Amal Clooney could face US entry ban under Donald Trump's sanctions. Is George Clooney's wife in trouble?
Agencies Amal Clooney and other top UK lawyers may face U.S. sanctions under President Trump's executive order for advising the ICC in a war crimes case against Israeli leaders. If enforced, sanctions could bar Clooney—renowned human rights barrister and wife of George Clooney—from entering the U.S., raising global concerns over legal freedom and international professional retaliation.
Amal Clooney, the globally renowned human rights lawyer and wife of Hollywood actor George Clooney, may soon face an unprecedented diplomatic backlash: a ban from entering the United States. This looming threat comes in the wake of reports that former—and now re-elected—U.S. President Donald Trump may extend sanctions to several U.K.-based barristers for their legal roles in advising the International Criminal Court (ICC) in its war crimes case against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant. The news, first reported by the Financial Times , has sent ripples through the international legal community. According to the report, the U.K. Foreign Office has discreetly warned a group of prominent British lawyers, Clooney among them, that they could be sanctioned under Trump's Executive Order 14203, signed in February 2025. The order targets individuals associated with what the administration has branded as the ICC's 'baseless' investigation into Israel's actions in Gaza—an investigation that has drawn sharp condemnation from Tel Aviv and Washington alike.
For Amal Clooney, a British citizen born in Beirut and raised in the U.K., the implications are deeply personal and professional. Besides her deep legal ties to international courts, she also maintains a residence in the United States with her husband and their two children. She is admitted to the New York bar and has taught as an adjunct professor at Columbia Law School. But if sanctioned, she could be denied U.S. entry, her assets potentially frozen, and her ability to work or even travel to the country severely curtailed.
The targeting of lawyers—merely for offering legal counsel—raises serious concerns about the erosion of legal neutrality. International criminal lawyer Alexandro Maria Tirelli told PEOPLE that the Trump administration could invoke sweeping laws such as the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and the Immigration and Nationality Act to enforce sanctions, even without criminal proceedings or judicial oversight. An executive order, he emphasized, is immune to appeal and difficult to reverse without prolonged litigation.
— musthafaaa (@musthafaaa)
Clooney is no stranger to legal controversies or high-stakes cases. Her impressive portfolio includes representing former Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, and Nobel Peace Prize winner Maria Ressa. She has stood before the International Court of Justice, prosecuted members of Hezbollah at the Special Tribunal for Lebanon, and spearheaded landmark genocide and war crimes cases against members of the Islamic State. Her clients include victims of the Yazidi genocide, the Rohingya massacre, and the Darfur conflict.
In December 2023, she filed a civil lawsuit against French multinational Lafarge on behalf of over 800 Yazidi-Americans for allegedly aiding ISIS. Her tireless advocacy has earned her global acclaim, culminating in a Legal 500 'Lawyer of the Year' award in 2024. Yet now, it is Clooney who finds herself in the legal crosshairs—not for wrongdoing, but for upholding the very tenets of international justice.
— endrapeinwar (@endrapeinwar)
If enacted, these sanctions would mark a dangerous precedent: penalizing lawyers for fulfilling their professional obligations. Critics argue such a move starkly violates the 1990 United Nations Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers, which guarantee the freedom of legal practitioners to operate without intimidation or political interference.
'No lawyer should be punished for standing up for human rights,' a senior barrister told The Guardian anonymously. 'This is not just about Amal Clooney. It's about every lawyer who believes in the rule of law.'
Even within the U.S., legal bodies are alarmed. When Trump threatened similar sanctions in March 2025 against American lawyers and judges critical of his administration, the American Bar Association swiftly condemned the move. 'We reject efforts to undermine the courts and the profession,' the ABA declared, defending the sanctity of legal independence.
At its core, this episode reflects a larger confrontation between global justice mechanisms and rising nationalist politics. The ICC's warrants against Netanyahu and Gallant follow accusations of disproportionate military aggression in Gaza after Hamas's October 2023 assault on southern Israel. Trump, a staunch ally of Israel, claims the ICC overstepped its jurisdiction—though Palestine, unlike the U.S. or Israel, is a party to the Rome Statute. Clooney's possible sanctioning is not merely a personal dilemma or political maneuver—it is a test of the world's commitment to justice without borders. If legal professionals like her can be barred from doing their jobs for defending human rights, then who will stand for the voiceless when the powerful come knocking? As the world watches, the message is clear: this is more than a legal drama—it's a fight for the future of international law. Will the scales of justice tip under political pressure, or will voices like Amal Clooney's continue to rise against the tide?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Enough is enough': Former Israel PM Ehud Olmert blames Netanyahu for Gaza war; urges Trump to intervene
Former Israel prime minister Ehud Olmert (left) and current PM Benjamin Netanyahu (Image credit: AP) Ehud Olmert, former prime minister of Israel, has blamed the current PM, Benjamin Netanyahu , for failing to prevent the October 7, 2023 attacks by the Palestinian militant group Hamas, which triggered a deadly war in the middle east. In an interview with AFP, Olmert said that US President Donald Trump must intervene in the current situation and tell Netanyahu, 'enough is enough.' He asserted that the United States has more influence on the Israeli government 'than all the other powers put together,' and that Trump could 'make a difference.' 'This is it. I hope he (Trump) will do it. There is nothing that cannot happen with Trump. I don't know if this will happen. We have to hope, and we have to encourage him,' the former prime minister added. The US has remained a key ally of Israel. It has approved billions of dollars for selling weapons and military equipment to Israel, often using its veto power in the UN to shield Israel from international pressure. Olmert served as prime minister of Israel from 2006 to 2009. He also suggested that Israel should denounce the continuation of the war in Gaza as a "crime" and insisted that a two-state solution is the only way to end the conflict. He added that while the international community initially accepted Israel's argument of responding to the October 7 attacks as an act of self-defense, this perception shifted when Netanyahu, instead of ending the war in March, chose to intensify military actions in Gaza. Netanyahu "has his personal interests, which are prioritized over what may be the national interests," Olmert charged. "If there is a war that is not going to save hostages, that cannot really do more than what has already been done against Hamas—and if, as a result, soldiers are getting killed, hostages may be killed, and innocent Palestinians are being killed—then, to my mind, this is a crime," Olmert said. "And this is something that should be condemned and not accepted," he added. The Hamas attack on Israel resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures. The Palestinian militants abducted 251 hostages, 54 of whom remain in Gaza, including 32 the Israeli military says are dead. Future plan to end decades-old middle east conflict: Olmert, along with former Palestinian foreign minister Nasser Al-Qidwa, is planning to end decades of conflict between Israel and the Palestinians by creating a Palestinian state alongside a secure Israel. According to the plan, both sides would swap 4.4 per cent of land. Israel would retain some parts of the West Bank where Israeli settlers already live. In exchange, the Palestinians would receive territory for a future Palestinian state that is currently part of Israel. Ahead of a meeting this month in New York, co-hosted by France and Saudi Arabia on steps toward recognizing a Palestinian state, Olmert said the plan is 'practical, doable, relevant, valid, and real.' Al-Qidwa, who will present the plan with Olmert at a conference in Paris on Tuesday organized by the Jean-Jaurès Foundation think tank, told AFP that the proposal is 'the only realistic and workable solution.' However, he said people in both Israel and the Palestinian territories still need to be convinced—especially while the war continues. 'The moment the war comes to an end, we will see a different kind of thinking. We have to move forward with the acceptance of coexistence between the two sides,' he said. He also noted that serious progress is not possible under the current Israeli government or the Palestinian leadership, led by President Mahmud Abbas, who has been in power for 20 years. 'You have to get rid of both. And that is going to happen,' he added, calling the Palestinian leadership 'corrupt and ineffective.'
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
40 minutes ago
- First Post
US-China handshake in London? Negotiators inch toward deal over rare earths, tech exports
US President Donald Trump has authorised Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's team to remove restrictions on the sales of chipmaking software, jet engine parts and ethane read more Top officials from the US and China will continue their meeting on Tuesday over an array of bilateral agreements, including the rare earth deal. The engagements began in London yesterday (June 10) as the two countries seek to sort out differences over Trump's tariffs. The talks are being led by China's Vice Premier He Lifeng, alongside US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. According to a report by The Washington Post, the US president has authorised Bessent's team to remove restrictions on the sales of chipmaking software, jet engine parts and ethane. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Expecting handshakes' In an interview with American outlet CNBC, Kevin Hassett, Director of the National Economic Council at the White House, on Monday said that the US expectation was that 'immediately after the handshake, any export controls from the US will be eased, and the rare earths will be released in volume, and then we can go back to negotiating smaller matters." A deal to ease restrictions on critical minerals and advanced technologies would mark a major shift in the ongoing US-China economic and tech rivalry. Meanwhile, Trump has reportedly described Monday's talks as 'good'. US-China trade tensions Tensions between Washington and Beijing have soared since Trump took office, with both countries engaging in a tariffs war that took duties on each other's exports to three figures – an effective trade embargo. The Geneva pact to cool tensions temporarily brought new US tariffs on Chinese goods from 145 percent to 30 percent, and Chinese countermeasures from 125 percent to 10 percent. But Trump recently said China 'totally violated' the deal. A key issue was Beijing's shipments of rare earths, crucial to goods including electric vehicle batteries. Throughout its talks with Washington, China has also launched discussions with other trading partners – including Japan and South Korea – to try to build a united front to counter Trump's tariffs. With inputs from agencies
News18
41 minutes ago
- News18
‘I May Move It Around': Trump Keeps Red Tesla, Praises Musk's Starlink As ‘Great Service'
Last Updated: The relationship between Trump and Musk has soured in recent weeks, following Musk's sharp criticism of Trump's so-called 'Big, Beautiful Bill' US President Donald Trump has dismissed speculation that he intends to part ways with his red Tesla Model S, stating instead that he might simply 'move it around a little bit." Speaking at a White House press briefing on Monday, Trump was asked directly if he planned to get rid of the electric car he purchased on March 11 from Elon Musk, his then-close ally. 'No, I may move it around a little bit," Trump replied. When asked where it might be relocated, he added cryptically, 'I have a lot of locations." The car was spotted parked at the White House over the weekend amid rumours of a fallout between Trump and Musk. NEWS: President Trump says he's not going to sell his Tesla or get rid of Starlink at the White House.'No, I may move the Tesla around a little bit." On Starlink Trump said: 'It's a good service." — Sawyer Merritt (@SawyerMerritt) June 9, 2025 Despite escalating tensions between the two, Trump also clarified he has no intention of discontinuing Starlink, Musk's satellite internet venture operated under SpaceX, at the White House. 'I don't think we'll be doing that with Starlink. It's a good service," Trump said, referring to the high-speed broadband provider that has become integral in remote and emergency communications. The relationship between Trump and Musk has soured in recent weeks, following Musk's sharp criticism of Trump's so-called 'Big, Beautiful Bill", which the Tesla and SpaceX CEO labeled an 'abomination" over concerns about the federal deficit. Trump responded with threats to revoke Musk's government contracts, prompting Musk to warn that SpaceX could withdraw its Dragon program in retaliation. When asked Monday if he still intends to speak with Musk, Trump replied, 'If I were him, I would want to speak to me. Maybe he's already called. You'd have to ask him." He added, 'We had a good relationship, and I just wish him well." Musk later responded with a heart emoji on X (formerly Twitter) to a clip of Trump's remarks — a subdued gesture in an otherwise very public fallout between two of the most prominent figures in American politics and tech.
