One in 20 would pay an unjustified parking ticket
One in 20 (5%) AA members would pay up immediately if they received a parking charge notice (PCN) from a private company, even if they had done nothing wrong, a new survey suggests.
The motoring services organisation described private parking operators as 'shark-like businesses'.
Of the survey respondents that would pay an unjustified PCN, more than half (53%) said they would do so because 'it gets rid of the hassle'.
Some 13% said they felt they would not get a fair hearing at an appeal, while 11% would fear legal action.
There is a growing trend for people approaching Citizens Advice regarding private parking operators.
The AA found the organisation helped 9,926 people in relation to the issue in 2024/25, compared with 7,412 people three years earlier.
Private parking businesses have been accused of using misleading and confusing signs, aggressive debt collection and unreasonable fees.
An investigation by the PA news agency earlier this week found drivers across England say they are being sent tickets because of faulty machines, which one campaigner claiming the devices are 'set up to trap people'.
A Bill to enable the introduction of a Government-backed code for private parking companies received royal assent under the Conservative government in March 2019.
The code was withdrawn in June 2022 after a legal challenge by parking companies.
Jack Cousens, head of roads policy for the AA, said: 'The delay in implementing the official Government code is scandalous.
'Six years on, no part of the legislation has been introduced to protect and safeguard drivers from an aggressive industry.
'The fact that drivers are willing to pay up when they have done nothing wrong, nor have any confidence in the current appeals process, shows why urgent action is needed.
'We are hugely concerned that the Government is standing idly by while drivers continue to receive threatening letters from a sector that works on the basis of guilty until proven innocent.
'Urgent action is needed, and introducing the rules by the end of the year will help wrestle back some of the balance in favour of the motorist.
'Until the measures within the Act are in place, drivers will continue to be attacked by these shark-like businesses.'
Private companies chase vehicle owners for alleged infringements in private car parks, such as at shopping centres, leisure facilities and motorway service areas.
They issued 7.2 million PCNs in the six months to the end of September 2024.
That was up 12% from the same period a year earlier and represented an average of 41,000 per day.
Each ticket can be up to £100.
Local growth minister Alex Norris said: 'We inherited a dysfunctional private parking market that has lacked crucial transparency and protection for motorists, leading to unfair and unjustified charges.
'Parliament legislated for a legally binding Code of practice six years ago with cross-party support but the four previous administrations all failed to implement it.
'Where they failed, we are determined to act.
'That is why we are working at pace to drive up standards by bringing forward a stronger, more robust legal private Parking code of practice.'
Will Hurley, chief executive of trade body the International Parking Community, said: 'Data shows that the appeals system is a vital and effective safeguard for motorists: one in four who appeal to the operator are successful.
'If a motorist believes a parking charge has been issued in error, we urge them to appeal and submit evidence.
'This process exists to ensure fairness and protect the motorists.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump frustrated by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, other Supreme Court picks: Sources
President Donald Trump has privately expressed frustration about the Supreme Court justices he appointed, mostly complaining about Justice Amy Coney Barrett, three people familiar with the conversations told ABC News. Those sources said the president conveyed that the justices he appointed could do more to back his agenda. Several Trump allies have also taken their complaints about Barrett directly to the president, labeling her as "weak." Others have expressed their viewpoints publicly, according to sources familiar with the matter. MORE: Supreme Court rules Trump administration must unfreeze foreign aid payments Conservative lawyer Mike Davis recently said on Steve Bannon's podcast, "She's a rattled law professor with her head up her a--." Davis, a Trump ally, is in frequent communication with the president, sources have told ABC News. Barrett has not commented in the past when asked about attacks by the president's allies. A senior administration official and additional sources familiar with Trump's thinking tell ABC News the president is looking to nominate judges in the mold of Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, and late Antonin Scalia. Barrett is a former Scalia law clerk, which Trump and Barrett both highlighted when he announced her as his nominee to replace the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 2020. "Particularly poignant to me was her long and deep friendship with Justice Antonin Scalia, my own mentor," Barrett said in the White House Rose Garden at the time. Maureen Scalia was also in the audience. In a statement to ABC News, principal deputy press secretary Harrison Fields stated: "President Trump will always stand with the U.S. Supreme Court, unlike the Democrat Party, which, if given the opportunity, would pack the court, ultimately undermining its integrity. The president may disagree with the Court and some of its rulings, but he will always respect its foundational role." CNN was first reported Trump's private frustration with Barret Tuesday. While the president has privately complained about Barrett, it is notable that he has not attacked her publicly. Trump defended her after she sided with the court's liberal justices ruling the Trump administration must unfreeze foreign aid payment. "She's a very good woman. She's very smart, and I don't know about people attacking her, I really don't know," Trump told reporters. MORE: President Trump nominates Amy Coney Barrett for Supreme Court seat However, Trump recently attacked Federalist Society leader Leonard Leo, who advised him on judicial nominations during his first term, calling him a 'sleazebag.' 'I am so disappointed in The Federalist Society because of the bad advice they gave me on numerous judicial nominations,' Trump wrote.
Business Wire
4 hours ago
- Business Wire
FDIC Rates Banner Bank ‘Outstanding' in Recent Community Reinvestment Act Performance Evaluation
WALLA WALLA, Wash.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The Banner Bank leadership team is pleased to share the Bank again earned an 'Outstanding' rating from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) in the Bank's recent Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) Performance Evaluation. 'Outstanding' is the highest available rating in a CRA evaluation and only 10% of all U.S. banks achieved it over the past five years. 'This achievement is an outcome of our team's thoughtful, intentional effort to do the right thing for our clients and the communities we serve.' Under this Act, the FDIC evaluates the performance of banks in helping meet the credit needs of clients, businesses and local communities. It assesses how well banks serve and support low- and moderate-income (LMI) individuals, LMI neighborhoods and small businesses in ways that are consistent with safe and sound operation and banking practices. All banks are regularly evaluated in this area. 'Earning the FDIC's highest rating is a reflection of our employees' commitment to consistently implement the core principles of CRA every day,' said President and CEO Mark Grescovich. 'This achievement is an outcome of our team's thoughtful, intentional effort to do the right thing for our clients and the communities we serve.' This is the second consecutive exam cycle Banner earned an Outstanding rating. Since 2021, only one other bank in the 'large bank' category also earned this back-to-back rating throughout the four states we serve. 'The Outstanding rating recognizes our hard work and genuine care to serve those in need— community is rightfully at the core of this effort,' said Senior Vice President & CRA Director Camino Smith. 'We are grateful for the strong partnerships we have built with so many community organizations that offer us invaluable feedback on how to make the greatest impact.' In announcing the results of our CRA Performance Evaluation, the FDIC shared these highlights: Banner Bank has an excellent level of community development investments and grants, often in a leadership position, particularly those that are not routinely provided by private investors. The Bank makes use of innovative and/or flexible lending practices in order to serve the assessment area's credit needs. Banner Bank is a leader in providing community development services. The Bank's lending levels reflect good responsiveness to the assessment area's credit needs. Geographic distribution of Banner loans reflects good penetration throughout the assessment area. Banner Bank exhibits a good record of serving the credit needs of the most economically disadvantaged areas of the assessment area, low-income individuals, and/or very small businesses, and is a leader in making community development loans. Banner Bank delivery systems are accessible to essentially all portions of the assessment area. The Bank exhibits good responsiveness to credit and community development needs and occasionally uses innovative and/or complex investments to support community development initiatives. Banner Bank is a Washington-chartered commercial bank serving consumer and business clients in Washington, Oregon, California and Idaho. With more than $16.2 billion in assets, Banner Bank is part of Banner Corporation (NASDAQ: BANR). Visit Banner Bank at
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Conservative fundraiser casts doubt on whether all votes were 'accurate and counted' in leaked call
A caller raising money for the Conservative Party cast doubt on the validity of the recount process in the recent federal election, according to a recording obtained by CBC News. In the fundraising call, which happened on Saturday, an official identifying herself as being from the Conservative Party's supporter services claimed that Liberals and media seek to "attack" Conservatives and "scrutinize" the results of two judicial recounts won by Conservatives. Later in the call, she suggested to a potential donor that the results of the recounts were not final. "We need to stand up. We need to make sure all the votes are accurate and counted," she said. The caller appeared to be referencing two tight races that were ultimately won by Conservatives — the Newfoundland riding of Terra Nova-The Peninsulas and the Ontario riding Windsor-Tecumseh-Lakeshore. She made the call a week after the judicial recounts finished, and after both Liberal candidates had concededtheir losses. The call was recorded by the recipient, who previously supported the Conservative Party of Canada. CBC News is not identifying the donor, who fears reprisal for speaking out. He said he shared the audio from the call because he felt frustrated and insulted that the party cast doubt on the integrity of the electoral process. It's not the first time the Conservatives have sought to fundraise by suggesting Liberals are trying to affect the outcome of elections after the ballots were cast. Shortly after the election, the party sent an email to its mailing list suggesting that their rivals sought to "flip just enough seats to edge closer to a majority" and were trying to "tip the scales" in the recounts. "It is part of a very common but unsavoury technique to get people to donate," said Chris Tenove, assistant director of the Centre for the Study of Democratic Institutions at University of British Columbia. "You both ring an emergency bell and say urgent funding is needed to address it. And that can put people into a state of mind where they're perhaps more likely to give money … big picture, I think this strategy of political advertising is corrosive." Conservative spokeswoman Sarah Fischer said in a statement that the party did not question the results, but "wanted to ensure the recounts were accurate and fair." Under Canadian law, recounts are automatically triggered when the difference in the number of votes received by the top-finishing candidates is 0.1 per cent or less of the total number of votes cast. There are costs for parties and candidates during recounts, and legitimate reasons for parties to help scrutinize results. However, the recounts were already over at the time of the call, with winners confirmed. "It made me wonder, was this an effective fundraising approach that was used in recent weeks? And this individual just isn't ready to let it go?" said Tenove. "A few weeks ago, it made sense that you did need scrutineers and maybe legal representatives right there to advance the Conservatives' position and the process. It's not at all clear why that would be necessary now." A recent Leger poll found that 25 per cent of Conservative supporters said they don't trust the election results. The public's trust in election results has become a flashpoint in political discourse following the 2021 "stop the steal" movement in the United States, based on the debunked conspiracy that former president Joe Biden's win was rigged. CBC News has verified the veracity of the audio. The phone number associated with the call directs to a voicemail message identifying it as the voter outreach and funding office for the Conservative Party of Canada. The caller is first heard saying hello, and thanking the supporter for past donations. Then the topic turns to the recounts. "We won the two major election recounts all across the country, but the media liberals are trying to attack us and scrutinize the result. So now we have political operators on the ground," she said before asking for a $1,750 donation to the "Recount the Fight" fund. The supporter questioned what the party official was saying, noting that the recounts were completed and the Conservatives won them. "I didn't really like your message. The recounts are already over. And I don't believe in a media conspiracy, so you're not selling me today," he said. The party official doubled down. "Right now, the Liberal media is attacking us. They're trying to scrutinize our results here. So we need to stand up, we need to make sure all the votes are accurate and counted." "I don't believe that message, I'm sorry," said the former donor. Then the party official hung up and the line went dead. Fischer said the party is looking into the caller's conduct, as they expect respectful and proper phone etiquette from all callers.
