Minister Narayana gets set to realise his promise to revive his Alma mater
The 150-year-old VR School in Nellore, which was closed down during the previous YSRCP regime, is all set to be reopened soon. It is also expected to be a birthday gift from Minister for Municipal Administration and Urban Development Ponguru Narayana to his home district.
Ever since he won the Nellore City Assembly constituency in the 2024 general elections and got into the State cabinet, the Minister has been focusing on reviving his Alma mater, where he not only studied, but also worked as a teacher in the past.
Mr. Narayana, who celebrated his birthday on Sunday, reiterated his resolve to get the modernisation work in progress completed at the earliest and get the school opened from the current academic year.
Chequered history
During the British regime, Sunku Narayanaswamy Chetty, headmaster of the Free Church Mission High School in Nellore, resigned owing to differences with the management and established this Hindu Anglo Vernacular School on May 3, 1875.
After he stepped down in 1878 expressing inability, erstwhile Diwan of the Venkatagiri Rajah's Estates Haji Mohammad Rahimtullah, shouldered the responsibility, bought a huge chunk of land and donated it to the school. However, the issue came back to the proverbial square one after Mr. Rahimtullah also stepped down in 1886.
V. Rajagopala Krishna Yachendra Bahadur, the 28th Raja of the Venkatagiri Samsthanam, provided a permanent corpus fund of ₹50,000, in recognition of which the school came to be known as Venkatagiri Rajah School.
As the school came under the management of the politically powerful AC Subba Reddy family, internal bickerings within the clan led to a legal tussle. The TDP government in 2018 appointed a Special Officer to run the affairs, but the school was completely closed down during the ensuing YSRCP regime in 2021.
Modernisation under way
Mr. Narayana has mobilised funds to the tune of ₹15 crore from Nagarjuna Construction Company under its Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) for modernising the school and setting up smart boards, science labs and sports infrastructure.
Speaking to The Hindu, Mr. Narayana said the school would offer a ray of hope for children hailing from impoverished sections of society. He also proposes to provide breakfast, lunch and snacks to the students.
The school is all set for inauguration by the Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu soon.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
More ‘mind space' for India in the American imagination
Why is there no 'Schwarzman Scholars' programme for India? Why does a country of 1.4 billion people — an ancient civilisation, a dynamic economy, a nuclear power, and a key player in the Indo-Pacific — still appear marginal in the priorities of elite American institutions? The answer lies not merely in policy lag but in perception, psychology, and deeply embedded narratives that continue to shape the West's engagement with Asia. The Schwarzman Scholars programme The 'Schwarzman Scholars' programme, launched in 2016 and based at Beijing's Tsinghua University, was explicitly modelled after the Rhodes Scholarship (founded in 1902). Its mission is ambitious: to cultivate a future generation of global leaders, deeply familiar with China's systems, strategic worldview, and societal aspirations. That no such equivalent programme exists for India is not an accident. It is the culmination of decades of lopsided intellectual investment — one that privileges China as essential, and views India, at best, as peripheral. This imbalance was presciently explored by Harold R. Isaacs in his seminal work, Scratches on Our Minds: American Images of China and India (1958). Isaacs uncovered the psychological residue — 'scratches', as he termed them — left on American consciousness by media, education, missionary engagement, and diplomatic narratives. China loomed large in this imagination: revolutionary, mystical, dangerous, promising. India, by contrast, was filtered through colonial British lenses: remote, spiritual, chaotic, and, ultimately, less urgent. Even today, those scratches endure. India is often misunderstood, misrepresented, or, more often, simply missing in the frameworks that shape western elite understanding. The Cold War's bipolar logic left India unmoored in American strategic thinking. China was a site of ideological competition, and later, a partner in global capitalism. India, non-aligned and self-reliant, never fit the template. Its democracy attracted rhetorical admiration, but its strategic ambivalence dampened deeper interest. This selective seduction continued into the 21st century. China masterfully framed its rise as an opportunity — and the West was psychologically prepared to believe it. Scholars such as Australian sinologist Stephen FitzGerald described in the 1980s how the West 'wanted China to succeed' — economically, politically, even ideologically. China offered a compelling, seductive narrative of transformation: poverty to prosperity, isolation to globalisation, authoritarian control with capitalist efficiency. Western business leaders, academics and policymakers were drawn in. Programmes such as Schwarzman were not just reflections of China's pull —they were symptoms of the West's emotional and intellectual readiness to be seduced. India never orchestrated such seduction. It emerged from colonialism with a focus on sovereignty and self-reliance. It rebuffed bloc politics, avoided entanglements, and developed slowly and unevenly. Its strengths — pluralistic democracy, entrepreneurial diaspora, and cultural richness — did not easily translate into strategic urgency or narrative coherence for the West. While the Chinese state invested heavily in soft power — through Confucius Institutes, think tanks, cultural exchanges, and university partnerships — India's outreach was modest, sporadic, and often bureaucratically constrained. The problem with India-focused research Even within American academia, the difference is stark. China Studies enjoys robust institutional support across top universities. With a few exceptions, India-focused research, by contrast, is fragmented, often subsumed under South Asian or Postcolonial Studies, with an emphasis on religion, anthropology, or classical languages. These are critical fields, but do not capture the lure of a civilisational state and a modern India that is shaping global technology, space innovation, climate policy, and strategic affairs. India appears in headlines, but rarely in syllabi. The consequences are serious. Future American leaders, whether in diplomacy, business, or policy, are not being trained to understand India in its full complexity. The persistence of reductive frameworks, such as the old hyphenation of 'India-Pakistan', continues to distort strategic thinking. U.S. President Donald Trump's repetitive remarks about mediating between India and Pakistan are not just personal gaffes. They reflect institutional inertia, a failure to update mental maps to match geopolitical reality. And here lies a paradox: just as India's importance is rising, its visibility in American intellectual and philanthropic circuits remains limited. The absence of a flagship fellowship akin to Schwarzman is both a symbol and a cause of this gap. Such a programme would not just serve India's interests; it would meet a growing demand among global youth for deeper engagement with the world's largest democracy — its challenges, innovations, contradictions, and aspirations. But for such a fellowship to succeed, India must first invest in the institutional foundation. Tsinghua University, where Schwarzman is housed, is not just a campus. It is a a brand, a node of state-backed ambition with global recognition. India has institutions of excellence — the Indian Institutes of Technology, Indian Institutes of Management, and emerging liberal arts universities such as Ashoka and Krea — but none as yet combine academic prestige, international pull, policy connectivity, and philanthropic momentum at the scale required. This must change. India needs a globally oriented, strategically empowered academic platform that can host and nurture the next generation of world leaders — Indian and foreign — who understand India not just as a subject of study but as a site of leadership. Creating such an institution will require government will, private capital, academic autonomy, and long-term vision. Narrative matters India also needs to project its narrative with much more feeling and conviction. The Chinese have always felt they are a 'chosen' people. The world, from Napoleon, has felt the same. India is the Cinderella in this story. Strategic restraint and ambiguity has served Indian diplomacy in many arenas, but silence can be mistaken for absence and risk-aversion for reticence and a lack of confidence. Narrative matters. Global leadership today is as much about shaping perceptions as it is about GDP or military muscle. That means calling out outdated framing, investing in storytelling, and claiming intellectual space with confidence. The refrain of a rising GDP lifting all boats, of International Yoga Days, will not just do. Every few blocks in an American city you will find a yoga studio and an Indian restaurant. But does that change the power scene for India? Ultimately, the battle for influence is not only fought in the corridors of power or in street corners, but is also shaped in classrooms, fellowships, research centres, and campus conversations. If India wants to be understood on its own terms, and not just as a counterweight to China or a bystander in someone else's story, it must be present in the places where ideas are formed and futures imagined. The scratches on our minds can be healed, but not with silence. They require vision, voice, and a story compelling enough to inspire the next generation of global leaders. A Schwarzman-style fellowship in India would not just be a corrective. It would be a declaration that India is no longer content to be studied at a distance. It wants to be known, on its own terms. Nirupama Rao is a former Foreign Secretary and Ambassador to the United States
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Govt releases irrigation water to Krishna East Delta canals for Kharif season
1 2 Vijayawada: In a significant development for the agricultural community, the govt whip and Vijayawada Central MLA, Bonda Umamaheswara Rao, along with other officials, formally released irrigation water to the Krishna East Delta canals from Prakasam Barrage on Sunday, marking the beginning of the Kharif season. On the occasion, a special pooja ceremony was performed and a total of 1,000 cusecs of irrigation water was released, with 700 cusecs allocated to Ryves Canal and 300 cusecs to Bandar Canal, benefiting approximately 7.40 lakh acres of ayacut under the Krishna East Delta region. Umamaheswara Rao emphasized that the TDP-led NDA state govt is a pro-farmer administration that prioritizes the welfare of farmers and ensures timely release of irrigation water to aid in crop cultivation. He highlighted that, unlike previous govts, the present NDA govt releases water to canals according to the schedule. Gannavaram MLA Yarlagadda Venkat Rao noted that although the decision to release irrigation water was initially scheduled for June 10, it was deferred to June 15 as farmers were not prepared for agricultural operations. He criticized the previous YSRCP govt for causing hardships to farmers due to untimely release of irrigation water for both Kharif and Rabi crops. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Perdagangkan CFD Emas dengan Broker Tepercaya IC Markets Mendaftar Undo Avanigadda MLA Mandali Buddha Prasad pointed out that the Avanigadda constituency, being a tail-end region in the Krishna delta, often faced severe losses due to neglect of canal maintenance and failure to remove debris. However, the present NDA govt has completed all necessary repairs and maintenance works, ensuring timely water release for crops. The event was attended by NTR district collector Dr G Lakshmisha, president of irrigation water consumer union federation Alla Venkata Gopala Krishna Rao, irrigation engineer-in-chief K Narasimha Murthy, and other officials.
The Hindu
5 hours ago
- The Hindu
G7 leaders gather in Canada for summit overshadowed by Israel-Iran crisis, trade wars
Leaders of some of the world's biggest economic powers arrive in the Canadian Rockies on Sunday (June 15, 2025) for a Group of Seven summit, overshadowed by an escalating conflict between Israel and Iran and U.S. President Donald Trump's unresolved trade war with allies and rivals alike. Israel-Iran conflict LIVE Israel's strikes on Iran and Tehran's retaliation, which appeared to catch many world leaders unawares, are the latest sign of a more volatile world as Mr. Trump seeks to withdraw the U.S. from its role as world policeman. Speaking on a flight to Canada to attend the summit, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said he had discussed efforts to de-escalate the crisis with Mr. Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, as well as other world leaders. Britain is sending fighter jets and other military reinforcements to the Middle East. 'We do have longstanding concerns about the nuclear programme Iran has. We do recognise Israel's right to self-defence, but I'm absolutely clear that this needs to de-escalate. There is a huge risk of escalation for the region and more widely," Mr. Starmer said, adding he expected 'intense discussions' would continue at the summit. Trump is summit's wild card As summit host, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has decided to abandon the annual practice of issuing a joint statement, or communique, at the end of the meeting. With other leaders wanting to talk to Mr. Trump in an effort to talk him out of imposing tariffs, the summit risks being a series of bilateral conversations rather than a show of unity. Mr. Trump is the summit wild card. Looming over the meeting are his inflammatory threats to make Canada the 51st state and take over Greenland. French President Emmanuel Macron arrived in Greenland on Sunday (June 15, 2025) for a highly symbolic stop on his way to Canada, meeting the Arctic territory's leader and Denmark's prime minister aboard a Danish helicopter carrier. Mr. Macron's office said the trip to Greenland is a reminder that Paris supports principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders as enshrined in the UN charter. Mr. Macron, who is one of the very few leaders to have known Mr. Trump during his first term, was the first European leader to visit the White House after Mr. Trump took office, emerging unscathed from the Oval Office encounter. But despite the two leaders' sporadic bromance, Mr. Macron's approach to Mr. Trump has failed to bear major results, with France caught up in the president's planned tariffs on the European Union. Nor did it bring any U.S. security guarantees for Ukraine despite Mr. Macron's efforts, together with Mr. Starmer, to build a coalition of nations that could deploy forces after any ceasefire with Russia, with the hope it would convince the Trump administration to provide backup. Mr. Trump is scheduled to arrive late Sunday (June 15, 2025) in Kananaskis, Alberta. Bilateral meetings between other leaders are possible on Sunday (June 15, 2025), but the summit programme does not get underway until Monday (June 16, 2025). Peter Boehm, Canada's sherpa of the 2018 G7 summit in Quebec and veteran of six G7 summits, expects the heads of state to pivot discussion to devote more time to the war. 'Leaders can accommodate a discussion, perhaps even a statement,' Mr. Boehm said. 'The foreign policy agenda has become much larger with this.' He tends to be a 'bully' Leaders who are not part of the G7 but have been invited to the summit by Mr. Carney include the heads of state of India, Ukraine, Brazil, South Africa, South Korea, Australia, Mexico and the UAE. Avoiding tariffs will continue to be top of mind. 'Leaders, and there are some new ones coming, will want to meet Donald Trump,' Mr. Boehm said. 'Trump doesn't like the big round table as much he likes the one-on-one.' Bilateral meetings with the American president can be fraught, as Mr. Trump has used them to try to intimidate the leaders of Ukraine and South Africa. Former Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chrétien told a panel this week that if Mr. Trump does act out, leaders should ignore him and remain calm like Carney did in his recent Oval Office meeting. 'He tends to be a bully,' Mr. Chrétien said. 'If Trump has decided to make a show to be in the news, he will do something crazy. Let him do it and keep talking normally.' Mr. Starmer had a warm Oval Office meeting with the president in February, wooing Mr. Trump with an invitation for a state visit from King Charles III. Mr. Trump has praised the British prime minister, despite their political differences. Zelenskyy expected to meet Trump Last month, Britain and the U.S. announced they had struck a trade deal that will slash American tariffs on U.K. autos, steel and aluminium. It has yet to take effect, however, though British officials say they are not concerned that the Trump administration might go back on its word. Mr. Starmer's attempts to woo Mr. Trump have left him in an awkward position with Canada, the UK's former colony, close ally and fellow Commonwealth member. Mr. Starmer has also drawn criticism — especially from Canadians — for failing to address Mr. Trump's stated desire to make Canada the 51st state. Asked if he has told Mr. Trump to stop the 51st state threats, Mr. Starmer told The Associated Press: 'I'm not going to get into the precise conversations I've had, but let me be absolutely clear: Canada is an independent, sovereign country and a much-valued member of the Commonwealth.' The war in Ukraine will be on the agenda. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is due to attend the summit and is expected to meet with Mr. Trump, a reunion coming just months after their bruising Oval Office encounter, which laid bare the risks of having a meeting with the U.S. president. Mr. Starmer met with Mr. Carney in Ottawa before the summit for talks focused on security and trade, in the first visit to Canada by a British prime minister for eight years. German officials were keen to counter the suggestion that the summit would be a 'six against one' event, noting that the G7 countries have plenty of differences of emphasis among themselves on various issues. 'The only the problem you cannot forecast is what the President of the United States will do depending on the mood, the need to be in the news," said Chrétien.
