thursday granted an interim stay on the Maharashtra government 's mandate to minority educational institutes to reserve seats for Schedule Castes/Schedule Tribes and Other Backward Classes for first-year junior college admissions.A bench of Justices M S Karnik and N R Borkar passed the order on a bunch of petitions filed by some minority institutions , challenging the May 6 resolution issued by the government's school education and sports department applying the constitutional/social reservations in minority education high court said it found substance in the petitioners' arguments and hence the mandate of social reservation will not be applicable for Class 11 admissions in minority educational HC bench said it was granting a stay on the clause of the resolution that included minority educational institutes for the directed the government to file its affidavit in reply to the petitions and posted the matter for further hearing on August high court on Wednesday questioned the government's rationale behind the resolution and asked if it was willing to withdraw the same or issue a corrigendum clarifying that minority institutes would not be included in the Thursday, government pleader Neha Bhide told the court that she has no instructions from the government to withdraw the resolution or issue a per the pleas, Article 15(5) of the Constitution excludes minority educational institutes, aided or unaided, from applicability of reservations for socially and educationally backward petitions claimed that under Article 30(1) (right of minorities to establish and administer educational institutions), the right of admission is exclusively with the management of the institution.A similar GR (government resolution) was issued in 2019 but it was withdrawn after petitions were filed then, they said.
