Amazon workers reject union in vote at North Carolina warehouse
Amazon workers at a facility near Raleigh, North Carolina, overwhelmingly voted against unionizing on Saturday.
Of the 3,276 ballots cast, there were 2,447 votes opposing the union and 829 in favor, according to the National Labor Relations Board. There were 77 challenged ballots, a gap that's too narrow to change the outcome of the election. The results still need to be certified by the NLRB.
The election at the facility, named RDU1 and located in the suburb of Garner, came after organizers with the upstart Carolina Amazonians United for Solidarity and Empowerment (CAUSE) campaigned at the warehouse for the past three years. The facility employs roughly 4,700 workers.
CAUSE said in a statement that the election results were a 'result of Amazon's willingness to break the law.'
'Amazon's relentless and illegal efforts to intimidate us prove that this company is afraid of workers coming together to claim our power,' the group said. 'Amazon may think it is above the law, but we will not accept a system that allows billionaires and corporations to play by a different set of rules.'
Amazon spokeswoman Eileen Hards denied that the company broke the law or interfered with the election.
'We're glad that our team in Garner was able to have their voices heard, and that they chose to keep a direct relationship with Amazon,' Hards said in a statement. 'We look forward to continuing to make this a great place to work together, and to supporting our teammates as they build their futures with us.'
Amazon, the nation's second-largest private employer, has long sought to keep unions out of its ranks. The strategy succeeded in the U.S. until 2022, when workers at a Staten Island warehouse voted to join the Amazon Labor Union. Last month, workers at a Whole Foods store in Philadelphia voted to join the United Food and Commercial Workers union.
Amazon responded to the Garner union drive with a barrage of anti-union messages in the warehouse, on a website, and sent through its AtoZ app to employees. A leader of the warehouse urged employees to 'vote no,' saying a union 'can get in the way of how we work together.' The company described CAUSE as an 'outside party' that's 'claiming to be a union.'
Amazon has previously said its employees can choose whether or not to join a union, and that it speaks 'openly, candidly and respectfully about these topics' so that they can 'make an informed decision.'
CAUSE was founded in 2022 by RDU1 employees Mary Hill and Rev. Ryan Brown to voice concerns about the company's response to the Covid pandemic, which they viewed as inadequate. The group sought to organize RDU1 to boost wages and secure longer breaks.
Starting pay at RDU1 is $18.50 an hour. CAUSE has pushed to negotiate for wages of $30 an hour.
In its statement on Saturday, CAUSE said it intended to continue organizing at RDU1 'because over half of Amazon employees are still struggling with food and housing insecurity.'
Labor groups have looked beyond NLRB elections in an attempt to gain a union foothold at Amazon. They've assisted employees with filing unfair labor practice charges with the NLRB against Amazon, accusing the company of violating labor laws.
The International Brotherhood of Teamsters helped coordinate a picket effort at nine Amazon facilities in December. Amazon said the walkout had no impact on its operations.
The Teamsters union has said it represents 9,000 Amazon workers around the country, although the company has refused to recognize the union and bargain with leadership.
Unions have enjoyed increasing support across the country, with 67% of Americans saying they approve of labor unions, according to Gallup. But that hasn't translated into higher membership rates. Union membership in the private sector declined slightly to 5.9% in 2024, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
North Carolina had the lowest union membership rate in the country last year, with only 2.4% of workers in the state represented, according to the BLS.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
28 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Windfarm cash could help boost Powys footpath network
WINDFARM developers could be asked to stump up money that can be used to improve Powys' network of footpaths. At a meeting of Powys County Council's Economy, Residents and Communities scrutiny committee on Thursday, June 12 councillors were given an update on the progress of the current Rights of Way Improvement Plan (ROWIP). This is a legal document that sets out what the council intends to do over 10 years to manage 8,000 kilometres of rights of way, plus open access land including commons in Powys. This is the largest network in the UK and does not include the Bannau Brycheiniog National Park area. Countryside access and recreation lead officer Sian Barnes said a review of the plan would begin early in the 2026/2027 financial year, and that funding would be part of this. Ms Barnes said; 'We knew in 2017 investment of over £1 million was needed to bring the network up to a standard that's open an easy to use, and at that stage only 38 per cent made that standard.' She said that since then costs have soared, but Welsh Government grants to cover some costs are only available until 2027. Ms Barnes said: 'The impacts of climate change are affecting all of us, countryside assets are suffering greater deterioration because we have increasing extreme weather and predominantly warmer wetter weather which is impacting on materials.' Ms Barnes told the committee that her team were looking for funding through the Marches Forward Partnership. 'And also, major developments including wind and solar farms, section 106 funding is routinely sought from wind farm developers and can be significant,' said Ms Barnes. These s106 agreements are a legally binding contract between a planning authority and developer which sees them contribute towards local infrastructure and services. Ms Barnes said the number of people going into the countryside increased significantly during the Covid-19 outbreak and this trend has continued. Committee vice-chairman Cllr Gary Mitchell (Plaid Cymru) said: 'It's useful to have that update, 2028 is not that far away. 'The figures are old but if we'd have invested £1 million back in 2018, we'd have a pretty good network. 'I would argue that the benefit that network brings in terms of tourism, communities connecting up with each other, is vast. He estimated that the £1 million from 2017 is now worth £3 million to £4 million today and believed it would be worth spending this sum on the network over a three to five years would bring about 'phenomenal changes.' Cllr Mitchell also wanted to see the Countryside Services team have the 'ability to respond' to planning application so that they could work on s106 agreements with more developers than just the ones involved in big energy projects.
Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Inflation is killing your savings - what you must do to combat it
Multi award-winning Chartered Financial Planner, Certified Coach, author of The Money Plan, and Sunday Mirror columnist The American economist Milton Friedman once said: 'Inflation is the one form of taxation that can be imposed without legislation.' Yet for most people, it slips under the radar, affecting our spending power without us giving it a second thought. In recent years, inflation has made headlines more than usual, from the post-COVID stimulus surge to its gradual retreat. I first raised concerns about the risk of rising inflation over three years ago. To me, it felt inevitable. Professional investors and economists should not have been caught off guard by its rise. What was surprising, however, was just how far and how fast it went. Get the best deals and tips from Mirror Money Inflation is a normal part of the economy, and it shouldn't be feared. However, when it gains momentum, it can spiral out of control, leading to a rapid increase in prices. This is what we have recently experienced, which led to the cost-of-living crisis that affected everyone. Inflation and its impact on wealth is often overlooked. I tell my clients that inflation is one of the biggest risks to their money. Why? Because inflation is effectively a constant tax on the value of your pounds and assets, a tax that we all collectively pay. Consider this: since 1989 inflation has averaged around 3%, which to most people would seem modest. But this means you would need to achieve at least a 3% return on your cash savings and investments, after tax and costs, each and every year, to maintain the value of your money. In other words, you need £189 today to buy the same goods which would have cost you £100 at the turn of the millennium, just because of inflation. That's why I advise against keeping excessive amounts of money on deposit for prolonged periods of time. Inflation is like carbon monoxide to your money: it's a silent killer of wealth creation, of which few people are aware. So, what's the solution? The answer lies in investing rather than maintaining cash deposits (savings). The MSCI World index, which is a collection of the world 's largest companies in developed countries, has delivered 10.5% pa average return over the last 20 years for UK investors. Even after accounting for fees and tax, you'll comfortably stay ahead of inflation. This is one reason why the wealthy get richer during inflationary times: they understand that companies can increase their prices and profits, which helps share values rise. You too can participate and grow your wealth over the next 20 years, even if you start small, but you must start. Now, more than ever, it's crucial to focus on the importance of investing to combat the negative effects of inflation. The recent high inflation rates serve as a stark reminder of this necessity.
Daily Mirror
7 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Brits urged to make one urgent toilet roll change to save £428 a year
The purchase of this household essential is costing UK households hundreds unnecessarily - and experts say there is a way to help cut the costs when doing your weekly shop Experts say you may literally be flushing money down the drain - as Brits are urged to make one change to their toilet roll to help save money. Research shows that the average family forks out a whacking £428 annually on toilet paper, but it's possible to slash this cost dramatically. A study by Victorian Plumbing, which looked deeper into the habits of 1,000 Brits, found that people typically use eight sheets per trip to the toilet. This adds up to a whopping 56 sheets daily and the research put own-brand toilet rolls from major supermarkets head-to-head against the nation's favourite brand. On average, these store brand sheets rack up a cost of 21p each. In stark contrast, the most beloved brand in the UK could set you back more than 150 per cent per sheet compared to the average supermarket's own brands - that's an astonishing annual saving of £184.32 per household, as reported by Bristol Live. And for those bargain hunters amongst us, Amazon's cracking out some top deals on bog roll - like 72 rolls for only £23.99 (price correct at time of going to press). Bathroom specialist at Victorian Plumbing, Alex Woods explained: "With inflation, supply chain pressures, and raw material shortages all pushing prices up, the humble toilet roll is starting to no longer be the minor household expense it once was. "While costs may be rising, there are still simple, practical steps we can take to reduce usage and the costly impact. When one small habit costs the UK nearly £3 billion a year, every sheet really does count." Cheeky Wipes, a reusable toilet wipe brand suggested: "Instead of adding a 9 pack to your weekly shopping (average household of 4 usage), buy in bulk if you've got the storage space. Comparing on Ocado, buying a 9 pack of Cheeky Panda works out at 88p per roll. By comparison, a 24 pack of their loo roll will work out at 83p per roll. "Shopping at wholesale type spaces such as Costco etc can obviously save even more," and further advised: "Another cost effective way to save money on toilet roll is to use less of it. If the 'average' person uses 8 to 9 sheets of toilet paper, reducing it by 2 sheets per visit will save 25% off your annual spend. "Of course let's be honest. Most men will only use loo roll for a poo. And women shouldn't need to use anywhere near that amount for a pee. So are some people really using 20 sheets per poo?".
