North Korea launches flurry of short-range ballistic missiles
SEOUL, May 8 (UPI) -- North Korea fired several short-range ballistic missiles into the sea between Korea and Japan on Thursday morning, Seoul's military said, in what officials characterized as a potential weapons test ahead of export to Russia.
In a text message to reporters, South Korea's Joint Chiefs of Staff said it detected the launch of multiple short-range ballistic missiles of various types from the Wonsan area, on the peninsula's east coast, between 8:10 a.m. and 9:20 a.m. KST. The missiles flew roughly 500 miles before landing in the East Sea.
"We have closely shared relevant information with the U.S. and Japan and are comprehensively analyzing the detailed specifications," the JCS said. "North Korea's missile launch is a blatant provocative act that seriously threatens the peace and stability of the Korean Peninsula and we strongly condemn it."
The South Korean and U.S. militaries are maintaining a defense posture to "overwhelmingly respond to any provocation," the JCS added.
At a briefing later in the morning, JCS spokesman Col. Lee Sung-jun did not specify the number of missiles launched, but said they were fired from mobile launchers and may have been modeled after the Russian Iskander system. He added that the weapons test was potentially connected to an arms export to Russia.
"We are assessing that it may have been a performance check for some exports or an experiment to evaluate flight stability," Lee told reporters.
The launch came one day after North Korean state media reported on a visit by leader Kim Jong Un to a munitions factory, where he called for workers to boost their output of artillery shells. Seoul and Washington say that North Korea has supplied missiles, artillery and soldiers to Russia for its war against Ukraine, while receiving much-needed financial support and advanced military technology in return.
After denying its involvement for months, Pyongyang late last month acknowledged for the first time that it is sending troops to Russia.
South Korean lawmakers, citing a briefing from Seoul's spy agency, said last week that around 600 North Korean troops have been killed and another 4,100 injured fighting for Russia on the frontlines of the Kursk region.
Thursday's launch was the North's first in nearly two months. Pyongyang fired multiple close-range ballistic missiles on March 10, coinciding with the start of major U.S.-South Korea joint military drills.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
3 hours ago
- Forbes
Here's What Could Be Next For U.S. Troops In Syria
U.S. Army soldiers board a CH-47 Chinook helicopter while departing a remote combat outpost known as ... More RLZ on May 25, 2021 near the Turkish border in northeastern Syria. (Photo by) The United States has withdrawn at least 500 of its 2,000 troops from Syria in recent weeks and is reconsolidating its on-the-ground presence from eight bases to just one. Analysts are divided over whether these moves are a prelude to a complete withdrawal. In an interview on Turkish television on June 2, the U.S. special envoy to Syria, Thomas Barrack, revealed that the U.S. will reduce its military base in Syria from eight bases to a mere one. U.S. troops are already leaving some bases they have used, especially in the eastern Arab-majority province of Deir ez-Zor. The U.S. first deployed a small number of troops to northeast Syria to help the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces combat the marauding Islamic State group in 2015. The U.S. first reduced its presence from approximately 2,000 to 900 near the end of President Trump's first term. It briefly increased its presence to 2,000 again in late 2024 as the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad swiftly collapsed. Beginning in April, the U.S. withdrew 500 troops, reducing the current presence to 1,500, and plans to further reduce it to under 1,000. In his Monday interview, Barrack called the SDF a 'very important factor' that should be integrated into the new Syrian government in Damascus, urging everyone 'to be reasonable in their expectations.' Kristin Ronzi, a Middle East and North Africa analyst at the risk intelligence company RANE, believes the special envoy's comments broadly align with the U.S. 'deprioritization' of Syria and the Pentagon's April announcement to reduce the American troop presence. 'The United States will increasingly look towards the Syrian central government and regional partners to increase their role in countering terrorism in Syria and the resurgence of the Islamic State,' Ronzi told me. 'But a complete U.S. withdrawal is unlikely, at least in the near term, since the Pentagon has indicated that the remaining troops would likely provide some high-level support for counterterrorism efforts in northeastern Syria.' 'The remaining U.S. troops will likely support Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces' counterterrorism efforts in the northeast, especially since the United States is continuing to provide some support for the SDF's maintaining of prisons holding Islamic State fighters and their families,' she said. The SDF has several prisons, camps, and detention centers with captured ISIS militants and their families dotted throughout the regions it currently controls and administers, the most infamous being the sprawling al-Hol camp. ISIS remnants in Syria have attempted to free their detained compatriots, most notably in a coordinated 2022 jailbreak in the northeastern city of Hasaka that took the SDF almost two weeks to suppress with U.S. support. The SDF has agreed to ultimately transfer control over these prisons to the new central government in Damascus. However, that has yet to happen. ISIS claimed its first attacks against Syrian government forces in late May. 'The United States will likely maintain some degree of a military presence in Syria for a while due to persistent concerns over a rise of jihadism and instability within the country,' Ronzi said. 'In order for the United States to fully withdraw from Syria, there would likely need to be increased confidence in the capacity of the Syrian government and regional partners to disrupt jihadist threats and that confidence would take time to build.' Ahmed al-Sharaa, leader of the armed Islamist group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham that toppled Assad, is now the president of the Syrian transitional government. HTS' former links with al-Qaeda, which Sharaa split from years ago, could limit broad military cooperation between the U.S. military and Damascus. 'Turkey would be more likely to increase military cooperation with Syria, especially since Turkey has offered to train Syrian troops and has an interest in establishing air and naval bases within Syria,' Ronzi said. 'This would also expand on ongoing cooperation efforts since, in May, Turkey, Jordan, and Syria established a joint operations center in Damascus to support counterterrorism efforts.' Turkish Defense Minister Yasar Guler confirmed on June 4 that Turkish troops would remain on Syrian soil to train Syrian soldiers and rebuild the country's shattered defenses. Caroline Rose, the director of the Crime-Conflict Nexus and Military Withdrawals portfolios at the New Lines Institute, believes Special Envoy Barrack's comments and recent troop movements in Syria are a 'clear sign' the U.S. is pursuing 'full-scale withdrawal in Syria concurrently with the withdrawal process in Iraq.' Furthermore, the April decision to withdraw 500 troops and pressure on its SDF ally and Damascus to 'expedite security reform negotiations' are 'signals that Washington seeks an exit route from Syria' as early as autumn or early winter. 'I think that the U.S. is trying to mirror in Syria the same process that is underway in Iraq: reconsolidating forces into one facility and transferring bases to local forces to prepare the foundation for a withdrawal in late 2025 or early 2026,' Rose told me. 'I think it is very likely that we will see further reductions of U.S. personnel in Syria (as well as Iraq).' RANE's Ronzi noted that there has been little progress by the SDF to integrate its forces and institutions into the new Syrian state army and central government, as stipulated in an agreement reached between them in March. She noted that the agreement had an 'original aspirational deadline' of the end of 2025. 'Although Barrack has noted the importance of integrating the SDF into the army, the SDF will likely slow walk this process to extract more favorable conditions from the central government,' Ronzi said. 'This will be especially likely if there is no imminent threat of a large Turkish-backed military operation and the SDF still has some U.S. support.' 'With little demonstrated steps towards integration, it is unlikely that the SDF will integrate completely by the end of this year, but increasing U.S. pressure could push the SDF closer toward integration.' Sources cited by the Saudi Al-Arabiya channel said the U.S. gave the SDF a deadline of late August to integrate into the Syrian Army. 'I think that this incentive to withdraw has created a surge in action from the Trump administration to try and achieve conducive conditions on the ground for withdrawal—conditions that will have to include a concluded agreement for the SDF to integrate into the Syrian Army,' Rose said. 'That being said, the attempt to clip the negotiation's process by months adds pressure but does not solve the key, central issue at hand: the fact that Damascus and the SDF are not on the same page and hold very different visions about what integration should look like.' 'If the Trump administration wants a sustainable plan in place that will hold, it should play a role in mediating these talks instead of simply expediting the deadline.'
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk joins an important club: former Trump officials who've turned on him
Before Donald Trump's conflict with Elon Musk turned into a raging dumpster fire, the president shared some thoughts with reporters about why his top campaign donor was moving away from him. The Republican specifically said: I'll be honest, I think he misses the place. I think he got out there and all of a sudden, he wasn't in this beautiful Oval Office. I'll tell you, he's not the first. People leave my administration, and they love us, and then at some point, they miss it so badly, and some of them embrace it, and some of them actually become hostile. I don't know what it is. It was in his next breath when the president suggested that Musk, whom Trump praised and celebrated just a few days earlier, had contracted a case of 'Trump derangement syndrome.' In other words, as far as the president is concerned, Musk enjoyed the glamor and prestige of White House work; one day after exiting the complex he discovered that he missed the place; and this in turn led the billionaire to condemn the Republican Party's domestic policy megabill — the inaptly named 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' — as 'a disgusting abomination.' If that sounds to you like an implausible explanation of the ugly Trump-Musk breakup, you're not alone. But let's not brush past a detail that the president made in passing: Referencing the former DOGE chief's newfound opposition to the GOP agenda, Trump said, '[H]e's not the first.' That's true, and it's a point worth dwelling on. The president's public comments suggested that he's aware of the extraordinary number of people from his team who have become, to borrow his word, 'hostile.' He added, however, 'I don't know what it is.' Perhaps I can help. As regular readers know, members of a presidential team have a unique perspective on an American presidency. After a chief executive chooses them for their powerful positions, these officials routinely work closely with the person behind the desk in the Oval Office, learning firsthand how a president thinks, works, prioritizes, processes information and leads. In Trump's case, an astonishing number of people who worked at his side, witnessing his leadership style up close, came to believe that he was the wrong man for the job. He has, after all, been condemned in no uncertain terms by retired Gen. John Kelly, Trump's former White House chief of staff; retired Gen. James Mattis, Trump's first defense secretary; Mark Esper, Trump's second defense secretary, and retired Gen. Mark Milley, Trump's choice to serve as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Several of these men warned the public that they saw Trump as a 'fascist,' a 'threat to democracy' and a man 'unfit' for public office. But they aren't alone. Stephanie Grisham, Trump's former White House press secretary, not only condemned him after working with him, she also spoke at the Democratic National Convention and urged the public to vote against her former boss. John Bolton, Trump's former White House national security adviser, issued similar warnings to Americans. Even Mike Pence, Trump's own former vice president, has become one of Trump's most prominent Republican critics. This week, Musk unexpectedly joined the club, shortly after his failed tenure on Team Trump ended with a whimper. The president would have Americans believe that these former members of his team turned on him because they missed the White House and the status. By that reasoning, every modern president would be in a similar position, watching their former aides trash them on a regular basis. Except, that hasn't happened at all. The opposition and condemnations that Trump has faced from leading members of his own team is unprecedented in American history. The Republican doesn't know 'what it is.' Maybe it has something to do with the fact that these officials got an up-close look at his work — and came away disgusted? This article was originally published on
Fox News
9 hours ago
- Fox News
Federal judge again blocks deportation of anti-Israel Columbia protester
A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration from detaining a Columbia University student and lawful permanent resident whom federal agents have targeted for deportation after she took part in an anti-Israel demonstration earlier this year. U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald's preliminary injunction on Thursday blocks Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) from taking 21-year-old Yunseo Chung into custody. Chung is originally from South Korea and has lived in the U.S. since she was seven years old. ICE had attempted to arrest her in March but were unsuccessful and the court has now barred ICE from detaining her without prior approval. If the government tries to detain Chung for any reason other than her potential deportation, it must give 72 hours' notice to Chung's lawyers and the court and allow the court time to determine if the detention attempt is a pretext for First Amendment retaliation. The ruling also states that she remains free while her legal case proceeds. Ramzi Kassem, co-director of CLEAR, a legal nonprofit at City University of New York that is representing Chung, praised the ruling. "This is a win not just for Yunseo and for the legions of people who stand up for Palestinians and oppose the daily atrocities in Gaza that our government underwrites, but also for freedom of speech and the rule of law in our country," Kassem said in a statement, per the Washington Post. It comes after the same judge in March ordered immigration officials to cease their efforts to arrest Chung. The Trump administration has alleged that her participation in a protest poses a potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequence for the United States. Chung's attorneys say that the government's pursuit of the Columbia student is an "unjustifiable assault on [the] First Amendment." Chung sued the government earlier this year. The lawsuit states that Chung was a participant in the anti-Israel protests, not a leader, and was "one of a large group of college students" expressing "shared concerns" over the war in Gaza. Chung, according to the lawsuit, "visited" the Gaza Solidarity Encampment, a number of tents organized in the center of campus, but does not state whether she stayed there. The lawsuit also makes it clear that she did not make public statements or engage in high-profile activities while at the protests. Chung's lawsuit states that she was never arrested or disciplined in relation to events at the encampment. However, she was later arrested during a 2025 protest at Barnard College. The lawsuit claims that it is common in New York City for police to arrest many protesters and that charges are usually dropped or dismissed. The lawsuit states that on March 8, an ICE official signed an administrative arrest warrant for Chung and federal law enforcement went to Chung's parents' house the next day seeking to arrest her. An ICE official allegedly told Chung's attorneys on March 10 that her green card had been "revoked," according to the lawsuit. The government has the authority to rescind permanent resident status if it believes that a person has violated U.S. immigration law. Chung's attorneys say in the lawsuit that law enforcement searched Chung's dorm room on March 13 in accordance with a warrant. She was valedictorian of her high school senior class and has a near-perfect GPA heading into her senior year, according to court documents. Chung is double-majoring in English and women's and gender studies at Columbia, the Washington Post reported. The Trump administration has also sought to deport former Columbia student Mahmoud Khalil, whom it accuses of playing a major role in anti-Israel protests at Columbia University.
