Trump administration demands action from 36 countries to avoid travel ban
U.S. President Donald Trump walks to board Marine One after speakiing with reporters to depart the White House on his way to attend the G7 Summit in Canada, Sunday, June 15, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)
WASHINGTON — WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration has given 36 countries, most of them in Africa, a Wednesday deadline to commit to improve vetting or face a ban on their citizens visiting the United States.
A weekend diplomatic cable sent by the State Department instructs embassies and consulates in the 36 countries to gauge their host countries' willingness by Wednesday to improve their citizens' travel documentation and take steps to address the status of their nationals who are in the United States illegally.
The cable, which was described to The Associated Press, asks the countries to take action to address the U.S. concerns within 60 days or risk being added to the travel ban, which now includes 12 nations. Of the 36 new countries targeted, 25 are in Africa.
State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce declined to comment on the specifics in the cable. She confirmed that the administration wanted nations to improve their own vetting processes for passport holders, accept their nationals deported from the U.S. and take other steps to ensure their citizens are not a threat to the U.S.
'We're looking at providing a period of time, (where if countries) don't get to that point where we can trust them and they've got to change the system, update it, do whatever they need to do to convince us that we can trust the process and the information they have,' she said.
The 36 countries identified in the cable are: Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Benin, Bhutan, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Djibouti, Dominica, Ethiopia, Egypt, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Kyrgyzstan, Liberia, Malawi, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, South Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, Tonga, Tuvalu, Uganda, Vanuatu, Zambia and Zimbabwe.
The Washington Post first reported on the cable.
Matthew Lee, The Associated Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Star
25 minutes ago
- Toronto Star
Intense Israeli strikes hit Tehran after Trump demands ‘unconditional surrender'
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — Intense Israeli airstrikes targeted Iran's capital early Wednesday after it issued a warning about a new area it could target, a day after U.S. President Donald Trump warned Tehran's residents to evacuate and demanded that the country surrender without conditions. Uncertainty roiled the region and residents of Tehran fled their homes in droves on the fifth day of Israel's air campaign aimed at Iran's military and nuclear program.
CBC
34 minutes ago
- CBC
What is deportation? Explaining what led to protests around the U.S.
⭐️HERE'S WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW⭐️ Protesters in the U.S. are unhappy with how President Donald Trump is deporting people who live in the U.S. illegally. Trump campaigned on a promise of removing criminals from the country. Opponents say he's sending away many people who are contributing positively to the U.S. Read on to find out why it's controversial. ⬇️⬇️⬇️ During his election campaign, U.S. President Donald Trump promised to embark on the 'largest deportation operation in American history.' The promise involves forcing people who live in the United States illegally to leave, and it's part of why Trump was elected. But since he's taken office, some Americans aren't happy with the way that promise is being carried out. Since June 6, people across the U.S. — especially in Los Angeles, California — have been protesting against Trump's approach to deporting undocumented immigrants. Trump and his supporters say their focus is removing people who pose a threat to American safety, but those who are opposed say that's not what's happening. Deportation and undocumented immigrants Deportation is the expulsion of someone from a country. They are usually sent back to their country of origin. In this case, the people being deported are undocumented immigrants — people living in the United States without permission to be there. These people come for a variety of reasons, including better job opportunities or because they're afraid of violence or persecution in their home countries. It's estimated that in 2022, there were 11 million undocumented immigrants living in the United States according to the Office of Homeland Security Statistics (OHSS). Why people are being turned away at the Canadian border Arguments for deportation Trump and his administration say that undocumented immigrants are a source of violent crime and other criminal activities like drug smuggling. He has also said that undocumented immigrants take jobs from Americans and deplete social services like welfare that provide money and resources to Americans in need. 'So when you see the border, it's not just the crime. Your jobs are being taken away too,' Trump said during the election campaign. Deportation isn't a practice specific to Trump or Republicans. Former U.S. presidents Joe Biden and Barack Obama (both Democrats) deported millions of undocumented immigrants during their terms. Arguments against deportation Megan Guzman, chair of the American Immigration Lawyers Association for the Southern California Chapter, has worked in the U.S. immigration system for many years. She said the vast majority of undocumented immigrants are not criminals, but are hard workers who contribute a lot to the U.S. economy. 'Undocumented immigrants pay billions in taxes each year and often take on the hardest jobs that others don't want to take, like farming,' she told CBC Kids News. 'They're out there for 20 hour shifts sometimes, showing up before the sun comes out and leaving long after it's dark.' She said deporting these kinds of workers could negatively impact the U.S. supply chain. WATCH — Understanding the global supply chain It's also complicated to deport people — Guzman said many have strong roots in the U.S. and could face violence if sent to their home countries. 'Most undocumented immigrants have been living here for 10, 15 years or more, and have children born in the U.S. who are American citizens,' she said. California Highway Patrol used smoke grenades to advance and push protesters off Highway 101 in Los Angeles on June 8 during protests over Trump's deportations. (Image credit:) How are people deported? The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is responsible for carrying out deportations. They often work with local police, access government databases and use other methods to locate undocumented immigrants and make arrests. Those under arrest are often taken to detention centres, where they may wait months before their deportation is arranged or before they can see an immigration judge to plead their case. Only those who can prove they've been in the U.S. for more than two years are entitled to plead their case in front of a judge, according to Guzman. She said those who can prove they'd face violence if returned to their home country may also be able to avoid deportation. Why are people upset and protesting? Earlier this month, thousands of people flooded the streets of Los Angeles, California, and other parts of the U.S. in protest. The protest erupted after ICE raided several locations across L.A. — including workplaces like Home Depot — and detained huge swaths of undocumented immigrants. Many come from countries in Central and South America. Guzman said the major reason people are protesting is because of the approach Trump is taking to deporting people. These students say their U.S. trip wasn't allowed because of border concerns Although the Biden and Obama administrations deported more people than Trump has so far, Guzman said they had clear criteria for who they'd target. 'They prioritized people with, for example, criminal history, immigration violations or those who were a possible danger to the public,' she said. Protesters in Los Angeles are unhappy about the sheer number of arrests ICE has made in recent weeks. (Image credit:) Trump is taking a different approach, Guzman said. She said Trump's administration seems more focused on deporting as many undocumented immigrants as possible without considering their background. Indeed, the White House has recently demanded that ICE triple the number of arrests it makes. 'They're is no criteria on who they're targeting and for what purpose, and that's creating a lot of fear in many communities,' Guzman said. 'We're seeing people who have lived here for 10, 15 or 20 years showing up to their shifts and getting picked up with no warning.' Guzman said detention facilities have been far over capacity with so many people being detained, which is also fuelling the protests. 'They are putting people into a system that doesn't have the infrastructure to house people and detain them in a way that honours humanity and dignity.' Deportation and constitutional rights Along with concerns over who is being deported, there have also been reports of violations of constitutional rights. For example, since March, the Trump administration has been deporting hundreds of Venezuelans living in the U.S. who it claims are part of a gang called Tren de Aragua. These people have been deported without a chance to plead their case in court. Guzman said this is a violation of a right called due process, which requires the government to go through specific legal steps before deporting someone. Trump has said he thinks there are far too many people to deport to give everyone the opportunity to see a judge. There is a backlog of 3.6 million cases waiting to be heard in immigration court in the United States, according to a report from Syracuse University.
Japan Forward
an hour ago
- Japan Forward
G7 Summit: Is South Korea Being Passed Over?
As the two-day G7 Summit wraps up in Canada, South Korea is facing renewed fears of diplomatic marginalization. On June 16, Seoul officials were caught off guard when they learned, via a breaking news report, that President Donald Trump would be leaving the summit a day early. The announcement came despite a planned meeting between Trump and South Korea's newly elected president, Lee Jae-myung, on the sidelines of the international forum. That South Korean side was not informed in advance through official channels has raised eyebrows. It is irregular for a foreign leader to abruptly cancel a meeting without prior consultation, and even more so for the other party to learn of it through the media. Seoul had anticipated holding the bilateral talks on June 17. While Trump's early departure, reportedly due to escalating Israel-Iran tensions, may appear understandable, it's reigniting a deeper anxiety in South Korea: the specter of Korea Passing. The term describes a tendency of major powers to discuss geopolitical matters surrounding the Korean Peninsula while excluding the South from the discourse. Strain in Seoul-Washington relations appeared almost immediately after Lee was inaugurated on June 4. His first phone call with Trump was delayed by three days and passed without any formal statement from the White House. By contrast, Lee's predecessor, Yoon Suk-yeol, received a congratulatory call from Washington on the day of his election victory. Lee Jae-myung is sworn in as South Korea's president and delivers his inaugural speech on June 4. (©Lee Jae-myung/Facebook) As the Trump administration remains preoccupied with escalating global crises, the lack of coordination with its treaty ally signals more than a mere oversight. For some in South Korea, it reflects a growing misalignment between the two capitals. That misalignment may partly stem from unease in Washington over Lee's approach to China. Within days of his electoral win, American policy analysts cautioned that the new South Korean leader could veer away from the traditional alliance. At a Washington Times Foundation forum in June, Patrick Cronin, Asia-Pacific security chair at the Hudson Institute, said: "If you're going to be closely allied with the United States on security, you're going to be alienating North Korea, China, and Russia." "How Lee Jae-myung's government manages that relationship," he continued, "is going to be crucial for the future of US interests, the future of the Korean Peninsula, and the future of the Korean people." Lee, then head of the Democratic Party, meets with Chinese Ambassador Xing Haiming in June 2023. The meeting drew criticism over what some viewed as Lee's excessive deference to Beijing. (©National Assembly Press Team) Such concerns are not without basis. During a campaign rally in March 2024, Lee appeared to downplay frictions in the Taiwan Strait, remarking, "Why are you picking on China? Just say xie xie [to China] and xie xie to Taiwan, too." The phrase xie xie, meaning "thank you" in Chinese, was widely interpreted as a rhetorical gesture suggesting that South Korea should remain neutral in the cross-Strait conflict. Lee framed the issue as having no relevance to his country's national interests, saying that Seoul should avoid entanglement altogether. Although Lee has been a vocal critic of former President Yoon's perceived deference to Tokyo, he now faces similar criticism for his apparent pro-Beijing proclivities. The collapse of the Lee-Trump talks marked a diplomatic setback for Lee's administration. This is especially true given that his invitation to the G7 came just days after taking office, with many on his team hoping for a successful diplomatic debut. Meanwhile, Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba met with Trump on Monday in Canada to discuss a range of pressing issues, including tariffs. The new South Korean president did regain some footing on Tuesday during a 30-minute meeting with Ishiba, where the two agreed to maintain active dialogue and pursue robust bilateral ties. For Lee, who lacks prior foreign policy experience, the challenges are piling up. Beyond establishing personal rapport with foreign leaders, he must soon tackle thornier matters such as the future of American forces on the Peninsula and managing relations with a nuclear-armed North Korea. Whether Lee can recalibrate his strategic posture to reassure Washington while preserving South Korea's autonomy remains an open question. But for now, speculation over Korea Passing lingers. Author: Kenji Yoshida
