Citroen e-C4 vs Volkswagen ID.3: which affordable EV is best for the family?
There's a new buzzword in the world of electric vehicles – affordability. It seems that with each new model that's launched, prices become cheaper, while those EVs that have been around for a bit longer have seen a steady fall in their prices over time.
Take the Citroen e-C4 as an example. This electric crossover hatchback has been on the market since 2020, and during its time on sale it has gone through a number of revisions to keep it competitive. Most recently, the e-C4 benefited from a facelift to incorporate Citroen's latest family look, but the French firm also took the opportunity to knock around £4,000 off its list price, too. Advertisement - Article continues below
Volkswagen is another company that has constantly tinkered with its model line-up, and the ID.3 hatchback has been updated with the arrival of a new entry-level variant. Called Essential, it does exactly what it says by offering the smallest battery and lowest power output in the range, but still has enough kit to make it an attractive option.
So which model makes the best case for itself? Does the e-C4 offer great value? Or does the ID.3 deliver enough to justify its price tag? Model: Citroen e-C4 50kWh Plus Price: £27,650 Powertrain: 50kWh battery (50kWh usable), 1x e-motor, 134bhp 0-62mph: 10.0 seconds Test efficiency: 3.6 miles/kWh Official range: 219 miles Annual VED: £195
The Citroen e-C4 uses the same platform as cars such as the Peugeot 208 and Vauxhall Corsa superminis, but its dimensions are more like a compact hatchback's. As with those models, it also comes with petrol and hybrid powertrains, but here we're concentrating on the all-electric version. Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below View 3 Series View Grandland X View Q4 e-tron
Prices start at £27,650, which is around £4,000 less than the pre-facelift model. This gets you a car with a 50kWh battery, while the top-spec Max model is the only one with the larger 54kWh pack.
Tester's notes
The e-C4's three drive modes are selected via a rocker switch next to the drive selector on the centre console, but as with other Stellantis models with this set-up, they seem a bit superfluous to me. The system defaults to Normal when you start the car, so you stick with that most of the time. Advertisement - Article continues below
Eco mode cuts the power, so it feels as if you need to work harder to maintain the same speed. Power adds a snappy throttle response that requires you to adjust your driving style to compensate. It feels at odds with the car's character.
One place where the e-C4's roots as a combustion-engined vehicle are most obvious is beneath the boot carpet. Lift it up and you'll find a circular recess for a spare wheel, but while the petrol C4 has a completely round indentation, the e-C4's is squared off to make space for the battery.
Ironically, not even the petrol version of the C4 has the option of a spare wheel – you'll just have to rely on the tyre pressure warning system and standard repair kit to keep you going if you suffer any damage. Model: Volkswagen ID.3 Essential Price: £30,860 Powertrain: 55kWh battery (52kWh usable), 1x e-motor, 168bhp 0-62mph: 8.2 seconds Test efficiency: 4.1 miles/kWh Official range: 241 miles Annual VED: £195
It's been five years since the Volkswagen ID.3 kicked off the electrification of VW's line-up, and since then it has been joined by a range of models that use largely the same running gear. Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below
The ID.3 itself was given a facelift in 2023, while the Essential model tested here has helped lower the overall starting price of the line-up. At £30,860, it falls between the 50kWh and 54kWh versions of the e-C4 on price, while the battery is rated with a usable capacity of 52kWh, which VW says is enough for a range of 241 miles. Advertisement - Article continues below
Tester's notes
I think Match trim adds enough extra to the ID.3 to justify its mark-up over the Essential version. Alloy wheels look smarter than the plastic trims on the base spec, while the reversing camera, navigation and main beam assist are all useful features to have.
Another handy addition is the two-zone climate control. All ID.3s have two bars beneath the main display that you slide your finger across to adjust the temperature. On Essential cars they keep the dash symmetry intact, because they have the same function.
Adding options involves paying for some pricey packs instead of individual items. VW's smart-looking head-up display comes with either the £1,175 Driver Assistance Pack or the Assistance Package Plus (£2,240), which also adds semi-autonomous driving tech that can change lanes. It also includes a memory function and a remote parking operation. Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below
If you want improved driving dynamics, the £955 Sports package adds Volkswagen's DCC Dynamic Chassis Control and progressive steering for sharper responses.
On the road
As with other Citroens, the e-C4 is geared towards comfort over sporty handling. Grip is good and the electric powertrain is responsive to a point, but the soft ride encourages you to take things easy and revel in the cosseting feel. The ID.3's rear-wheel-drive set-up and responsive electric motor sound like a recipe for fun, and it's certainly more engaging than the Citroen, but the ride is fidgety at lower speeds. Advertisement - Article continues below
Tech highlights
All versions of the e-C4 come with a 10-inch touchscreen. Plus and Max trims feature navigation and voice control, but all variants include wireless smartphone connectivity. The ID.3 also features this tech, while adaptive cruise control is included as standard too. Neither car comes with a heat pump as standard, but it's a more affordable extra on the Citroen at £450; it costs £1,150 to add to the VW.
Price and running
There's an overlap in prices between the highest-spec versions of the e-C4 and the entry point to the ID.3 line-up, but both models feature a similar amount of kit. The VW proved to be more efficient on test, with a return of 4.1 miles per kWh compared with 3.6mi/kWh for the Citroen. Combine this with the bigger battery, and the ID.3 can travel more than 210 miles between charges. Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below
Practicality
The Citroen looks rakish next to the upright VW, but these two cars offer a similar amount of space inside. The ID.3 has more headroom and legroom, but both cars are equally wide, and boot space is pretty much comparable between them, too. The VW's bay is longer and wider, but there's a high load floor because of the rear-mounted electric motor that takes up space beneath the boot. Advertisement - Article continues below
Charging
Volkswagen offers a faster DC charging rate than Citroen. A 10-80 per cent top-up can take as little as 25 minutes from a 145kW source, but the e-C4 maxes out at 100kW, and Citroen quotes a 20-80 per cent charge time of half an hour. If you can take advantage of 11kW three-phase charging, you'll need to pay £300 to upgrade the e-C4 to use it – it's a standard feature on the ID.3.
Ownership
Both models come with a three-year/60,000-mile warranty, while VW includes three years of roadside assistance to Citroen's one. Servicing costs are very similar between these two models, with the annual price of Citroen's £508 four-year package working out nearly the same as VW's £384 three-year deal. Citroen was fifth out of 32 in the last Driver Power brands' survey, well ahead of VW in 29th.
While the Volkswagen Golf set a benchmark in the compact hatch class, the Volkswagen ID.3 hasn't quite had the same impact in the EV sector. Updates have improved the car, though, while the latest Pure-battery variant delivers good value for money while still offering a decent range. Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below
We'd go as far to say that this model in Match trim is the sweet spot in the range. It offers all the kit you could possibly want at a price that makes higher-spec variants look expensive. The roomy cabin and decent driving manners help it to slot easily into family life. Advertisement - Article continues below
Latest Volkswagen ID.3 deals
Picking between these two cars is difficult because they both have key strengths. There's lots to like about the Citroen e-C4, especially its comfortable ride and plush seats, while the reduced list prices make it even more tempting.
As a family car, the C4 ticks the right boxes for space and practicality, while the choice of petrol, hybrid or EV powertrains means there should be a model for most buyers. As an EV, it's a refined machine, but the range and slow charging capability mean it's a little behind the curve when compared with the ID.3.
Latest Citroen e-C4 deals Citroen e-C4 Volkswagen ID.3 Our choice e-C4 50kWh Plus ID.3 Pure Essential Price from/price of our choice £27,650/£29,310 £30,860/£33,135 Powertrain and performance Powertrain 1x electric motor 1x electric motor Power 134bhp 168bhp Torque 260Nm 310Nm Transmission Single-speed auto/FWD Single-speed auto/RWD 0-62mph/top speed 10.0 seconds/93mph 8.2 seconds/99mph Battery capacity/usable 50/50kWh 55/52kWh Official range 219 miles 241 miles Test efficiency/range 3.6mi/kWh/180 miles 4.1mi/kWh/213 miles Charging 100kW (20-80% in 30 mins) 145kW (10-80% in 25 mins) Dimensions Length/wheelbase 4,355/2,670mm 4,264/2,770mm Width/height 1,800/1,520mm 1,809/1,564mm Rear kneeroom 585-830mm 637-869mm Rear headroom/elbow room 910/1,445mm 956/1,444mm Boot space (front/seats up/down) 380/1,250 litres 385/1,267 litres Boot length/width 800/1,005mm 852/1,013mm Boot lip height 725mm 774mm Kerbweight/towing weight 1,571/454kg 1,712/548kg Turning circle 10.9 metres 11.5 metres Costs/ownership Residual value (after 3yrs/36,000 miles) £9,899/35.8% £15,708/50.9% Depreciation £17,751 £15,152 Insurance group/quote/VED 22/£757/£195 20/£601/£195 Three-year service cost £508 (4yrs) £384 Annual tax liability std/higher rate £166/£331 £185/£370 Annual fuel cost (12,000 miles) £832 £732 Basic warranty (miles)/recovery 3yrs (60,000)/1yr 3yrs (60,000)/3yrs Driver Power manufacturer position 5th 29th NCAP Adult/child/ped./assist/stars 80/83/57/63/4(2021) 87/89/71/88/5(2020) Equipment Metallic paint/wheel size £595-£720/18 inches £810-£965/18 inches Parking sensors/camera Rear/yes Front & rear/no Spare wheel/Isofix points Repair kit/two Repair kit/three Keyless entry & go/powered tailgate No/no Yes/no Leather/heated seats No/no/£450 No/no/£1,150 Screen size/digital dashboard 10.0 inches/yes 12.9 inches/yes Climate control/panoramic sunroof Two-zone/no Two-zone/£795 USBs/wireless charging Three/no/£400 Four/no/yes Wireless CarPlay/Android Auto Yes/yes Yes/yes Blind-spot warning/head-up display No/yes No/no Adaptive cruise/steering assist No/yes Yes/yes
Citroen
Most extras are reserved for the top-spec Max model. This includes the Techno Pack, which adds 360-degree cameras, adaptive cruise control and a wireless phone charger for £500. A sunroof costs £790 on Max trim.
Volkswagen
As well as having more kit, the ID.3 has more options, too. Alloys (£1,310) can replace the standard wheel trims, there are trick LED lights (£1,725) and a tow hitch (£1,105), but this is just for mounting a cycle carrier.
Looking for your next car? You can now search our nationwide dealer network for a choice of great cars on offer right now with new, used and leasing deals to choose from... New BYD Dolphin Surf Comfort review: the best BYD yet
New BYD Dolphin Surf Comfort review: the best BYD yet
The new BYD Dolphin Surf Comfort is arguably the Chinese brand's most convincing model in its range Best cars to own: Driver Power 2025 results
Best cars to own: Driver Power 2025 results
The best new cars to own in the UK right now according to the people who already do. It's the 2025 Driver Power results! New entry-level Renault Symbioz is £3k cheaper than a Nissan Qashqai
New entry-level Renault Symbioz is £3k cheaper than a Nissan Qashqai
The Renault Captur has also been fitted the new full-hybrid powertrain, which gets a bigger battery for more pure-electric driving
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
an hour ago
- Times
The state spends £24,000 a year for every adult. Something's got to give
It's amazing how things change. Just a few months ago Rachel Reeves told us the financial situation was so grim she had no choice but to take the winter fuel payment from all but the poorest pensioners. And now, thanks to Labour, it's all going so well she can afford to give it back. That was, of course, a lie. But it wasn't the big lie. No, the big lie was that the spending review bore any relation to what we will actually spend. The traditional recipe for political success is simple: scrimp, then splurge. Get the pain out of the way after the election, so you can splash out before the next one. • Jobs market is flashing a warning sign to Rachel Reeves That's not the approach Reeves took. She wanted to show she was ending austerity (such as it was). But the finances were desperately tight. Her solution, apart from raising taxes, was to frontload her spending increases and hope something turned up. The result is a spending profile that resembles a child playing a violin: sharp, then flat. Between 2025-26 and 2028-29, day-to-day departmental spending is to rise from £518 billion to £568 billion. Factoring in inflation, that means budgets in the last two years of the parliament will grow by just 1 per cent a year — and far less for most departments, since the overall figure includes 3 per cent a year for the NHS (which is getting more than half of all the extra cash). Will Labour really go into the election amid more 'Tory austerity'? Well, no. It'll want to spend more. Or need to: Reeves's ferociously tight numbers leave no room for downturns, pay strikes, trade wars or shooting wars. Her plans also depend on £14 billion in hazily detailed 'efficiency savings'. And the hoped-for bailout via a mid-term growth bonanza is less likely than ever. But here's the paradox. From the perspective of the Labour Party, most of those working in public services and her own electoral prospects, Reeves isn't spending nearly enough. But from another perspective, the chancellor is spending far, far too much. Public spending is running at 44 per cent of GDP, a historic high. Taxes, too, are historically high, and universally expected to go higher. Not only have we been spending like crazy, not least because of the pandemic, but we've been spending money we don't have — resulting in an annual bill of more than £100 billion just to cover the interest on our debts. These numbers can be hard to put into context. So our team at the Centre for Policy Studies think tank has come up with a different way of looking at it. We estimate that we are now spending £23,757 for every adult in this country: roughly two thirds of the average full-time salary of £37,500. That includes £3,807 on health, £5,817 on welfare and pensions and a shocking £1,955 for that debt bill. Restrict the calculation to those of working age, and spending is north of £30,000 a head. Factor in economic inactivity, and the state is almost certainly spending more than every worker aged 18 to 65 is earning. This is very obviously not sustainable. So how to square the circle? Given the position we're in, shaving departmental budgets just won't cut it, especially when the chancellor claims to have already ruthlessly reviewed every pound they spend (yet somehow set them all the same target for efficiency savings). We need to accept instead that government cannot actually do all the things it tries to. But we already know how hard that will be. If ministers are going to U-turn on the winter fuel payment and wobble on a set of welfare reforms that barely slow, let alone halt, the rise in disability and incapacity spending, how can they possibly tackle issues like the triple lock, social care or special educational needs and disability (Send) costs for councils? That's before even mentioning the NHS. So here are a couple of heretical thoughts. The first is that rather than guaranteeing the level of any individual benefit, we should think in terms of total spend. Let's say we decide that we can only afford to devote 1.5 per cent of GDP to a particular benefit. If more people claim, the totals go down. If people want more cash, they either have to dob in the fraudsters or accept the kinds of policy likely to swell GDP. A gentler version would be to keep benefits from falling, but ensure that they increase only when we can actually afford it. Revolutionary, I know. The second idea is more fundamental: to accept that government cannot actually move the economic needle. If you were listening to the spending review, you would have heard pledge after pledge: billions spent on this, billions on that. But that is not how you get the economy growing. You do that by creating the conditions for individuals and businesses to boost it for you. This may sound like Thatcherite dogma. But it's simple maths. Investment in the UK is roughly 18 per cent of GDP. But the state is responsible for perhaps a sixth of that. Hence Reeves's talk of 'co-investment': using small amounts of state funding to leverage much larger private sums. Or let's look at affordable housing, one of the few areas that did get some cash at the spending review. The government is promising an extra £39 billion over ten years. That's useful. But housebuilders knocked up £46 billion in private sector housing in just the past year — a pretty slow year, at point is that even small increases, or falls, in private sector activity have a far larger impact on the economy, and balance sheet, than the endless initiatives that pour forth from government. Which is precisely why Reeves's jobs tax was so damaging. Generating those increases, or falls, often isn't about money, but common sense. On housebuilding, for example, our system is based on local plans set out by councils. But loads of councils don't have plans in place. And Labour has embarked on a massive local government reorganisation that will delay their publication still further, dooming any hope of hitting its housing targets. It may be anathema to many on the Labour benches, but if the government is to have any hope of avoiding tax rises not just this autumn but for years to come, it needs to do what it finds hardest: clear the obstacles and let the private sector get on with it. The temptation, instead, will be to hammer work, wealth and business one more time. Which will of course make the task facing the chancellor even harder.
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
PSG inspired by Los Angeles as it sets out to build new stadium
LOS ANGELES, June 14 (Reuters) - Paris St Germain is drawing inspiration from the success of new state-of-the-art venues in Los Angeles as the Champions League title winners begin the process of building a new stadium for the team, CEO Victoriano Melero said. PSG has outgrown the 48,000-capacity Parc des Princes, and team officials will spend a year studying potential sites in Massy and Poissy with an eye toward offering a variety of entertainment options, Melero said. "The next challenge is a new stadium," Melero told Reuters in Los Angeles ahead of PSG's Club World Cup match on Sunday in Pasadena. "For one year we're going to go into an analysis and make a choice for our future, and we're inspired by what is going on in the U.S. with sports facilities," he said. "One example here is SoFi Stadium. It's incredible and much more than a sports facility - it really is part of entertainment and shows. So that is what we really want to push to diversify our revenue." SoFi Stadium, a technological marvel that opened in 2020, is home to the NFL's Rams and Chargers and has hosted concerts by artists like Taylor Swift and Beyonce. It will play a key role in next summer's World Cup and the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics. The $5 billion stadium is located in Hollywood Park, a growing commercial and residential area. The 70,000-capacity indoor-outdoor stadium sits next to Intuit Dome, the high-tech NBA arena that opened last year. PSG is looking at Massy, south of Paris, and Poissy, west of the French capital, as potential sites for a new stadium. The team will play Parc des Princes for the foreseeable future while the new stadium is built. U.S. fans and investors have played a vital role in the stunning success of the club both on and off the field, said Adrien Frier, the French consul-general in Los Angeles. "Paris St Germain is what you would call in the tech sector a unicorn, and it's a unicorn that has some American blood in it," he said at a reception honoring the team in Beverly Hills, where the Champions League trophy was on display. PSG has an estimated five million fans in the U.S. and has benefited from its high-profile partnership with Nike's iconic Air Jordan brand. U.S.-based Arctos Partners holds 12.5% of the shares of the team, with majority owner Qatar Sports Investments owning the remaining 87.5% for a club that is valued at $4.4 billion. Melero said the team's ambitions are only growing. "We wrote the story of the club with that cup," he said, gesturing toward the gleaming trophy. "And right now the next move is to write the story of football with this very young team."
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Rachel's gone on a £4TRILLION spending spree... so here's how to make sure it gives your investments a turbo boost: These are some of the firms that will win big - and how to invest in them
After the blowout comes the debt hangover – and economic experts expect us all to end up with sore heads and wallets after Rachel Reeve's Spending Review last week. But while we wait to see which of our taxes she'll raise in the autumn Budget to pay for it all, we can help ourselves by investing in some of the companies that will reap the benefits from her largesse.
