IFI and Friedrich Ebert Stiftung hold third edition of Beirut Security Debates at AUB
NNA - The Issam Fares Institute for Public Policy and International Affairs (IFI) at the American University of Beirut (AUB), and the Friedrich Ebert Stiftung (FES) Regional Peace and Security Project, held the third edition of the Beirut Security Debates (BSD) at IFI. The event, titled "A New Era? Scenarios for the Middle East," gathered local, regional, and international scholars, experts, and policymakers to analyze, discuss, and debate critical questions on security-related and geopolitical issues at this pivotal juncture for the region.
In his welcoming remarks, IFI Director Joseph Bahout noted that this year's BSD will reflect on the deep uncertainty faced by both the region and the world, "a world and a region in flux," and part of an international system that is yet to be defined and understood, "with our own region in shambles and partly undergoing a sinuous transition for the best or the worse... this remains to be seen." He believed, however, that hosting such debates at the Institute was a "reflection of our mission, that is to understand and impact our national and possibly our international environments for the better."
Similarly, FES Regional Peace and Security Project Director Marcus Schneider asked if the region was truly at the end of this enormous period of turbulence, whether emanating from Gaza, Lebanon, or other parts of the region, each of which "has the potential to ignite the region that has never quite succeeded in extinguishing the fires." Schneider noted that there remains a considerable disconnect between German political discourse and the reality on the Middle East ground in view of the most recent wars. One thing is certain, he said, that regardless of what new order emerges from all the bloodshed, the "rules-based international order" has died.
Meanwhile, AUB President Fadlo Khuri noted that this year's BSD unfolds "at a time when even as the sound of arms has mostly gone quiet, the threat of violence remains close." We are navigating a period shaped by contradictions, he said, "ceasefires without peace, negotiations without trust, and diplomacy without clarity." He added that this is what makes this year's BSD thematic question not a rhetorical one, but a genuine inquiry to understand "if we are witnessing the beginning of transformation or merely another turn in a long and familiar cycle." Khuri noted that at AUB, and particularly through IFI's work, "we hold fast to the idea that rigorous inquiry, grounded in evidence and lived experience, can offer more than understanding."
The conference featured panel discussions that dealt with the possible scenarios for the Middle East in the years to come, including what U.S. President Trump has in stock for the Middle East, the future of the Palestinian question, viable choices for Iran given the regional reconfiguration, how Syria will embark on state-building, and Lebanon's prospects amid uncertainty. BSD also featured a book reflection with Minister of Culture Ghassan Salame, centered around his latest book on war and peace in the 21st century. The discussion expanded into a wider debate about today's world fractures and trends, with a special focus on the Middle East, where war has been reshaping the region for a long while, amidst talks of new dynamics of normalization and redistribution of power.
The recording of the conference and the full conference report will be available on IFI's website soon.
-------------------------
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Nahar Net
16 hours ago
- Nahar Net
Why are Hezbollah and other allies staying out of Israel-Iran conflict?
by Naharnet Newsdesk 15 June 2025, 12:16 Hezbollah has long been considered Iran's first line of defense in case of a war with Israel. But since Israel launched its massive barrage against Iran this week, the Lebanese group has stayed out of the fray. A network of powerful Iran-backed militias in Iraq has also remained mostly quiet — even though Israel used Iraq's airspace, in part, to carry out the attacks. Domestic political concerns, as well as tough losses suffered in nearly two years of regional conflicts and upheavals, appear to have led these Iran allies to take a back seat in the latest round convulsing the region. - The 'Axis of Resistance' - Hezbollah was formed with Iranian support in the early 1980s as a guerilla force fighting against Israel's occupation of southern Lebanon at the time. The militant group helped push Israel out of Lebanon and built its arsenal over the ensuing decades, becoming a powerful regional force and the centerpiece of a cluster of Iranian-backed factions and governments known as the " Axis of Resistance." The allies also include Iraqi Shiite militias and Yemen's Houthi rebels, as well as Palestinian militant group Hamas and the Islamic Jihad. At one point, Hezbollah was believed to have some 150,000 rockets and missiles, and the group's former leader, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah once boasted of having 100,000 fighters. Seeking to aid its ally Hamas in the aftermath of the Palestinian militants' Oct. 7, 2023 attack on southern Israel and Israel's brutal offensive in Gaza, Hezbollah began launching rockets across the border. That drew Israeli airstrikes and shelling, and the exchanges escalated into full-scale war last September. Israel inflicted heavy damage on Hezbollah, killing Nasrallah and other top leaders and destroying much of its arsenal, before a U.S.-negotiated ceasefire halted that conflict last November. Israel continues to occupy parts of southern Lebanon and to carry out near-daily airstrikes. For their part, the Iraqi militias occasionally struck bases housing U.S. troops in Iraq and Syria, while Yemen's Houthis fired at vessels in the Red Sea, a crucial global trade route, and began targeting Israel. - Condolences to Iran, condemnations of Israel - Hezbollah and its new leader Sheikh Naim Qassem have condemned Israel's attacks and offered condolences for the senior Iranian officers who were killed. But Qassem did not suggest Hezbollah would take part in any retaliation against Israel. Iraq's Kataib Hezbollah militia — a separate group from Lebanon's Hezbollah — released a statement saying it was "deeply regrettable" that Israel fired at Iran from Iraqi airspace, something that Baghdad complained to the U.N. Security Council over. The Iraqi militia called on the Baghdad government to "urgently expel hostile forces from the country," a reference to U.S. troops in Iraq as part of the fight against the militant Islamic State group, but made no threat of force. Hezbollah was weakened by last year's fighting and after losing a major supply route for Iranian weapons with the fall of Syrian President Bashar Assad, a key ally, in a lightning rebel offensive in December. "Hezbollah has been degraded on the strategic level while cut off from supply chains in Syria," said Andreas Krieg, a military analyst and associate professor at King's College London. - A changing attitude to Iran - Many Hezbollah members believe "they were sacrificed for Iran's greater regional interests" since Hamas' attack on Israel triggered the latest Israel-Hamas war, and want to focus on "Lebanon-centric" interests rather than defending Iran, Krieg said. Still, Qassem Qassir, a Lebanese analyst close to Hezbollah, said a role for the militant group in the Israel-Iran conflict should not be ruled out. "This depends on political and field developments," he said. "Anything is possible." Both the Houthis and the Iraqi militias "lack the strategic deep strike capability against Israel that Hezbollah once had," Krieg said. Renad Mansour, a senior research fellow at the Chatham House think tank in London, said Iraq's Iran-allied militias have all along tried to avoid pulling their country into a major conflict. Unlike Hezbollah, whose military wing has operated as a non-state actor in Lebanon -- although its political wing is part of the government -- the main Iraqi militias are members of a coalition of groups that are officially part of the state defense forces. "Things in Iraq are good for them right now, they're connected to the state -- they're benefitting politically, economically," Mansour said. "And also they've seen what's happened to Iran, to Hezbollah and they're concerned that Israel will turn on them as well." That leaves the Houthis as the likely "new hub in the Axis of Resistance," Krieg said. But he said the group isn't strong enough — and too geographically removed — to strategically harm Israel beyond the rebels' sporadic missile attacks. Krieg said the perception that the "axis" members were proxies fully controlled by Iran was always mistaken, but now the ties have loosened further. "It is not really an axis anymore as (much as) a loose network where everyone largely is occupied with its own survival," he said.
Al Manar
a day ago
- Al Manar
Sayyed Houthi: Israeli Aggression on Iran Comes in Context of Targeting Its Model of Independence
Head of Yemen's Ansarullah Movement Sayyed Abdul Malik Badreddine Al-Houthi indicated that the Israeli aggression against the Islamic Republic of Iran came within a broader Western effort that views Iran as an independent model supportive for the Palestinian cause. In a televised speech on the occasion of the Day of Wilaya, Sayyed Houthi said that the Israeli enemy, backed by the West, sees the Islamic Republic of Iran as a nation building a civilizational renaissance and an Islamic power. 'The Israeli, American, British, and their allies do not want any independent state among Muslims that does not submit to their authority. The Israeli enemy is criminal and audacious in committing such a heinous crime—an enemy with absolutely no justification for its aggression against the Islamic Republic of Iran.' All the fabrications, pretexts, and excuses promoted by the Israeli enemy are utterly absurd. he said, highlighting the positions of Arab and Islamic countries united in condemning the Israeli aggression against Iran, as a good and positive development. In its aggression against the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Israeli enemy violates the airspace of Arab countries without concern, Sayyed Houthi underlined, adding that the Ummah must restore the equation of deterrence against the Israeli enemy, rather than accepting the equation of unchecked aggression. 'The American, British, French, and the Western community in general seek only to contain the Iranian response. If the West fails to contain Iran's response through political pressure and other means, their direction will be to cooperate with the enemy to confront Iran's retaliation.' We in Yemen support the Iranian response and are partners in this stance with everything we can offer, Sayyed Houthi said, extending condolences to the Iranian leadership and people, and congratulations on martyrdom of a number of officials, experts and citizens. Sayyed Houthi affirmed that any Islamic country that engages in a confrontation with the Israeli enemy must be supported, as that is the true responsibility and interest of the Ummah. 'We continue to support Gaza, stand by the Palestinian people, and remain engaged in an open war with the Israeli enemy. Our stance is firm and ongoing as part of our jihadi duties in the path of Allah Almighty.' Iranian Armed Forces shot down Israeli drones on Saturday as the Zionist entity goes on with its aggression on the Islamic Republic for the second day.
Nahar Net
a day ago
- Nahar Net
Report: Officials act to spare Lebanon war as ceasefire committee urges arms timetable
by Naharnet Newsdesk 6 hours The warnings received by Lebanon with the start of the Israel-Iran conflict were not only passed on to Hezbollah but also to the Palestinian factions allied with it, especially Hamas and the Islamic Jihad, informed sources said. 'Their leaderships were unequivocally told that any military action from the Lebanese south, whether through rockets or any move of military nature, would be faced by a very firm and unprecedented Lebanese stance that includes taking totally unexpected political and security decisions,' the sources told the Nidaa al-Watan newspaper in remarks published Saturday. The sources revealed that these messages were relayed through several channels, most notably Army chief General Rodolphe Haykal, who 'communicated with Hezbollah after the Israeli strike on Iran and told it of the need to keep Lebanon neutral and not be dragged into a new confrontation, 'because this war is not our war.'' Haykal also called on Hezbollah to 'abide by the official stance that stresses that the decisions of war and peace are in the hands of the state.' Nidaa al-Watan added that the five-party ceasefire committee has 'advised Lebanon to lay out a timetable for the handover of weapons to avoid the worse, telling it that the international community will not overlook this matter.' 'Through taking practical steps requested from it, Lebanon can fend off the specter of war, because Israel is insisting to put an end to every threat targeting it, while one of the international community's conditions for helping Lebanon is extending state's authority and collecting all illegal weapons,' the daily quoted the ceasefire committee as saying. Lebanese officials meanwhile told the newspaper that Lebanon has carried out contacts with foreign powers in order to avoid war, specifically with the U.S. and France, and that 'an agreement was reached on Lebanon's neutrality.' Moreover, political authorities gave the Lebanese Army a green light, especially in south Lebanon, and a state of maximum alert was declared as Hezbollah 'responded positively' to the request for staying out of the conflict, Lebanese officials told the daily. 'These messages came under direct supervision from senior state officials in parallel with international and regional coordination to spare the Lebanese front involvement in the open inferno,' the sources added.
