logo
North Korea is making what could be its largest, most advanced warship ever, new satellite photos show

North Korea is making what could be its largest, most advanced warship ever, new satellite photos show

Seoul, South Korea
CNN —
New satellite images show what could be North Korea's biggest warship ever – possibly more than double the size of anything in leader Kim Jong Un's naval fleet.
Images taken by independent satellite providers Maxar Technologies and Planet Labs on April 6 show the ship under construction in the water at the Nampo shipyard on North Korea's west coast, about 60 kilometers (37 miles) southwest of the capital Pyongyang.
Analysts say the pictures show ongoing construction of weapons and other internal systems of the ship, which is likely a guided-missile frigate (FFG) designed to carry missiles in vertical launch tubes for use against targets on land and sea.
'The FFG is approximately 140 meters (459 feet) long, making it the largest warship manufactured in North Korea,' an analysis by Joseph Bermudez Jr. and Jennifer Jun at the Center for Strategic and International Studies said.
For comparison, the US Navy's Arleigh Burke-class destroyers are about 505 feet long and its under-construction Constellation-class frigates will be 496 feet long.
The existence of the warship is not a surprise.
The Kim regime has been engaged in a rapid modernization of its armed forces, developing a range of new weapons and testing intercontinental ballistic missiles that can reach almost anywhere in the United States.
It's done that despite United Nations sanctions that have puts strict limits on its access to the materials and technology to develop those weapons.
But the closer ties with Russia since the beginning of the Ukraine war could be helping North Korea overcome the UN sanctions, analysts say.
Kim Duk-ki, a retired South Korean admiral, said he thinks Moscow may be providing the technology for the frigate's missile systems.
Pictures of the vessel appeared in a report by state-run Korean Central Television released late last year on the ruling Workers' Party's end-of-year plenary session. The images showed leader Kim inspecting the ship's construction.
An image from Korean Central Television shows leader Kim Jong Un checking the work on a new warship late last year.
Korean Central TV
The images in the KCTV video show the warship could have the kind of weaponry possessed by modern navies, including vertical launch cells that could be used to fire a variety of missiles.
Analysts also noted the ship seems to be set up to have phased-array radar, which can track threats and targets more quickly and accurately than previously displayed North Korean capabilities.
Despite those indications of advanced warfighting abilities, analysts urged caution in making assumptions.
The challenge of building warships
Almost any shipbuilder can get the hull and propulsion systems right, said Carl Schuster, a former US Navy captain and Hawaii-based analyst.
'However, modern warships represent an integration challenge of communications, electronics, weapons, and both electronic and acoustic sensor technologies' that is not so easily achieved, he said.
In an interview with CNN in March, South Korean lawmaker Kim Byung-kee, a member of the National Assembly's Intelligence Committee, questioned whether Pyongyang has the technical ability to build an advanced warship, or the infrastructure to support it.
'Operating such a big military warship takes significant amount of budget. They not only have to build a warship, but make a team that would operate it, and it costs to operate it including the equipment and fuel. Also, one huge warship cannot go out on its own. So the question is, can North Korea afford the cost?' he said.
Kim, the retired South Korean admiral, was cautious on not underestimating what the final product may look like, especially its lethality.
'If North Korea equips the new frigate with the hypersonic ballistic missile it claimed to have successfully tested in January, that will cause a game changing impact in the regional security,' the former naval officer said.
After reviewing the satellite images for CNN, Schuster said it's likely a year or more of work remains before the new North Korean warship can begin sea trials.
'This ship's construction is being delayed by the lack of the superstructure, sensor and weapons systems intended for installation,' he said.
North Korea's aged fleet
North Korea's navy has about 400 patrol combatants and 70 submarines, according to the most recent estimate from the US Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) in a 2021 report.
Though that's a large number of vessels, most of them are old and small.
Joseph Dempsey, an analyst at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, wrote in a January blog post that Pyongyang has only two principal surface combatants. Those Najin-class frigates – 1,600-ton warships dating to the early 1970s – are obsolete, he wrote.
The DIA report said the North Korean navy would largely be reduced to coastal defense in any conflict with South Korea or the United States, both of which have vastly superior naval forces.
But North Korean leader Kim has been pushing to modernize his naval fleet. It is also developing submarine-launched missiles and the subs to carry them.
In September, Kim inspected the site for a new naval port.
'Now that we are soon to possess large surface warships and submarines which cannot be anchored at the existing facilities for mooring warships, the construction of a naval base for running the latest large warships has become a pressing task,' he said at the time.
Yu Yong-won, a South Korean lawmaker, said the ship under construction at the Nampo yard is only one example of Kim trying to modernize his navy.
A nuclear-powered submarine is under construction at a shipyard in the North Korean port of Sinpo and another frigate or destroyer is in the works in Chongjin, Yu said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China says US is ‘provoking frictions' as tensions flare despite trade truce
China says US is ‘provoking frictions' as tensions flare despite trade truce

Egypt Independent

time12 hours ago

  • Egypt Independent

China says US is ‘provoking frictions' as tensions flare despite trade truce

Hong Kong CNN — China has accused the United States of 'provoking new economic and trade frictions' as it responded to US President Donald Trump's claims that Beijing had violated a trade truce agreed by the two nations last month, which paused their blistering tariff war. China was 'strictly implementing' the consensus of those trade talks, the Chinese Commerce Ministry said in a statement Monday, while blaming the US for taking steps that 'seriously undermine' the agreement. 'The United States has been unilaterally provoking new economic and trade frictions, exacerbating the uncertainty and instability of bilateral economic and trade relations,' the statement said. 'If the United States insists on its own way and continues to undermine China's interests, China will continue to take resolute and forceful measures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests,' it added. The comments come after Trump on Friday said China had 'TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US.' In a post on Truth Social, the US president said that he made a fast deal with China to 'save them from what I thought was going to be a very bad situation.' He added: 'So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!' The back and forth spotlights a ratcheting up of tensions between the US and China just weeks after the two sides reached the surprise trade truce in Geneva, which significantly dialed down the hefty tariffs that each imposed on the other in April. That agreement gave the two sides a 90-day window to hash out a broader deal, an effort that now appears imperiled as each side accuses the other of working against the spirit of that agreement. US officials have described talks as 'stalled' and suggested that the involvement of Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping is needed to jumpstart progress. President Donald Trump speaks at US Steel Corporation's Mon Valley Works-Irvin plant on May 30, 2025, in West Mifflin, Pennsylvania. Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP A key point of contention has been Beijing's export controls on rare earth minerals and associated products, which were imposed as part of its retaliation against Trump's 'reciprocal' tariffs on Chinese goods. Following the talks, US officials had expected China to ease export restrictions of those minerals, which are an essential part of everything from iPhones and electric vehicles to big-ticket weapons like F-35 fighter jets and missile systems. But the restrictions haven't been lifted, causing intense displeasure inside the Trump administration and prompting a recent series of measures imposed on China, three administration officials told CNN last week. Meanwhile, Beijing accused the US last month of 'undermining' the consensus reached in Geneva, after Washington warned companies against using AI chips made by its national tech champion Huawei. In a further escalation of tensions, the US then last week also moved to limit critical technology sales to China and restrict the number of Chinese students studying in the US –spotlighting how the scope of their competition is much broader than just trade. In the Monday statement, China's Commerce Ministry hit out at these measures, saying the US has 'successively introduced a number of discriminatory restrictive measures against China after the Geneva Economic and Trade Talks, including issuing AI chip export control guidelines, stopping the sale of chip design software to China, and announcing the revocation of Chinese student visas.' Beijing, as well as other Asian capitals, is also feeling the pressure of trade frictions at home. China's manufacturing activity shrank for a second month in May, an official survey showed on Saturday. Tariffs imposed this year on Chinese goods entering the US, its largest export market, currently stand at 30%, not including any pre-existing duties. Critical mineral concerns Trump administration officials have homed in on China's controls on exports of rare earths in their assessments of China's compliance with the agreement reached in Geneva. The deal saw the two sides dial back during the 90-day grace period mutual tariffs that had soared to well over 100%. It also included an agreement from China to 'suspend or remove' non-tariff countermeasures taken against the US since April 2. A cargo ship unloads at the ore terminal in the West Port Area of Yantai Port in Shandong province, China, on April 25, 2025. Costfoto/NurPhoto/Getty Images China on April 4 imposed export controls on seven rare earth minerals and associated products in what was seen as a retaliation against Trump's duties on its goods. Its export control regime does not ban exports outright but requires government approval for each shipment regardless of destination, enabling greater control over a supply chain that China has come to dominate globally. That system appeared to remain in place last month following the talks, CNN reporting showed. During an interview that aired Sunday with CBS' Face the Nation, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said China was 'withholding some of the products that they agreed to release' in Geneva, referring to critical minerals. 'Maybe it's a glitch in the Chinese system, maybe it's intentional,' he added, noting that the issue would be 'ironed out' when Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping have a call, which Bessent said he believes will happen 'very soon.' The two leaders are known to have last spoken on January 17, days before Trump's inauguration. China has defended its export control regime, describing it last week as 'in line with international practices' and 'not targeted at specific countries.' When asked about its export controls on rare earth minerals, part of a wider category of critical minerals, during a regular press briefing Friday, a spokesperson for China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said Beijing was 'willing to strengthen dialogue and cooperation in the field of export controls with relevant countries and regions.' Speaking to CNN on Friday, former US Ambassador to China Nicholas Burns said Beijing had been 'difficult' in negotiations thus far, withholding rare earths and not fulfilling 'the promises that were apparently made in that Geneva meeting.' 'A lot of this is on China – China has been the most disruptive force in global trade over the last 25 to 30 years,' said Burns, who was ambassador during the former Biden administration. 'China has to prove to the United States on intellectual property, on forced technology transfer, that it's going to be a responsible trading partner of the United States.'

14,000 troops, 100 ballistic missiles and millions of munitions: What North Korea has sent to Russia, report finds
14,000 troops, 100 ballistic missiles and millions of munitions: What North Korea has sent to Russia, report finds

Egypt Independent

time12 hours ago

  • Egypt Independent

14,000 troops, 100 ballistic missiles and millions of munitions: What North Korea has sent to Russia, report finds

CNN — North Korea has sent soldiers and millions of munitions, including missiles and rockets, to Russia over the past year, according to a new report by an international watchdog, which details the extent to which Pyongyang has helped Moscow 'terrorize' Ukraine's population over its three-year war. The report was released Thursday by the Multilateral Sanctions Monitoring Team (MSMT), an initiative made up of 11 United Nations members, formed after Russia forced the disbandment of a previous UN panel that monitored the implementation of sanctions against North Korea. While some of the team's findings have been well documented – such as North Korea sending troops to fight for Russia – the report lays out the stunning scope and scale of weaponry sent from Pyongyang since Russia's invasion of Ukraine. That includes as many as 9 million rounds of artillery and ammunition in 2024; more than 11,000 troops last year, and another 3,000 troops in the early months of this year; rocket launchers, vehicles, self-propelled guns and other types of heavy artillery; and at least 100 ballistic missiles 'which were subsequently launched into Ukraine to destroy civilian infrastructure and terrorize populated areas such as Kyiv and Zaporizhzhia,' the report found, citing participating states. 'These forms of unlawful cooperation between (North Korea) and Russia contributed to Moscow's ability to increase its missile attacks against Ukrainian cities including targeted strikes against critical civilian infrastructure,' the report said. In return, Russia provided North Korea with various valuable pieces of weaponry and technology, including air defense equipment, anti-aircraft missiles, electronic warfare systems and refined oil, the report said. A news broadcast in Seoul, South Korea, showing a Russian military facility reportedly used as a training ground for North Korean troops sent to assist in the war against Ukraine. Kim Jae-Hwan/SOPA Images/SIPAPRE/AP Moscow has also provided data feedback on Pyongyang's ballistic missiles, helping improve its missile guidance performance, it said. These actions 'allow North Korea to fund its military programs and further develop its ballistic missiles programs, which are themselves prohibited under multiple (UN Security Council resolutions), and gain first-hand experience in modern warfare,' the report found. It said its findings were based on MSMT participating states and cited supporting evidence from the Open Source Centre (OSC), a UK-based non-profit that uses publicly accessible information for research, and Conflict Armament Research (CAR), a UK-based research organization. Both Russia and North Korea are violating the UN arms embargo and are transferring arms and military equipment through actors and networks that evade sanctions, the report alleged. The two countries will likely continue their military cooperation 'at least for the foreseeable future,' it added. In a joint statement, the member nations behind the MSMT – Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, South Korea, the United Kingdom and the United States – urged North Korea to 'engage in meaningful diplomacy.' Western governments have become increasingly concerned about the long-term implications of what appears to be a deepening strategic partnership between the two nations. In recent months, the US has warned that Russia may be close to sharing advanced space and satellite technology with North Korea in exchange for continued support for the war in Ukraine. Russian President Vladimir Putin acknowledged in April for the first time that North Korean soldiers took part in the fighting to recover Russian territory after Ukraine's incursion into the Kursk region last year. North Korea also confirmed its troop presence there for the first time in April. Though North Korean troops had been deployed to Kursk since at least November, they withdrew from the front lines in January after reports of mass casualties, Ukrainian officials said. Both countries have denied that Pyongyang is supplying arms to Moscow, despite overwhelming evidence. However, as part of a landmark defense pact struck last year, they have both pledged to use all available means to provide immediate military assistance in the event the other is attacked. Putin has warned he would provide arms to Pyongyang if the West continues arming Ukraine. In recent weeks, Ukraine's allies have lifted a ban on Kyiv firing long-range missiles into Russia, after days of Russia bombarding the Ukrainian capital and other regions with massive aerial attacks and as the US grows increasingly frustrated with Putin over the lack of a peace deal.

Drone strikes ahead of Russia-Ukraine peace talks leave Trump's credibility hanging by a thread
Drone strikes ahead of Russia-Ukraine peace talks leave Trump's credibility hanging by a thread

Egypt Independent

time13 hours ago

  • Egypt Independent

Drone strikes ahead of Russia-Ukraine peace talks leave Trump's credibility hanging by a thread

CNN — It was already hard to imagine a breakthrough emerging from the direct talks between Russia and Ukraine set to be renewed in Istanbul on Monday. But in the aftermath of what appear to have been multiple large-scale Ukrainian drone strikes against strategic bases across Russia, it's even less likely either side will be prepared to shift their red lines. Even before the latest strikes, which targeted Russian strategic aircraft thousands of miles from the Ukrainian border, the Kremlin had declined to formally set out, in the form of an agreed-to memorandum, what exactly it wants in return for ending what it refers to as its 'Special Military Operation'. But Russian officials have made no secret about their hardline terms, including sovereignty over all annexed territories, the demilitarization of Ukraine, immediate sanctions relief and what the Kremlin calls 'de-Nazification', involving things like guaranteeing the rights of Russian-speakers. Concerns about further NATO expansion toward Russian borders – especially Ukraine, but other countries too – have also been a consistent Kremlin grievance, as has the fate of hundreds of billions of dollars in frozen Russian assets abroad. There's been speculation in the Russian and Western media about areas for possible negotiation, and the outcome of the Istanbul talks are being closely watched for any hints of flexibility. But in the aftermath of what appears to have been a spectacular Ukrainian success, talk of Kremlin compromises may, for the moment, be off the table. Ukraine goes into this second round of direct talks bolstered by its apparent destruction of Russian strategic bombers and other crucial air assets. On Sunday, President Volodymyr Zelensky set out some of Ukraine's positions, including an unconditional ceasefire and the return of Ukrainian children taken to Russia. But Russian demands for Ukrainian forces to withdraw from territory it claims but has not even conquered remain unpalatable, even more so now Ukraine has shown it can still strike deep behind the front lines. Smoke rises above the area following a Ukrainian drone attack in the Usolsky district of Russia's Irkutsk region, in this still image from a video published Sunday. Governor of Irkutsk Region Igor Kobzev/Handout via Reuters Even before the latest Ukrainian drone strikes, amid preparations for the peace talks in Istanbul, Russia was stepping up attacks on Ukraine in what seems to be the early stages of a new summer offensive. Overnight Saturday, Russia launched its largest drone attack on Ukraine since the beginning of the war – involving 472 drones. On Sunday, a Russian missile strike killed at least 12 people and wounded more than 60 at a training site for the Ukrainian military. As all this unfolds, an increasingly frustrated US President Donald Trump, who used to brag he could end the Ukraine war in short order, is now watching from the sidelines as a cornerstone of his stated foreign policy looks decidedly shaky. Neither his pressure on the Ukrainian leader, who Trump lambasted in the Oval Office, nor his recent scolding of the Kremlin ruler appear to have pushed the two sides any closer to a peace deal. Trump still has powerful levers to pull if he chooses, like imposing tough new sanctions, such as those overwhelmingly supported in the US Senate, or adjusting US military aid in a way that would dramatically increase the costs of fighting on. The measures may not be decisive, but they would send a message of US commitment. What Trump says he is tempted to do, though, is simply walk away from the whole mess. This is Biden's war, he insists, or Putin's and Zelensky's. But walking away – and it is unclear what that means in terms of US policy – may no longer be an option. At least not walking away unscathed. His own insistence on ending the Ukraine conflict, along with his personal interventions with the Ukrainian and Russian leaders, means that Trump and the United States are now inextricably linked with the outcome. That's why events on the battlefield and at the negotiating table in Istanbul are being watched so closely. Despite his regular attempts to disown it, the Ukraine war has very much become Trump's war on which US credibility now hangs by a thread.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store