High-tech housing project to share site with controversial First Nation grow op
A federal government agency is funding an experimental housing project on the site of a controversial, large-scale marijuana grow op in the Haudenosaunee community of Six Nations in southwest Ontario.
Next Generation Manufacturing Canada, a federal agency under Industry, Science and Economic Development Canada, provided a $3.7 million grant to the Toronto-based construction firm Horizon Legacy for the project.
Horizon Legacy has partnered with Six Nations architect Brian Porter and his firm Two Row Architect.
But the project is set for a plot of land shared with a new marijuana plantation that's facing community pressure to shut down. Legacy Farms has become a lightning rod for controversy in Six Nations since greenhouses began to go up this year. Residents object to its over 70 sprawling greenhouses and the constant traffic of trucks, and are unhappy at the prospect of further large-scale construction in the community, which is about 100 kilometres southwest of Toronto.
Horizon Legacy says the $10 million, 30-unit project will be "the largest multi-storey Indigenous housing development" in the country, and be constructed with robotics.
Neighbours fight to get rid of massive marijuana grow-op
9 hours ago
Duration 4:58
A massive marijuana grow operation in the heart of Six Nations of the Grand River is raising concerns that the cannabis industry is getting out of control. CBC's Jorge Barrera investigates where it came from and meets the community members fighting to shut it down.
Horizon Legacy CEO Nhung Nguyen told CBC News she's aware of "issues" with the location, but hopes any controversy won't overshadow the potentially cutting-edge project which, she says, could revolutionize construction in First Nations.
"This technology will be, we believe, transformational for Canada," said Nguyen.
Horizon Legacy is developing the use of a robotic arm, called Val 2.0, that acts like a portable 3D printer, pouring out a special concrete mix to build walls and structures. The company recently used it for a row-house project in Gananoque, Ont.
The project in Six Nations will be the first time the technology will be used to raise load-bearing walls. If successful, the project could be replicated in other First Nations, allowing rapid housing construction in a sector facing a labour shortage, she said.
The construction firm has no connection to Legacy Farms, says Nguyen.
The building will be called Eh ni da se, which means "new moon" in the language of the Cayuga, according to Horizon Legacy's website.
The Cayuga are one of the six nations that make up the Haudenosaunee Confederacy, which maintains a traditional governance structure separate from elected band councils.
Legacy Farms is owned by Porter's son Aaron Porter, and is licensed by the Six Nations Cannabis Commission.
The commission was created by the elected band council to regulate cannabis production and retail on the reserve. The band, in an exercise of sovereignty, created its own cannabis rules outside of federal and provincial laws.
Resident Nancy Porter — a distant relative of both men — has rallied community members to shut down Legacy Farms. The grow op, with its berm and greenhouses, mars her horizon and looms in her kitchen window.
"It's like a pain that won't go away," she said.
She says she sees trucks rumbling by every day with grow op supplies and white vans shuttling in workers from outside the territory. Its construction disrupted the land's natural drainage, causing flooding along neighbouring properties, including her yard.
She only found out about the housing project when she was informed by CBC News.
Neither the community nor the band council were notified of the project by Horizon Legacy or Brian Porter. No notification was required.
She says the new project also needs to be shut down.
"What is the big deal, hiding everything?" she said.
Several generations of Porter's direct family — her parents, grandparents and great-grandparents — farmed soy and wheat on the land that's now the site of the grow op and housing project. As a child she used to roam and play throughout the property, she says. The grow op sits partly on what was once her family's land — sold last year by her brother.
She says the band council and commission have ignored her questions and concerns. Neither the council nor commission responded to CBC News's requests for comment.
"I ain't going to live another year through this," she said. "Something's got to give."
Some community members say the Legacy Farms controversy proves the cannabis industry in Six Nations is out of control, and have raised questions about the influx of workers from outside the reserve.
Aaron Porter says those migrant workers come through an agency and that he's checked to make sure they are all legally allowed to work in Canada.
He would not provide the name of the agency, but says he's shared it with the Cannabis Commission.
"I wouldn't bring criminals into a community that I love," he said.
And Brain Porter says neither development is exceptional by Six Nations standards — where no zoning regulations exist.
Community members build what they want on their own lands, he says.
"I've got lots of friends that had great views of natural areas and then someone purchased the property and converted it into something else and they didn't have a say over it," he said.
Porter notes that just to the northeast of the property, along Chiefswood Road, one of the main arteries through the community, is the Ohsweken Speedway. It's owned by a Six Nations member who built it on family lands. The racetrack roars to life every Friday night from May to September.
Just down from the Speedway sits the sprawling cigarette factory and warehouse buildings of Grand River Enterprises, which ships tobacco products around the globe.
"There are factories going up weekly, right in the interior of all these lots," he said.
"There's no process for building permits. So there's lots of construction happening here. The vast majority, none of the members know about it."
Health Canada and Ontario's Ministry of the Attorney General say they have no agreements with Six Nations allowing it to license marijuana producers or retailers. The issuing of cannabis licences by First Nations communities — outside of federal and provincial frameworks — has not been tested in court.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
21 minutes ago
- National Post
Canadian military personnel to get 20% pay hike: defence minister
Canadian Forces personnel are to receive a 20 per cent salary increase, Defence Minister David McGuinty has confirmed. Article content The move is part of a $9-billion spending increase that will see Canada's defence and security budget climb to an all-time high of $62.7 billion annually by next year. The initiative was announced June 9 by Prime Minister Mark Carney. Article content Carney said the salary increases were well deserved and would contribute to retaining personnel in the ranks as well as attracting new recruits. Article content Article content McGuinty told journalists on June 10 that improvements were also coming in military benefits, housing and health care. 'That's where a lot of the initial investment will be, of course, including a 20-per-cent pay increase,' he said. Article content Article content But when that pay hike will come is still unclear. The Ottawa Citizen asked the Department of National Defence on June 10 for details about the raises and for information on when military personnel would see the extra money on their paycheques. DND did not respond. Article content In addition, there will be increases in training allowances and the introduction of retention bonuses for key military personnel. No further details were provided. Article content At a June 9 technical briefing that followed Carney's spending announcement, government officials noted it was expected that around 1,400 new staff would be hired at DND. More health-care workers will be hired for the Canadian Forces and the civilian workforce will be expanded so military personnel can focus on operations, government officials said at the technical briefing. Under government-imposed rules, the officials who provided the briefing cannot be identified. Article content Article content The Ottawa Citizen asked DND on June 9 for a timeline on when the additional 1,400 staff would be hired. DND did not respond. Article content Article content June Winger, national president of the Union of National Defence Employees, said Wednesday that she had received initial information from DND that more civilian staff would be hired, but no specific details. But Winger noted that the department had faced significant barriers in getting new staff in place because of delays in completing security clearances. Such clearances are taking months and perspective staff, instead of waiting, are instead accepting jobs other than at DND, she said. Article content In January, the Ottawa Citizen reported that military staff were recommending retention bonuses to keep key personnel from leaving the ranks, but there were questions at the time about whether the government would fund such a plan.
CBC
28 minutes ago
- CBC
New study sheds light on connection between motherhood and job loss
Arina Kharlamova was cradling her two-month-old daughter when an email popped into her inbox that disrupted the calm of her maternity leave. The message invited the Whitby, Ont., woman to a meeting where she was told she was part of a layoff affecting 30 per cent of the staff at the company she worked for. "It felt like a tailspin, honestly," she recalled. "It was very, very destabilizing, very difficult to be present and continue just focusing on my baby rather than starting to panic." Though she didn't know it at the time, Kharlamova was not alone in her experience. A new study funded by advocacy group Moms at Work and law firm Hudson Sinclair found 15 per cent of 1,390 Canadian moms who gave birth in 2022 and 2023 were dismissed, laid off or had their contracts go unrenewed during their pregnancy, maternity leave or when they returned to work. The respondents were surveyed online and reached through social media posts, email blasts and partner organizations, including women's associations across Canada. The overall Canadian workforce has an average involuntary turnover rate of 5.1 per cent, according to 2023 research from consulting firm Mercer. Allison Venditti, Moms at Work's founder, found the gap striking even though she had long suspected there was a connection between motherhood and job loss. She's heard many stories of pregnant women or new moms losing their jobs. Some, like Kharlamova, were terminated as part of a larger group of layoffs because their employer was closing or downsizing, which means they likely would have lost their jobs regardless. However, Venditti suspects that some companies add pregnant women or mothers to broader layoff lists because they're "out of sight, out of mind" and easy to cut when managers are asked to let go of staff. Others terminate them because they worry parenting will get in the way of work or reduce productivity, she said. Concerns often dismissed When Venditti broached the phenomenon with other people, she says they told her things such as, "it's not a real problem" or "anecdotally hearing it from a couple of women doesn't make it true." Realizing that "in order to fix the problem, you have to show that it's a problem," she set off to collect data. At 15 per cent, the findings suggests this group has more than three times the involuntary departure rate as the broader working population. That wound up being "validating" for Deborah Hudson, a Toronto employment lawyer whose firm co-funded the survey. She's had at least 100 clients, including three in a recent week, draw a link between their pregnancies and their unemployment. Employers cannot lay off workers because they've taken leave but are allowed to terminate employees during their leave if the reason for the cut is entirely unrelated to them being pregnant or giving birth, Hudson said. That means moms on parental leave can legally be laid off if their employer goes out of business, closes one of its divisions or cuts a wide swath of its workforce to cope with mounting costs. But a company can't hire someone to temporarily cover a leave and then terminate the original worker to give the job to their replacement for the long term, Hudson says, because Canadian laws dictate that employees on parental leave must be reinstated to their original position or a comparable role upon their return. In these cases and others, employers are betting their employees won't go to lawyers, she says. Employers that cut staff as a result of their impending or current parental status are often hoping workers won't have the time, energy or funding to fight them, Venditti said. When they do, she said it often ends up in a settlement because no one wants to endure a lengthy and expensive legal process. "These are women who have been on maternity leave and are often getting 55 per cent (of their wages through employment insurance) who need to go back to work and are, in most instances, not in a financial position to go after their company because they're trying to find daycare and a new job," she said. WATCH | Calls to reform EI so those on parental leave qualify: Government pressured to reform EI so those on parental leave qualify 1 year ago Duration 1:55 The NDP is leading a push for reform to Employment Insurance so that people who are laid off while on parental leave, or shortly after returning from it, still qualify for benefits. Critics say the current system discriminates against parents. Lack of flexibility upon return to work also a problem While the bulk of Canadian mothers Moms at Work surveyed kept their jobs through pregnancy, 16 per cent were denied flexible work during that time and 11 per cent said they were discouraged from attending prenatal appointments. After giving birth but still on leave, 21 per cent said they were pushed to work while off with their baby and 29 per cent reported feeling pressured to return early. When they were back on the job, 26 per cent reported reduced earnings because they were demoted to lower paying jobs or got fewer bonuses and commissions. Twenty-five per cent were denied promotions and one in six were reassigned "undesirable duties." Those numbers suggest to Venditti that "women are coming back to organizations that are making it very clear that they don't want them there." "If they're not pushing you out the door, many places are trying," she said. Companies should instead think more long-term, said Beth Wanner, a Regina-based marketing executive who started Mother Cover, a firm supporting workers that take leave. She said about a third of parents leave their jobs within 18 months of returning from parental leave. Many make the leap to new companies because they felt unsupported during or after pregnancy at their last employer but would have stuck around if they were afforded more flexible work hours or weren't overlooked for promotions or raises. With companies spending up to 200 per cent of someone's salary to replace employees gone for good and pouring months into training new workers, she said there's not just a moral case but also a business case for them to treat women better during and after their pregnancies. "This isn't about charity," she said. "This isn't about just doing what's right." It isn't only companies with a role to play. Venditti said there is much the federal government can do as well. Because Canada's current employment insurance program requires recipients to have worked between 420 and 700 hours prior to a leave, when moms lose their jobs during or following pregnancy, they've likely burned through all of or most of their eligibility. She'd like to see income support for mothers not be contingent on hours worked and be more generous than EI, which pays up to 55 per cent of a woman's salary. She envisions those supports could be offered through a program dedicated just for parental leave, rather than the traditional EI system.
CTV News
28 minutes ago
- CTV News
Supreme Court of Canada to hear Facebook privacy case
A Facebook privacy tab is displayed on a computer screen showing a Facebook Help Centre page in Ottawa on Tuesday, Sept. 10, 2024. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick OTTAWA — The Supreme Court of Canada has agreed to review a ruling that concluded Facebook broke federal privacy law by failing to adequately inform users of risks to their data when using the popular social media platform. Last September, the Federal Court of Appeal found Facebook, now known as Meta Platforms, did not obtain the meaningful consent required by the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act between 2013 and 2015. The decision overturned a 2023 Federal Court ruling. The Court of Appeal said Facebook invited millions of apps onto its platform and did not adequately supervise them. It found that the Federal Court's failure to engage with the relevant evidence on this point was an error of law. Privacy commissioner Philippe Dufresne called that decision an acknowledgment that international firms whose business models rely on users' data must respect Canadian privacy law. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 12, 2025. Jim Bronskill, The Canadian Press
