Indian Navy will lead New Delhi's response to any future Pakistani aggression, minister says
NEW DELHI (Reuters) -India will use the firepower of its navy in response to any future aggression by Pakistan, India's defence minister said on Friday, weeks after the fiercest fighting in decades between the two nuclear-armed neighbours.
Relations between India and Pakistan are tense after four days of fighting this month, which involved fighter jets, missiles, drones and artillery before a ceasefire was announced.
"If Pakistan resorts to anything evil or unethical, it will, this time, face the firepower and ire of the Indian Navy," Defence Minister Rajnath Singh said on the aircraft carrier INS Vikrant off the coast of the western Indian state of Goa.
A spokesperson for Pakistan's military referred Reuters to a May 12 statement, which said there would be a "comprehensive and decisive" response whenever Pakistan's sovereignty was "threatened and territorial integrity violated".
The latest fighting erupted after 26 people, mostly Indian tourists, were killed in an April 22 attack in Kashmir, a disputed Himalayan territory claimed by both nations. New Delhi blamed the attack on "terrorists" backed by Pakistan, which denied the charge.
A ceasefire took effect on May 10 and a top Pakistani military official told Reuters on Friday that both countries were close to reducing their troop build-up along their border to pre-conflict levels.
The Indian Navy has said it deployed its carrier battle group, submarines and other aviation assets in the northern Arabian Sea within 96 hours of the April 22 attack.
Defence Minister Singh said 'Operation Sindoor', under which India launched the strikes on Pakistan, was paused, but not yet over.
"We stopped our military actions on our own terms. Our forces had not even started showing their might," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Epoch Times
17 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
Dutch Defense Minister Warns of Escalating Chinese Spy Operations
Dutch Defence Minister Ruben Brekelmans warned Saturday that Chinese cyber espionage targeting the Netherlands is intensifying, with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) particularly focused on stealing advanced semiconductor technology. 'The semiconductor industry, which we are technologically leading—or technology advanced, of course—to get that intellectual property, that's interesting to China,' Brekelmans told Reuters on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue security forum in Singapore on May 30.
Boston Globe
25 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
India and Pakistan's air battle is over. Their water war has begun.
India's targeting of water, however, is not just about combating terrorism, analysts say. The Indian government has been frustrated by the 65-year-old treaty, believing it has favored Pakistan from the start, and analysts say that India is hoping to force Pakistan to renegotiate it. That could allow India to better use its allotted waters to meet the needs of its immense population and adapt to climate change. Advertisement India's decision to put the agreement 'in abeyance' -- and the vague conditions it has imposed on Pakistan to reverse that -- has injected a note of uncertainty into the future of a treaty that has survived multiple wars and conflicts. A full breakdown would have serious consequences for both countries, especially Pakistan, an arid land with few other sources of water. Advertisement Rising temperatures and increased demand make South Asia's water systems among the world's most stressed. The hostile neighbors also share a need to address dangers like flash floods and glacial lake bursts unleashed by global warming. And if changes in river flows endanger Pakistani lives or employment, India could face international opprobrium. The treaty specifies how the waters of the Indus River basin -- around which one of the world's oldest civilizations, the Indus Valley civilization, flourished -- will be used by the two countries. The agreement, which became necessary after India and Pakistan became independent nations in 1947, took nine years to negotiate and was signed in 1960 in what its preamble called a 'spirit of goodwill,' and with the World Bank as a mediator. Pakistan has unrestricted use of three western rivers, and India has the same claim to three eastern rivers. India also has limited rights to the western rivers within its territory, including for irrigation, and the ability to build dams for power generation. The treaty's allotment of 80 percent of the waters in the Indus system to Pakistan was a 'remarkable act of generosity, driven by the hope of promoting subcontinental peace,' said Brahma Chellaney, a strategic analyst who has written about water and conflict. Scientists and officials say the treaty has held up because it is a sound legal document that provides for a permanent commission with representatives from each country who are expected to be in regular contact, as well as mechanisms for settling conflicts using neutral experts and arbitration. But it has been a trying process over the decades between deeply distrustful neighbors. Advertisement In 1992, when five days of heavy monsoon rains caused deadly flooding, Pakistani officials accused India of unannounced dam releases, while India maintained that the actions were necessary owing to the extreme rainfall and were in compliance with protocol. India currently has six dams on the western rivers, with plans to build more. Pakistan has raised objections to several of the dam designs and plans, including the Kishenganga hydroelectric project. Over the past decade, the treaty has encountered increasing geopolitical friction. After attacks on Indian troops in 2016 and 2019 in Indian-administered Kashmir, India announced plans to curtail water flows to Pakistan but did not follow through. The treaty can be altered by mutual consent. As India has formally sought to revise the treaty, Pakistan has rejected these efforts, according to Indian government records and experts. 'The obstructionist approach' continues to prevent the 'utilization of the legitimate rights by India,' Parvathaneni Harish, India's permanent representative to the United Nations, said at a forum last week on water and armed conflict. At the same meeting, Pakistan's deputy permanent representative, Usman Jadoon, said that India was using river waters as a political weapon, and that Islamabad would not allow New Delhi to turn water into a tool of coercion. India has little ability to substantially reduce the flow of water into Pakistan, and building the infrastructure to do so would take years, experts say. But Pakistan is unnerved by India's suspension of its participation in the treaty in part because India has stopped providing hydrological data, according to Indian government officials and experts. Because it is downstream, Pakistan relies heavily on India to share this data, which is crucial for Pakistani agriculture, a sector that accounts for nearly one-quarter of the country's economy and employs 37 percent of the labor force. Advertisement Information from India about glacier melt, the speed of floodwaters and precipitation levels, as well as timing decisions on opening sluice gates, is vital for Pakistan to determine its irrigation needs and flood management plans. Fazalullah Qureshi, a former senior Pakistani official, linked this data gap to Pakistan's inability to anticipate devastating floods in 2022, which killed over 1,700 people and affected 33 million of the country's 245 million people. During the coming monsoon season, Pakistani water managers will need to operate in a more uncertain environment, relying less on formal notifications and more on real-time observations and rapid-response systems, said Hassaan F. Khan, an assistant professor of environmental studies at Tufts University. Khan said that underscored the 'urgent need for Pakistan to invest in more nimble, adaptive water governance.' Qureshi said there was no immediate threat to the country's water supply, but a prolonged suspension of treaty mechanisms could severely affect agriculture and the broader economy. This article originally appeared in
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Suspect accused of shoving 70-year-old grandma in NYC subway station ordered held on $45K bail
A woman-hating goon with 20 busts on his rap sheet is finally behind bars after being nabbed for allegedly shoving a 70-year-old grandmother to the ground at a Midtown subway station. Sherlock Arana, a 37-year-old career criminal, was ordered held on $45,000 bail on second-degree assault charges after getting nabbed for the Monday morning alleged attack on Janet Parvizyar, an LA resident visiting the Big Apple. The victim was at the Lexington Avenue/53rd Street station around 10:30 a.m. when, police said, Arana came up to her and asked, 'What are you doing here?' The thug then shoved her into the wall, and then to the floor, she said. 'I don't understand, why did they let them go like this,' Parvizyar told The Post this week. 'I mean, they have to do something about this. He's going to kill somebody.' Bystanders came to her aid but the goon took off before they could get to him — but alert cops who recognized Arana from surveillance video and a wanted poster caught up with him Wednesday morning, sources said. According to a criminal complaint, the attack left Parvizyar with a twisted ankle and 'substantial pain' to her head and neck. She was treated at NYU Langone Medical Center and released. Manhattan prosecutors asked that Arana be held on $45,000 cash bail or a $90,000 bond, but the judge ruled for a $45,000 bond, the same amount as the cash bail. Arana has a history of assaulting women, and was sentenced to nine months in jail nearly a decade ago for attacking a woman at a Queens subway station. He was last arrested in 2023 on a robbery charge — among his nearly two dozen arrests, law enforcement sources said. 'I was walking to work and he came up behind me and punched me in the face,' the 23-year-old victim of that attack said Thursday. 'I was fighting back and he grabbed my bag and ran off.' She said the random assault left her with a split lip and a knock on her forehead. 'They're gonna keep letting him out,' the woman added. 'When it happened, they just let him go. It was a little crazy.' She said she no longer lives in Queens. According to sources, Arana has targeted women he believes to be Indian in the earlier incidents. Parvizyar, his latest victim, is Iranian. 'It's scary, really scary, when you don't expect something like this to happen to you,' she told The Post.
