Senate Republican promotes ‘education freedom' with $125M voucher program for private schools
Private school kids rally Jan. 28, 2025, at the Statehouse in Topeka. (Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector)
TOPEKA — Senate Republicans have revived an attempt to enrich private schools and the families they serve through a $125 million voucher program.
Private schools from around the state delivered their students en masse Tuesday to demonstrate support for Senate Bill 75, which is similar to legislation considered in past sessions. Republican leaders, bolstered by enlarged supermajorities, have promised to pass a voucher program this year.
Supporters of the bill promote it as a 'school choice' initiative, even though the money would flow to families whose children are already enrolled in private schools, there are no private school options for large swaths of the state, and the credits may not be enough for low-income families to afford private school tuitions that exceed $20,000 annually in some places.
The students who were bused to Wednesday's rally on the south steps of the Statehouse carried signs that read 'let me learn,' 'put kids first,' 'parents know best' and 'choice means hope.'
Sen. Renee Erickson, a Wichita Republican who chairs the Senate Education Committee, told the students 'education freedom is the key to education,' and she promised to 'get it done' this year.
She said it was time for the state 'to truly value the diversity and learning styles and individuals for every single student in Kansas.'
Erickson sponsored SB 75, which would give parents an $8,000 tax credit for each child enrolled in an accredited private school. Parents who homeschool their children — which is classified as a nonaccredited private school — would receive $4,000 per child. They could claim the credits in advance or when they file their tax returns. Any student who is enrolled in a public school for any period of time would be ineligible to receive a tax credit that year. Students who receive a low-income student scholarship would be excluded from the tax credits.
The legislation is capped at $125 million for the first year, but would increase by 25% each year, as long as tax credits reach 90% of the cap. Kansas State Department of Education data shows there are currently 26,000 students enrolled in private schools, which means the annual cost for the voucher program could exceed $200 million by the fourth year.
Private school officials and students spoke in favor of unlocking funding that would support faith-based learning. Opponents questioned the merits of using tax dollars to promote religious ideology.
Emily Aragon, a 15-year-old student at Maranatha Christian Academy in Shawnee, said she valued the unconditional support and guidance she receives at her school, which she has attended since fourth grade. She said she was was previously homeschooled.
Aragon said she has learned through her private school teachings 'that no dream or goal is too big when it is fueled by dedication and passion.'
'I passionately believe that all Kansans should have access to an education that not only prepares them for their future, but also empowers them to make a positive, lasting impact on our society,' Aragon said.
John Walker, superintendent of Central Christian School in Hutchinson, said it was his 'fundamental belief' that 'parents have the sovereign rights over their children.' He said it would become clear decades from now that proponents of 'school choice' were on the right side of history.
'We do lots of things that the public school does,' Walker said. 'We teach from a different world view, and that's what parents want to sign up for.'
Private school kids rally Jan. 28, 2025, at the Statehouse in Topeka. (Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector)
Senate President Ty Masterson speaks at rally of private school kids Jan. 28, 2025, at the Statehouse in Topeka. (Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector)
Private school kids rally Jan. 28, 2025, at the Statehouse in Topeka. (Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector)
Senate President Ty Masterson speaks at rally of private school kids Jan. 28, 2025, at the Statehouse in Topeka. (Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector)
Pastor Wade Moore, of Urban Prep Academies in Wichita, speaks at rally of private school kids Jan. 28, 2025, at the Statehouse in Topeka. (Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector)
Private school kids rally Jan. 28, 2025, at the Statehouse in Topeka. (Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector)
Private school kids rally Jan. 28, 2025, at the Statehouse in Topeka. (Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector)
Private school kids rally Jan. 28, 2025, at the Statehouse in Topeka. (Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector)
Private school kids rally Jan. 28, 2025, at the Statehouse in Topeka. (Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector)
Sen. Renee Erickson speaks at rally of private school kids Jan. 28, 2025, at the Statehouse in Topeka. (Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector)
Private school kids rally Jan. 28, 2025, at the Statehouse in Topeka. (Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector)
Private school kids rally Jan. 28, 2025, at the Statehouse in Topeka. (Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector)
Senate President Ty Masterson speaks at rally of private school kids Jan. 28, 2025, at the Statehouse in Topeka. (Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector)
Private school kids rally Jan. 28, 2025, at the Statehouse in Topeka. (Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector)
Private school kids rally Jan. 28, 2025, at the Statehouse in Topeka. (Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector)
Private school kids rally Jan. 28, 2025, at the Statehouse in Topeka. (Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector)
Pastor Wade Moore, of Urban Prep Academies in Wichita, speaks at rally of private school kids Jan. 28, 2025, at the Statehouse in Topeka. (Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector)
Private school kids rally Jan. 28, 2025, at the Statehouse in Topeka. (Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector)
Private school kids rally Jan. 28, 2025, at the Statehouse in Topeka. (Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector)
Private school kids rally Jan. 28, 2025, at the Statehouse in Topeka. (Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector)
Private school kids rally Jan. 28, 2025, at the Statehouse in Topeka. (Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector)
Pastor Wade Moore, of Urban Prep Academies in Wichita, speaks at rally of private school kids Jan. 28, 2025, at the Statehouse in Topeka. (Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector)
Private school kids rally Jan. 28, 2025, at the Statehouse in Topeka. (Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector)
Sen. Renee Erickson, who sponsored legislation to funnel public cash into private schools, speaks at rally of private school kids Jan. 28, 2025, at the Statehouse in Topeka. (Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector)
Bart Kooiman, who identified himself as a U.S. citizen, Kansas resident and small business owner, drew a correlation in his written testimony between 'school choice' and the option to terminate a pregnancy in Kansas. The state's perspective on 'choice,' he said, 'is upside down in the worst ways.' He pointed to the volume of abortions performed in Kansas for out-of-state residents.
'What does that say about the priorities of our state?' Kooiman said. 'Is that what you want our state to be known for? In Kansas, parents can freely choose to end the life of their unborn child, but they cannot choose which school their child attends.'
Speaking in opposition to the bill, Laurel Burchfield, advocacy director for the Mainstream Coalition, said it would be wrong to divert taxes away from public services to pay for religious teachings.
She said Christian school textbooks have been shamed for the way they teach about science in history. They describe the Loch Ness Monster as a real example of a modern day dinosaur that proves creationism, or characterize slavery as a former of immigration for Black people to leave Africa, she offered as examples.
'This bill essentially is making me now donate or tithe to churches to which I do not belong,' Burchfield said. 'It also promotes a very specific view of the world that can be based in narrow extremist religious teachings that don't represent the beliefs of many people of faith.'
Lynn Rogers, a banker and former state senator, lieutenant governor and state treasurer, predicted the voucher program would 'devastate rural communities.' If a small school lost 5-10 students, he said, the school could close. He testified on behalf of Kansas Interfaith Action Group.
'You lose a school, you lose a post office, you lose a co-op, you lose the entire community,' Rogers said. 'I've seen it happen many times.'
Because families would be eligible no matter their income, he said, a family with two students in private school and annual earnings of $300,000 would not pay any state taxes after receiving the credits.
'That's going to blow a real hole in your budget,' Rogers said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
22 minutes ago
- Axios
Amid backlash, Tesla remained resilient in Texas
Even as Tesla deliveries plunged nationally this year amid Elon Musk's very visible (if short-lived) alliance with President Trump, there was at least one state where Tesla registrations were up: Texas. Why it matters: The registration data, obtained by Axios through public information requests, indicates loyalty to the brand in its home base, including Texas' large urban and suburban counties. The depth of conservatives' enthusiasm for Musk's automobiles now faces a major test amid the absolute meltdown last week between the Tesla CEO and the president. By the numbers: Texans registered 12,918 new Teslas in the first three months of 2025, a period when Musk, who contributed more than $250 million to a pro-Trump super PAC during the 2024 election campaign, was enmeshed in the Trump administration as the overseer of DOGE, the president's cost-cutting initiative. Over the same period in 2024, Texans registered 10,679 Teslas. That's a 21% increase year over year. The intrigue: The spike in Texas registrations came as Tesla was flailing elsewhere. Tesla's vehicle deliveries plunged 13% globally in the first quarter of 2025 (336,681 electric vehicles) compared with Q1 2024 (386,810). Tesla vehicles were torched at showrooms and the brand's reputation cratered. Zoom in: Tesla saw year-over-year improvements in its sales in some of the most populous Texas counties. In Travis County, new Tesla registrations grew from 1,369 in the first quarter of 2024 to 1,424 during the first quarter of 2025. In Harris County, they grew from 1,526 to 1,837 during the same period. Tesla registration grew from 1,316 to 1,546 in Collin County and from 990 to 1,146 in Dallas County. In Bexar County, registrations grew from 631 to 664. What they're saying:"It's homegrown pride," is how Matt Holm, president and founder of the Tesla Owners Club of Austin, explains the car company's resilience to Axios. "And regardless of all the drama going on these days, people can differentiate between the product and everything else going on, and it's just a great product." "Elon has absolutely and irreversibly blown up bridges to some potential customers," says Alexander Edwards, president of California-based research firm Strategic Vision, which has long surveyed the motivations of car buyers. "People who bought Teslas for environmental friendliness, that's pretty much gone," Edwards tells Axios. Yes, but: The company had been enjoying an increasingly positive reputation among more conservative consumers. Musk was viewed favorably by 80% of Texas Republicans polled by the Texas Politics Project in April — and unfavorably by 83% of Democrats. In what now feels like a political lifetime ago, Trump himself even promoted Teslas by promising to buy one in support of Musk earlier this year. "In some pockets, like Austin, you have that tech group that loves what Tesla has to offer, can do some mental gymnastics about Musk, and looks at Rivian and says that's not what I want or might be priced out," Edwards says. Between the lines:"Being in the state of Texas, you're naturally conditioned to think you're better than everyone else in the U.S. And when you buy a Tesla" — a status symbol — "that's what you're saying. It doesn't surprise me that there's an increase in sales" in Texas, Edwards says. Plus: Tesla's resilience in Texas could have practical reasons as well, Edwards says. Texas homes — as opposed to, say, apartments in cities on the East Coast — are more likely to have a garage to charge a car in, he adds. What's next: Musk said late last month that Tesla was experiencing a "major rebound in demand" — without providing specifics. But that was before things went absolutely haywire with Trump and Tesla stock took a bath last week.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Colombian presidential candidate in a critical condition following assassination attempt
BOGOTA, Colombia (AP) — Miguel Uribe, a conservative Colombian presidential hopeful, was in critical condition on Monday after being shot in the head from close range during a rally at the weekend. In a statement, doctors said the 39-year-old senator had 'barely' responded to medical interventions, that included brain surgery, following the assassination attempt that has had a chilling effect on the South American nation. Uribe was shot on Saturday as he addressed a small crowd of people who had gathered in a park in Bogota's Modelia neighborhood. On Sunday hundreds of people gathered outside the hospital where Uribe is being treated to pray for his recovery. Some carried rosaries in their hands, while others chanted slogans against President Gustavo Petro. 'This is terrible' said Walter Jimenez a lawyer who showed up outside the hospital, with a sign calling for Petro's removal. 'It feels like we are going back to the 1990's,' he said, referring to a decade during which drug cartels and rebel groups murdered judges, presidential candidates and journalists with impunity. Petro has condemned the attack and urged his opponents to not use it for political ends. But some Colombians have also asked the president to tone down his rhetoric against opposition leaders. The assassination attempt has stunned the nation, with many politicians describing it as the latest sign of how security has deteriorated in Colombia, where the government is struggling to control violence in rural and urban areas, despite a 2016 peace deal with the nation's largest rebel group. The attack on Uribe comes amid growing animosity between Petro and the Senate over blocked reforms to the nation's labor laws. Petro has organized protests in favor of the reforms, where he has delivered fiery speeches referring to opposition leaders as 'oligarchs' and 'enemies of the people." 'There is no way to argue that the president… who describes his opponents as enemies of the people, paramilitaries and assassins has no responsibility in this' Andres Mejia, a prominent political analyst, wrote on X. The Attorney General's office said a 15-year-old boy was arrested at the scene of the attack against Uribe. Videos captured on social media show a suspect shooting at Uribe from close range. The suspect was injured in the leg and was recovering at another clinic, authorities said. Defense Minister Pedro Sánchez added that over 100 officers are investigating the attack. On Monday, Colombia's Attorney General Luz Adriana Camargo said that minors in Colombia face sentences of up to eight years in detention for committing murders. Camargo acknowledged that lenient sentences have encouraged armed groups to recruit minors to commit crimes. However, she said that Colombian law also considers that minors who are recruited by armed groups are victims, and is trying to protect them. 'As a society we need to reflect on why a minor is getting caught up in a network of assassins, and what we can do to stop this from happening in the future' she said.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This AI Company Wants Washington To Keep Its Competitors Off the Market
Dario Amodei, CEO of the artificial intelligence company Anthropic, published a guest essay in The New York Times Thursday arguing against a proposed 10-year moratorium on state AI regulation. Amodei argues that a patchwork of regulations would be better than no regulation whatsoever. Skepticism is warranted whenever the head of an incumbent firm calls for more regulation, and this case is no different. If Amodei gets his way, Anthropic would face less competition—to the detriment of AI innovation, AI security, and the consumer. Amodei's op-ed came in a response to a provision of the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which would prevent any states, cities, and counties from enforcing any regulation that specifically targets AI models, AI systems, or automated decision systems for 10 years. Senate Republicans have amended the clause from a simple requirement to a condition for receiving federal broadband funds, in order to comply with the Byrd Rule, which in Politico's words "blocks anything but budgetary issues from inclusion in reconciliation." Amodei begins by describing how, in a recent stress test conducted at his company, a chatbot threatened an experimenter to forward evidence of his adultery to his wife unless he withdrew plans to shut the AI down. The CEO also raises more tangible concerns, such as reports that a version of Google's Gemini model is "approaching a point where it could help people carry out cyberattacks." Matthew Mittelsteadt, a technology fellow at the Cato Institute, tells Reason that the stress test was "very contrived" and that "there are no AI systems where you must prompt it to turn it off." You can just turn it off. He also acknowledges that, while there is "a real cybersecurity danger [of] AI being used to spot and exploit cyber-vulnerabilities, it can also be used to spot and patch" them. Outside of cyberspace and in, well, actual space, Amodei sounds the alarm that AI could acquire the ability "to produce biological and other weapons." But there's nothing new about that: Knowledge and reasoning, organic or artificial—ultimately wielded by people in either case—can be used to cause problems as well as to solve them. An AI that can model three-dimensional protein structures to create cures for previously untreatable diseases can also create virulent, lethal pathogens. Amodei recognizes the double-edged nature of AI and says voluntary model evaluation and publication are insufficient to ensure that benefits outweigh costs. Instead of a 10-year moratorium, Amodei calls on the White House and Congress to work together on a transparency standard for AI companies. In lieu of federal testing standards, Amodei says state laws should pick up the slack without being "overly prescriptive or burdensome." But that caveat is exactly the kind of wishful thinking Amodei indicts proponents of the moratorium for: Not only would 50 state transparency laws be burdensome, says Mittelsteadt, but they could "actually make models less legible." Neil Chilson of the Abundance Institute also inveighed against Amodei's call for state-level regulation, which is much more onerous than Amodei suggests. "The leading state proposals…include audit requirements, algorithmic assessments, consumer disclosures, and some even have criminal penalties," Chilson tweeted, so "the real debate isn't 'transparency vs. nothing,' but 'transparency-only federal floor vs. intrusive state regimes with audits, liability, and even criminal sanctions.'" Mittelsteadt thinks national transparency regulation is "absolutely the way to go." But how the U.S. chooses to regulate AI might not have much bearing on Skynet-doomsday scenarios, because, while America leads the way in AI, it's not the only player in the game. "If bad actors abroad create Amodei's theoretical 'kill everyone bot,' no [American] law will matter," says Mittelsteadt. But such a law can "stand in the way of good actors using these tools for defense." Amodei is not the only CEO of a leading AI company to call for regulation. In 2023, Sam Altman, co-founder and then-CEO of Open AI, called on lawmakers to consider "intergovernmental oversight mechanisms and standard-setting" of AI. In both cases and in any others that come along, the public should beware of calls for AI regulation that will foreclose market entry, protect incumbent firms' profits from being bid away by competitors, and reduce the incentives to maintain market share the benign way: through innovation and product differentiation. The post This AI Company Wants Washington To Keep Its Competitors Off the Market appeared first on
