Wrongful death lawsuit says Big Oil contributed to heat wave and woman's death
In one of the nation's first wrongful-death claims seeking to hold the fossil fuel industry accountable for its role in the changing climate, a Washington state woman is suing seven oil and gas companies, saying they contributed to an extraordinarily hot day that led to her mother's fatal hyperthermia.
The lawsuit filed in state court this week says the companies knew that their products have altered the climate, including contributing to a 2021 heat wave in the Pacific Northwest that killed 65-year-old Juliana Leon, and that they failed to warn the public of such risks.
On June 28, 2021, an unusual heat wave culminated in a 108-degrees Fahrenheit (42.22 degrees Celsius) day — the hottest ever recorded in the state, according to the filing. Leon had just driven 100 miles from home for an appointment, and she rolled down her windows on the way back because her car's air conditioning wasn't working.
Leon pulled over and parked her car in a residential area, according to the lawsuit. She was found unconscious behind the wheel when a bystander called for help. Despite medical interventions, Leon died.
The filing names Exxon Mobil, Chevron, Shell, BP, ConocoPhillips, Phillips 66 and BP subsidiary Olympic Pipeline Company. ConocoPhillips, BP and Shell declined to comment when reached by The Associated Press. The other companies did not respond to requests for comment.
'Defendants knew that their fossil fuel products were already altering the earth's atmosphere,' when Juliana was born, Thursday's filing said. 'By 1968, Defendants understood that the fossil fuel-dependent economy they were creating and perpetuating would intensify those atmospheric changes, resulting in more frequent and destructive weather disasters and foreseeable loss of human life.'
The filing adds: 'The extreme heat that killed Julie was directly linked to fossil fuel-driven alteration of the climate."
The lawsuit accuses the companies of hiding, downplaying and misrepresenting the risks of climate change caused by humans burning oil and gas and obstructing research.
International climate researchers said in a peer-reviewed analysis that the 2021 'heat dome' was 'virtually impossible without human-caused climate change.'
Scientists have broadly attributed the record-breaking, more frequent, longer-lasting and increasingly deadly heat waves around the world to climate change that they say is a result of burning fossil fuels. Oil and gas are fossil fuels that, when burned, emit planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions, such as carbon dioxide.
'We've seen a really advanced scientific understanding about this specific effects that climate change can cause in individual extreme weather events,' said Korey Silverman-Roati, a senior fellow at the Columbia Law School's Sabin Center for Climate Change Law. 'Scientists today are a lot more confident in saying that but for climate change, this would not have happened."
Silverman-Roati said the specificity of the case could clarify for people the consequences of climate change and the potential consequences of company behavior.
Unprecedented action
States and cities have long gone after fossil fuel industry stakeholders for contributing to the planet's warming — somewhat unsuccessfully. Hawaii and Michigan, for example, recently announced plans for legal action against fossil fuel companies for harms caused by climate change, and they have been met by a counter lawsuit from the U.S. Justice Department.
The current administration has been quick to disregard climate change and related jargon. Under President Donald Trump, the U.S. withdrew from the Paris climate agreement, again; the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration — an agency whose weather forecasting and research workforce has been gutted — will no longer track the cost of weather disasters fueled by climate change; and the Environmental Protection Agency has been called on to a rewrite its long-standing findings that determined planet-warming greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare.
Meanwhile, the federal government has ramped up support for oil and gas production in the name of an 'American energy dominance' agenda, and it rolled back a host of other efforts and projects to address climate change.
Around the world, other climate cases are being watched closely as potentially setting unique precedent in the effort to hold major polluters accountable. A German court ruled this week against a Peruvian farmer who claimed an energy company's greenhouse gas emissions fueled global warming and put his home at risk.
Still, a case that looks to argue these companies should be held liable for an individual's death is rare. Misti Leon is seeking unspecified monetary damages.
'Big Oil companies have known for decades that their products would cause catastrophic climate disasters that would become more deadly and destructive if they didn't change their business model,' said Richard Wiles, president of the Center for Climate Integrity, said in a statement on the case. 'But instead of warning the public and taking steps to save lives, Big Oil lied and deliberately accelerated the problem."
___
Alexa St. John is an Associated Press climate reporter. Follow her on X: @alexa_stjohn. Reach her at ast.john@ap.org.
___
___
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
2 hours ago
Judge weighs government's request to unseal records of FBI's surveillance of Martin Luther King Jr.
WASHINGTON -- A federal judge is weighing a request from the Trump administration to unseal records of the FBI's surveillance of Martin Luther King Jr. — files that the civil rights leader's relatives want to keep under wraps in the national archives. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon in Washington, D.C., said during a hearing on Wednesday that he wants to see an inventory of the records before deciding whether the government can review them for possible release to the public. 'This is delicate stuff,' Leon said. 'We're going to go slowly. Little steps.' Justice Department attorneys have asked Leon to end a sealing order for the records nearly two years ahead of its expiration date. A department attorney said the administration is only interested in releasing files related to King's assassination. The Southern Christian Leadership Conference, which King led, is opposed to unsealing any of the records for privacy reasons. The organization's lawyers said King's relatives also want to keep the files under seal. In 1977, a court order directed the FBI to collect records about its surveillance and monitoring of King and turn them over to the National Archives and Records Administration. The order required the records to remain under seal for 50 years — until Jan. 31, 2027. In January, President Donald Trump ordered Attorney General Pam Bondi to review and publicly release documents about King's assassination 'because the American people have an interest in full transparency about this key historic event,' government lawyers wrote. 'To maximize this transparency objective, the records sealed in this case should be part of the Attorney General's review,' they added. SCLC attorneys said the FBI tried to discredit King and their organization by illegally wiretapping King's home, SCLC offices and hotel rooms where King met with other SCLC officials. Unsealing records of those recordings is contrary to the interests of SCLC, the King family and the public, the lawyers argued. 'Since its inception, this case has been about government overreach,' said SCLC attorney Sumayya Saleh. Justice Department attorney Johnny Walker said the administration has no intention of releasing any personal communications or privileged records contained in the files. 'Thankfully, I am not here to defend the allegations in the underlying complaint,' Walker told the judge. Nobody involved in the litigation knows what's in the archives and whether any of it relates to King's assassination. 'It could be easy. There could be nothing, and then we just all go away,' Walker said. 'It's not going to happen overnight,' the judge said. 'The court is going to move very carefully.' King was shot and killed on April 4, 1968, while standing on the balcony of a motel in Memphis, Tennessee. In 1976, the SCLC and Bernard Lee, who was King's executive assistant at the organization, filed a lawsuit to challenge the legality of the FBI's surveillance. The 1977 court order required the FBI to compile records of its telephone wiretapping operations, between 1963 and 1968, at King's home and at the SCLC offices in Atlanta and New York. Bernice King, the civil rights leader's youngest daughter, said in a court filing that she hopes the files are permanently sealed or destroyed. 'It is unquestionable that my father was a private citizen, not an elected official, who enjoyed the right to privacy that should be afforded to all private citizens of this country,' she said. 'To not only be unjustifiably surveilled, but to have the purported surveillance files made public would be a travesty of justice.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Judge weighs government's request to unseal records of FBI's surveillance of Martin Luther King Jr.
WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge is weighing a request from the Trump administration to unseal records of the FBI's surveillance of Martin Luther King Jr. — files that the civil rights leader's relatives want to keep under wraps in the national archives. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon in Washington, D.C., said during a hearing on Wednesday that he wants to see an inventory of the records before deciding whether the government can review them for possible release to the public. 'This is delicate stuff,' Leon said. 'We're going to go slowly. Little steps.' Justice Department attorneys have asked Leon to end a sealing order for the records nearly two years ahead of its expiration date. A department attorney said the administration is only interested in releasing files related to King's assassination. The Southern Christian Leadership Conference, which King led, is opposed to unsealing any of the records for privacy reasons. The organization's lawyers said King's relatives also want to keep the files under seal. In 1977, a court order directed the FBI to collect records about its surveillance and monitoring of King and turn them over to the National Archives and Records Administration. The order required the records to remain under seal for 50 years — until Jan. 31, 2027. In January, President Donald Trump ordered Attorney General Pam Bondi to review and publicly release documents about King's assassination 'because the American people have an interest in full transparency about this key historic event,' government lawyers wrote. 'To maximize this transparency objective, the records sealed in this case should be part of the Attorney General's review,' they added. SCLC attorneys said the FBI tried to discredit King and their organization by illegally wiretapping King's home, SCLC offices and hotel rooms where King met with other SCLC officials. Unsealing records of those recordings is contrary to the interests of SCLC, the King family and the public, the lawyers argued. 'Since its inception, this case has been about government overreach,' said SCLC attorney Sumayya Saleh. Justice Department attorney Johnny Walker said the administration has no intention of releasing any personal communications or privileged records contained in the files. 'Thankfully, I am not here to defend the allegations in the underlying complaint,' Walker told the judge. Nobody involved in the litigation knows what's in the archives and whether any of it relates to King's assassination. 'It could be easy. There could be nothing, and then we just all go away,' Walker said. 'It's not going to happen overnight,' the judge said. 'The court is going to move very carefully.' King was shot and killed on April 4, 1968, while standing on the balcony of a motel in Memphis, Tennessee. In 1976, the SCLC and Bernard Lee, who was King's executive assistant at the organization, filed a lawsuit to challenge the legality of the FBI's surveillance. The 1977 court order required the FBI to compile records of its telephone wiretapping operations, between 1963 and 1968, at King's home and at the SCLC offices in Atlanta and New York. Bernice King, the civil rights leader's youngest daughter, said in a court filing that she hopes the files are permanently sealed or destroyed. 'It is unquestionable that my father was a private citizen, not an elected official, who enjoyed the right to privacy that should be afforded to all private citizens of this country,' she said. 'To not only be unjustifiably surveilled, but to have the purported surveillance files made public would be a travesty of justice.' Trump's Jan. 23 executive order also called for declassifying records about the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy and Sen. Robert F. Kennedy.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ground beef sold at Whole Foods might be contaminated with E. coli, USDA warns
The US Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service has issued a public health alert for some raw ground beef products sold at Whole Foods Market because of a risk of E. coli contamination. The products are 1-pound, vacuum-packed packages of Organic Rancher organic 85% lean and 15% fat ground beef with use- or freeze-by dates of June 19 or June 20. They came from Vermont-based NPC Processing and have an establishment number Est. 4027 inside the USDA mark of inspection. The raw ground beef is no longer available for purchase, but FSIS says it's concerned that the packages may still be in consumers' refrigerators or freezers. They should not be used and should be thrown away or returned to the place of purchase. According to FSIS, there have been no confirmed reports of illnesses related to these products, but people should contact a health care provider if they're concerned. Organic Rancher says the products were available from May 26 through June 3 in the following states: Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Mississippi, North Carolina, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia and Wisconsin, as well as the District of Columbia. Other states were not affected, it says, and products with different use- or freeze-by dates are not involved and are safe to use. E. coli is a potentially deadly bacterium that can cause dehydration, bloody diarrhea and abdominal cramps for two to eight days after exposure. Although most people recover within a week, some may develop a serious complication called hemolytic uremic syndrome, which can lead to kidney failure or death. It can happen in any age group but is most common in children younger than 5 and older adults. 'The root cause of the issue has been identified, and immediate corrective actions have been put in place to ensure the ongoing integrity of the Organic Rancher brand,' the company said in its alert. 'We are treating this matter with the utmost seriousness and are fully committed to ensuring the safety and satisfaction of our customers.' FSIS emphasizes that all consumers should consume only ground beef that has been cooked to a temperature of 160 degrees Fahrenheit, and the only way to confirm that ground beef has reached a temperature high enough to eliminate harmful bacteria is to use a food thermometer that can measure internal temperature.
