
This interactive map shows you what your NYC block looked like 400 years ago
At the New York Botanical Garden, a team of scientists just published an interactive map that explores what all five boroughs of New York City looked like 400 years ago—and you can search for your own block.
The map, called ' The Welikia Project,' was made by the NYBG's Urban Conservation team. It takes the city block by block, uncovering the history of flora, fauna, and Indigenous people that once lived in each area before it became an urban enivronment. The name 'welikia' is borrowed from the Lenape people, who lived in what's now New York City for 8,000 to 10,000 years before European settlers; it means 'my good home.'
Viewers can use the tool to look at almost any area in the five boroughs—including Grand Central, Yankee Stadium, and individual streets—to see what kinds of trees might have grown there, whether the area was host to any particular species of animals, and how Indigenous people may have used the land's resources.
The project was spearheaded by Eric Sanderson, a historical ecologist and vice president of urban conservation strategy at NYBG who has studied New York's ecology for over two decades. Sanderson says the map has a range of uses, from helping New Yorkers feel more connected to their city to offering new insights to city planners and urban flood prevention experts.
A decades-long project
Sanderson has been studying the historical ecology of NYC since the early aughts, after moving to the city in 1998 to work at the Wildlife Conservation Society. His years-long deep dive began while browsing through used books at The Strand: He came across a book full of historical maps of New York City. One particular map—the British headquarters during the American Revolution—showed Manhattan when it was a fledgling city at the very southern tip of the island.
'The rest of the map was hills, streams, wetlands, and beaches—not what we normally think of when we think of New York City,' Sanderson says. 'So I geo-referenced that map, and I started to think about how the streams and the wetlands and the beaches related to the modern geography of the city today.'
That initial spark of curiosity ultimately became the 2009 bestselling book Mannahatta: A Natural History of New York City, which reconstructed the flora and fauna that once made up Manhattan. The book went on to become an exhibition at the Museum of the City of New York, a National Geographic cover, and a TED Talk.
'After that, I was kind of looking to go back to my conservation work,' Sanderson says. 'And yet, people kept asking me, 'Aren't you going to do Brooklyn?' or, 'Don't you live in the Bronx?' or, 'Have you ever been to Staten Island?' So I started pulling together pieces of information, doing more reading, and looking at historical maps. Eventually that led to [The Welikia Project].'
The Welikia Project
Currently, Sanderson is working on another book called The Welikia Atlas and Gazetteer: A Guide to New York City's Indigenous Landscape, slated for release in 2026, that maps the historical ecology of all five NYC boroughs. In the meantime, he and his team at NYBG have spent the past year and a half assembling the Welikia Project website, which compiles all of Sanderson's new research into an easy-to-parse interactive map.
Sourcing the historical map data to build a recreation of early NYC presented a host of challenges. Whereas Sanderson had the British headquarters map as a touchstone for his Mannahatta work, he says this larger project was much more piecemeal.
'When we moved to the scope of the whole city, there was no one map that was very early and showed me all [the things I was looking for],' Sanderson says. 'We spent a large part of the project just going to map archives, like the Library of Congress, the New York Public Library, and the British Library in England, as well as many others.'
In all, Sanderson's team georeferenced more than 600 maps from the late 18th century to the late 19th century, analyzing hundreds of puzzle pieces to assemble an overarching view of the city pre-urbanization. Using this influx of data, they then built a digital map by layers, creating one layer illustrating all of the streams, another for the topography, another for the marshes, and so on until the bigger picture began to take shape.
Another branch of the project entailed sifting through biological data, as well as plant and animal surveys, to understand the flora and fauna that would have inhabited the region 400 years ago. Then, Sanderson's team used a kind of prediction tool called a Muir web to take both the topographical data and the biological data and produce an estimate of what the habitat most likely looked like on every NYC block.
According to the map, Grand Central Station was once home to white wood aster plants and green frogs; Staten Island Mall hosted redback salamanders; and Yankee Stadium was a low salt marsh community inhabited by eastern gray squirrels and passenger pigeons.
Future applications
Sanderson says the Welikia Project could be used for a number of practical applications, from helping landscape architects understand the native environment to giving urban planners a better sense of the city's makeup. Currently, he's working on a follow-up study to assist in urban flood planning.
According to a recent study from the Regional Plan Association, as many as 82,000 housing units in and around NYC could be lost due to flooding by 2040, and that could double to 160,000 by 2070. Sanderson plans to map all of the places that were historically aquatic ecosystems—like streams, wetlands, and beaches—in order to produce more accurate predictions of future flood patterns.
For the everyday New Yorker, Sanderson hopes that The Welikia Project provides a chance to better understand the landscape that serves as their home.
'What I really want people to do is to zoom into their block where they live, and to see that it was a forest or a wetland, and to think about what that means for them,' Sanderson says. 'For some people, I think that's a testimony to how much the world has changed over the last 400 years. One of my colleagues said, 'Somewhere between Mannahatta and Manhattan is the story of every place on Earth.' In some ways, that is the case.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
No Corrections: June 7, 2025
Errors are corrected during the press run whenever possible, so some errors noted here may not have appeared in all editions. To contact the newsroom regarding correction requests, please email nytnews@ To share feedback, please visit Comments on opinion articles may be emailed to letters@ For newspaper delivery questions: 1-800-NYTIMES (1-800-698-4637) or email customercare@


Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Asking Eric: Grandparents want to keep in touch with estranged granddaughter
Dear Eric: My husband and I have been estranged from our 17-year-old granddaughter for eight years. We were loving, supportive grandparents but after the mother of our granddaughter broke up with our son, the father, she stopped our granddaughter from seeing us as well. For eight years, I have tried to keep contact with our granddaughter with gifts and cards on her birthday, Christmas and other times. I do not receive a response of any kind from her. We believe her mother forbids her from contacting us. My question is should I continue to send cards and gifts to her? I'm ready to stop. I don't want her to forget us but I'm very tired of attempting to reach out to her with no response. — Estranged Gramma Gramma: Eight years is a long time to go with no response. I'm sorry; I know that's hard. If you're ready to stop — or modify this practice — I think it's OK to do so. Sending cards and gifts hasn't had the desired effect thus far and if it's just contributing to your grief and sense of loss, it might be best to take a pause. Consider, however, that your granddaughter is about to be a legal adult and therefore will be able to make different choices about who gets to contact her. And also consider that the gifts may have had a positive impact on her, even if they didn't result in a closer relationship with you. There are a lot of unknowns. As such, don't feel obligated to keep up a tradition that's wearing you down. You might, for instance, take a few years off, and then reach out with a letter asking if she's open to reconnecting. You'll have to respect whatever she chooses, but there are other paths forward. They'll just take a little more time. Dear Eric: I have been dating my girlfriend for one and a half years now, and we have a really strong relationship. I care about her a lot, and our relationship means a lot to me. However, recently our relationship has been missing the spark it used to have, and it just isn't as exciting anymore (although I still very much enjoy spending time with my partner and our relationship is fine). Additionally, I have started finding someone at work attractive and have found myself looking at them a lot and trying to be around them often. I have already told my partner that I find this person attractive, but I said it didn't amount to much (sort of like thinking a movie star is attractive) and so my partner was not too upset. However, I feel very guilty about my feelings of attraction and am worried that it could be a sign my girlfriend may not actually be right for me. I'm hesitant to just break up with my current partner and begin talking to the person I'm attracted to as I feel it would hurt her greatly and I also don't want to lose such a good relationship. Furthermore, I haven't spent much time with this co-worker whom I'm attracted to, and don't wish to spend any time with them as it feels like cheating. So, I don't know much about their personality, and they could end up being someone that I actually dislike. Is it a bad idea to throw away a perfectly good relationship just for a 'crush?' Is it immoral to have these feelings and stay with my partner? Are these feelings a sign that maybe our relationship isn't meant to be? — Confused Lover Confused: Bad idea? Yes. Immoral? No. A sign? Reply hazy, ask again. Your relationship with your girlfriend is changing, as is natural. Things won't always have the sizzle and spark of your early attraction. That can be jarring, but it's often an opportunity for you both to reinvest in the relationship, to make some adjustments, and to light new sparks. Relationships aren't ever static. Try to communicate openly about what you miss, what you're hoping for, and ways — big and small — that you can keep building the relationship. I don't know what the inside of this crush looks like. But I know that it's often easier to look at something that's new and mostly unknown and start to construct an idealized narrative. It's easier to imagine that everything will be perfect with some other person — without even really knowing that person — than to accept that 'perfect' with the person we do know takes work. Most of the time, a crush is just a crush. If you want to get to know your co-worker outside of the office and see if reality matches your imagination, that's fine (presuming she also wants to get to know you). But I think your first step should be spending some time working on your relationship with your partner. (Send questions to R. Eric Thomas at eric@ or P.O. Box 22474, Philadelphia, PA 19110. Follow him on Instagram and sign up for his weekly newsletter at 2025 Tribune Content Agency, LLC.


Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Miss Manners: Guest keeps toilet seat lid up after flushing
Dear Miss Manners: We have become friends with another couple over the past two years, and we frequently invite them for dinner. Lately, I've noticed that the husband leaves the toilet seat up after using the bathroom. Both my husband and I have a habit of closing the lid before flushing. Is there a way I can politely bring this up with our guest?