logo
US attack on Iran was carried out ‘in full co-ordination' with Israel

US attack on Iran was carried out ‘in full co-ordination' with Israel

Irish Times6 hours ago

'Fordow is gone' was the simple message sent by US president
Donald Trump
on social media early on Sunday, putting an end to days of speculation over whether he would be willing to provide the coup de grace to
Iran's
nuclear project.
Seven B-2 bombers dropped a dozen 'bunker buster' bombs on the Fordow nuclear facility while navy submarines fired 30 Tomahawk cruise missiles at two other nuclear sites, Natanz and Isfahan.
The US strikes came nine days after
Israel's
surprise attack on Iran, launching a war that has reshaped the Middle East, lifting Israel's military supremacy to new heights while leaving Iran and its so-called Axis of Resistance in tatters – and, at the same time, reinforcing Washington's image as the pre-eminent global superpower.
Israeli prime minister
Binyamin Netanyahu
said the US attack was carried out 'in full co-ordination' with Israel and was a continuation of the Israeli military and Mossad operations in Iran against the Iranian nuclear programme, which he said threatened Israel's existence and endangered world peace.
READ MORE
'At the beginning of the operation, I promised you that Iran's nuclear facilities would be destroyed one way or another. That promise has been kept,' he said.
'President Trump is leading the free world with strength. He is a great friend of Israel, a friend like no other.'
Despite the apparent success of the American bombing, it remains unclear how much of its supply of enriched uranium Iran managed to transfer away from the nuclear sites that were hit.
[
US attack on Iran 'not about regime change', says defence secretary after Trump hails 'spectacular military success'
]
Israel's national security council chief Tzachi Hanegbi said the US attack had pushed Iran's nuclear programme back by several years.
A few hours later, Iran launched 30 ballistic missiles towards Israel, scoring direct hits in Tel Aviv and another location in central Israel, injuring 30 people.
However, the attack was no bigger than similar strikes last week. The discipline of residents, who headed to safe rooms and bomb shelters, ensured there were no fatalities despite large damage to buildings.
Israel temporarily closed its airspace after the US attack and reinstituted strict guidelines for public gatherings, permitting only essential activity.
Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi said Tehran reserved all options to defend its sovereignty, interests and people', warning that the US attack would have 'everlasting consequences.'
However, Iran's military options appear limited and would be likely prompt a US counter attack.
Houthis in Yemen also threatened to respond, after previously warning that a US strike would lead to a resumption of attacks on international shipping in the Red Sea.
For much of his political career Netanyahu has made thwarting Iran's nuclear programme his priority, raising the issue in speech after speech in apocalyptic terms, arguing that Iran would not be deterred and that an Iranian nuclear bomb would present an existential threat to Israel.
With Israeli intelligence concluding Tehran was moving dangerously close to the bomb, something had to give between the two rival regional powers.
Israel believed that following the defeat of Hizbullah and the fall of the Assad regime in Syria last year, Tehran took a strategic decision to acquire a nuclear bomb and already had enough enriched fissile material for at least nine bombs. The decades-long waiting game was over.
The deadly
Hamas
attack on southern Israel on October 7th, 2023, resulted in the biggest number of Jews killed in a single day since the Holocaust. Most Israelis believed this traumatic event would become Netanyahu's legacy: a day of infamy he would never be able to erase.
But he now sees an opportunity to reshape that legacy once again and go down in history as the leader who with patience and determination saved Israel from the threat of nuclear annihilation.
It's a narrative that the majority of the Israeli public appear to be buying into – for now, at least.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump threatens regime change in Iran with chilling ‘MIGA' social post following bombings
Trump threatens regime change in Iran with chilling ‘MIGA' social post following bombings

Irish Daily Star

time24 minutes ago

  • Irish Daily Star

Trump threatens regime change in Iran with chilling ‘MIGA' social post following bombings

Donald Trump chillingly alluded to a "regime change" in Iran as he suggested that one would "MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN." In a Truth Social post on Sunday afternoon, the U.S. president wrote, "It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!" The post comes after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hinted at a plan to assassinate Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei in several interviews last week following his strikes on Iran . Read More Related Articles Donald Trump dementia fears spike after 'symptom' spotted in President's suit Read More Related Articles JD Vance faces huge backlash for bringing 'uncontrollable kids' to Trump parade Experts, however, worry that such an assassination could create even more unrest in a region deeply afflicted by it. Khamenei fears that, too, and has already made provisions for the event of his assassination. Wary of such a possibility, Khamenei now only speaks to his commanders through a trusted aide and has suspended electronic communications in order to make it more difficult to find him, according to three Iranian officials familiar with his emergency war plans, who spoke to The New York Times. He's now holed up in a bunker, and he's reportedly picked an array of potential replacements down his chain of command in the event that more of his lieutenants are killed. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei threatened "irreparable damage" to America (Image: via Getty Images) Khamenei has already named three senior clerics as candidates to succeed him, too, the officials said, in the event that he's assassinated. It's been described as a remarkable move and one that illustrates just how precarious his situation is — this could be the end of his three decades of rule. The entire point of Khamenei's work is to preserve the Islamic Republic, which is in danger of collapsing amid the airstrikes and surprise attacks launched by Israel — and now, the U.S., too — over the past couple of weeks. The strikes are the biggest assault on Iran since its war with Iraq back in the 1980s, and the effect has been detrimental to the nation's capital, Tehran. The Israeli attacks have reportedly been much more intense and have caused more damage in Tehran than Saddam Hussein did during his entire eight-year war against the country. Iran overcame the initial shock from the attacks, however, and has been able to reorganize enough to launch daily counterstrikes against Israel, striking a hospital, the Haifa oil refinery and religious buildings and homes. But when the U.S. entered the war, things changed. Trump announced late Saturday that the U.S. had deployed B-2 bomber jets to strike three of Iran's nuclear sites — including its uranium-enrichment facility deep underground at Fordow. "Our objective was the destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's No. 1 state sponsor of terror," Trump said in an address to the nation on Saturday night.

Irish Examiner view: There is no endgame in Iran-US conflict
Irish Examiner view: There is no endgame in Iran-US conflict

Irish Examiner

time36 minutes ago

  • Irish Examiner

Irish Examiner view: There is no endgame in Iran-US conflict

Those of us who awoke to notifications of the American attack on Iranian nuclear sites must be forgiven the sense of creeping dread that the blaze lit by Israel's strikes is about to become a forest fire. Donald Trump — who ordered the attacks without congressional approval and campaigned on keeping America out of wars — seems to think this single big-stick action will be sufficient, saying 'now is the time for peace'. He has already called for Iran's 'unconditional surrender' in the face of Israel's military actions. However, with his rambling speeches and moments of confusion having given rise to concerns about the sort of deteriorating mental capabilities he would have accused Joe Biden of demonstrating, alongside an increasingly incoherent approach to foreign policy (he was the one who withdrew from Obama's nuclear agreement with Iran in the first place), he is capable of anything at any time. Let us be clear that Europe, Israel, and the US have valid reasons to be concerned about Iran's potential to build a nuclear weapon. It has funded and armed proxies across the Middle East, and the country's human rights violations at home are egregious. However, even Trump's own director of intelligence said Iran was not close to building a nuclear bomb — though when told this during a doorstep interview, he simply said she was wrong. How do you tackle that sort of wilful ignorance? It cannot be surprising that Iran has ruled out diplomacy for the time being, given that its ministers have said it was engaging in diplomacy when it was attacked by Israel. The door is not locked, just shut gently for now. Jaw-jaw may be better than war-war, but it requires both sides to engage. That we are now looking at escalation across the Middle East, where the US has 40,000 troops and myriad business and military interests, seems especially depressing given that Iran claims to have largely evacuated the targeted nuclear sites before they were hit. So bringing in the big guns may have been for nought but carnage. The art of the deal indeed. In the era of drone and cyberwarfare, brute force attacks seem almost a throwback or a relic, though they are still effective. But, given that Ukraine has shown how a smaller, nimbler force powered by modern tech can outwit bigger forces, what's to stop Iran doing something similar — and on a longer timescale than just an immediate retaliation? The only thing for certain is that we are not near the endgame, whether that be measured in days, weeks, or years.

World awaits Iranian response after US hits nuclear sites
World awaits Iranian response after US hits nuclear sites

RTÉ News​

timean hour ago

  • RTÉ News​

World awaits Iranian response after US hits nuclear sites

The world braced for Iran's response after the US attacked key Iranian nuclear sites, joining Israel in the biggest Western military action against the Islamic Republic since its 1979 revolution. A day after the US sent 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs crashing into the mountain above Iran's Fordow nuclear site, Iran vowed to defend itself at all costs, American leaders urged Iran to stand down, and pockets of anti-war protesters began taking to the streets in US cities. In a post to the Truth Social platform yesterday, US President Donald Trump addressed the issue of regime change in Iran. "It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!" he wrote. Iran and Israel continued to trade volleys of missile attacks, with an explosion in western Iran claiming the lives of half a dozen military personnel, according to an Iranian media outlet. Earlier, Iran fired missiles that wounded scores of people and flattened buildings in Tel Aviv. The US State Department ordered employees' family members to leave Lebanon and advised citizens elsewhere in the region to keep a low profile or restrict travel. An advisory from the US Department of Homeland Security warned of a "heightened threat environment in the United States." Law enforcement in major US cities stepped up patrols and deployed additional resources to religious, cultural and diplomatic sites. Air France KLM said it has cancelled flights to and from Dubai and Riyadh yesterday and today, in a sign of the broader effects of the attacks. Iran has so far not followed through on its threats of retaliation against the United States - either by targeting US bases or trying to choke off global oil supplies - but that may not hold. Speaking in Istanbul, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said his country would consider all possible responses. There would be no return to diplomacy until it had retaliated, he said. "The US showed they have no respect for international law. They only understand the language of threat and force," he said. Ali Shamkhani, an adviser to Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said on X that the initiative was "now with the side that plays smart, avoids blind strikes. Surprises will continue!" Mr Trump, in a televised address, called the strikes "a spectacular military success" and boasted that Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities had been "completely and totally obliterated." But his own officials gave more nuanced assessments and - with the exception of satellite photographs appearing to show craters on the mountain above Iran's subterranean plant at Fordow - there has been no public accounting of the damage. The UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, said no increases in off-site radiation levels had been reported after the US strikes. IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi told CNN that it was not yet possible to assess the damage done underground. A senior Iranian source told Reuters that most of the highly enriched uranium at Fordow had been moved elsewhere before the attack. Reuters could not immediately corroborate the claim. Mr Trump, who veered between offering to end the war with diplomacy or to join it before ultimately moving ahead with the biggest foreign policy gamble of his career, called on Iran to forgo any retaliation. He said the government "must now make peace" or "future attacks would be far greater and a lot easier." US Vice President JD Vance said the US was not at war with Iran but with its nuclear programme, adding this had been pushed back by a very long time due to the US intervention. In a step towards what is widely seen as Iran's most effective threat to hurt the West, its parliament approved a move to close the Strait of Hormuz. Nearly a quarter of global oil shipments pass through the narrow waters that Iran shares with Oman and the United Arab Emirates. Iran's Press TV said closing the strait would require approval from the Supreme National Security Council, a body led by an appointee of Mr Khamenei. Attempting to choke off Gulf oil by closing the strait could send global oil prices skyrocketing, derail the world economy and invite almost certain conflict with the US Navy's massive Fifth Fleet, based in the Gulf and tasked with keeping the strait open. Security experts have long warned a weakened Iran could also find other unconventional ways to strike back, such as bombings or cyberattacks. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, in an interview on "Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo," warned Iran against retaliation for the US strikes. Mr Rubio separately told CBS's "Face the Nation" talk show that the US has "other targets we can hit, but we achieved our objective." "There are no planned military operations right now against Iran," he later added, "unless they mess around." The UN Security Council met yesterday to discuss US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites as Russia, China and Pakistan proposed the 15-member body adopt a resolution calling for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire in the Middle East. UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres said earlier that the US bombings in Iran marked a perilous turn in the region and urged a halt to fighting and return to negotiations over Iran's nuclear programme. Diverging war arms Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told Israeli reporters that Israel was very close to meeting its goals of removing the threats of ballistic missiles and the nuclear programme in Iran. US officials, many of whom witnessed Republican President George W Bush's popularity collapse following his disastrous intervention in Iraq in 2003, have stressed that they were not working to overthrow Iran's government. "This mission was not and has not been about regime change," Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth told reporters at the Pentagon. "The president authorised a precision operation to neutralise the threats to our national interests posed by the Iranian nuclear programme." Anti-war activists organised demonstrations in New York, Washington and other US cities, with protesters carrying signs that read "hands off Iran". Meanwhile, Iranians contacted by Reuters described their fear at the prospect of an enlarged conflict involving the US. "Our future is dark. We have nowhere to go - it's like living in a horror movie," Bita, 36, a teacher from the central city of Kashan, said before the phone line was cut. Much of Tehran, a capital city of 10 million people, has emptied out, with residents fleeing to the countryside to escape Israeli bombardment. Iranian authorities say more than 400 people have been killed since Israel's attacks began, mostly civilians. Iran has been launching missiles back at Israel, killing at least 24 people over the past nine days. Air raid sirens sounded across most of Israel yesterday, sending millions of people to safe rooms. In Tel Aviv, Aviad Chernovsky, 40, emerged from a bomb shelter to find his house had been destroyed in a direct hit. "It's not easy to live now in Israel (right now), but we are very strong. We know that we will win," he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store