More U.S. nationals wrongfully detained in Venezuela than anywhere else: State Department
The State Department on Tuesday warned citizens against any travel to Venezuela, where it says more U.S. nationals are currently wrongfully detained than in any other country.
The big picture: The department has ramped up its warnings to Americans not to travel to the South American country, urging citizens earlier this month to prepare a will if they plan to travel there.
Driving the news: The department has assigned its highest travel advisory level — do not travel — for Venezuela, citing in its Tuesday media release the "severe risks" of wrongful detention, torture while in custody, kidnapping and other threats.
U.S. embassies in Colombia, Brazil and other South American countries issued security warnings Tuesday.
U.S. citizens are at "extreme risk of detention" when entering Venezuela and could be "unjustly charged" with serious crimes, like terrorism, and detained for a long period of time, the warnings said.
"There is no safe way for Americans to travel to Venezuela," the security alerts stressed.
The State Department did not respond to Axios' request for comment.
What they're saying:"Dual citizenship, a Venezuelan visa, past travel to Venezuela, or a job in Venezuela does not protect U.S. national travelers," the State Department's alert read. "Every American is at risk of being detained by [Venezuelan President Nicolás]Maduro's regime."
It further urged any U.S. citizens currently in Venezuela to leave immediately.
There is currently no U.S. embassy or consulate operating in Venezuela.
The State Department has warned against traveling to Venezuela for years and announced the temporary suspension of operations of the U.S. Embassy in Caracas and the withdrawal of diplomatic personnel in March 2019.
Catch up quick: Several American citizens have been detained in Venezuela, including two people who Maduro said in January, ahead of his inauguration following a disputed election, were part of a group of "mercenaries."
In September, Venezuela said three U.S. citizens had been arrested alongside three others over an alleged U.S.-sponsored plot to kill Maduro. The State Department rejected allegations of CIA involvement.
Six American prisoners came home from Venezuela earlier this year after Richard Grenell, a special envoy, met with Maduro. Another American, a U.S. Air Force veteran, was also released this month.
Zoom out: Tens of thousands of Venezuelan migrants have fled to the U.S. amid years of political and economic turmoil.
But the Supreme Court last week cleared the path for the Trump administration to strip temporary deportation protections from more than 300,000 Venezuelans.
The administration has zeroed in on Maduro's regime, seeking to tie him to criminal gang activity as it invokes wartime authority to deport undocumented people with little or no due process.
But a recent intelligence memo first shared with the New York Times found that the regime is likely not directing criminal gang Tren de Aragua's movements to and operations within the U.S.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
27 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trump administration considers adding 36 countries to travel ban list
The United States is considering restricting entry to citizens of an additional 36 countries, in what would be a significant expansion of the travel ban announced by the Trump administration early this month, according to a State Department memo reviewed by The Washington Post. Among the new list of countries that could face visa bans or other restrictions are 25 African nations, including significant U.S. partners such as Egypt and Djibouti, plus countries in the Caribbean, Central Asia and several Pacific Island nations. A State Department spokesperson said the agency would not comment on internal deliberations or communications. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Such a move would mark another escalation in the Trump administration's aggressive crackdown on immigration. The memo, which was signed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and sent to U.S. diplomats who work with the countries on Saturday, said the governments of listed nations were being given 60 days to meet new benchmarks and requirements established by the State Department. It set a deadline of 8 a.m. Wednesday for them to provide an initial action plan for meeting the requirements. The memo identified varied benchmarks that, in the administration's estimation, these countries were failing to meet. Some countries had 'no competent or cooperative central government authority to produce reliable identity documents or other civil documents,' or they suffered from 'widespread government fraud.' Others had large numbers of citizens who overstayed their visas in the United States, the memo said. Other reasons included the availability of citizenship by monetary investment without a requirement of residency and claims of 'antisemitic and anti-American activity in the United States' by people from those countries. The memo also stated that if a country was willing to accept third-country nationals who were removed from the United States or enter a 'safe third country' agreement it could mitigate other concerns. It was not immediately clear when the proposed travel restrictions would go into enforcement if the demands were not met. The countries facing scrutiny in the memo are listed as: Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Benin, Bhutan, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde, Cambodia, Cameroon, Côte d'Ivoire, Democratic Republic of Congo, Djibouti, Dominica, Ethiopia, Egypt, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Kyrgyzstan, Liberia, Malawi, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, South Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, Tonga, Tuvalu, Uganda, Vanuatu, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. The list represents a significant expansion of a presidential proclamation issued June 4, when the United States fully restricted the entry of individuals from Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The United States had also partially restricted the entry of travelers from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela under that order. Democrats and other critics of the Trump administration have described its efforts to issue blanket travel bans on selected nations as xenophobic and bigoted, pointing to President Donald Trump's efforts to block travel from Muslim-majority nations in his first term and the high number of African and Caribbean nations targeted during this term. Early in his first term, Trump attempted to restrict travel from Iran, Iraq, Syria, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen and Libya. The initial version of the ban caused confusion and chaos at airports. It faced numerous legal challenges until the Supreme Court upheld the third version of it in June 2018. While the travel ban was rescinded under the Biden administration, Trump repeatedly pledged to reinstall it on the campaign trail, stating it would be 'bigger than before.' On Inauguration Day, the White House issued an executive order calling on U.S. agencies, including the State Department, to look for 'countries throughout the world for which vetting and screening information is so deficient as to warrant a partial or full suspension on the admission of nationals from those countries.' Hannah Natanson contributed to this report.
Buzz Feed
31 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Trump Press Secretary's "Stupid" Comment, Viral Outrage
Ahead of President Donald Trump's US military parade, a press conference was held to address his views on protests, and things got heated. To celebrate the army's 250th anniversary, a huge military parade is expected to be held today in Washington, DC, and is set to include thousands of soldiers marching the streets, tanks, warplanes, army parachutists, and more. Today is also Trump's 79th birthday. "Critics have compared the expensive parade (which reportedly costs a whopping $40 million) to the ones held in Russia and North Korea. To counteract the massive demonstration, his policies, and the recent ICE raids/deportations, protests, known as the No Kings Protests, continue to take place around the country, with some even scheduled to happen today. On Tuesday, Trump spoke out on the country-wide demonstrations and warned that anyone protesting during the anniversary parade will be met with "very heavy force." So, when White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt held a daily briefing the following day, it was expected that reporters would have some follow-up questions about his remarks on protests against immigration raids in Los Angeles, which escalated after Trump authorized military forces to protect federal property against the wishes of city and state officials. One interaction in particular has generated a lot of attention online, ultimately going viral for the "aggressive" response Karoline gave NOTUS White House correspondent Jasmine Wright. "The president warned that any protests on Saturday would be met with force," Jasmine began. "Can you clarify what kind of protest President Trump does support or find acceptable?" "The president absolutely supports peaceful protests," Karoline responded. "He supports the First Amendment. He supports the rights of Americans to make their voices heard. He does not support violence of any kind." The First Amendment protects the freedom of religion, speech, press, peaceful assembly, and the right to petition the government for redress of grievances. "He does not support violence of any kind. He does not support assaulting law enforcement officers, who are simply trying to do their job. It's very clear for the president what he supports and what he does not. Unfortunately, for Democrats, that line has not been made clear, and they've allowed this unrest and this violence to continue, and the president has had to step in." To get some clarification from Karoline, Jasmine asked, "So, if there were peaceful protests on Saturday for the military parade, President Trump would allow that?" To which Karoline responded, "Of course, the president supports peaceful protest. What a stupid question." Jasmine's facial expression said it all, because how rude! The comment was so uncalled for. Not only did Karoline not answer the question, but she threw all professionalism out the window while conversing with Jasmine. Many people online were disgusted by it all: The responses continued to highlight her behavior: Unfortunately, this seems to be a pattern for Karoline. Other correspondents have dealt with similar experiences. You can watch here and here. The parade is set to take place later today at 6:30 p.m. ET in D.C., so only time will tell what will happen with today's protests. What are your thoughts on all of this? Let me know in the comments.
Axios
36 minutes ago
- Axios
Minnesota shootings set off five-alarm fire in Congress
Members of Congress went into this weekend with their nerves already severely frayed. The shooting of two lawmakers in Minnesota on Saturday has sent those tensions over the edge. Why it matters: In discussions with Axios on Saturday, lawmakers in both parties described growing unease on Capitol Hill about the country's increasingly volatile political atmosphere — and what it means for their security. One senior House Democrat, speaking on the condition of anonymity to describe sensitive internal discussions, said text chains between members were "on fire" Saturday morning after the news of the shootings broke. Lawmakers "are scared," the senior Democrat said, and want "addresses hidden and security updates. They won't be silenced." A House Republican told Axios they responded to the news by immediately raising the issue of members' security with House leadership. What happened: Minnesota state House Leader Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark were shot and killed in their home in what President Trump and Attorney General Pam Bondi described as a "targeted" attack, Axios' Torey Van Oot, Nick Halter and Kyle Stokes reported. State Sen. John Hoffman and his wife Yvette were also shot in their home overnight. The suspect in the shootings was dressed as a police officer and left behind a manifesto naming many lawmakers, law enforcement said. Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz said the shootings appeared to be a "politically motivated assassination." What they're saying: House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) said he asked the House sergeant-at-arms and Capitol Police to "ensure the safety of our Minnesota delegation and Members of Congress across the country." "Our country is on edge like never before," he said in a statement. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said in a post on X: "Such horrific political violence has no place in our society, and every leader must unequivocally condemn it." A Capitol Police spokesperson told Axios they are "aware of the violence targeting state lawmakers in Minnesota" and "have been working with our federal, state and local partners," but declined to offer further details. What we're hearing: "People are definitely at a heightened attention," a second House Democrat told Axios of their colleagues' states of mind following the shooting. A second House Republican who spoke to Axios said it is "important to wait and not jump to conclusions" until there is more information on the shooter's motive. However, they added, "if it ends up being politically motivated, [in my opinion] ALL Republicans need to come out swinging against political violence." Between the lines: The shootings come just days after Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) was held on the ground and handcuffed after attempting to confront Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem during a press conference in Los Angeles. The incident sent shockwaves through Congress, with one House Democrat even berating a Republican colleague on the floor to "grow a pair of balls" and urge their colleagues denounce the incident. Padilla brief detention came on the heels of Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) being indicted over a scuffle with DHS officers and an aide to Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) being briefly handcuffed. Zoom out: While tensions have risen in recent months, members of Congress are no strangers to violence or threats of violence.
