logo
University of Cambridge granted High Court injunction against protesters

University of Cambridge granted High Court injunction against protesters

Yahoo21-03-2025

The University of Cambridge has been granted a High Court order blocking Israel-Palestine protests on parts of its campus until the end of July.
Last month, a judge dismissed a request by the university for a five-year injunction blocking direct action related to the conflict on several sites without the university's consent.
The university returned to the High Court on Wednesday, asking a judge for a four-month injunction preventing protesters from disrupting multiple graduation events on two sites planned up to July 26, the final graduation ceremony of the academic year.
The European Legal Support Center (ELSC) opposed the university's bid, with its lawyers telling the court the injunction is a 'disproportionate infringement' on the human rights of the protesters and would set a 'dangerous precedent' for protesting on campuses.
In a ruling on Friday, Mr Justice Soole granted the injunction, stating there is an 'imminent and real risk of a recurrence' of direct action on the campus and a 'strong probability that this will otherwise occur' if the order is not issued.
He said: 'I am satisfied that there is a compelling need for the granting of an injunction.'
He added the 'proposed terms are the minimum necessary in the circumstances'.
Lawyers for the university told the court in London that last year, pro-Palestine protesters staged demonstrations at Senate House Yard and Greenwich House, which 'forced' a graduation ceremony to be moved.
Myriam Stacey KC, for the university, told the hearing there is a 'real and imminent risk' of further action on campus, with protesters saying 'we will be back' after leaving Senate House Yard at the end of November.
She said the protesters appeared to be mostly affiliated with the group Cambridge for Palestine, whose stated aims online include for the university to 'divest from institutions and companies complicit in the ongoing ethnic cleansing of Palestine'.
She told the court: 'It is the activity we are seeking to stop, not the viewpoint. It is legally irrelevant who is doing this. It is what they are doing that we object to.'
Ms Stacey continued in written submissions that the university sought to prohibit protesters from entering, occupying or remaining on the sites for direct action without its consent, directly blocking access to the sites, or erecting or placing structures on them, such as tents or sleeping equipment.
Owen Greenhall, for ELSC, said in written submissions the university was discriminating against the 'race and/or political belief' of protesters as it was only after pro-Palestine actions that it began seeking an injunction, allowing other demonstrations such as those for Ukraine or industrial action.
He said an injunction was 'not necessary' and would have a 'chilling effect on political expression at Cambridge'.
But Mr Justice Soole said the injunction 'does provide a fair balance between the rights of all parties'.
Following the ruling, a spokesperson for the university said: 'The University of Cambridge welcomes today's decision at the High Court.
'We took this action to protect the right of students to graduate and to prevent access to buildings that contain sensitive, confidential information.
'This was never about preventing lawful protest. The injunction safeguards a very small part of the University estate from an occupation that would prevent graduations from going ahead.
'It also protects the right for our staff to work. Protests occur regularly at the university, including a rally held immediately outside Great St Mary's church during the last graduation ceremony while an injunction covering the Senate House, a few yards away, was in place.'
Cambridge for Palestine said it 'condemns' the decision, which it described as 'a violent move to criminalise and police our movement'.
Anna Ost, senior legal officer at ELSC, said: 'It is more important than ever to resist attempts to shut down protests for Palestinian liberation.
'The extent of the five-year injunction the university originally asked for demonstrated that they were seeking to restrict protests.'
She continued: 'Instead of acting urgently to review their investments, the university has stalled and sought to silence their critics with this injunction.
'We remain deeply concerned about the broader trend of universities using legal measures to target solidarity with Palestine.'
Ruth Ehrlich, head of advocacy and campaigns at Liberty, which also intervened in the case, said: 'Today's judgment sets a dangerous precedent which will severely restrict protest rights on campus.
'Students have long been at the forefront of movements for social change, whether in opposing apartheid or rising tuition fees.
'It is not right that universities are curbing students' ability to do so, and creating a hostile space for people simply trying to make their voices heard.
'We urge universities to allow students to speak up for what they believe in on campus, and to protect the right to protest.'
The University of Cambridge has been approached for comment.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

University of Michigan severs ties with security company after personnel followed students
University of Michigan severs ties with security company after personnel followed students

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

University of Michigan severs ties with security company after personnel followed students

The Brief The University of Michigan says they have cut ties with private security companies, but many students are calling them out. U-M says no individual or group was or should ever be targeted for their beliefs or affiliations. Attorney Amir Makled said many students in the anti-Israel demonstrations on campus beg to differ. ANN ARBOR, Mich. (FOX 2) - The University of Michigan says they have severed ties with several private security companies hired to patrol high traffic areas on campus, but many students, including pro-Palestinian demonstrators, say their actions have amounted to surveillance. Now they are calling the university out. What they're saying U-M says no individual or group was or should ever be targeted for their beliefs or affiliations, but many of those students in last year's anti-Israel demonstrations on campus beg to differ. Attorney Amir Makled represented several Pro-Palestinian protesters at U-M, including some who say they were followed and harassed by undercover security teams whose contracts have now been terminated by the University. "I think that this is a continuation of what we're seeing nationally," said Makled. "They've spent nearly a million dollars going after students wrongfully monitoring them, recording them, and it's totally unjustified." The backstory University leadership has said private security was hired to report suspicious incidents in high-traffic areas, not to conduct surveillance, but tensions came to a head in 2024 during the anti-Israel demonstrations, including a large encampment that was eventually shut down by officials due to safety concerns. Seven demonstrators were faced with felony charges relating to the encampment, but those charges were dropped in May. "I think we saw some videos online of one of these private investigative employees acting as if they had some sort of a mental challenge or physical handicap in a way to not maybe raise suspicion that they are actually watching the targeted individual, but who knows what the irregularity was. Nonetheless, they should never have been used in the first place." The other side Michigan's Interim President talked about the issue in a letter to the community, saying in part: "…We recently learned that an employee of one of our security contractors has acted in ways that go against our values and directives. What happened was disturbing, unacceptable, and unethical, and we will not tolerate forward, we are terminating all contracts with external vendors to provide plainclothes security on campus…" City Shield, the Detroit company providing some of the contracted security, released a statement to FOX 2 following the contract terminations saying quote: "City Shield Security Services has a strong history of protecting people and property as a nationally leading provider. We are aware of recent reporting and are investigating the matter. We take all complaints seriously and investigate them rigorously, ensuring appropriate actions and professional standards. We respect the need for client and protection services confidentiality and as a standard industry practice do not discuss the details of those services or contract, which would obviously undermine the protection provided." Attorney Makled says it's good the private security has been dumped…but wants more change. "I think the university is going to be held accountable. They need to have some transparency," he said. "We need to have oversight over the spending of these universities and these independent investigations must happen against the university, not against the students."

After LA, Trump hard launches new First Amendment: Only MAGA can protest
After LA, Trump hard launches new First Amendment: Only MAGA can protest

USA Today

time27 minutes ago

  • USA Today

After LA, Trump hard launches new First Amendment: Only MAGA can protest

After LA, Trump hard launches new First Amendment: Only MAGA can protest | Opinion Rule No. 1: No protesting unless it's something Trump wants you to protest. Show Caption Hide Caption Australian journalist shot with a rubber bullet in Los Angeles Australian journalist from 9News, Lauren Tomasi, was shot with a rubber bullet while reporting from the protests in Los Angeles. President Donald Trump and his band of faux-macho nogoodniks keep poking the city of Los Angeles, hoping it will squeal and create the kind of violent theater that gives right-wing media its life force. First they sent in the National Guard to address predominantly peaceful anti-ICE protests, but the sprawling city failed to adequately burn. Now they're sending in U.S. Marines to get the job done. It's an intentional, dangerous and wholly unnecessary provocation. And based on how Trump and other Republicans have reacted to the ongoing protests, we should all be clear on the administration's new rules for protesting in America. Rule No. 1: No protesting unless it's something Trump wants you to protest For those who engage in liberal activities like reading and 'seeing things with your own eyes and believing they're real,' it might seem odd that the man who praised Jan. 6 insurrectionists as "great patriots" and then pardoned them all has the gall to call LA protesters 'insurrectionists.' Technically, there's nothing about the California protests that would make them an insurrection, while everything about the 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol, an effort to overturn a free-and-fair election, made it an actual insurrection. But that kind of fact-based thinking is now illegal, and protesters in Los Angeles and elsewhere need to understand that the First Amendment only applies to things Trump and Republicans want to hear. As border czar Tom Homan said on June 9 about the LA protesters: 'I said many times, you can protest. You get your First Amendment rights. But when you cross that line, you put hands on an ICE officer, or you destroy property or ICE says you impede law enforcement … that's a crime. And the Trump administration is not going to tolerate it.' Opinion: Trump lied about LA protests to deploy the National Guard. He wants violence. Correct. Unless you're a pro-Trump protester. In which case, breaking into a federal building, beating the snot out of police officers and destroying property is patriotic and easily pardonable. Rule No. 2: Protesters can only use American flags Video of California protesters waving flags from Mexico and other countries really upset a number of Republicans who have apparently never been in Boston on St. Patrick's Day. Sen. James Lankford of Oklahoma said: 'This is an American city, and to be able to have an American city where we have people literally flying Mexican flags and saying 'you cannot arrest us' cannot be allowed.' If those protesters were waving a good old-fashioned American flag, it would be an entirely different story. But in Trump's America, flag choice matters. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt called out 'left-wing radicals carrying foreign flags.' Vice President JD Vance declared on social media: 'Insurrectionists carrying foreign flags are attacking immigration enforcement officers.' MIND THE FLAGS, PEOPLE! The rule seems pretty clear. Your First Amendment right only allows you to carry an American flag, unless you are a Trump supporter during an actual insurrection, in which case you can carry a Confederate flag, replace an American flag with a Trump flag or use an American flag on a pole to beat a police officer. Opinion: Three ways the Trump-Musk feud revealed the GOP's twisted hypocrisy Rule No. 3: No spitting on or disrespecting law enforcement officers In response to some LA protesters allegedly spitting on authorities, Trump declared on social media June 9: ' 'If they spit, we will hit.' This is a statement from the President of the United States concerning the catastrophic Gavin Newscum inspired Riots going on in Los Angeles. The Insurrectionists have a tendency to spit in the face of the National Guardsmen/women, and others. These Patriots are told to accept this, it's just the way life runs. But not in the Trump Administration. IF THEY SPIT, WE WILL HIT, and I promise you they will be hit harder than they have ever been hit before. Such disrespect will not be tolerated!' Some might respond to this by saying, 'But the Jan. 6 insurrectionists whom you pardoned en masse did a lot more than just spit. They brutally attacked police officers, physically injuring more than 140 of them.' To which Trump would probably say: 'Shut up. Your First Amendment rights are hereby revoked!' Or he might say what he actually said when he pardoned hundreds of Jan. 6 rioters after he was inaugurated Jan. 20: 'These are people who actually love our country, so we thought a pardon would be appropriate.' To clarify, the people who Trump thinks love this country, demonstrated by them loving him, are allowed to express that love by defacing a federal building they broke into and viciously assaulting police officers. People who Trump thinks don't love the country, demonstrated by them exercising their First Amendment right to protest things he doesn't want them to protest, will be beaten up for spitting. Follow Trump's protesting rules, or he'll call in the troops It's clear as mud, folks. Americans across the country should feel free to get out and protest, as long as it's for the right reasons and done in a way that aligns completely with the beliefs of Republicans and the Trump administration. Anything outside of that and they'll call in the National Guard. And the Marines. And, I guess, the flag police? Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @ and on Facebook at

Greta Thunberg departs Israel on flight to Paris after detention aboard aid ship
Greta Thunberg departs Israel on flight to Paris after detention aboard aid ship

CNN

time29 minutes ago

  • CNN

Greta Thunberg departs Israel on flight to Paris after detention aboard aid ship

Swedish climate and human rights activist Greta Thunberg departed Israel on a flight to France on Tuesday after being detained by Israeli forces alongside other activists aboard an aid ship bound for Gaza. 'Greta Thunberg just departed Israel on a flight to Sweden (via France),' Israel's foreign ministry wrote in a post on X alongside two photos of the young activist aboard a plane. Thunberg, 22, is a well-known climate activist who has long eschewed air travel, famously sailing to a climate conference in New York in 2019. At least five of her fellow crew members who were also detained on board the Madleen aid ship Monday have refused to agree to depart voluntarily and will be deported, according to France's Foreign Minister on Tuesday. 'Last night our consul was able to see the six French nationals who were arrested by the Israeli authorities. Their families have been contacted. One of them agreed to a voluntary departure and is expected to return today. The other five will be deported,' Jean-Noël Barrot wrote in a post on X. One of the French nationals detained by Israel on Monday is Rima Hassan, a Member of the European Parliament. 'Over the last days and hours, the President of the European Parliament has been in constant contact with the Israeli authorities… to ensure the safety and security of the Member of the European Parliament, Rima Hassan, who was one of the people aboard the boat Madleen and all those accompanying her,' Delphine Colard, a spokesperson for the European Parliament said on Monday. Israel's foreign ministry had said earlier that anyone who refused to sign deportation documents and leave Israel would be brought before judicial authorities to authorize their deportation. The detained crew of the Gaza-bound aid ship that was intercepted by Israel on Monday morning docked in the Israeli port of Ashdod Monday evening, according to Israel's foreign ministry. The Madleen is part of the Freedom Flotilla Coalition, an organization that has campaigned against Israel's blockade of Gaza and tried to break the siege by boat. The Freedom Flotilla Coalition (FFC) said the Israeli military had 'attacked' and 'unlawfully boarded' the Madleen, which was attempting to deliver aid to Gaza – where more than 600 days of war, and an 11-week Israeli blockade of all aid, has pushed the enclave's 2.1 million people deeper into a hunger crisis. Amnesty International also condemned the detention of the activists. 'The operation of intercepting and blocking the Madleen in the middle of the night and in international waters violates international law and put the safety of those on the boat at risk,' Agnès Callamard, Amnesty International's secretary general, said in a statement. In a statement to CNN, Israel said that it 'is preventing the entry of all vessels into the Gaza Strip, in accordance with international law.' Israel had repeatedly vowed to stop the aid boat from reaching Gaza and described the ship as a 'selfie yacht' carrying 'celebrities.' Israel imposed a full humanitarian blockade of Gaza on March 2, cutting off food, medical supplies, and other aid to the more than 2 million Palestinians who live in the territory for 11 weeks. Faced with growing international pressure, Israel began allowing a trickle of aid in late May. But humanitarian organizations say it is only a fraction of the aid that entered the enclave before the war, and have warned of a worsening humanitarian crisis and the growing risk of widespread famine. A UN-backed report warned in late April that one in five people were facing starvation. Dozens of Palestinians have been killed over the past week while on their way to try and obtain aid from a new US-backed group commissioned to deliver aid to Gaza, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). The group is intended to replace the UN-led system of distributing aid in Gaza. The United Nations has warned that the new distribution mechanism has become a 'death trap' for desperate people seeking food in the strip.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store